[Deacon Ted Heap of St. Edith Stein Catholic Church in Katy.]
[00:00:02]
ALL RIGHT. IS COMMISSIONER CAGLE ON THE LINE? I AM, COMMISSIONER.
HOW ARE YOU FEELING? I'M FEELING ACTUALLY QUITE WELL.
THANK YOU. I'M GLAD TO HEAR IT.
SO. WELL, COMMISSIONER GARCIA GETS HERE.
LET'S GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED.
AND THIS AUGUST 2ND, 2022, MEETING OF THE HARRIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT IS NOW IN SESSION.
INVOKER IS BEING PRESENTED BY PRECINCT THREE.
I HAD THE PLEASURE OF WELCOMING CONSTABLE TED HEATH TO OFFER OUR OPENING PRAYER TODAY.
HE HAS LED IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THAT'S WHAT MOST OF US KNOW HIM AS.
BUT EQUALLY, HE'S A LEADER IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AS A PART OF THE PERMANENT DIACONATE THERE SINCE 2003. HE SERVED THE PEOPLE OF THE OF SAINT ANNE CATHOLIC CHURCH.
AND TOM BAUGH IS CURRENTLY ASSIGNED TO SAINT E, THE STEIN CATHOLIC CHURCH IN KATY, TEXAS.
SO WILL HE GET A STARTED, RIGHT? JUDGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO PRAY WITH YOU THIS MORNING.
SO LET US BEGIN, AS WE SHOULD ALWAYS BEGIN IN PRAYER.
JESUS CHRIST. SO TODAY WE ASK YOU TO SEND YOUR SPIRIT DOWN UPON THOSE WHO SIT ON THIS COURT, FOR YOU HAVE ENTRUSTED THEM WITH GREAT RESPONSIBILITY, A RESPONSIBILITY OF SETTING POLICY WHICH AFFECTS THE LIVES OF MILLIONS WITHIN THIS COUNTY.
MAY ALL WHO ARE ELECTED, APPOINTED OR CALLED TO SERVE THE HOLY PEOPLE OF GOD DO SO ALWAYS WITH A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT SERVICE TRULY MEANS.
IF YOUR WORD SAYS IN SCRIPTURE, THERE IS NO AUTHORITY EXCEPT FROM YOU.
IN ALL MANKIND HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BY YOU.
GIVEN THEM SUCH AUTHORITY BY YOU.
WE PRAY TODAY THAT THOSE WHO SIT ON THIS COURT BY WHAT THEY SAY AND WHAT THEY DO WILL ADMINISTER SUCH AUTHORITY UNCORRUPTED BY PERSONAL DESIRES OR AGENDAS, BUT INSTEAD IN KINDLED BY YOUR SPIRIT, WHERE THEY GOVERN WITH THE SAME COMPASSION AND MERCY AND LOVE THAT YOUR SON HAS DEMONSTRATED FOR ALL OF US.
BUT WE OFFER UP THEIR FAULTS ALONG WITH OUR OWN, TO THE CROSS OF CHRIST, KEEPING ALWAYS OUR EYES FIXED ON YOU AND REMAINING CONFIDENT AND HOPEFUL IN THE FULFILLMENT OF YOUR GOOD WORK.
AND FINALLY, WE THANK YOU, FATHER, FOR THE GIFT OF ALL LIFE THE CHILDREN, THE AGED, THE DISABLED AND THE UNBORN THAT WE MAY SEE THE FACE OF GOD AND ALL THAT YOU HAVE CREATED.
MAY GOD CONTINUE TO BLESS AND TO WATCH OVER THIS GREAT COUNTRY, THE STATE OF TEXAS, OUR COUNTY, AND ALL OF THE MEMBERS OF THIS COURT, WHERE IT IS TOGETHER THAT WE STRIVE TO GO FORWARD IN YOUR NAME.
WE PRAY ALL OF THIS IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER AND THE SON AND THE HOLY SPIRIT.
THANK YOU, DAVID. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH HE STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE TEXANS.
OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED WITH THE RESOLUTIONS.
[Departments (Part 1 of 5)]
AND THE FIRST RESOLUTION IS.ASSISTANT CHIEF ROYAL AND HIS RETIREMENT AND I SUSPECT CHIEF ROYAL IS HERE JOINING US.
[00:05:04]
CHIEF, I SEE.CHIEF ROYAL SERVED AS THE DEPUTY INCIDENT COMMANDER AT NRG FOR THE KATRINA MEGA SHELTER OPERATION, WHICH INSURED MORE THAN 26,000 PEOPLE WHO WERE IMPACTED IN LOUISIANA, WERE GIVEN SHELTER AND ASSISTANCE.
HE MANAGED ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE OPERATIONS DURING THE ITC CHEMICAL FIRE.
AND I COULD TELL YOU GUYS, WE WERE LUCKY TO HAVE CHIEF ROYAL THERE WITH HIS EXPERIENCE.
SO WELL RESPECTED, SO KNOWLEDGEABLE, SO CALM IN THE FACE OF PRESSURE AND A WONDERFUL LEADER.
AND HARRIS COUNTY WILL MISS THAT SERVICE CHIEF.
AND I'VE BEEN HONORED TO HAVE BEEN ABLE TO WORK ALONGSIDE YOU.
THAT IS NOW THE STANDARD IN TEXAS.
HE WAS INTEGRAL IN THE OFFENSIVE PLAN THAT AVERTED DISASTER DURING THE CHEMICAL PLANT FIRE.
AND HE HAS LED THE CHARGE, AS WE'VE IDENTIFIED, STAFFED AND EQUIPPED UNDER CHIEF CHRISTENSEN'S LEADERSHIP, OUR FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE AND OUR HAZMAT RESPONSE ABILITIES, WHICH WE IDENTIFIED AFTER THE ITC FIRE.
SO LET ME JUST READ THIS VERY, VERY BRIEFLY, WHEREAS ROBERT BOB ROYAL, JUNIOR ASSISTANT CHIEF OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS, WILL RETIRE FROM HARRIS COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE ON JULY 31, 2022, AFTER 18 YEARS OF SERVICE TO HARRIS COUNTY AND 49 YEARS OF PUBLIC SAFETY EXPERIENCE.
HE BEGAN HIS CAREER WITH THE HOUSTON FIRE DEPARTMENT IN NOVEMBER 1973.
HIS CAREER HAS COVERED MANY ASPECTS OF PUBLIC SAFETY, THE FIRE SERVICE AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT.
BUT HIS CONTRIBUTIONS IN THE FIELD OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE WILL BE HIS LASTING LEGACY.
AFTER DEVOTING A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF HIS LIFE AND ENERGY TO HARRIS COUNTY, ASSISTANT CHIEF EARLE IS NOW LOOKING FORWARD TO NEW ADVENTURES, TRAVELING AND SPENDING EVEN MORE TIME WITH HIS FAMILY, PARTICULARLY HIS WIFE OF 50 YEARS, CHERYL ROYAL.
HARRIS COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE TEAM AND MANY EMPLOYEES ACROSS THE COUNTY AND COUNTRY WILL MISS HIM BOTH PERSONALLY AND PROFESSIONALLY IN HIS RETIREMENT. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT HARRIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT HEREBY CONGRATULATE AND COMMEND ASSISTANT CHIEF ROBERT BOB ROYAL JR MOTION.
YEAH, WELL, JUDGE HIDALGO AND HONORABLE COMMISSIONERS.
I THINK MY MOM MAY HAVE WRITTEN THAT, BUT I'VE BEEN RICHLY BLESSED IN THIS CAREER.
SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES ARE IN THE BACK.
I'D ALSO LIKE TO RECOGNIZE MY WIFE, SHERYL, AND MY SON JUSTIN.
BUT YOU KNOW, WANT I STARTED OUT AS A FIREFIGHTER.
MANY YEARS AGO, I ACTUALLY COMMISSIONER AND I WORKED THE STREETS TOGETHER WHEN HE WAS WITH HPD.
I NEVER DREAMED I'D BE IN A POSITION LIKE THIS.
I CAN TELL YOU THAT, YOU KNOW, THE GOOD LORD DIRECTS YOU IN CERTAIN WAYS.
AND AND I SAID, I'VE BEEN VERY LUCKY.
I'VE BEEN VERY BLESSED TO BE HERE.
AND I WILL SAY THANKS FOR EVERYTHING.
THANKS FOR THE PEOPLE OF HARRIS GANG.
BEFORE YOU TAKE OFF, MAN, I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU.
[00:10:01]
YOU KNOW, YOU YOU'RE JUST THE THE EPITOME OF PUBLIC SERVICE.YOU'VE GIVEN OF YOURSELF, MAYBE, SURELY SACRIFICED A LITTLE BIT.
AND WE THANK YOU AND AND YOUR SON FOR ALLOWING YOU TO TO BREAK AWAY AND CONTEND TO STRANGERS AND PEOPLE YOU NEVER MET.
BUT TO DO IT WITH THE DEDICATION AND THE PASSION THAT I HAVE SEEN IN YOU FROM DAY ONE.
YOU KNOW, NORMALLY IN THIS KIND OF BUSINESS, YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO GET A LITTLE WORN OUT.
BUT BUT, BOB, YOU HAVE YOUR SPIRIT.
CHERYL, IF YOU IF YOU IF WE START TO GET THEM THAT LIST OF DO'S, WE'RE GOING TO KEEP HIS RETIREMENT OPEN HERE BECAUSE HE MAY REALIZE IT'S SAFER HERE THAN IT IS AT.
BUT LISTEN, CONGRATULATIONS AND GOD BLESS YOU.
THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER. THANK YOU SO MUCH, CHIEF.
I'M JUST PROUD TO BE THE HOME OF YOU ALL IN YOUR RETIREMENT.
SO LOOK FORWARD TO SERVING YOU IN PRECINCT THREE.
I KNOW YOU MADE A LOT TO THE CROSBY COMMUNITY.
I MEAN, A LOT TO HARRIS COUNTY IN GENERAL.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, ALTHOUGH YOU GET THE RESOLUTION SPECIAL LINE IN THERE FOR THEM AS WELL AND FOR SURE, BEST WISHES WITH YOUR RETIREMENT AND DON'T LET THEM GET TIRED OF YOU NOW, OKAY? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU AGAIN FOR EVERYTHING, COMMISSIONER CAGLE.
THANK YOU. CHIEF CHRISTIANSON, DID YOU HAVE A FEW WORDS TO ADD? SO I DO WANT EVERYBODY TO KNOW THAT CHIEF ROYAL HAS OFFICIALLY RETIRED.
BUT AS YOU CAN SEE, WE'VE ENSURED THAT HE REMAINS IN UNIFORM.
I CALLED HIM THIS MORNING AND I SAID, SIR, YOU'RE BACK HOME WITH US.
SO HE'S STILL ANSWERING HIS PHONE.
SO MAYBE WE CAN MAKE THAT HAPPEN.
BUT AGAIN, THANK YOU ALL FOR RECOGNIZING CHIEF ROYAL AND HIS AMAZING STAFF.
AND I TELL YOU WHAT, THE SUPPORT FROM COMMISSIONERS COURT FOR THE HAZMAT TEAM, I KNOW THIS IS A CHIEF ROYAL AND I'M BLESSED BECAUSE HE DECIDED TO STAY ON AFTER THE ITC THING.
HE HAD BEEN TALKING ABOUT RETIREMENT AND IT'S BECAUSE OF THE SUPPORT OF COURT GETTING THE STATION OVER IN THE WEST SIDE OPENED AND NOW WE FEEL LIKE WE HAVE EQUALITY THROUGHOUT HARRIS COUNTY AND CHIEF ROLES.
HE'S NOT GOING ANYWHERE. HE'S COMING BACK.
IS THERE A MOTION ON THIS SECOND MOTION BY COMMISSIONERS TAKEN BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS ALL IN FAVOR? I OPPOSE THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
THE SECOND ITEM OUT OF ORDER IS ITEM 123 ON PAGE 16.
AND THIS IS THE HARRIS COUNTY LEGISLATIVE AGENDA.
AND YOU ALL SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED THE RESOLUTION.
AND THIS IS ABOUT BRITTNEY GRINER.
IT'S SO IMPORTANT THAT WE DISCUSS WHAT WE CAN DO TO HELP BRITTNEY GRINER.
AND WHAT WE CAN DO RIGHT NOW IS ADVOCATE.
I PROPOSE THAT WE CALL ON THE WHITE HOUSE, THE STATE DEPARTMENT ITEM 123 COMMISSIONER CABLE 123.
SO THE THE RESOLUTION IS AS FOLLOWS.
WHEREAS WOMEN, WOMEN'S, NATIONAL BASEBALL EXCUSE ME, WOMEN'S NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION BASKETBALL PLAYER BRITTNEY GRINER WAS BORN ON OCTOBER 18TH, 1990, IN HOUSTON, TEXAS, AND STARTED HER BASKETBALL CAREER AT NIMITZ HIGH SCHOOL AND ALDINE ISD AFTER RECORDING RECORD BREAKING BASKETBALL COLLEGIATE CAREER AT BAYLOR UNIVERSITY.
SHE WAS SELECTED AS THE FIRST OVERALL PICK BY THE PHENIX MERCURY IN 2013.
[00:15:06]
SHE WAS NAMED A WNBA ALL-STAR SEVEN TIMES AND A TWO TIME WNBA SCORING CHAMPION.SHE WAS DETAINED BY RUSSIAN AUTHORITIES AT THE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT IN RUSSIA ON FEBRUARY 17, 2022.
THE US DEPARTMENT OF STATE HAS DETERMINED SHE IS WRONGFULLY DETAINED.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS PART OF THE COUNTY'S LEGISLATIVE AGENDA, THE HARRIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT DIRECTS THE INTER-GOVERNMENTAL AND GLOBAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT TO WORK WITH THE HARRIS COUNTY CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION, THE US DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND THE WHITE HOUSE TO PRESS FOR THE IMMEDIATE RELEASE OF BRITTNEY GRINER AND PROVIDE SUPPORT FROM HARRIS COUNTY FOR EFFORTS TO SECURE HER RELEASE.
WE HAVE FURTHER RESOLVED THE HARRIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT EXPRESSES UNWAVERING SUPPORT TO THE FAMILY OF BRITTNEY GRINER, INCLUDING HER WIFE, CHERYL GRINER, PARENTS SANDRA AND RAYMOND GRINER AND SIBLINGS, AND CALLS ON THE UNITED STATES TO SECURE, PROMPT AND SAFE RETURN FOR OUR HOMETOWN HERO.
SECOND MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? OKAY. ALL IN FAVOR.
ALL RIGHT, ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT.
I'M IN FAVOR OF MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
SO I HOPE EVERYONE WILL JOIN ME IN THE ADVOCACY ONLINE, WHEREVER YOU CAN.
LET'S SPEAK OUT FOR BRITTNEY GRINER AND GET HER HOME.
WELL, I HAVE I HAVE A THIRD ONE, THE FINAL ONE, WHICH WILL TAKE UP AT 3:00 PM.
THAT'S THE RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING AUGUST 4TH AS COAST GUARD DAY.
BUT THE REPRESENTATIVE, CAPTAIN SMITH, HE'S NOT AVAILABLE UNTIL 3 P.M..
COMMISSIONER ELLIS, I KNOW YOU HAVE A RESOLUTION AS WELL.
YEAH, I HAVE TWO RESOLUTIONS AND I HAVE THE.
IF WE CAN'T ELECT TO DO THE ELECTIONS UPDATE BECAUSE I THINK THAT THE INTERIM DIRECTOR HAS TO LEAVE.
I JUST THINK IT'S IMPORTANT WE DO IT AS WELL.
I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THE ONE YOU'RE DOING, BY THE WAY.
I NOTICED, BY THE WAY, ONLINE THAT THERE'S A MURAL FOR BRITTNEY GRINER THAT WENT UP IN D.C.
SO IF WE WORK IT OUT, WE DIDN'T PUT IT ON THE AGENDA.
BUT IF THEY AGREE, WE WANT TO PUT ONE OUT THERE.
BECAUSE I DO THINK YOU'RE RIGHT THAT ADVOCACY IS SO IMPORTANT AND WE'LL DO AS MUCH AS WE CAN TO GET.
I THINK NOW'S THE TIME TO GET PRESS ATTENTION.
SO THANK YOU FOR PUTTING IT ON THE AGENDA.
THE FIRST ONE IS TO HONOR A YOUNG ACTIVIST.
I'M PLEASED TO HONOR A LOCAL 19 YEAR OLD ACTIVIST, OLIVIA JULIANA.
I GOT THAT RIGHT. THERE IS A STORY ON THAT HONOR.
I'LL GET THAT RIGHT A LITTLE EARLY.
I WAS TELLING HER MY ADVOCACY FOR ACCESS TO ABORTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE.
OLIVIA TURNED DISPARAGING, HATEFUL, BODY SHAMING COMMENTS MADE BY A SITTING MEMBER OF CONGRESS INTO AN OPPORTUNITY TO RAISE AWARENESS AND OVER $2 MILLION IN SUPPORT OF SAFE AND LEGAL ACCESS TO ABORTION ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
DESPITE FACING SCORES OF HATEFUL EMAILS AND PERSONAL ATTACKS ON SOCIAL MEDIA AFTER AN ANTI-ABORTION CONGRESSMAN TARGETED HER ON TWITTER, OLIVIA WENT HIGH.
SHE EXEMPLIFIES THE POWER AND POTENTIAL OF GEN Z TO MAKE LASTING, MEANINGFUL CHANGE.
[00:20:01]
WHEREAS IN THE RESOLUTION IT SAYS, WHERE IS OLIVIA? JULIANA? ADVOCACY AROUND REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE IS URGENTLY NEEDED, PARTICULARLY IN A COUNTY WHERE WE HAVE HIGH RATES OF MATERNAL MORTALITY, UNINSURED RESIDENTS, AND A LACK OF PAID FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE.THE GROUNDSWELL OF NATIONWIDE SUPPORT FOR OLIVIA JULIANA'S ADVOCACY IS A TESTAMENT TO THE IMPORTANCE OF PROTECTING BODILY AUTONOMY, REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE.
EVERY PERSON SHOULD BE ABLE TO DECIDE THEIR FUTURE, CONTROL THEIR BODY, AND ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE, INCLUDING ABORTION AND CONTRACEPTION, FREE FROM VARIOUS PUNISHMENT, HUMILIATION OR HARM.
AND I KNOW SHE'S HERE, BUT I'D LIKE TO SAY.
THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS AND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER RCA.
ALL IN FAVOR. AND YOU OPPOSE? NO, AND I'M.
OH, HERE SHE IS. COME OVER HERE.
I JUST KNOW SO MANY PEOPLE, OLIVIA, YOU KNOW, SAYING, WOW, SHE'S FROM HARRIS COUNTY.
ISN'T THAT YOUR COUNTY? AND AND I PUT ON TWITTER FOR YOU, AND I FEEL THIS WAS A STRONG WOMAN.
WHEN THEY PUSH BACK, YOU PUSH BACK HARDER.
AND I LOVE THAT. THAT'S WHAT YOU DID.
AND I HOPE YOU CONTINUE TO DO THAT.
THANK YOU. I THINK THIS IS A TESTAMENT THAT NOT ONLY SHOULD PEOPLE HAVE THE FREEDOM TO MAKE CHOICES ABOUT THEIR OWN BODIES, BUT REGARDLESS OF YOUR OPINION ON WHETHER OR NOT ABORTION IS ETHICAL OR NOT, NO ONE SHOULD TOLERATE THE FACT THAT A SITTING MEMBER OF CONGRESS DECIDED TO TARGET A TEENAGER ON SOCIAL MEDIA.
I JUST WANT TO ADD, HE JULIANI.
HE HAS BEEN TRAVELING THE COUNTRY.
AND I ASSUME AT SOME POINT YOU TRAVELED THE GLOBE.
AND IT'S JUST BEEN A PLEASURE TO GET TO KNOW HER.
YES. THANK YOU FOR COMING AS WELL.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. JUDGE OLIVIA, I GOT THREE WORDS FOR YOU.
GESTURE. THE SECOND RESOLUTION THAT I HAVE IS IN SUPPORT OF THE FEDERAL LEGISLATION THAT HOPEFULLY WILL MOVE THROUGH THE UNITED STATES SENATE. IT IS THERE.
THIS IS RESPECT FOR MARRIAGE ACT.
IT DECLARES THAT MARRIAGES PERFORMED IN ONE STATE MUST BE RECOGNIZED IN ALL STATES WITHOUT RESPECT TO RACE, SEX, ETHNICITY OR NATIONAL ORIGIN.
THE ACT WOULD REPEAL THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, WHICH DEFINED MARRIAGE AS A LEGAL UNION BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN, GUARANTEE RECOGNITION OF SAME SEX MARRIAGES AND INTERRACIAL MARRIAGES UNDER FEDERAL LAW, CODIFYING THE FEDERAL PROTECTIONS CONFERRED IN THE LOVING DECISION, THE WINDSOR DECISION AND THE OBAMA UNVEIL THE RULING.
JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS STATED IN HIS CONCURRING OPINION IN DOBBS THAT OVERFLOW WAS AMONG THE DECISIONS HE WAS INTERESTED IN RECONSIDERING THE RESPECT FOR MARRIAGE ACT PASSED IN THE HOUSE BY US HOUSE BY 267 TO 157.
THAT VOTE WAS IN JULY OF 2022.
VERY RECENTLY, 47 REPUBLICANS VOTED IN SUPPORT OF THE BILL.
MORE THAN 170 BUSINESSES WITH EMPLOYEES IN ALL 50 STATES HAVE DECLARED SUPPORT FOR THE BILL.
AS OF JULY 27, FOUR REPUBLICANS HAVE STATED PUBLICLY THAT THEY WILL SUPPORT THE BILL, ACCORDING TO A JUNE REPORT FROM GALLUP, 71% OF AMERICANS BELIEVE SAME SEX MARRIAGES SHOULD BE RECOGNIZED BY LAW.
[00:25:10]
LAW AND MY WIFE'S MOTHER.YOU KNOW, OUR COUNT IS LARGER THAN 25, 26 STATES.
SO I HOPE THAT OUR GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS WILL DO AS MUCH AS THEY CAN TO HELP TRY AND GET IT PASSED.
AND I WOULD MOVE ADOPTION CIRCUIT.
THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS, A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
I ABSOLUTELY SUPPORT THIS RESOLUTION.
AND I APPRECIATE YOU FOR BRINGING IT.
SO MANY, SO MANY FOLKS ARE CONCERNED LIVING IN FEAR THAT MARRIAGES WILL NOT BE RECOGNIZED.
THANK YOU. SO, COMMISSIONER, I KNOW WE HAVE.
COMMISSIONER ELLIS WANTED TO TALK ALSO TO THE ELECTIONS ADMINISTRATOR.
AND COMMISSIONER GARCIA HAS ANOTHER RESOLUTION OUT OF ORDER.
SO I PROPOSE WE TAKE COMMISSIONER GARCIA'S RESOLUTION PICTURES AND THEN WE'LL DO THE ELECTIONS.
GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
THIS RESOLUTION IS FOR RAFAEL PALAFOX.
AND AND HE, TOO, IS GOING TO JOIN BOB, I THINK, ON WITH A FISHING POLE SOMEWHERE.
BUT I ALSO IF I WANTED TO MAKE SURE TO THANK YOU PUBLICLY FOR ALL THAT YOU'VE DONE FOR SO MANY YEARS AND AND WANTED, IT'S AN HONOR TO PRESENT THIS PROCLAMATION.
AND LET ME JUST TELL YOU, YOU'VE GOT A BIG, BIG, BIG, BIG, BIG, BIG FAN AND A GUY NAMED HECTOR DE LEON, BECAUSE HE LET ME KNOW OF YOUR PLANS.
AND THIS IS HOW THIS RESOLUTION CAME TO BE.
AND SO, RAFAEL, THIS RESOLUTION READS, WHEREAS RAFAEL PALAFOX HAS HELD VARIOUS POSITIONS WITH THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LATINO ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS EDUCATION FUND SINCE JOINING FEBRUARY THE SECOND, 1995.
WHEREAS, THROUGH HIS MOST RECENT ROLE AS A TEXAS SENIOR COORDINATOR, RAFAEL WORKED DILIGENTLY AND AND CONTINUE TO EXPAND AL'S VERY VOTER CAMPAIGN IN TEXAS THROUGH VOTER REGISTRATION ACTIVITIES, PHONE BANKS, HOTLINE, PROMOTIONS, NATURALIZATION OATH CEREMONIES, AND OTHER VOTER ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES THROUGHOUT HARRIS COUNTY.
RAFAEL WITNESSED FIRSTHAND HOW CHALLENGING THAT CAN BECOME.
IT CAN BE TO BECOME A NATURALIZED CITIZEN.
HE FOUND IT REWARDING TO HELP APPLICANTS 101 AND WAS ESPECIALLY GRATIFIED WHEN APPLICANTS REFERRED TO FRIENDS AND FAMILIES TO AN EDUCATION FUND FOR ASSISTANCE.
AND. WHEREAS, THROUGH HIS LEADERSHIP, THE NILO EDUCATION FUND, ORGANIZED CITIZENSHIP FORUMS AND IN HARRIS COUNTY AND THROUGHOUT TEXAS, PROVIDING FREE ASSISTANCE WITH THE NATURALIZATION APPLICATION PROCESS TO THOUSANDS OF LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS.
WHEREAS RAFAEL BECAME KNOWN AS MR. NELLO BY HIS COLLEAGUES, ILLUSTRATING HIS FUNDAMENTAL SERVICE TO NILO EDUCATION FUND.
AND. WHEREAS, RAFAEL WILL BE DEARLY MISSED.
HIS COMMITMENT AND WILLINGNESS TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE WILL REMAIN IN THE PROGRAM, ALONG WITH THE FONDNESS AND RESPECT HIS PEERS AND THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS HOLD IN HIS REGARD.
YOU HAVE MADE A DIFFERENCE IN THE LIVES OF SO MANY.
LIKE MY PARENTS, WHEN THEY CAME TO THIS COUNTRY, THEY PARTICIPATED IN THOSE CITIZENSHIP CLASSES.
I WAS ONE OF MY FONDEST MEMORIES FOR ME, WAS TEACHING SOME OF THOSE CLASSES YEARS BACK.
AND I STILL RUN ACROSS SOME OF MY MY STUDENTS WHO HAVE SINCE BEEN NATURALIZED.
CAN JUST BE THAT AND NOT MAKE AS DEEP AND AN IMPACT ON SOMEONE.
[00:30:01]
IF NOT, IF IT WERE NOT FOR SOMEONE LIKE YOU THAT JUST DEEPLY CARED AND PROBABLY SPENT MORE TIME IN THE OFFICE ON THE WEEKENDS DOING WHAT YOU'RE DOING THAN WHAT YOU WERE PAID TO DO.SO, RAFAEL, WE'RE VERY GRATEFUL FOR YOU.
THANK YOU FOR ALL THAT YOU'VE DONE.
MY NAME IS RAFAEL PALAFOX, AND I WANT TO THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
IT'S BEEN A PLEASURE AND AN HONOR TO WORK WITH THIS NATIONAL ORGANIZATION.
AND THE ONE THING THAT I DO REMEMBER A LOT IS THAT, YOU KNOW, I WAS CROSSING THE BORDER ONE TIME AND I WAS COMING FROM VACATION AND I HAD TO STOP TO GET SOME OIL FOR MY CAR.
AND SOMEBODY ACROSS THE PARKING LOT SCREAMS. MR. NADAL. MR. NADAL.
I SAID, DO YOU REMEMBER ME? I SAID, WELL, YOU KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE THAT I HELP? I DON'T REMEMBER. BUT IT'S A NICE FEELING TO HEAR THAT PEOPLE CALL YOU.
I GUESS HE DIDN'T REMEMBER MY NAME, BUT THANK YOU AGAIN SO MUCH AND TAKE US GOOD.
PROUD OF YOU. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH.
COMMISSIONER RAMSEY, I'D LIKE TO SECOND IT AND I'M STARTING A TREND HERE.
YOU'RE GOING TO BE RETIRING IN THE PRECINCT THREE AND THAT'S WE'RE GOING TO WELCOME YOU.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP.
AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR CONTINUED LEADERSHIP IN THE PRECINCT, IN THE COUNTY AS WELL.
MR.. YES, COMMISSIONER ELLIS RAPHAEL, I JUST WANT TO THANK YOU AS WELL.
AND IT'S INTERESTING YOU'D BE HERE TODAY.
YOU'RE RETIRING, BUT YOU'RE NOT FINISHED YET.
AND I'M HOPING THAT WE HAVE A SUPPORT HERE TO SPEND AS MUCH OF YOUR MONEY, OUR MONEY AS WE CAN DO AS MUCH AS WE CAN TO MAKE THAT A PLEASURABLE AND A MEMORABLE EXPERIENCE.
YOU KNOW, YOU CERTAINLY GET SOME ATTACKS ALONG THE WAY.
BUT BUT THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU'VE DONE.
I WILL KEEP YOU RIGHT IN THE FILE.
REAL QUICKLY, IS YOUR ANY OF YOUR FAMILY HERE? NO. THEY'RE ON VACATION.
AND WHO WHO HAS YOUR SUCCESSOR BEEN DETERMINED RIGHT NOW IS ADRIAN.
THINK THEY CAN PRONOUNCE HIS LAST NAME, BUT IT'S A LONG LENGTH.
WONDERFUL. WELL, AGAIN, CONGRATULATIONS.
PLEASE STICK AROUND. AND, HECTOR, WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME DOWN AND SAY A COUPLE OF WORDS? WE HAVE THIS GENTLEMAN. YOU YOU WORK VERY, VERY CLOSELY WITH HIM.
OH, THANK YOU FOR THIS IS GOING TO BE SHORT.
OBVIOUSLY, ONE OF THE REASONS THAT I COMMUNICATED WITH YOU IS BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T KNOW.
BUT I LEFT THE EDUCATIONAL FUND FOR OVER A DECADE.
I ESTABLISHED IT HERE IN HOUSTON.
AND GUESS WHO WAS RIGHT BESIDE ME WHEN I WAS TRYING TO HELP THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE BECOME CITIZENS? THIS GUY, THIS MAN RIGHT HERE AND THIS MAN IS THE REASON I CONTACTED HIM IS BECAUSE HE'S LIKE EVERYBODY THAT SITS BEHIND THE SCENES, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE ALL THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT DO A LOT OF WORK AND THEY REALLY GO ON NOTICE ALL THEIR LIVES, BUT THEY COMMIT TO AND MANY PEOPLE THAT KNOW ME HAVE HEARD ME SAY THIS 1000 TIMES, THE GREATEST THING WE CAN DO IN OUR LIFETIME IS CONTRIBUTE TO THE BUILDING OF A GOOD CITY.
AND ALL THESE FOLKS BEHIND YOU ARE CONTRIBUTING TO THAT END.
AND THIS PERSON MADE MY SUCCESS POSSIBLE, AND THAT'S WHY I KNOW IT.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU. CONGRATULATIONS.
YOU ARE GOING TO VOTE ON THIS.
WELL, WE'LL VOTE WHEN WE RETURN IT.
WE'RE GOING TO TAKE COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
ITEM 307 AND THAT'S AN UPDATE BY THAT.
STEPHENS. NOW IT'S RELATED TO ITEM TWO 292, BUT ITEM 292 IS AN EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEM.
THAT'S THE ITEM ABOUT THE AUDIT.
[00:35:02]
AND ANYTHING I'M RELYING ON J TO LET US KNOW WHAT WE NEED TO SAVE FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION.HEY, JUDGE, THIS IS CHRISTIAN ON.
WE ACTUALLY DON'T NEED TO TAKE 292 IN EXECUTIVE SESSION.
OKAY. OKAY. SO THEN WE WILL TAKE ITEMS 307 AND 292 TOGETHER BECAUSE E.A.
STEVENS HAS A COMMITMENT, A CONFERENCE, A STATE CONFERENCE.
GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER. SO THANK YOU.
I WANT TO GET SOME SENSE OF I'LL GIVE YOU A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS I MAY THINK OF AS WE GO, OBVIOUSLY.
LOOK, I WANT TO THANK YOU, FIRST OF ALL, BETH, FOR GATHERING THE TEAM IN PREPARATION FOR CLIFFORD.
TATUM WILL BE COMING ON BOARD WHO WAS THE LONE FINALIST.
WE ALL KNOW HOW HARD YOU HAVE WORKED IN.
I KNOW THE DEADLINE IS COMING UP FOR ENDING VOTER REGISTRATION.
I AM CURIOUS TO KNOW, BY THE WAY, YOU KNOW, YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE RANDOMNESS OF IT.
YOU ARE A COUNTY ATTORNEY, BUT IT IS WHAT IT IS.
AND I'D LIKE TO ALSO ASK THAT YOU ALL DO ANYTHING YOU CAN TO MAKE SURE YOU ASK OUR FEDERAL PARTNERS TO COME AND WATCH WHAT THE STATE IS DOING, JUST AS THEY SAY THEY'RE TRYING TO WATCH WHAT WE DOING.
BUT I WANT TO GET SOME SENSE OF ARE YOU ANTICIPATING AN INCREASE IN MAIL BALLOT QUESTIONS AND ISSUES DUE TO THE EXPECTED INCREASE IN TURNOUT AND HOW YOU ARE PREPARING TO ADDRESS MAIL BALLOT ISSUES? AND I'LL REPEAT THEM AGAIN, BUT I'LL JUST GIVE YOU A COUPLE AND YOU MAY WORK IN YOUR PRESENTATION.
ARE YOU FACING ANY ISSUES CONFIRMING POLLING CENTER LOCATIONS? ARE THERE ANY BUDGET NEEDS THAT YOU CONSIDER ESSENTIAL FOR A SAFE AND SECURE ELECTION THAT HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED YET FOR THE NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION? HOW WILL LOCATING CENTRAL COUNTY AT NRG STREAMLINE ELECTION NIGHT OPERATIONS? AND GET SOME SENSE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE RESPONSE TO THIS AUDIT INTERFERE WITH YOUR PREPARATION FOR THE NOVEMBER 2022 GENERAL ELECTION.
AND IF SO, DO WE NEED TO ALLOCATE MONEY TO MAKE SURE WE CAN DO THAT? AND I WANT TO GET SOME UPDATE ON ONE ITEM WILL BE COMING FORWARD FROM YOU OR MAYBE THE COUNTY MANAGER OR WHOEVER.
I KNOW I PUT IN A REQUEST SOME TIME BACK TO MAKE SURE THAT WE BRING SOMEBODY IN TO COME UP WITH THE BEST IDEAS FROM AROUND THE COUNTRY ON WHAT WE CAN DO TO INCREASE REGISTRATION.
AND TO MAKE VOTING AS EASY AS POSSIBLE UNDER THE CONSTRAINTS THAT THE STATE HAS PUT ON US.
BUT JUST IN GENERAL TERMS, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE ARE WE'RE READY.
I WANT TO MAKE SURE. WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE LAW.
WHAT WE CAN DO TO MAKE IT EASIER TO REGISTER THEM, TO GET THEM TO VOTE.
AND IF WE CAN'T GO IN LINE AND GIVE PEOPLE WATER AND THINGS LIKE THAT, I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE THINKING ABOUT CAN WE DO ANYTHING TO ENCOURAGE FOOD TRUCKS? ARE SOME SOME VEHICLE NEARBY WITH WATER SO PEOPLE CAN WALK OVER AND GET IT AND GET BACK? I WANT TO TAKE THE STATE'S MANDATE TO MAKE IT HARDER TO VOTE.
TO SEE WHAT WE CAN DO TO STILL ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO GO AND PARTICIPATE IN A PROCESS.
BUT THOSE ARE JUST THE GENERAL PARAMETERS.
I MAY THINK OF SOMETHING ELSE AS YOU.
IF YOU PRESENT. AND YOU MUTED THE STUDENTS.
AND THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER ELLIS, FOR PUTTING THIS AGENDA ITEM ON.
[00:40:08]
THAT I DO THAT. ALL RIGHT, TIFFANY, CAN WE GO AHEAD TO SLIDE THREE, PLEASE? OKAY. SO WE'RE JUMPING INTO NOVEMBER PREPARATIONS.WANT TO TOUCH FIRST ON VOTER REGISTRATION EFFORTS.
WE HAVE BEEN OUT IN THE COMMUNITY REGISTERING FOLKS TO VOTE OVER THE COURSE OF JULY.
WE CAN SEE THERE THE EVENTS THAT WE HAD IN JULY, OVER 100.
WE HAVE BEEN PRESENT AT NATURALIZATION CEREMONIES, COLLECTED A NUMBER OF FORMS THERE.
AND THEN OUR HAVE OVER 100 EVENTS SCHEDULED BETWEEN NOW AND NOVEMBER EXCUSE ME, AUGUST 20TH AND ARE CONTINUING TO SCHEDULE THOSE EVENTS OUT IN THE COMMUNITY SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO VOTER REGISTRATION IN THE LEAD UP TO THE VOTER REGISTRATION DEADLINE, WHICH IS IN OCTOBER.
GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE. ALL RIGHT.
IN JUNE AND JULY, WE HAD COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SPECIFICALLY FOCUSED ON MEETING THE MACHINES.
AND SO WORKING HARD TO MAKE SURE THAT FOLKS HAVE ACCESS TO BE ABLE TO HAND ON TOUCH.
AND I WANT TO, IF YOU DON'T MIND, JUST HOLD IT, JUDGE, IF WE MIGHT.
I MEAN, I KNOW HOW MUCH WE RELY ON OUR PARTNERS, JUST AS A COURTESY TO A FELLOW ELECTED OFFICIAL.
ONE THAT I NORMALLY DON'T GET WHEN I GO BACK TO WHERE I WORKED FOR 27 YEARS.
IF YOU CAN IF WE CAN JUST LET HIM SPEAK.
THAT SHOULD BE. ITEM 20, WHICH IS THE BALLOT ITEM, IF I'VE GOT THAT RIGHT.
CAN YOU PLEASE PUT HIM ON? I BELIEVE HE'S THERE IN PERSON, JUDGE.
AND BUT I WANT TO EXTEND THIS COURTESY TO YOU, BECAUSE I APPRECIATE EVERYTHING YOU DO.
THANK YOU. AND WE KNOW YOU HAVE TO LEAVE.
THANK YOU SO MUCH. I ACTUALLY HAVE TO I NEED TO GET BACK TO COURT IN 10 MINUTES, SO I APPRECIATE IT.
THANK YOU SO MUCH. I WAS NOT PLANNING TO BE HERE TODAY, BUT I WAS VERY CONCERNED IN RELATION TO THE BOND PACKAGE THAT'S COMING UP. AND I THINK YOU GUYS ARE DISCUSSING IT TODAY.
THIS IS A, I THINK, $1.2 BILLION BOND PACKAGE.
I THINK IN TERMS OF MY REPRESENTATION IN SOUTHWEST HOUSTON, THIS IS ESPECIALLY CONCERNING BECAUSE MY COMMUNITY IN SOUTHWEST HOUSTON IS A COMMUNITY THAT HAS, LET'S JUST SAY NICELY, HAS BEEN OVERLOOKED FREQUENTLY WHEN IT COMES TO INFRASTRUCTURE, WHEN IT COMES TO IMPROVEMENT, WHEN IT COMES TO PUBLIC SAFETY. IT IS SOMETHING THAT OUR COMMUNITY IS TREMENDOUSLY CONCERNED ABOUT.
SOUTHWEST HOUSTON IS GROWING AT A TREMENDOUS RATE, AND ANYBODY WHO KNOWS HOUSTON RECOGNIZES THAT EVEN WHEN TIMES ARE BAD, SOUTHWEST HOUSTON WAS GROWING AND GROWING AT A RECORD PACE, ESPECIALLY THE ASIA TOWN AREA IS JUST WE DID REDID THE ROADWAYS JUST A FEW YEARS AGO AND ALREADY AT CAPACITY RIGHT DURING.
DURING HAVI WHILE WE DID NOT HAVE SITTING WATER THAT MUCH IN OUR AREA, ALL THE FLOOD WATERS FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE CITY CAME THROUGH OUR SECTION OF TOWN AND, YOU KNOW, AND DID A LOT OF DAMAGE.
WHILE OUR TOTAL FLOOD HEIGHT DIDN'T GO THAT MUCH.
[00:45:02]
WE WANTED ADDITIONAL HELP TO DEAL WITH THAT.I KNOW I ALMOST LOST MY CAR SEVERAL TIMES ON CHIMNEY ROCK ALONE BECAUSE THAT CHIMNEY ROCK ALWAYS FLOODS EVERY SINGLE TIME, NO MATTER WHAT IT IS, BECAUSE IT'S ONE OF THE PATHWAYS FOR THE WATER.
AND WE WOULD LIKE FOR SOME OF THAT TO BE ADDRESSED SO THAT THERE'S NOT SO MUCH SITTING WATER FOR THAT LONG IN THAT AREA IN TERMS OF TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE, IN TERMS OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, ESPECIALLY IN THIS IN THIS BOND PACKAGE, SOUTHWEST HOUSTON HAS BECOME THE NEW HOME OF A VERY LARGE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY.
SOME OF IT IS ASIAN, SOME OF HIS NON-ASIAN.
HAVING ADEQUATE TRANSPORTATION KEEPS THEM ALIVE BECAUSE IF THEY DON'T HAVE THE ABILITY TO TRAVEL, TO GO BUY GROCERIES, TO SEE THEIR FRIENDS, TO GO SEE A DOCTOR, THEIR LIFESPANS DRAMATICALLY DECREASE.
AND THIS IS A THIS IS A STUDIED FACT THAT WHENEVER YOU CUT ELDERLY MEMBERS OF SOCIETY OFF AND DON'T GIVE THEM ACCESS TO TRANSPORTATION, THEIR LIFESPANS DRAMATICALLY DECREASE.
IN TERMS OF THERE'S I KNOW THERE'S A SUBSTANTIAL PACKAGE IN HERE FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE.
THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR OUR COMMUNITY, ESPECIALLY THE ASIAN COMMUNITY, BECAUSE DURING THE LAST TWO YEARS, WE HAVE SEEN A DRAMATIC RISE IN ANTI-ASIAN HATE DURING THE BEGINNING OF IT IN 2020.
I KNOW SHERIFF GONZALEZ AND THEN CHIEF ACEVEDO ALL PUT ADDITIONAL RESOURCES INTO OUR COMMUNITY TO DEAL WITH THE VANDALISM, TO DEAL WITH THE INCIDENTS, TO DEAL WITH PEOPLE COMING OVER AND JUST CAUSING PROBLEMS. I KNOW THEY TOOK GREAT SACRIFICES TO DO THAT, AND I KNOW THEY COULD NOT SUSTAIN THAT.
WE KNEW THAT THEY COULD NOT SUSTAIN THAT, AND THEY TOLD US SO IF WE HAVE ADDITIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE, IF WE HAVE THE FUNDS FOR ADDITIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE, WE COULD PUT MORE STATIONS OUT THERE, WE COULD PUT MORE PATROLS OUT THERE.
THAT WOULD GO A LONG WAY TO RELIEVE THE ANXIETY THAT OUR COMMUNITY HAS.
THANK YOU, REPRESENTATIVE. AND I DON'T THE FOLKS I THINK FORGOT TO KEEP TIME.
SO PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU DO THAT.
GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER ELLISON, I WANT TO I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR COMING IN TO THE EFFORTS YOU PUT INTO TRYING TO MAKE SURE WE GET OUR EQUITABLE RECOVERY MONEY FROM THE FEDS THAT THE STATE CONTROLS.
ABSOLUTELY. ONE OF THE LOUDER VOICES ON THAT, AND WE APPRECIATE THAT.
I DO WANT TO STRESS THAT WHEN WE GET TO THIS ITEM, YOU KNOW, I AM GOING TO BE AN ADVOCATE FOR US MAKING SURE THAT WE GO TO THE AREAS THAT ARE WORSE FIRST.
THANK YOU. IT'LL BE INTERESTING.
YOU'LL BE IN COURT OR SOMEWHERE, BUT IF YOU FINISH WHEN WE GET TO IT, YOU OUGHT TO COME AND LISTEN BECAUSE I'M GOING TO ASK FOR A DISCUSSION ON HOW THE MONEY'S BEEN DIVIDED IN THE PAST. ABSOLUTELY.
IT'S INTERESTING HOW FOLKS WILL COME NOW AND SAY THEY WANT TO JUST DIVIDE IT FOUR WAYS EVENLY.
BUT I'M JUST GOING I'M NOT GOING TO DO IT.
I KNOW, BUT I'M GOING TO HAVE TO WALK THROUGH.
HOW WAS IT DIVIDED IN THE PAST? BUT REGARDLESS OF HOW WE DO IT, I'M GOING TO MAKE THE CASE THAT WE OUGHT TO BE EQUITABLE, RIGHT? AT LEAST GIVEN WHERE THE GROWTH IS.
RIGHT. THAT HAVE THE BIGGEST PROBLEM IN EACH OF THE PRECINCTS, INCLUDING MINE.
RIGHT. SOME WIELDED MADE THE MOST NOISE.
BUT I JUST WANT TO STATE THEN.
THANK YOU SO MUCH. I REALLY APPRECIATE THAT, JUDGE.
YES. COMMISSIONER GARCIA, REPRESENTATIVE WILL, THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH.
AND AS IT'S BEEN SAID, THANK YOU FOR ALL YOU DO, ALWAYS DO AND DONE AND DOING AND WILL DO.
SO LET ME JUST QUITE DIRECTLY ASK YOU.
SO IS THIS BOND PACKAGE IMPORTANT TO PASS? ABSOLUTELY. IT IS TREMENDOUSLY IMPORTANT TO MY COMMUNITY.
AND I KNOW THERE'S EVEN STUFF IN THERE THAT'S KIND OF SMALL.
LIKE THERE'S LIKE $100 MILLION JUST FOR PARKS.
I'M TELLING YOU, THAT IS IMPORTANT TO MY COMMUNITY BECAUSE OUR PARKS HAVE BEEN SO LONG OVERLOOKED.
IT IS A SERIOUS QUALITY OF LIFE ISSUES.
IT MEANS IF YOU HAVE BETTER PARKS FOR MY AREA, IT MEANS PEOPLE'S HOME VALUES GO UP.
IT MEANS PEOPLE ARE MORE ABLE TO TO SELL THEIR HOMES AND RECOVER THEIR.
THERE WERE INVESTMENTS AND ALL THIS OTHER THINGS, JUST LIKE NOBODY WANTS TO MOVE INTO AN AREA IF THEY HAVE KIDS, IF THERE'S NO PARKS OR THE PARKS ARE ALL RUN DOWN AND TORN UP AND WE ARE APART IN OUR AREA HAS BEEN SO LONG OVERLOOKED.
WE ARE ASKING FOR THIS GOOD DEAL.
[00:50:04]
PEOPLE ENOUGH YET.THIS ITEM IS BEING DISCUSSED, POTENTIALLY VOTED ON AND PLACED ON THE NOVEMBER BALLOT WITH MORE TIME THAN IT WAS DONE FOR THE FLOOD BOND PROGRAM.
SO YOUR THOUGHTS ON WHETHER THIS HAS GOTTEN ENOUGH AIRTIME? SO, I MEAN, THE WAY I LOOK AT IT, THIS BOND PACKAGE, 95% OF THIS BOND PACKAGE IS FLOOD CONTROL, ROADS AND PUBLIC SAFETY.
I'M NOT SURE WHO YOU'RE TALKING TO, BUT EVERYBODY IN MY COMMUNITY, YOU MENTIONED THOSE THREE THINGS.
PEOPLE ARE DOWN. THEY DON'T NEED TO BE SOLD ON FLOOD CONTROL, ROADWAYS AND PUBLIC SAFETY.
THEY JUST NEED TO KNOW THAT THEY'RE GOING TO VOTE YES.
VERY GOOD. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH.
ALL THE BEST TO YOU. APPRECIATE YOUR REPRESENTATIVE.
THANKS SO MUCH. THANK YOU, REPRESENTATIVE.
THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER. WE CONTINUE WITH THIS.
THANK YOU. SORRY FOR THE INTERRUPTION, BUT IT WAS IMPORTANT.
NOT A PROBLEM AT ALL. I AGREE.
ALL RIGHT. BACK TO OUR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT WITH MEET THE MACHINES.
AGAIN, WE HAD SEVERAL EVENTS OVER THE COURSE OF JUNE AND JULY TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC, TO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR IN-PERSON INTERACTION WITH THE MACHINES SO THAT THEY CAN PREPARE FOR NOVEMBER.
WE'RE EXCITED TO ANNOUNCE WE HAVE A LAUNCH OF HAIR SNOPES.COM.
THIS IS A NEW WEBSITE THAT WE ARE PREPARING TO LAUNCH ON AUGUST 6TH.
AND WE ARE PREPARED TO GO LIVE ON AUGUST 6TH.
THAT WILL INCLUDE A PRESS RELEASE, AN EMAIL BLAST AND A SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN.
NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. TURNING YOUR ATTENTION TO BOTH CENTER LOCATIONS.
AS YOU ALL KNOW, THIS IS TAKES A LOT OF WORK AND FEEDBACK FROM MANY STAKEHOLDERS AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING TO GET A GOOD DRAFT LIST PREPARED AND SENT TO YOUR STAFF MEMBERS.
WE HAVE MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR THE END OF THIS WEEK WITH YOUR STAFF MEMBERS TO REVIEW BOTH A TENTATIVE EARLY VOTING LOCATION LIST, AS WELL AS THE TENTATIVE ELECTION DAY LOCATION LIST. AND THEN WE HAVE SOME MORE STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS EARLY NEXT WEEK, IDEALLY WITH THE POLITICAL PARTIES.
WE'RE WORKING ON THE DATE ON THAT.
THAT IS ALL TO CULMINATE IN THE INITIAL DRAFT WITH TO YOU ALL TO PRESENT A COURT ON NEXT COURT DATE THAT WILL SEEK APPROVAL OF THAT INITIAL LIST AND THEN WILL OF COURSE, SUPPLEMENT WITH ANY THAT NEED TO CHANGE FROM THERE.
THAT IS WHERE WE WERE FOR THE MAY 24TH PRIMARY RUNOFF ELECTION ON ELECTION NIGHT.
WE ARE WORKING TO SECURE THAT SPACE IN ADVANCE SO THAT WE CAN HAVE SOME OF THE OPERATIONS AT NRG IN ADVANCE OF EARLY VOTING, DURING EARLY VOTING, AND THEN FINALIZING WITH ELECTION NIGHT AT NRG.
THE DROP OFF SITUATION, AS WE TEND TO HAVE IT PLANNED, WOULD ENTAIL A DRIVE THROUGH DROPOFF AS WE HAD IT FOR MAY 24TH, BUT EXTENDING OUT TO MORE DRIVE THRU LANES AND MORE TENTS BECAUSE OF COURSE THE NOVEMBER ELECTION WILL HAVE MORE POLLING LOCATIONS WITH EQUIPMENT RETURNING TO NRG AND THEN INSIDE OF HALL RD, WE WILL HAVE A SIMILAR LAYOUT TO OR WE TENTATIVELY PLAN TO HAVE A SIMILAR LAYOUT TO THE MAY 24TH LAYOUT FOR PROCESSING THAT EQUIPMENT AS IT COMES THROUGH TO GET IT TO THE CENTRAL COUNT BOARDS THAT IS THERE ON SITE TO PROCESS THE VOTES.
WE THIS IS TENTATIVE, BUT WE CURRENTLY PLAN TO WITH THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THEN BUDGET SEEK APPROVAL OF OF THAT FINAL DRAFT PLAN AT THE NEXT COURT DATE.
[00:55:07]
JUDGES. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, WE HAVE OVER 1600 NAMES SUBMITTED THUS FAR FROM FROM THE POLITICAL PARTIES.AND THAT THE PROGRAM ITSELF INCLUDES 3 HOURS OF HANDS ON TRAINING WITH THE ELECTION WORKERS.
AND TO FINALIZE THERE, WE DO PLAN TO BEGIN TRAINING AT THE END OF SEPTEMBER AND HAVE A TENTATIVE SCHEDULE OUT TO YOUR STAFF MEMBERS IN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS. AND TIFFANY LAST NIGHT, PLEASE.
ADDRESSING THE AUDIT THAT WAS ANNOUNCED LAST WEEK.
SO JUST TO BE VERY CLEAR, THIS IS TWO SETS OF AUDITS THAT ARE THAT WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT.
SO THAT'S ONE AUDIT LAST WEEK WAS ANNOUNCED, A THE RANDOMIZED AUDIT THAT WAS ADDED TO THE BY THE LEGISLATURE LAST LEGISLATIVE SESSION.
WE WERE, AS YOU ALL KNOW, SELECTED AS ONE OF THE TWO COUNTIES THAT HAVE OVER 300,000 POPULATION.
AND THIS WILL START THAT AUDIT WON'T START UNTIL AFTER THE NOVEMBER 2020 ELECTION OCCURS.
AND IT WILL LOOK BACK TO AUDIT EVERY ELECTION FROM NOVEMBER 22, ALL THE WAY BACK TO NOVEMBER 20.
AND AND WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY OUTLINE OF HOW THAT PROCESS WILL GO.
IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE WILL PROVIDE SOME OF THAT THAT GUIDANCE ABOUT HOW HOW IT WILL PROCEED IN THE LEAD UP TO THE NOVEMBER 2020 ELECTION. AND, TIFFANY, IF YOU TAKE THE SLIDE DECK DOWN.
JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I ANSWER SOME OF YOUR QUESTIONS.
COMMISSIONER ELLIS WORKING SPECIFICALLY FROM THE AUDIT PERSPECTIVE.
WE WOULD ABSOLUTELY BE SUPPORTIVE OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATING OR, YOU KNOW, PROVIDING A ANALYSIS OF HOW THESE AUDITS ARE GOING AND MAKING SURE THAT THE AUDITS ARE ABIDING BY NATIONAL STANDARDS OF HOW THESE SORTS OF AUDITS TAKE PLACE.
DO WE ANTICIPATE THAT AUDIT BEING INTERFERING WITH THE NOVEMBER 22 ELECTION? THIS SPECIFIC AUDIT THAT WAS JUST ANNOUNCED, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THE PREPARATION WOULD NOT OCCUR TILL AFTER THE NOVEMBER ELECTION.
AS I SAY, THOUGH, WE ARE STILL UNDERGOING THE INITIAL NOVEMBER 2020 AUDIT AND WE ARE IN WEEKLY COMMUNICATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S AUDIT AUDIT DIVISION ABOUT THAT.
AND SO AS WE GET CLOSER TO NOVEMBER, THERE MAY BE A TIME THAT COMES WHERE WE HAVE TO SORT OF PUT THAT ON PAUSE SO THAT WE CAN FULLY FOCUS BACK ON PREPARING FOR THE NOVEMBER 2022 ELECTION.
WHO PAYS FOR THE AUDIT? DO THEY PAY FOR THE STAFF TIME IT TAKES TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATION THEY WANT, OR DO WE HAVE TO PAY FOR IT? I BELIEVE THE WELL FOR THE NOVEMBER 2020 ELECTION AUDIT THAT WE'RE CURRENTLY GOING THROUGH.
WE'RE PAYING FOR OUR STAFF TIME.
THEY'RE PAYING FOR THEIR STAFF TIME FOR THE NOVEMBER.
WELL, I GUESS, YEAH, UNLESS THE STAFF VOLUNTEERED, SO I DIDN'T HAVE TO PAY.
YOU HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT IT'S COSTING US ON THE CURRENT? IT'S ON STAFF TIME.
BUT WE CAN ABSOLUTELY PULL PULL THAT INFORMATION FOR YOU.
IS IT EASY? I DON'T WANT TO MAKE IT MORE WORK.
IS IT EASY TO PULL IT? YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE IT NOW.
BUT I'M JUST CURIOUS TO KNOW WHAT WHAT DOES IT COST? BUT IT SHOULD BE FAIRLY EASY TO PULL.
I CAN. I CAN GATHER THAT FOR YOU.
I THINK IT'D BE ABLE. AND THEN I'M WONDERING, MAYBE YOU DON'T KNOW.
SOMEBODY ELSE MIGHT KNOW HOW MANY COUNTIES? OVER 300,000 IN TEXAS.
THAT'S AN INTERESTING, RANDOM ODDITY TO PULL THEM OUT OF A HAT TO DO IT.
ANYBODY SEE WHAT ALL WENT IN THE HAT? I CAN JUMP IN HERE, COMMISSIONER.
I BELIEVE THERE ARE 17, AND ANYBODY HERE CAN CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG.
I BELIEVE THAT THERE ARE 17 COUNTIES THAT HAVE A POPULATION OF 300,000 OR MORE.
AND I CAN TALK ABOUT SOME OF THE CHALLENGES THAT THAT WE'VE SEEN WITH THE INITIAL SELECTION PROCESS, WHICH WILL ANSWER THE QUESTION ABOUT WHETHER THEY PULLED IT OUT OF A HAT. THE ANSWER IS IT WAS A BUCKET.
[01:00:02]
IT WASN'T A HAT. BUT THE REASON I ASKED MR. COUNTY TURN, REMEMBER, WE'RE PICKING THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR AND I WAS PRESIDING OVER IT.THEY MADE SURE I DIDN'T PUT THE NAMES IN THE HAT.
I'M JUST I MEAN, LOOK, IT WAS AS TRANSPARENT AS YOU COULD BE.
YOU KNOW, THEY SAID I COULD GO IN THE ROOM AND I SAID, NO, I WON'T EVEN GO IN THE ROOM.
AND WE JUST TOOK MY 31 PEOPLE IN THE SENATE PICKING THE PRESIDING OFFICER.
SO I THINK, YOU KNOW, THE BEST WAY TO KIND OF PROVIDE CONTEXT FOR ALL OF THIS IS, YOU KNOW, AS AS OUR INTERIM ELECTIONS ADMINISTRATOR MENTIONED, WE'RE CURRENTLY IN THE MIDDLE OF AN AUDIT FOR THE 2020 ELECTION.
RIGHT. THAT BEGAN IN 2021 AND HAS NOT STOPPED.
AND THAT ELECTION NIGHT, IT WAS ANNOUNCED BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE JUST HOURS AFTER FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP WROTE A PUBLIC LETTER CALLING ON GOVERNOR GREG ABBOTT TO AUDIT WHAT HE CALLED THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION SCAM.
AND OF COURSE, THE 2020 ELECTION WAS NOT RUN BY THE ELECTION'S ADMINISTRATOR.
RIGHT. THAT'S AN ELECTION THAT WAS RUN BY A COUNTY CLERK.
AND OF COURSE, THE PURPOSE OF ALL OF THIS IS TO PUT ALL OF THESE COUNTIES ON NOTICE, RIGHT? TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS TRANSPARENCY IN THE PROCESS FOR WHATEVER COUNTY IS GOING TO HAVE TO SPEND HIS TIME AND ITS RESOURCES DEALING WITH THIS AUDIT.
WE'RE NOT AWARE OF ANY RULES BEING MADE PUBLIC.
WE HAVE SCOURED THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S WEBSITE THERE, SOCIAL MEDIA.
WE HAVEN'T SEEN ANYTHING ABOUT ANY RULES AS TO THE SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE AUDIT.
AND WE HAVE, IN FACT, REACHED OUT TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE TO GET MORE INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT RULES WERE IN PLACE AT THE TIME THAT THEY DID THIS RANDOMIZED PROCESS. BUT IN ADDITION TO THAT, THERE WAS NO NOTICE GIVEN AT ALL OF THIS ELECTION PROCESS.
RIGHT. THE ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT DIDN'T RECEIVE ANY WRITTEN NOTICE.
OUR OFFICE DIDN'T RECEIVE ANY WRITTEN NOTICE.
AND OF COURSE, HAD WE KNOWN THAT THIS WAS GOING ON, WE WOULD HAVE ENSURED THAT SOMEBODY WAS THERE TO, AS YOU JUST PUT IT, COMMISSIONER ELLIS, ENSURE THAT THERE WAS TRANSPARENCY IN THE PROCESS. AND, YOU KNOW, THIS IS A DEPARTMENT THAT PUTS OUT A NUMBER OF PRESS RELEASES ON HIGHLY POLITICIZED TOPICS, RIGHT? WHEN THEY BELIEVE THAT THERE WAS ISSUES IN THE HARRIS COUNTY ELECTIONS SECRETARIES, THE SECRETARY OF STATE PUT OUT A PRESS RELEASE WHEN THEY WERE GOING THROUGH THEIR 2020 AUDIT.
ALL OF THAT MAKES IT SUSPICIOUS.
AND THEN THOSE SLIPS GO INTO A BUCKET AND THEN AN EMPLOYEE PULLS THEM OUT OF THE BUCKET AND HANDS THE TWO SLIPS TO THE GENTLEMAN WHO WAS ANNOUNCING IT, AND HE STATES THE NAMES OF THE COUNTIES THAT WENT INTO THE BUCKET.
IT DOESN'T ACTUALLY SHOW THAT THE PAPER THAT WAS PULLED FROM THE BUCKET, IN FACT, SAID HARRIS COUNTY AND SAID IT'S JUST HANDED TO THE GENTLEMAN WHO ANNOUNCED IT AND THEY DON'T EVEN SHOW THE SLIP TO THE CAMERA.
ALL OF THESE THINGS TAKEN TOGETHER MAKE THIS HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE LAW REQUIRES THAT THE PROCESS BE RANDOM AND ALSO REQUIRES THAT THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE CREATE RULES TO EFFECTUATE THE PROCESS.
AND SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE ASKING FOR AUTHORITY NOW TO CONSIDER ANY TYPE OF LEGAL AVENUES ON THIS, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, IF THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE IS GOING TO TARGET BUT TARGET US, AS THEY DID IN 2021 AFTER TRUMP CALLED FOR AN AUDIT OUT HERE, WE WANT TO BE PREPARED TO TACKLE IT IN COURT IF THAT'S NECESSARY.
SO, JUDGE. MR. COUNTY ATTORNEY MENEFEE IF YOU HAVE SUGGESTED LANGUAGE, I'D BE HONORED TO MAKE THAT MOTION AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME.
AND THEN I WANT TO ASK WHAT ROLE, IF ANY, COULD THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PLAY? HOW WOULD I PHRASE THIS? I'D LIKE TO MAKE SOME MAKE SURE IF THERE'S SOME WAY SOMEBODY CAN AUDIT THE AUDITORS.
YOU KNOW, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE, SINCE EVERYBODY WANTS EVERYTHING TO BE FAIR, I'D LIKE TO UNDER THIS NEW STATE LAW, EVERY TIME THEY GET READY TO AUDIT SOMEBODY, I HOPE THERE'S SOME MECHANISM WHETHER THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN PARTICULAR, CAN COME IN AND LOOK AT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE DOING THE LOOKING.
DOES THAT MAKE SENSE OR JUST THINK ABOUT IT?
[01:05:02]
AND I WOULD CERTAINLY. TAKE THE CASE TO OUR FEDERAL TO OUR FEDERAL PARTNERS.I'D FEEL COMFORTABLE DOING THAT IF YOU WOULD THINK ABOUT IT.
YES. COMMISSIONER GARCIA, THANK YOU.
AND COMMISSIONER ELLIS, I'D BE HONORED TO THE SECOND THAT MOTION AS WELL.
BUT I DO HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS FOR YOU IN TERMS OF OF HOLDING THE REINS.
AND AND I KNOW THAT YOU'RE BUSY LOOKING TOWARDS THE NOVEMBER ELECTION.
WHAT DOES THIS BODY NEED TO BE THINKING OR TAKING INTO ACCOUNT? ARE THERE ANY ITEMS THAT YOU WOULD BE RECOMMENDING TO THE TO THE INCOMING ADMINISTRATOR TO IMMEDIATELY PROPOSE TO THIS BODY FOR FUNDING OR FOR SOME OTHER FORM OF SUPPORT? ANYTHING THAT THAT WE NEED TO BE THINKING ABOUT IN ADVANCE OF THAT OFFICIAL TRANSITION AND WHAT ITEMS YOU MIGHT BE ENCOURAGING HIM TO PUT ON THE ON THE AGENDA.
YES. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
SO WE ARE PREPARING FOR OUR NEW E.R., MR. TATUM, TO COME INTO OFFICE MID-AUGUST.
AND SO I ANTICIPATE HE WOULD BE THE ONE PRESENTING TO YOU ALL ON THE NEXT COURT DATE.
AND SO IN MAKING THAT PREPARATION AND GETTING READY FOR THE AUGUST 23RD COURT.
THE THINGS TO HIGHLIGHT ARE, ONE, WORKING WITH THE BUDGET OFFICE ON PRESENTING TO YOU ALL A BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 23 THAT INCLUDES A ROBUST NOVEMBER ELECTION, THAT INCLUDES MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE FUNDING FOR POLLING LOCATIONS, FUNDING FOR STAFFING OF THOSE POLLING LOCATIONS, FUNDING FOR NRG.
I THINK IT'S INCUMBENT ON THE COURT TO CONSIDER AND SUPPORT US MOVING TO IN OUR G FOR THE OPERATIONS OF THE ELECTION, INCLUDING ELECTION NIGHT.
THE OTHER THING TO PUT ON YOUR RADAR IS WORKING ON A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO TO GIVE PROPOSALS RELATED TO ADVERTISING AND CANVASING.
COMMISSIONER, ONE OF YOUR QUESTIONS ABOUT MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE COMMUNICATING RELATED TO VOTER REGISTRATION, VOTE BY MAIL EDUCATION AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON MEET THE MACHINES AND ON THE VOTE BY MAIL.
SPECIFICALLY, THE QUESTION WAS POSED, COMMISSIONER ELLIS, ABOUT DO WE ANTICIPATE AN INCREASE OF MAIL BALLOTS? AND THE ANSWER THERE IS WHOLEHEARTEDLY, YES, WE DO ANTICIPATE AN INCREASE IN MAIL BALLOTS.
WE'RE ALREADY SEEING THE APPLICATIONS PICK UP.
AND SO PREPARING TO HAVE THE SPACE TO BE ABLE TO BOTH ENTER THOSE APPLICATIONS, COMMUNICATE WITH THOSE WHO PROVIDE APPLICATIONS THAT DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STRICT REQUIREMENTS OF SB ONE, MAKING SURE THAT WE HAVE THE SPACE TO PROCESS THOSE MAIL BALLOTS AND MAKE SURE THAT THEY GET OUT TO THE VOTERS AND THEN PROCESS THEM WHEN THEY RETURN.
AND SO THAT'S WHAT I WOULD PUT ON YOUR RADAR TO PREPARE FOR MR. TATUM PRESENTS TO YOU ALL.
VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY AND THEN COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
THERE WAS STEVENS. THANK YOU FOR A BIT OF AN UPDATE.
CLEARLY, WE'VE HAD PROBLEMS IN OUR ELECTIONS IN HARRIS COUNTY THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS.
ARE YOU VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE LIST OF PROBLEMS WE'VE HAD, SUCH AS POLLING LOCATIONS NOT OPEN ON TIME, LACK OF TRAINING, NOT RECEIVING THE CORRECT BALLOT.
10,000 BALLOTS WERE DISCOVERED NOT BY US, BUT BY A THIRD PARTY.
AND WHEN WE GET RESULTS, NOTHING IS MORE DISCONCERTING TO THE VOTERS OUT THERE THAN THE DELAYS THAT WOULD TAKE TO COUNT THE VOTES. PEOPLE BECOME VERY SUSPICIOUS WHEN IT TAKES SEVERAL DAYS WHEN IT SHOULD TAKE SEVERAL HOURS.
WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE COST AND THE COST AND THE COST AND I HEAR WHEN PEOPLE START USING WORDS LIKE ROBUST, I'M I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO GETTING A REQUEST FOR MORE MONEY.
[01:10:04]
I WOULD THINK THERE'S BEEN VOTER SUPPRESSION IN HARRIS COUNTY SIMPLY BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW HOW TO RUN AN ELECTION.AND I HOPE THAT WE WILL GET TO THE POINT THAT WE CAN RUN A RELIABLE, STABLE, PREDICTABLE ELECTION.
SO THE NEW ELECTIONS ADMINISTRATOR COMING IN IS GOING TO INHERIT ALL OF THOSE PROBLEMS, WHICH I'VE NOT HEARD A SOLUTION YET ON WHAT THERE WOULD BE. SO MY SIMPLE STATEMENT THERE, IF THERE'S ANY COUNTY IN THE STATE THAT NEEDED AUDITING, IT'S HARRIS COUNTY WHETHER TO DRAW YOUR NAME OUT OF A HAT OR NOT.
WE OUGHT TO GET AUDITED SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE PROBLEMS WE'VE HAD IN THE COUNTY.
COMMISSIONER ELLIS I WOULD JUST LIKE TO ECHO THAT IN A DIFFERENT SENSE.
VOTER SUPPRESSION LAW THAT PASSED THAT HAS A RACIAL ELEMENT TO IT.
OBVIOUSLY, IT HAS A PARTIZAN ELEMENT TO IT.
I MEAN, THIS PLACE IS GOING BACK TO THE BAD OLD DAYS.
AND I'D SAY, BLESS YOU, MY MY FRIEND.
NOW I FEEL THAT WAY WHEN IT'S TEXAS, BUT THEN HOW ARE WE DOING ON REGISTRATION? NOW COMPARED TO THE PAST, LIKE HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE REGISTERED TO VOTE? OF THOSE THAT ARE ELIGIBLE IN TEXAS, I WANT TO MAKE SURE.
THE FIRST STEP OUGHT TO BE DOING AS MUCH AS WE CAN.
I'VE TRIED IT IN EVERY OFFICE I'VE BEEN IN.
YOU KNOW, I WRITE ALL OF THE THE KIDS COMING OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL.
I SEND THEM A VOTER REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE.
I MIGHT ADD. A GOOD NUMBER OF THEM ARE GOING TO VOTE AGAINST ME.
SOME OF THEM WHO GOT MY CERTIFICATES OVER THE YEARS HAVE RUN AGAINST ME.
BUT I DO IT AND EVERYBODY DOESN'T FEEL THAT WAY.
MIGHT I ADD THAT MAYBE THAT'S THE BENEFIT OF HAVING BEEN HERE 38 YEARS? IT WON'T BE THE END OF THE WORLD IF I DON'T HAVE HONORABLE IN FRONT OF MY NAME.
BUT WHAT OUR NUMBERS NOW COMPARE TO.
THE PAST. I'M PULLING THE EXACT NUMBER RIGHT NOW, BUT WE ARE OVER 2.5 MILLION REGISTERED VOTERS AND WE'RE ABOUT 4.8 MILLION.
HOW MANY ELIGIBLE? 2.5 MILLION REGISTERED.
OUT OF HOW MANY WOULD BE ELIGIBLE? JUST IF YOU KNOW. WELL, I THINK WE'RE 4.5 POPULATION WISE, BUT I DON'T HAVE OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD THAT THE ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE OF THAT.
SO YOU MIGHT EVEN TELL OUR NEW AEA WHEN THEY COME IN.
I JUST BEEN CURIOUS TO KNOW HOW MANY HAVE BEEN PURGED WITH THE STATE'S EFFORT.
MAKE SURE HE IS LOOKING AT, YOU KNOW, THE CONTROVERSY TO PRESS CONTROVERSY OVER TO DOOR TO DOOR SCAMMERS WHO OUT IN MY OLD NEIGHBORHOOD, I WANT TO MAKE SURE FIRST STEP IS WE DOING AS MUCH AS WE CAN TO PUSH BACK WHAT WHAT OUR FUND'S OWN EFFORTS TO STATE HAS PUT IN PLACE TO MAKE IT HARDER FOR PEOPLE TO VOTE AND THEN GET TO THE OTHER PART.
I GUESS WE'LL STILL HAVE THE LONGEST BALLOT IN THE STATE, IF NOT THE COUNTRY.
IS THAT FAIR COMMENT? SO THAT'S TOTALLY HOW MANY IN THE COUNTRY THAT RIGHT.
YEAH, THAT'S RIGHT. IT IS ONE OF ONE, IF NOT THE LONGEST IN THE COUNTRY.
AND WE'LL PROBABLY BE BACK TO THE TWO SHEETS, IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S RIGHT. WHAT WE'RE ANTICIPATING RIGHT NOW IS AND THIS WE WILL KNOW VERY SOON, BECAUSE WE HAVE TO GET CONTRACTS WITH THE LOCAL ENTITIES THAT WILL JOIN US FOR THE NOVEMBER BALLOT.
WE BASICALLY HAVE TO SEE HOW MANY CONTESTS THAT WE HAVE THAT WE WON'T KNOW THAT FOR A FEW WEEKS.
YOU ALL ARE GOING TO SORT IT THROUGH, WHICH COULD CREATE THE MOST CARTRIDGE OR WAS IT THE TERM PRINTER PROBLEM? I KNOW I HAD THAT ISSUE.
AND THEN WE USE STATE LAW WHERE YOU CAN'T DRIVE THROUGH.
I DID DRIVE THROUGH AND I HAD THE THE ISSUE.
WE CAN'T DO THAT. AND AM I RIGHT? WE CAN'T GIVE THEM WATER ANYMORE.
RIGHT. I THINK ANYTHING OF VALUE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
OKAY. SO I WOULD DEFER TO YOU WHEN YOU ALL WHEN THIS NEW PERSON COMES IN, WHATEVER WE CAN DO, ASSUMING IF THERE ARE LINES. I DON'T KNOW.
[01:15:01]
BUT IF THERE ARE LINES, I DON'T KNOW IF THEY'LL BE THE SUPPORT ON THIS COURT.BUT I'M CERTAINLY GOING TO ADVOCATE.
WE SPEND SOME OF OUR MONEY TO DO AS MUCH AS WE CAN WITHIN.
MR. COUNTY ATTORNEY, THE LIMITS OF THE LAW.
IF WE CAN'T GIVE THEM ANYTHING OF VALUE, LIKE SIMPLY GIVING SOMEBODY WATER, I THINK THAT'S A VALUE WHEN YOU NEED IT IS A VALUE, ADDED KIRSCH. YEAH.
WHAT CAN WE DO TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE ARE VENDORS NEARBY SO THAT THEY CAN DO IT? I JUST WANT TO MAKE IT AS I HEARD A PODCAST THE OTHER DAY, PEOPLE OUT AT DISNEYLAND, THEY FIGURE OUT WHAT THEY CAN DO TO MAKE WAITING, YOU KNOW, A PLEASURABLE EXPERIENCE.
AND I HEARD SANJAY GUPTA ON THIS PODCAST SAY, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE DOING SOMETHING RIGHT WHEN PEOPLE ARE SAYING, CAN I TAKE A LITTLE LONGER BEFORE WE GET MY TICKET TO GET ON A RIDE? BUT WE NEED TO DO AS MUCH AS WE CAN.
AND THIS IS REGARDLESS OF WHO SOMEBODY IS VOTING FOR.
I'M GOING TO ADVOCATE THAT WE SPEND OUR MONEY.
I'M GOING TO TREAT THIS JUST LIKE IF I IF I'VE BEEN A COUNTY COMMISSIONER WITH THE ABILITY TO DO IT IN YAZOO, MISSISSIPPI, IN THE SIXTIES OR FORTIES, BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE WE ARE.
AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE SPEND THE MONEY TO GO AND DO THAT REGARDLESS HOW PEOPLE WANT TO VOTE.
I WILL ACTUALLY WORK WITH MR. TATUM ON PROVIDING THAT TO YOU.
AND I'M TRYING TO GET IT OUT BECAUSE I THINK THAT HELPS WITH THE PR EFFORT.
AND PEOPLE KNOW, I MEAN, IT SOUNDS GREAT WHEN YOU GOT 2.5 MILLION PEOPLE WHO ARE REGISTERED TO VOTE, BUT WHEN YOU GET 4.8, 4.9 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE COUNTY, SOME OF THEM ARE UNDER 18, OBVIOUSLY.
BUT SO HOW MANY COULD ELIGIBLE BUT ARE NOT REGISTERED TO VOTE TO ME BEFORE OCTOBER 11TH? THANK YOU. MR..
MR.. TURNER, YOU CAN WORK UP THAT MOTION.
YOU TELL ME LATER AND I'LL DO IT NOW OR LATER WHENEVER I HAVE A NOTE ALREADY.
I DON'T, YOU KNOW, YOU'LL TELL ME IF THIS IS RIGHT.
BUT WHAT I HAVE IS A MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION REGARDING REGARDING THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S SELECTION OF HARRIS COUNTY FOR RANDOMIZED AUDIT OF ITS ELECTIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION ONE 27.3 51A OF THE TEXAS ELECTION CODE.
I'LL MOVE IT. SO THAT WORKS, JUDGE.
DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM? EITHER ITEM 292 OR 307.
I DON'T KNOW IF I CAN JUST DO IT AS A REQUEST.
BUT SHOULD I DO IT AS A MOTION.
ONE WAS MOVED TO SUPPORT THE LEASE OF NRG ARENA FOR THE NOVEMBER 2022 ELECTION OPERATIONS AND DIRECT RELEVANT COUNTY DEPARTMENTS TO SUPPORT THE LOGISTICS REQUIRED TO USE NRG, THE NEED THAT IS A MOTION CIRCUIT.
TO MAKE THIS MOTION, I MOVED TO SUPPORT THE LEASE OF NRG ARENA FOR THE NOVEMBER 2022 ELECTION OPERATIONS AND DIRECT RELEVANT ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENTS TO SUPPORT THE LOGISTICS REQUIRED TO USE NRG.
OKAY. SO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THAT ONE BY COMMISSIONER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
ALL IN FAVOR. I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY MOTIONS.
NO, WE'RE VOTING ON THIS ONE RIGHT NOW.
I WOULD I WOULD REQUEST IF I CAN PLEASE REPEAT FOR CLARIFICATION FOR EACH ONE.
SUPPORT THE LEASE OF NRG ARENA.
FOR THE NOVEMBER 2022 ELECTION OPERATIONS AND DIRECT RELEVANT COUNTY DEPARTMENTS TO SUPPORT THE LOGISTICS REQUIRED TO USE NRG ARENA.
AND THIS IS JUST A MOTION SEPARATE FROM.
COMMISSIONER ELLIS IS CORRECT.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
HI. COMMISSIONER HAHN I'M IN FAVOR OF MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY EVERYONE'S JUST TO REQUEST THAT THE ELECTIONS OFFICE IDENTIFY A COST TO THE 22 2020 ELECTION AUDIT AND THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE 2022 ELECTION AUDIT FOR TRANSPARENCY PURPOSES WITH THE TAXPAYERS.
DO WE NEED TO VOTE ON THAT? NO. OKAY.
AND THEN LET'S GO BACK TO THE ITEM COUNTY ATTORNEY HAD SENT US.
[01:20:01]
ELECTIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION ONE 27.3 51A OF THE TEXAS ELECTION CODE.I MOVE IT SLOW MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS IF I CAN MAKE SURE I SEE YOU ALL IN FAVOR.
IS THIS ALSO FOR 307 OR FOR 292? THAT'S FOR 292 THROUGH 92.
I DO THINK IT'S WORTH CALLING, CALLING OUT THE FACT THAT THERE WAS AN ELECTION AUDIT THAT WAS REQUESTED RIGHT AFTER FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP REQUESTED IT, THAT THERE WAS SOME DELAYS ON THE ELECTION REPORTING, OBVIOUSLY.
BUT THIS WAS ALSO AFTER LEGISLATION THAT MADE IT SO MUCH HARDER FOR US TO RUN THE ELECTION.
AND WE HAVE GONE FORWARD WITH CHANGING THE ELECTIONS ADMINISTRATOR.
BUT. THE JANUARY SIX HEARINGS CONTINUE TO SHOW HOW DANGEROUS IT IS AND WHAT A FALSE STATEMENT IT IS THAT BY CREATING MORE AND MORE DOUBT IN THE ELECTION, YOU ARE SOMEHOW CREATING MORE FAITH IN THE ELECTION.
I MEAN, DOES MEAN THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY MORE MONEY, WHETHER WE GET FEDERAL.
I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN USE FEDERAL MONEY TO DO IT OR NOT, BUT TO GET FOLKS TO GO AND DO THIS AND THE YOU KNOW, THE CONSTANT HURDLES THAT ARE COMING UP THAT EVEN ONE PARTY PUTS IN THE WAY TO MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT.
AND MOST OF THE PROBLEMS HAVE BEEN BECAUSE OF THAT AWFUL LEGISLATION THAT THEY PASSED.
AND I JUST YOU KNOW, I DON'T DANCE AROUND IT.
EVERYBODY KNOWS WHAT THEY'RE DOING.
PEOPLE THEY WANT TO STAY IN POWER BY MAKING IT HARDER FOR PEOPLE TO VOTE.
I SEE YOUR QUESTION, COMMISSIONER CAGLE.
IT SAYS THAT THE THE COUNTY COULD BE AUDITED FOR THE PREVIOUS TWO YEARS.
SO THIS IS EVEN RELITIGATING POTENTIALLY THE 2020 ELECTION RESULTS THAT PEOPLE STORMED OUR NATION'S CAPITAL AND KILLED OTHERS OVER THAT WE ARE THAT WE ARE RIGHT NOW WATCHING IN REAL TIME BE REPLAYED.
AND WE ARE SEEING WHITE HOUSE LEADERS ADMIT THAT THEY KNOW THAT THE ELECTION WAS NOT STOLEN, JUST AS THE FOLKS THAT PASSED THIS LEGISLATION PASSED IT IN THE NAME OF A SO CALLED STOLEN ELECTION THAT THEY ALSO KNEW HAD NOT BEEN STOLEN.
SO THE IDEA OF AUDITS, IF IT WASN'T TAINTED BY JANUARY SIX, IT SURE WAS TAINTED BY THE 2021 DECISION OF THE STATE TO ISSUE AN AUDIT TO HARRIS COUNTY AS SOON AS PRESIDENT TRUMP ASKED FOR THERE TO BE ONE.
AND IT SURE SHOULD BE TAINTED BY THE HORRENDOUS TRUTHS THAT ARE COMING OUT OF THESE JANUARY SIX HEARINGS BY REPUBLICAN LEADERS AND SENIOR STAFF MIGHT ADD.
AND SO IT IS OUR DUTY IN HARRIS COUNTY TO REMEMBER AND REMIND EVERYBODY THAT THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF WIDESPREAD VOTER FRAUD, NOT IN THE 2020 ELECTION, NOT IN THE 2021 ELECTION, NOT IN ANY 2022 ELECTION.
THERE HAVE BEEN DELAYS OVER TIME AND THIS COUNTY IS IN OTHER COUNTIES.
LEGISLATION IS PARTLY THE CAUSE OF IT, BUT THERE IS NO REASON FOR FOR A POLITICIZED AND POLITICALLY MOTIVATED ELECTION AUDIT, ESPECIALLY AFTER DEMOCRACY NEARLY CRUMBLED OVER THIS PANDERING.
COMMISSIONER CAGLE HAD A QUESTION.
I THOUGHT WE JUST VOTED ON FINDING OUT WHAT THE COST WAS OF THE AUDIT.
WAS WAS THAT WHAT WE WERE VOTING ON? IT WAS JUST A REQUEST JUST TO FIND OUT WHAT THE COST WAS THE LAST.
SO THE VOTE THAT WE JUST TOOK WAS ON THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S ACTION AGAINST THE AUDIT.
THE VOTE WE JUST TOOK US TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION.
I'M SO SORRY. I MISUNDERSTOOD WHAT WE WERE VOTING ON.
DO YOU WANT TO SWITCH YOUR VOTE? YES, I DO. OKAY.
DO WE HAVE TO VOTE AGAIN? WE LEARNED ABOUT THE GANG JUDGE.
WE JUST NEED TO JUST RECOGNIZE COMMISSIONER KAGAN'S VOTE AS A NO, IT ISN'T.
DID YOU WANT TO VOTE NO ON SUPPORTING THE LEASE OF NRG ARENA? I THINK YOU WANT TO VOTE NO ON THAT ONE, TOO.
NO, I SUPPORT THE ARENA AND I SUPPORT FINDING OUT WHAT THE COST IS OF THE AUDIT.
AND I'M SORRY, WITH THE VIRTUAL THING HERE, I GOT LOST ON WHAT WE WERE VOTING ON.
THEY TELL ME THAT COVID CREATES A FOG, BUT SOMEBODY VOTES AROUND HERE WELL BEFORE.
[01:25:05]
WELL, YOU'RE THE ONLY ONE THAT HASN'T HAD YOU.I'M THE ONLY ONE WITHOUT THE FOG.
COMMISSIONER GARCIA, I HAVE A NOTE HERE THAT YOU WERE POSSIBLY GOING TO BRING SOME STUDENTS.
IS THAT STILL. YEAH, THEY THEY I DON'T THINK THEY'RE STILL JUDGE.
SO THE SECOND COMMISSIONER CAGLE LET ME ON THE LAST AGENDA ITEM, I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A CLARIFICATION THAT MY VOTE IS REGISTERED FOR FINDING OUT WHAT THE COST IS FOR ENERGY AGAINST THE LAWSUIT.
SO, JUDGE. YES, THAT'S CORRECT.
COMMISSIONER, GO AHEAD. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
I THINK THEY HAVE THEY'VE GONE BACK TO WORK.
BUT I JUST WANT TO RECOGNIZE THAT IT IS A VERY, VERY PROUD MOMENT FOR ME BECAUSE I CONTINUE TO LOOK TO COMMISSIONER ELLIS'S WORK IN THE LEGISLATURE WITH HIM.
WELL, WE HAVE THE PRECINCT TWO STUDENT TO GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY, AND THIS IS A PROGRAM INTENDED TO TEACH TEENS LEADERSHIP SKILLS SERVICE, LEARNING PROJECTS, COMMUNITY SERVICE AND VOLUNTEERING.
IN ADDITION TO ATTENDING COMMISSIONERS COURT THAT WERE HERE, HERE, HERE THEY COME, THE STUDENTS GOT TO VISIT THE UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS, THE UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON, AND THIS IS THE FIRST CLASS OF THE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY CURRENTLY ATTENDING THE ROSE M AVALOS P-TECH SCHOOL OUT OF ALDINE ISD.
AND I WANT TO THANK IN PARTICULAR MR. JOE FUENTES. HE'S HE'S A TEAM MEMBER AND AN INTERIM AND INTERIM PRECINCT TWO EDUCATION SERVICE MANAGER WHO BROUGHT THE STUDENTS HERE THIS MORNING. AND SO I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT I'M GOING TO RECOGNIZE EACH ONE, BEGINNING WITH AN IF YOU'LL JUST KIND OF WAVE, LET US KNOW WHICH ONE YOU ARE.
IS ESMERALDA CHEN ALL RIGHT? 17. SHE'S A SENIOR.
COSI IS ALSO 17 AND A SENIOR AARON.
AARON IS 16 AND HE'S A JUNIOR.
BUT GET THIS, THIS GUY ALREADY IS TALKING GOING TO MIT.
MONSERRAT FLORES, ONCE READ, IS 16 AND A JUNIOR, ELIANA LUNA.
ELIANA IS 16 AND A JUNIOR AND JOSE CUEVAS.
JOSE IS ALSO 16 AND AND A JUNIOR.
AND WE JUST HAD A REAL GOOD DISCUSSION EARLIER THIS MORNING.
AND SO I JUST WANT TO THANK THE FIRST CLASS OF THE STUDENT TO GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP ACADEMY.
OKAY. ROSE AVALOS, TAKE SCHOOL OUT ALL DAY.
NOW I'M WAITING, SAID BRITTANY ORANGE.
I'M WAITING TO SEE IF THEY'RE GOING TO AGREE TO LET THE COUNTY DO THAT MURAL OVER THERE.
AND I WAS TALKING TO SOMEBODY THE OTHER DAY ABOUT THE ROLE YOUNG PEOPLE PLAY, SO YOU OUGHT TO GO BACK AND ASK, GO TO YOUR SCHOOL BOARD AND TELL THEM YOU WANT A BRITTNEY GRINER MURAL UP AT ONE OF THOSE SCHOOLS.
CONGRATULATIONS. CONGRATULATIONS TO YOU.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR WORK AND YOUR INTEREST IN GOVERNMENT.
OKAY. SO BEFORE WE TAKE THE SPEAKERS, I WANT TO LIST SEVERAL ITEMS THAT ARE NO ACTION.
SEEMS WE HAVE MORE THAN USUAL.
SO THE PLAN OF THREE IS WE'LL HAVE CAPTAIN SMITH AND SOMETIME BETWEEN TWO AND FOUR IS WHEN AIR AND OKAY ARE AVAILABLE TO DISCUSS THE COMPENSATION STUDY.
SO I'LL MAKE A NOTE TO DISCUSS THAT THEN.
AND THAT'LL BE ITEMS 26, 308 AND 256.
SO WITH THAT SAID, LET'S GO AHEAD AND TAKE ANY REMAINING SPEAKERS.
[Appearances before court (Part 1 of 3)]
[01:30:05]
FIRST IS SPEAKER NUMBER THREE, JACOB CLEMENT SPEAKING IN PERSON FOR ITEMS 412 164 249 302 THROUGH 306. YOU HAVE 2 MINUTES NOT BEING.BEING LIKE THE TWO GUYS IN THERE.
AND THEN WHEN MY LAST NIGHT THERE WITH THEM TO LOOK AT BUT I'M GOING TO GET BACK.
I WANT TO CONGRATULATE THE COMPANY FOR HONORING THE COAST GUARD BECAUSE HEY, THEY'RE THEIR MANO SEMPER PARTNERS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
AND THEN WHEN I WENT TO BEGIN WITH NUMBER THREE OR TO THE REQUEST BY ONE PERSON TO GET A RESOLUTION FOR THIS OLIVIA BECAUSE OF THE STUPID THING SHE'S DONE FOR SUPPOSEDLY HEALTH CARE SERVICES, HOW WAS ABORTION A HEALTH CARE? BECAUSE WHEN YOU HAVE TWO LIVES, THE MOTHER AND THE CHILD IN THE WOMB AND YOU GET RID OF THE LIFE OF THE MOTHER THAT IS IN HEALTH CARE.
AND HE'S LIKE, LET YOUR KIESSLING GO MORE TOWARDS YOU.
ABOUT TWO OR THREE MORE WANTING THE PASSAGE AS THE RESPECT FOR MARRIAGE ACT.
AND THAT IS A GOOD ACT TO PASS.
BUT THE BEST THING THAT IS DONE IS THE THREE OR FOUR WHERE HE WANTS TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH MORE THAN EARLY COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL REGARDING THE PLANNING OF GUN VIOLENCE.
ME AT THE SCHOOL, THAT'S SOMETHING CONSTRUCTIVE.
AND I WANT TO ALSO CONGRATULATE COMMISSIONER RAMSEY BECAUSE HE'S GETTING THE DUFF CROSBY SIGNS.
HOPEFULLY YOU GUYS CRITICIZE BECAUSE IF YOU DON'T VOTE FOR THAT, THEY'RE QUAKERS.
WELL, I COULD GO ON AND ON, BUT I AM BECAUSE I'M VERY AMUSING TODAY.
I'M GOING TO GET BACK SURGERY.
CORTISONE SHOT IN MY BACK BECAUSE I GOT HIT BY A CAR ON JUNE 21ST.
NEXT IS SPEAKER NUMBER SIX, PRISCILLA MORRIS SPEAKING VIRTUALLY ON ITEM 12 UNDER COVID 19.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
ON THE MOUTH OF THE PUPPET THAT I CHOSE, RIGHT? YES, MA'AM. YOU'RE SPEAKING ON ITEM 12 UNDER COVID 19 POLICY? YES, MA'AM. YOU CAN BEGIN SPEAKING.
LISTEN, I THINK I'VE MADE A BIG IMPACT ON EVERYONE.
THE FACT THAT THIS REPORT IS GOING OUT ON A VOLUNTARY SOURCE, KNOWING WHEN MY SON WAS SUPPOSED TO THIS THING, I KNOW THAT WOULD BE KIND OF REALLY DANGEROUS.
THE FACE OF THIS VIRUS SPREADING AROUND EVERYWHERE.
BUT YOU SAY THEN I THINK ANYONE I THINK WE HAVE TO GO NO FURTHER DISCUSSIONS.
OKAY. LIKE ME, LIKE AROUND ONE OF THE 22.
I HAVEN'T I HAVEN'T REALLY QUIT.
SO ONE DAY MY FATHER WOULD WANT IT ALL ON MY SIDE, BUT WE COULDN'T BECAUSE WE HAD A PERSON OVER AS FAR AS I SAW THEM AS SOON AS THEY DID. EVEN THOUGH, LIKE THEY SAY TIME IS ACTUALLY A THING, WE'LL MAKE SURE SOMEONE FOLLOWS UP WITH YOU TO SEE IF THEY CAN HELP HER. NEXT TO THE SPEAKER, NUMBER SEVEN, STATE REPRESENTATIVE JOHN ROSENTHAL SPEAKING ON ITEM 20.
UNDER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION, YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE.
GO AHEAD, PLEASE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS, COURT COUNTY JUDGE AND COMMISSIONERS FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK TODAY.
I WANT TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED BOND.
[01:35:04]
SO IT'S FOR INFRASTRUCTURE, VITALLY IMPORTANT.I CONSIDER THIS A CORE TO YOUR FUNCTION AS OUR COUNTY GOVERNMENT AND MY DISTRICT HOUSE DISTRICT ONE, I-35 IS ALL UNINCORPORATED HARRIS COUNTY, SO WE RELY VERY HEAVILY AND VERY GRATEFUL FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY.
SO I JUST WANT TO LEND MY VOICE IN A POSITIVE WAY TOWARDS THIS BOND.
I KIND OF WISH IT WAS A HIGHER DOLLAR AMOUNT, BUT DEFINITELY SOMETHING BETTER THAN NOTHING.
AND I FULLY SUPPORT I HOPE YOU ALL WILL VOTE FOR IT.
SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR ALLOWING ME TO TALK.
JUDGE. YES, ROSENTHAL, THIS IS RODNEY.
AND WHILE WE HAVE YOU, I DO WANT TO ENCOURAGE YOU, I GUESS, FROM THE PRESS ACCOUNTS.
I DON'T THINK THEY'LL APPROVE, WOULD BE HONEST WITH YOU.
BUT I HOPE BEFORE ALL OF THAT MONEY GOES OUT, SOMEBODY WILL MAKE A CASE.
OR WE WILL LOSE AN OPPORTUNITY TO GET FEDERAL MONEY, BUT WE'LL SEE WHEN IT COMES.
BUT I THINK IS HIGHLY UNLIKELY.
THE VOTERS IN HARRIS COUNTY ARE GOING TO PICK UP.
HOW MUCH IS IT, MR. BARRY? 20 THE GOLF WELL, THE LOCAL MATCH WOULD BE ON THE ORDER OF 10 BILLION FOR CAPITAL PLUS OPERATING.
AND IF THE GULF COAST PROTECTION DISTRICT USES ITS TAXING AUTHORITY, OVER 80% WOULD BE IN HARRIS COUNTY BECAUSE MOST OF THE PEOPLE AND MOST OF THE PROPERTIES ONLY BECAUSE YOU TALK ABOUT A BOND ISSUE, REPRESENTATIVE AND I AND I APPRECIATE THAT I'VE THOUGHT ABOUT IT AND YOU KNOW, YOU WANT TO STOP MAKING THAT NOISE BEFORE ALL OF THAT MONEY GOES OUT, BECAUSE ACTUALLY, THANKS SO MUCH FOR BRINGING THAT UP.
AND IT'S REALLY TIMELY SINCE THIS HAS JUST MOVED THROUGH THE CONGRESS RIGHT NOW.
RIGHT. AND THE THE STATE LEGISLATION TO PLANT THE SEED MONEY TO BRING DOWN THOSE FEDERAL DOLLARS WAS JOINT AUTHORED BY MYSELF AND DENNIS PAUL, WHO'S A CONSERVATIVE, BUT MY FELLOW ENGINEER IN THE TEXAS HOUSE.
AND WE BOTH CONSIDER, YOU KNOW, HAVING A COASTAL BARRIER THAT I DIKE WOULD BE A DRAMATIC BENEFIT FOR OUR AREA ESPECIALLY BUT TEXAS AS A WHOLE IT'S GOING TO HAVE A GREAT ECONOMIC IMPACT.
WE'RE WALKING INTO IT. I'M PRETTY GOOD ON THE NUMBERS.
AND NO, I KNOW ONE COMMISSIONER CAHILL'S CONCERNS WAS WHAT'LL HAPPEN WHEN WE GET TO DIKE.
I DON'T THINK YOU GET $10 BILLION ON PROPERTY TAXES IN PEOPLE IN HARRIS COUNTY.
I DO I DO NOT THINK IT WILL PASS.
YOU'RE RIGHT. THIS IS A GOOD TIME TO BE PUTTING IN WORDS ON THE BUDGET.
I'M SURE THAT THEY ARE TAKING INPUT FROM ALL KINDS OF DIRECTIONS RIGHT NOW.
MAKE SOME GOOD NOISE ON IT BEFORE THE ELECTION.
AND LET'S TAKE, I PROMISE, THE BREAK EVERY 2 HOURS.
SO LET'S JUST TAKE A QUICK TEN MINUTE BREAK.
WE'LL BREAK UNTIL 1210 AND WE'LL CONTINUE WITH THE SPEAKER'S.
[Appearances before court (Part 2 of 3)]
IT'S 12, 16 AND COMMISSIONERS COURT IS BACK IN SESSION.WE'LL CONTINUE WITH THE SPEAKERS.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
TO DO THAT AS AN OFFICIAL, JUST AS I AM TRUSTEES OF A.
PEOPLE THAT AS A BENEFICIARY AS A CONSTITUENT OF HARRIS COUNTY I BY NOVEMBER 23 FOR THE TIMES, YOU MUST FIRST ESTABLISH AND YOU MUST FIRST ESTABLISH TRUST AND TRANSPARENCY TO THE BENEFICIARY OF THE COUNTY TO BE WORTHY OF WINNING SUCH UPON THE ELECTION.
[01:40:06]
TAX INCREASE.AND THEN THREE AND FINALLY IN A HIGHLY CONTESTED ELECTION YEAR TO THE COMMISSIONERS COURT SHOULD NOT CONSIDER POLICIES THAT WILL HAVE A LONG. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
PASTOR, THANK YOU. WE'RE GOING TO KEEP PRAYING FOR YOU.
IS RODNEY ELLIS ALL RIGHT? HEY, THANK YOU SO MUCH, COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
THANK YOU, PASTOR. THANK YOU, TRUSTEE.
NEXT TO SPEAKER NUMBER EIGHT, MELVIN SPINKS SPEAKING ON ITEM 20.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
I'D LIKE TO SPEAK ABOUT MY SUPPORT FOR THE HARRIS COUNTY BOND BALLOT INITIATIVE.
MY SUPPORT OF THE $1.2 BILLION HARRIS COUNTY BOND PROGRAM IS BASED ON THREE FACTORS.
FIRST, POPULATION IN HARRIS COUNTY IN TEXAS IS INCREASING AND WILL CONTINUE.
INFRASTRUCTURE DEMANDS FOR IMPROVED ROADS AND BETTER DRAINAGE.
ALSO, INCREASE BOND FUNDING IS A PRIORITY.
PRIORITY FOR THESE FUTURE NEEDS TO THE INFRASTRUCTURE.
BOND INVESTMENTS NEED TO BENEFIT THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY, BOTH EQUITABLY AND FISCALLY.
THANK YOU, SIR. YOUR TIME IS UP.
I APPRECIATE THE TIME, JUDGE MELVIN, I JUST WANT TO JUST COMMISSIONER GARCIA, I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR CALLING IN AND SPEAKING IN SUPPORT OF THE BOND. MELVIN, WITH YOU, YOU JUST WERE CHAIRING AC DC.
AND I WANT TO ASK YOU A COUPLE OF THINGS.
IS IT IS IT CRITICAL THAT A BOND PACKAGE BE PUT ON THIS ON THIS CYCLE? COMMISSIONER. YOU KNOW, AS WE LOOK AT THESE FROM 7 TO 8 YEARS APART, IT IS THAT TIME THAT WE HAVE A BOND PROGRAM.
THE LAST BOND PACKAGE PASSED IN 2015 WITH I THINK THE PRETENSE WE WOULD HAVE THOSE FUNDS ENDED, INVESTMENTS MADE WITHIN 5 TO 7 YEARS.
AND SO, YES, IT'S THAT TIME PERIOD.
GOOD DEAL. AND AND IN TERMS OF THE THE THE CATEGORIES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS BOND PACKAGE, ROADS, DRAINAGE PARKS, PUBLIC SAFETY, VISION ZERO, ARE THOSE APPROPRIATE CATEGORIES TO INCLUDE IN THIS PACKAGE AND NOT TO FAIL TO MENTION WHAT I'M TRYING TO ADD TO IT.
THAT'S HOW WE ECONOMICALLY PROSPER AS A COMMUNITY.
SO THOSE ARE THE BASIC, FUNDAMENTAL THINGS.
AND CLEARLY IN LINE WITH THE INVESTMENT, AS WE ALL KNOW, IS SAFETY AND AREA AREA.
SO YES, AND AND IN MY LAST QUESTION, BECAUSE I'M LOOKING AT A AT A REPORT HERE TITLED INFLATION INDICATORS TO MONITOR IN A VOLATILE ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT, WITH THE PREDICTION THAT INFLATION IS GOING TO GET WORSE IN NEXT YEAR IN THE FUTURE, IS IT BETTER TO WAIT OR TO PUT A PACKAGE UP NOW? WELL, AS WE ALL KNOW.
INFLATION CONTINUES AT A PACE.
AND SO WE WANT TO PUT THOSE PROJECTS INTO THE INTO THE PLANNING STAGE.
THESE ARE PROGRAMS THAT LAST 5 TO 7 YEARS.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP.
THANK YOU FOR CALLING IN TODAY.
ABSOLUTELY. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS.
THIS IS ROD NELSON AND THANK YOU FOR CALLING.
AND SO COMMISSIONER GARCIA MADE A COUPLE OF POINTS.
YOU BOTH DID THE TIMING, ITS TIME IT MATCHES WITH THE TIME IT IMPACTS.
[01:45:06]
IT HELPS US TO FIGHT INFLATION.LET ME GIVE YOU A COUPLE MORE.
I HOPE THE FEDERAL LEGISLATION PASSES THAT SENATOR MANCHIN HAS PLAYED A KEY ROLE IN.
THERE'LL BE OPPORTUNITIES TO MATCH.
IS IT FAIR THAT IF WE HAVE CAPITAL FUNDING, THAT PUTS US IN A BETTER POSITION TO DRAW DOWN MORE FEDERAL MONEY THAT WE HOPE IS COMING? WELL, ABSOLUTELY.
CERTAINLY THOSE COMES WITH SOME STRINGS, AS YOU WELL KNOW, ATTACHED TO IT.
SO WE NEED TO BE CAREFUL WHAT WE ASK FOR FROM THE FEDS.
BUT VERY IMPORTANT TO HAVE THAT MONEY AVAILABLE FLOW IN THOSE PARTNERSHIPS DO HAPPEN.
AND MELBOURNE. YOU'VE WATCHED THIS OVER THE YEARS AND I KNOW YOU ALL NORMALLY GET ACTIVE.
I SHOULD POINT OUT IT WASN'T OUR TRADITIONAL BOND PACKAGE LIKE THIS ONE.
OF COURSE WE HAD ONE OTHER ONE THAT WAS HARVEY THAT CAME ALONG.
AND ARE YOU AWARE THAT WE'RE PUTTING MORE TIME INTO THIS ONE THAN WE HAD FOR HARVEY? SO IN TERMS OF OUTREACH, THERE'S MORE TIME.
WE'RE AHEAD OF THE SCHEDULE THAT WE HAD WHEN WE PUT THE HARVEY PACKAGE UP.
JUST. WERE YOU AWARE OF THAT? WELL, COMMISSIONER, I KNOW ON THESE TYPES OF PRIORITIES, PRIORITIES, THE TIME IS ALWAYS OF THE SENSE TO GET OUT THERE AND COMMUNICATE WELL TO THE PUBLIC WHAT THESE PROJECTS ARE.
SO CERTAINLY THAT'S UP TO THE COURT AND YOUR DEPARTMENT TO MAKE SURE THAT HAPPENS.
I HOPE YOU ALL OUT THERE AS WELL.
AND LOOK, FROM YOUR EXPERIENCE WATCHING THE COURT OVER THE YEARS, I WOULD WATCH IT FROM A DISTANCE.
BUT CAN YOU REMEMBER A TIME WHEN A COMMISSIONERS WERE OPPOSED TO AN INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE PACKAGE? IN YOUR EXPERIENCE, COMMISSIONER, I.
YOU KNOW, CLEARLY WE WANT A UNIFIED COURT ON THIS.
I THINK WE'VE STIPULATED FROM OUR INDUSTRY THAT IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE HAVE A UNIFIED COURT WHEN WE GO AFTER BOND PROGRAMS. HEY, THANK YOU. APPRECIATE YOU BEING SO PATIENT.
NEXT IS SPEAKER NUMBER NINE, REBECCA CORNELL SPEAKING ON THE SAME ITEM.
YOU HAVE A MINUTE? GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
YES. MY NAME IS REBECCA CORNELY.
I APPRECIATE YOUR LETTING ME JOIN IN THIS MEETING TODAY.
I THINK IT SHOULD BE DISCUSSED.
OUR COMMISSIONER, SO FAR IN THE PAST HAS ALWAYS, YOU KNOW, HAD OUR BEST INTERESTS IN MIND.
SO I'M VERY MUCH IN SUPPORT OF ITEM 20 AND I HOPE THAT IT PASSES.
WE DO NEED MORE ROAD REPAIRS, MORE BRIDGEWORK, MORE DRAINAGE.
WE DO HAVE A FLOODING PROBLEM STILL.
THANK YOU. AND THANK YOU TO MR. COMMISSIONER AND MRS. BALGO AND ALL THE COURTS THERE FOR EVERYTHING THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO GET PAST.
NEXT TO SPEAKER NUMBER 11, JULIO DEL CARPIO SPEAKING ON THE SAME ITEM.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
AH YES. MY NAME IS JULIA, DOCUDRAMA DEVELOPER OF OLD TOWN HARRISBURG.
THIS IS A UNIQUE TOURIST TOURIST DEVELOPMENT IN HOUSTON, EASTERN.
WE ARE PLANNING TO DO A REPLICA OF THE FIRST CAPITAL OF TEXAS THAT DISAPPEARED IN 1836.
FROM HERE, THE INDEPENDENCE OF TEXAS WAS DIRECTED.
CERTAINLY, IT'S MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE ALAMO.
WHEN THE FIRST CAPITAL IS COMPLETED, WE CAN BRING MILLIONS OF TOURISTS TO OUR SITE AND GENERATE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS FOR THE EAST IN THE SAME WAY THAT THE ALAMO DOES.
I WILL ENCOURAGE FOR THIS BOND TO BE PASSED BECAUSE WE NEED TO IMPROVE THE ROADS.
WE NEED TO IMPROVE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WILL BENEFIT, YOU KNOW, OUR COMMUNITY AS WELL.
THAT COULD DO WONDERS FOR THE TOURIST INDUSTRY.
NEXT IS SPEAKER 13 WALTER STINSON OF THE HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE SPEAKING ON ITEM 20.
[01:50:03]
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONERS AND JUDGE HIDALGO.
ONE THING I WANT TO ITERATE IN THIS IS AT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE.
WE DON'T HAVE ADEQUATE PARKING.
WE NEED LOCKER ROOMS. WE NEED A PLACE FOR THEM TO TAKE A BREAK AND RECOVER AND THEN GO BACK OUT ON THE STREETS BECAUSE THEY ARE ESSENTIAL PERSONNEL.
SO BASICALLY, OUR BILL IS IS WE'VE OUTGROWN WHERE WE AT.
WE DO HAVE PARTNERSHIPS IN OUR COMMUNITIES WITH SOME OF OUR CONTRACT PARTNERS AND MY DISTRICT.
YOUR TIME IS UP. DEPUTY GORDON.
GORDON, CONTINUE. WHAT I WAS GOING TO SAY IS COMMISSIONER GARCIA'S, WE HAVE PARTNERSHIPS WITH SOME OF OUR MUD DISTRICTS OUT THERE THAT ACTUALLY SPEND THEIR FUNDS TO GIVE US SOME OFFICE SPACE OUT IN THE DISTRICTS.
WITHOUT THAT, WE WOULDN'T HAVE ADEQUATE ROOM FOR SOME OF OUR INVESTIGATORS.
WE HAVE VIOLENT CRIMES INVESTIGATORS, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INVESTIGATORS THAT ARE ASSIGNED ALL OUR DISTRICTS AND THEY UTILIZE THOSE OFFICE SPACES IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO BE CLOSE TO THE DISTRICTS AND BE OUT THERE WITH THE CRIMES HAPPEN.
SO IF WE COULD GET THIS PASSED, BUILD A BIGGER FACILITY AND MODEL SOME OF THE FACILITIES THAT HPD HAVE, YOU KNOW, IT'S BETTER FOR OUR COMMANDERS TO BE ABLE TO COMMAND THOSE DISTRICTS AND HAVE ALL THE RESOURCES IN ONE PLACE SO THEY CAN REACH OUT AND SAY, HEY, WE HAVE THESE PROBLEMS GOING ON.
THIS IS WHAT I NEED OUR VIOLENT CRIMES INVESTIGATORS TO WORK ON INSTEAD OF HAVING TO YOU KNOW, IT BASICALLY IT'S A SUPERVISOR'S NIGHTMARE WHEN IT COMES TO HAVING ALL YOUR PEOPLE SPREAD OUT AROUND THE COUNTY BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE ADEQUATE SPACE TO PUT THEM ALL TOGETHER.
AND I KNOW I'VE TALKED A LOT, BUT THAT'S WHAT WE NEED.
WE NEED GENERATORS FOR OUR FACILITIES.
WHEN THE LIGHTS GO OUT, WE'RE IN THE DARK.
AND AS YOU KNOW, DURING HARVEY CYPRESS WOOD AND CLAY ROAD AND WAYNESVILLE, WE ALL FLOODED.
I KNOW THE COUNTY INVESTED MONEY TO REBUILD THOSE FACILITIES FOR US, BUT IT'S ONLY A MATTER OF TIME.
IT'S PROBABLY GOING TO HAPPEN AGAIN.
WE NEED TO RAISE THOSE ELEVATIONS.
AND IF WE COULD LOOK AT SOME CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND HAVE, YOU KNOW, BETTER PARKING, MORE SECURE FACILITIES, KNOW OUR JAILS, OUTLYING JAILS DON'T HAVE ALL OF THEM, DON'T HAVE SALLY PORTS.
WE DON'T HAVE FENCED IN AREAS FOR OUR CARS.
AND LET ME ASK YOU THIS, COMMISSIONER GARCIA, WOULD YOU, SIR, DO YOU THINK YOU ARE AN ANOMALY IN THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, THAT THE FACILITIES NEED TO BE UPGRADED? DO YOU THINK YOU'RE BY YOURSELF OR DO YOU THINK THERE'S A FEW MORE DEPUTIES STANDING WITH YOU? I THINK I THINK THERE'S A LOT MORE DEPTH THAT EXTENDED WITH ME, SIR.
AND, YOU KNOW, WE'RE HARRIS COUNTY GROWN.
YOU KNOW, WE'RE THE FOURTH LARGEST CITY IN THE COUNTRY COUNTY IN THE COUNTRY.
WE JUST NEED TO PUT A LITTLE MORE MONEY BACK IN OUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS.
AND AND LIKE I SAID, IT'S ALSO ABOUT THE ABOUT THE CITIZEN.
THERE'S ROOM TO MOVE AROUND IN THERE.
SO THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS THAT WE CAN WE CAN IMPROVE ON.
AND I THINK THAT LOOKING AT THIS, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY, INFLATION IS INFLATION.
WE'RE ALL GOING TO HAVE TO PAY TAXES.
I'M WILLING TO PAY THAT BECAUSE I THINK IT'S NEEDED.
I'M NOT ONE TO WASTE MONEY, BUT BUT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT I THINK THAT WE CAN ALL BENEFIT FROM.
YOU KNOW, WE'VE OUTGROWN OUR 50 YEAR OLD SUBSTATIONS.
WE HAVE GROWN THEM. YOU SURE HAVE, MAN.
[01:55:02]
SO THANK YOU FOR.THANK YOU FOR CALLING IN. AND THANK YOU FOR SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF THE MEN AND WOMEN OUT THERE DOING A TOUGH JOB AS IT IS AND WORKING IN TOUGH CONDITIONS. I'M HOPING THAT WE'LL GET THIS PASSED AND THAT IT WILL ALLOW US TO START THE PROCESS, TO BEGIN TO TO UPGRADE THOSE VERY, VERY ANTIQUATED FACILITIES.
IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, SOME OF THE PLACES THAT YOU'RE WORKING IN WERE BUILT IN THE LATE SIXTIES AND NOT EARLY SEVENTIES, AND THAT HAS BEEN THAT, AND THAT MIGHT BE GENEROUS.
NEXT TO SPEAKER NUMBER 14, NICHOLAS KOSTER, ALSO OF THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SPEAKING ON ITEM 20.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
AFTERNOON. I'M JUST GOING TO FOLLOW UP ON WHAT STING'S MOM HAD MENTIONED.
I'M GOING TO TOUCH ON THE ITEMS. A COUPLE OF ITEMS THAT STENZEL MENTIONED COMPARING TO HPD, NOT ONLY HPD, BUT ALL OF A MAJORITY OF THE SURROUNDING LOCAL AGENCIES.
BUILDINGS COMPARED TO THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ALTHOUGH ALSO THE NEWEST BUILDING WAS BUILT IN 1979.
THAT WAS DISTRICT FIVE SUBSTATION.
WHEN YOU COMPARE IT TO ALL THE OTHER SUBSTATIONS, THEY ALL HAVE A COMMUNITY MEETING ROOM.
WE HAVE DESIGNATED ROLL CALL ROOMS RIGHT NOW.
WE USE ONE ROOM FOR MULTIPLE USES AND INTERRUPTS THE OTHER OFFICERS WORKING IN THAT ROOM.
THEY HAVE OFFICER DORM ROOMS, THEY HAVE LAUNDRY ROOMS AND EVEN THE NATURAL DISASTERS.
THANK YOU, SIR. YOUR TIME, OFFICERS GOING TO DO THEIR LAUNDRY? GO. GO AHEAD. YOU GOT ANOTHER MINUTE TO WRAP UP, MAN.
SO AGAIN, OFFICER, DORM ROOMS, LAUNDRY ROOMS. IN TIME OF NATURAL DISASTERS, THE OFFICERS WHO ARE WORKING THE LONG HOURS THEY HAVE, THEY CAN WASH THEIR CLOTHES, THEY CAN GET REST AT THE STATIONS ON THEIR OFF HOURS.
SO I THINK WE ABSOLUTELY NEED THE BOND TO UTILIZE THESE FUNDS TO HELP.
SO BRING THOSE STATIONS UP TO THE STANDARDS THEY NEED TO BE A GOOD DEAL.
THANK YOU. NEXT, THE SPEAKER NUMBER 15, JOHN NANY OF THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE SPEAKING ON ITEM 20.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
MY NAME IS JOHN NANNI. I'VE BEEN A CAPTAIN WITH THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE NOW FOR 31 AND A HALF YEARS.
I'VE WORKED AT EVERY STATION IN THE COUNTY AND ALL OF THEM ARE PRETTY MUCH INADEQUATE TO AS THE OTHER DEPUTIES AND THE SERGEANT WAS SAYING IN REGARDS TO KEEPING UP WITH THE PERSONNEL THAT WE'VE THAT WE'VE GAINED AND SERVING THE COMMUNITIES AS IT GROWS SO QUICKLY.
THEY'RE NOT. THEY'RE NOT SUFFICIENT TO FOR PARKING.
THERE'S NO STAFF RESTROOMS. THERE'S NO LOCKER ROOMS. THERE'S NO MEETING ROOMS. A LOT OF TIMES WHEN WHENEVER WE WANT TO HAVE A MEETING, WE'RE FORCED TO ACTUALLY REACH OUT TO OTHER DEPARTMENTS, FIRE DEPARTMENTS, COMMUNITY LOCATIONS, CHURCHES, RESTAURANTS THAT HAVE MEETING ROOMS. AND AND WE TRY TO HAVE MEETINGS THERE.
IT'S I MEAN, IT DOES HAVE A GOOD POINT TO FOR COMMUNITY RELATIONSHIPS.
CAPTAIN GORDON, CONTINUE YOUR REMARKS.
YEAH. I'M ALMOST WRAPPING UP HERE.
SO, YOU KNOW, WE DO WE DO HAVE GOOD RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE COMMUNITY AND SOME OF THE LOCATIONS, AND WE DO HAVE GOOD PARTNERSHIPS, BUT WE DEFINITELY NEED TO GET UPDATED TO WHERE WE CAN ACTUALLY BE INDEPENDENT AND AND HAVE WHAT WE NEED TO TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY.
CAPTAIN, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR CALLING IN.
THANK YOU FOR SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF YOUR TROOPS.
AND AND YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.
I MEAN, WHEN I WAS WORKING ALONGSIDE YOU, I WAS HAPPY TO HOLD THOSE THOSE COMMUNITY MEETINGS.
[02:00:03]
THAT WE CAN, YOU KNOW, BUILD THAT RELATIONSHIP WITH THE COMMUNITY.BUT YOU CAN'T DO IT IF IF YOU'RE NOT INVITING PEOPLE OVER TO YOUR HOUSE.
AND SO AND OBVIOUSLY, YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE CALLERS BEFORE YOU SPOKE ABOUT.
THE WORKING CONDITIONS THAT THAT THE TROOPS ARE HAVING TO BE SUBJECTED TO.
DO YOU AGREE WITH THAT OR DO YOU THINK THAT WAS JUST A DEPUTY TRYING TO TO MAKE HAY FOR HIS HIS OR HIS OWN WORKING STATION? DO YOU THINK IT'S IMPORTANT FOR THE TROOPS TO HAVE A GOOD WORKING SPACE AND ENVIRONMENT? OH, YES, SIR. ABSOLUTELY.
A MATTER OF FACT, I THINK THE LEVEL OF ATTRITION THAT WE SEE NOWADAYS IS A LOT OF IT HAS TO DO WITH SOME OF THESE YOUNGER FOLKS THAT ARE HIRING ON AND THEY'RE NOT REALLY SEEING THE SUPPORT. I THINK THAT THAT THEY EXPECT AND I THINK HAVING NEW STATIONS IS JUST A START TO ACTUALLY SHOW THEM THAT WE ARE APPRECIATED AND THEY ARE APPRECIATED AND AND THAT THERE'S THERE'S THERE'S A LOT OF ROOM TO GROW HERE.
GOOD DEAL, MAN. THANK YOU SO MUCH, CAPTAIN.
THANK YOU, SIR. NEXT TO SPEAKER 17, MIKE LEE OF THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE SPEAKING ON ITEM 20.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONERS.
AND JUDGE HIDALGO, THIS IS MIKE LEE.
I'M THE CHIEF OF LAW ENFORCEMENT HERE AT THE HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE.
AND SO, YOU KNOW, I JUST HAD ABOUT THREE OR FOUR OF OUR EMPLOYEES SPEAK UP.
BUT I CAN TELL YOU, JUDGE COMMISSIONERS, EVERY DEPUTY OVER HERE WOULD SAY THE SAME THING.
OUR FACILITIES ARE 6 TO 7 DECADES OLD AND THEY'RE INADEQUATE.
AND, YOU KNOW, HAVING SPENT 27 YEARS AT HPD AND SEEING WHAT THE CITY AND THE INVESTMENT THEY MADE OVER THE YEARS AND THEIR INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, IT MEANS A LOT TO TO THE POINT THAT COMMISSIONER JUST ASKED CAPTAIN DANNY ABOUT WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO THE DEPUTIES? YOU KNOW, IT'S I KNOW WE ALL THE TIME HERE.
YOU KNOW HOW IMPORTANT PAY IS.
PAY IS IMPORTANT. AND I KNOW THAT'S SOMETHING YOU'RE TAKING A LOOK AT, BUT IT'S MORE THAN PAY.
YOU KNOW, IT'S WORKING CONDITIONS.
IT'S IT'S SHOWING THAT WE HAVE THAT WE TAKE PRIDE IN THE FACILITIES, THAT WE'RE SHOWING OUR SUPPORT FOR OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT BY HAVING A NICE FACILITY TO WORK IN. AND IN THIS ENVIRONMENT, RECRUITING AND RETENTION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT, AS YOU ALL KNOW, NATIONWIDE IS A STRUGGLE.
AND THIS IS ONE OF THOSE AREAS THAT WE CAN REALLY MAKE PROGRESS.
THANK YOU. HEY, CHIEF, REAL QUICKLY, BEFORE YOU GET OFF, LET ME LET ME ASK YOU, FIRST OF ALL, THANK YOU FOR CALLING IN AND AND THANK YOU FOR REITERATING THE POINTS THAT CAPTAIN MADE AND SOME OF YOUR OTHER EMPLOYEES THERE.
YOU KNOW, WHEN I WAS ON CITY COUNCIL, I LED THE CHARGE TO CREATE A HPD'S REAL TIME CRIME CENTER.
DO YOU THINK AN INVESTMENT OF THAT NATURE WOULD BE IMPORTANT FOR THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE TO ALSO DEVELOP? I DO.
THERE'S ACTUALLY THE REAL TIME CRIME CENTER WAS A GREAT IDEA AND IT WAS A GREAT FACILITY.
THERE'S THAT I MEAN, THERE'S THERE'S SO MANY THINGS THAT IT'S HARD TO PIN DOWN.
THAT IS I'M NOT SAYING THAT'S A GOOD THING.
WE DON'T EVEN HAVE A DRIVING FACILITY TO TRAIN MY DEPUTIES SO THEY CAN IMPROVE THEIR.
WE AVERAGED TEN WRECKS A WEEK.
OUR DEPUTIES DO DRIVE FOR A LIVING.
AND SOMETIMES, LIKE I SAID, IT'S IN PURSUITS WHICH IS VERY DANGEROUS.
SO IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT WE HAVE THEM ON THE TRACK TRAINING ON A REGULAR BASIS.
YOU KNOW, OUR OUR CITY BRETHREN BUILT THEIR OFFICERS A DRIVING FACILITY OVER FIVE DECADES AGO.
WE DON'T HAVE A DRIVING FACILITY TO THIS DAY FOR OUR DEPUTIES.
WE DON'T HAVE AN ACTIVE SHOOTER FACILITY FOR OUR DEPUTIES TO TRAIN IN.
WE HAVE TO GO AROUND AND ASK, YOU KNOW, THE COMMUNITY.
DO YOU HAVE A FACILITY TO GO? AND IT IS NOT EASY TO DO BECAUSE DAMAGE CAN OCCUR TO THEIR FACILITY.
[02:05:06]
WE DON'T HAVE THAT ABILITY AND WE'RE STRUGGLING TO GET OUR DEPUTIES THROUGH.AND TEXAS LEADS ALL THE STATES AND HARRIS COUNTY LEADS THE STATE AND THE NATION IN DROWNING DEATHS.
I CAN'T TELL YOU HOW MANY TIMES IN MY 32 YEAR CAREER WITH THE CITY OF HOUSTON POLICE AND AS A DEPUTY OVER HERE, HOW MANY TIMES I'VE BEEN ON BOATS OR UP TO MY NECK IN SWIFT WATER? WE HAVE WE HAVE TO TRAIN OUR DEPUTIES HOW TO HOW TO RESCUE PEOPLE.
IT'S JUST IT'S JUST UNFATHOMABLE THAT WE DON'T HAVE THOSE TYPE OF RESOURCES AND WE KNOW THOSE TYPES.
THOSE ARE THE TYPES OF THINGS THAT CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH THIS BOND.
BUT I MEAN, WHAT WE SEE SO FAR, I MEAN, WE'RE EXCITED ABOUT IT BECAUSE WE THINK THIS IS THE OPPORTUNITY AND IT'S NOT CASTING FAULT OUT THERE ON ANYONE. IT'S JUST THAT WE KNOW THAT THE INVESTMENT HAS NOT BEEN MADE, THE APPROPRIATE INVESTMENT HAS NOT BEEN MADE ON THE LAW ENFORCEMENT SIDE OF THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE IN DECADES.
YOU KNOW, WE HAVE REALLY PRIDED OURSELVES IN MOVING THIS DEPARTMENT TO A, YOU KNOW, COMMUNITY BASED DEPARTMENT OF BEING VERY TRANSPARENT AND TO BE ABLE TO BUILD SUBSTATIONS THAT ARE MORE COMMUNITY BASED, THAT ARE WELCOMING TO THE COMMUNITY THAT THAT THAT INCORPORATE COMMUNITY ROOMS THAT WE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC TO ALLOW THEM TO COME IN AND USE THOSE FACILITIES AND TO BUILD THOSE RELATIONSHIPS WITH OUR OFFICERS AND OUR DEPUTIES IS CRITICAL.
AND I CAN TELL YOU, WE DO NOT HAVE THAT CAPABILITY AT THIS POINT.
YOU REMINDED ME THAT I WAS ASKING THE BUDGET OFFICE FOR A DRIVING COURSE FOR OUR DEPUTIES BECAUSE WE WERE HAVING TO BORROW SPACE AT NRG TO DO THAT TRAINING OUT THERE IN THAT PARKING LOT.
IT'S TIME. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
I APPRECIATE YOU SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF THE MEN AND WOMEN OF THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE.
NEXT TO SPEAKER NUMBER 18, DANNY WILLIAMS OF THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE SPEAKING ON ITEM 20.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE.
VERY QUICKLY, I WANT TO RE-EMPHASIZE SOMETHING THAT'S BEEN SPOKEN BY EVERYONE ABOUT THE SUBSTATIONS.
THEY ARE ANTIQUATED. YES, THEY ARE OUTDATED.
BUT ONE THING CHIEF LEIF SPOKE IS ABOUT THE COMMUNITY PART OF IT.
THAT SHOULD BE AN AREA OF A COMMON PLACE.
SO THEY FEEL LIKE THEY ARE PART OF SOMETHING, TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IS AND BE ABLE TO ENFORCE WHAT LAW ENFORCEMENT REALLY IS TO BE GIVEN MORE THAN PEOPLE THINK WE ARE GIVEN TO MAKE IT MORE CONDUCIVE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT THAT THEY FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE DEALING WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT, LAW ENFORCEMENT DOING WITH THIS COMMUNITY.
BUT AGAIN, YOU HAVE THE STATIONS ARE VERY ANTIQUATED.
AND WE'RE LOOKING FOR YOUR SUPPORT WITH THIS BOND AS WELL.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. GREAT.
NEXT. SPEAKER 19 ALEXI SWIRSKY SPEAKING IN PERSON ON ITEM 20.
YES, I OBJECT TO SCHEDULING A BOND ELECTION FOR NOVEMBER 2023.
THE COUNTY NEEDS TO ESTABLISH TRUST AND TRANSPARENCY TO BE WORTHY OF WINNING A BOND ELECTION.
THE FOLLOWING HARRIS COUNTY ENTERPRISES HAVE NOT MET THAT CRITERIA.
NOT COUNTING 10,000 VOTES IN THE MOST RECENT PRIMARY.
TWO JUDGE HIDALGO'S AIDES ARE UNDER INDICTMENT IN RELATION TO AWARDING A COVID CONTRACT TO ELEVATE STRATEGIES WHO IS NOT THE LOWEST BIDDER NOR THE MOST QUALIFIED APPLICANT. A TONE CONTRACT WAS AWARDED TO A COMPANY IN CALIFORNIA.
HOW MANY OTHER CONTRACTS HAVE GONE TO FIRMS WHICH WERE NOT THE LOW BIDDER AND WHY?
[02:10:04]
THERE ARE OBJECTIONS FROM SOME OF YOU TO THE UPCOMING AUDIT OF THE NOVEMBER 2022 ELECTION.WHY? WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO HIDE? BRITISH ELECTION? NO. THE PUBLIC DOESN'T TRUST HARRIS COUNTY TO GIVE THEM REAL MONEY.
BOND MONEY HONESTLY WORK TO ESTABLISH TRUST AND TRANSPARENCY BEFORE SCHEDULING A BOND ELECTION.
WE NEED DETAILS OF HOW THE MONEY WILL BE SPENT AND THE MONEY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOCATED BETWEEN PRECINCTS BASED ON WHETHER THAT PRECINCTS COMMISSIONER VOTED FOR THE BOND OR AGAINST IT. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU SO MUCH. NEXT TO SPEAKER 21, SAEED HAQ, SPEAKING ON ITEM 20.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
GOOD AFTERNOON, EVERYONE. THIS IS AD HOC.
I'M WITH INFOTECH ENGINEERS AND INNOVATORS IN HARRIS COUNTY, VERY SMALL BUSINESS.
THANK YOU, JUDGE AND COMMISSIONERS, FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO THEM.
I SUPPORT THIS BOND BALLOT INITIATIVES WE HAVE SEEN LIKE AN UNPRECEDENTED GROWTH IN OUR REGION.
HARRIS COUNTY AND OTHER AGENCIES THERE HAVE BEEN WORKING HARD TO IMPROVE THE INFRASTRUCTURE.
I BELIEVE WE NEED MORE INVESTMENT.
ONE OF MY OTHER CONCERN IS LIKE THERE IS A HIGH PROBABILITY THAT RECESSION IS IN HORIZON.
ANY RECESSION HAS ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE JOB MARKET.
SO IN THE LONG RUN, IT WILL BE A WIN WIN FOR EVERYONE IN OUR REGION.
OUR REGION WILL HOST 2026 WORLD CUP SOCCER.
THANK YOU FOR CALLING. THIS IS COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
AND LET ME JUST QUICKLY ASK YOU.
I KNOW THAT YOU ARE ONE OF THE FIRMS IN TOWN, BUT THE REALITY OF IT IS, ARE ARE WE DOING ENOUGH? HAVE WE CAUGHT UP WITH ALL OF THE REPAIRS AND DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE? HAVE WE INSTITUTED ENOUGH VISION ZERO TO KEEP OUR ROADWAYS SAFE IN HARRIS COUNTY? FROM YOUR PERSPECTIVE, ARE WE THERE? WE ARE ALMOST THERE, BUT HONESTLY SPEAKING, NOT 100% THERE, I BELIEVE.
LIKE THERE ARE LOT TO DO STILL FOR FOR THE REGION, FOR THE HARRIS COUNTY.
NEXT, THE SPEAKER NUMBER TEN, BETH WHITE OF THE HOUSTON PARKS BOARD, SPEAKING ON ITEM 20.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
THANK YOU. MY NAME IS BETH, VICE PRESIDENT AND CEO OF HOUSTON PARKS BOARD.
OUR MISSION IS TO CREATE, IMPROVE, PROTECT AND ADVOCATE FOR PARKS FOR EVERYONE.
WE ALSO OFFER, AGAIN, OUR COMMITMENT TO EXPLORE PARTNERSHIPS WITH THE COUNTY TOWARD A MARQUEE PARK PROJECT THAT WOULD HAVE A TRANSFORMATIVE IMPACT ACROSS ALL FOUR PRECINCTS.
AND WE STAND READY TO SUPPORT YOUR EFFORTS IN THIS REGARD.
WITH THIS IS COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
LET ME JUST ASK YOU, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT WE HAVE A COUPLE OF AT LEAST A COUPLE OF PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS THAT WOULD BE IN HARM'S WAY IF THIS BOND PACKAGE WERE NOT TO PASS.
DO YOU THINK THAT THESE PARTICULAR PROJECTS.
WOULD IT BE JUST SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE NO BIG DEAL? AND THE TWO PROJECTS I'M SPEAKING OF IS ONE THAT'S IN PRECINCT TWO.
IT IS THE JESUIT CREEK BRIDGE.
IS THAT A PROBLEM OR NOT? WELL, I THINK THE PARK BONDS WOULD BE CRITICAL IN ORDER FOR THOSE PROJECTS TO MOVE FORWARD.
[02:15:08]
THE COMMISSIONER'S PARK PRIORITIES IN ALL FOUR PRECINCTS, I THINK THE FUNDING WOULD BE REALLY IMPORTANT TO MOVE THOSE PROJECTS FORWARD, TO CREATE THIS INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM OF PARKS AND OPEN SPACE THAT I THINK WE'RE ALL AFTER.GOOD. AND NOW LET ME ASK YOU ABOUT.
IS THAT IS THAT PROJECT IMPORTANT OR NOT? I THINK THAT'S ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF AN IMPORTANT PROJECT IN WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP WITH EACH OF THE COMMISSIONERS TO SEE WHERE THAT LANDS WITHIN THEIR OWN PARK IMPROVEMENT PLANS.
SO I THINK THAT THERE ARE SO MANY OPPORTUNITIES OUT THERE TO PROVIDE CRITICAL LINKS, TO CONNECT SYSTEMS, TO CONNECT THE BIO GREENWAYS, OR TO CONNECT OTHER GREENWAYS AND BICYCLE CORRIDORS THROUGHOUT THE REGION.
THANK YOU. AND LASTLY, LET ME AGAIN THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND COLLABORATION WITH THE CAMPUS TOURIST TRAIL AND PLAZA.
AND AND OBVIOUSLY, YOU KNOW, ONE IS THAT I'VE INCLUDED A $200 MILLION COMPONENT FOR PARTNERSHIPS.
AND OBVIOUSLY THAT COULD VERY WELL BE FOR US TO CONTINUE TO WORK WITH YOU TO CONTINUE WHAT YOU'RE DOING, LIKE WITH THE BUFFALO BUFFALO BAYOU GREENWAYS PROJECT AND AND ALL THAT AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT'S STILL IN FRONT OF US.
BUT THANK YOU FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP AND LOOKING FORWARD TO CONTINUE TO WORK WITH YOU.
BUT IT WILL BE HARDER TO WORK WITH YOU, BETH, IF THIS IF THIS BOND DOESN'T PASS.
THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER. COMMISSIONER TOM RAMSEY HERE.
APPRECIATE THE MANY, MANY, MANY CONVERSATIONS WE'VE HAD.
OF COURSE, WE GOT 68 PARKS AND WE'VE GOT A LOT OF FOLKS WANT TO STEP UP, PARTNER WITH YOU.
SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR VISION AS WE TRY TO MAKE BETTER PARKS IN HARRIS COUNTY.
RODNEY ELLIS I JUST WANT TO WALK BACK THROUGH THE NUMBERS AGAIN.
WHEN YOU WERE HERE BEFORE BY YOU GREENAWAY'S REMIND US AGAIN.
SOMETIMES I ROUND THE NUMBERS OFF.
I DO ENJOY A BREAK AND I KNOW SOMETIMES I KICK THE NUMBER UP AND I SAY THAT PRETTY CHEAP.
I THINK WE GAVE YOU 8 MILLION.
BUT REMIND US AGAIN WHAT BUY YOU GREENWAYS WAS AND WHY THE MONEY CAME FROM.
SO BIO GREENWAYS IS A 220 PLUS MILLION DOLLAR INVESTMENT TO CREATE CONTINUOUS LINEAR PARKS AND TRAILS ON NINE OF OUR MAJOR BAYOUS. THERE WAS A $100 MILLION BOND THAT WAS PASSED IN 2012 BY CITY OF HOUSTON VOTERS BY OVER 64% OF THE VOTE.
THAT WAS MATCHED BY OUR COMMITMENT TO PUT TOGETHER FUNDING.
WE HAD ORIGINALLY COMMITTED TO 120.
WE HAVE RAISED OVER 128, NEARLY 130.
AND THANKS TO THE SUPPORT OF HARRIS COUNTY, AS YOU SAID, NOT ONLY FOR PROVIDING THE LAND, WE ADDED OVER 800 ACRES TO THE SYSTEM AS WELL. PRECINCT ONE GAVE US A VERY GENEROUS GIFT OF $7 MILLION TO HELP US ON THREE OF THE DIFFERENT BIO PROJECTS.
WORKING IN CLOSE PARTNERSHIP WITH HARRISON.
BUT IT'S ONE OF THE BIGGEST SINGLE BIGGEST DOWN PAYMENT ON PARK EQUITY THROUGHOUT HOUSTON.
AND WE'D LOVE TO SEE THAT VISION CONTINUES THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE HARRIS COUNTY.
SO I'D LIKE TO RUN BACK THROUGH IT AGAIN.
NINE BY. ALL OF THEM RUN IN THE SAME DIRECTION.
THEY HIT TOWARDS THE GULF OF MEXICO.
THEY RUN THROUGH EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD, EVERY DEMOGRAPHIC YOU CAN THINK OF.
THE CITY PUT UP A BOND PACKAGE, THE $100 MILLION YOU ALL COMMIT TO COME UP WITH 120.
THE COUNTY DONATED THE LAND, WHICH WE DON'T USE.
I'M JUST SAYING I'M JUST POINTING IT OUT.
WHEN I SAW WHAT YOU PASSED OUT TO THE OFFICERS WHEN THIS CAME UP BEFORE, I JUST.
[02:20:05]
I GLANCED AT IT. I WAS ON A FLIGHT.IT LOOKED TO ME LIKE MOST OF THE PROJECTS WERE IN PRECINCTS THREE AND FOUR.
I WAS JUST LOOKING AT IT ON A FLIGHT, I MUST ADMIT.
BUT IS THAT FAIR COMMENT? MOST OF THE THE LACK OF CONNECTIVITY WOULD BE UNINCORPORATED OUTSIDE THE CITY, HOUSTON, SHALL I SAY.
WELL, MOST OF THEM ARE THREE AND FOUR.
WHAT WE LAID OUT IN TERMS OF WHAT WE THOUGHT WERE REALLY VIABLE OPTIONS.
THEY WERE BROKEN OUT BY PRECINCTS.
AND THERE ARE THERE IS MORE MILEAGE IN THREE AND FOUR THAN IN ONE AND TWO.
YOU'RE CORRECT. AND WHAT IS IT, RON? IS IT YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURSUE TO SEE WHAT WOULD BE PRIORITIES FOR EACH OF THE FOUR PRECINCTS? WE WANTED TO LAY OUT SOMETHING THAT SHOWED CONNECTIVITY TO KEEP BUILDING ON THE SYSTEM.
YEAH. AND WHAT IS IT? BECAUSE YOU ALL DO REAL TRAILS THAT WILL LAST AT LEAST FROM MY LIFETIME.
IS THAT A ROUGH FIGURE? IT IS. THAT IS A ROUGH ESTIMATE, WHICH INCLUDES ALSO NECESSARY LAND ACQUISITION.
BUT IT'S A TEN FOOT WIDE CONCRETE TRAIL.
WE FOUND THAT THAT IS THE THAT IS THE BEST WAY TO BUILD TRAILS, TO HOLD UP IN A FLOOD WAY.
BUT THAT IS OUR PREFERRED METHOD.
THEY WANT TO GO FROM BRES TO GREENS TO HALLS TO BUFFALO, TO SIMS TO TO MCGREGOR.
IS THAT CORRECT? WE DID OFFER UP, IN ADDITION TO AN EXPANDED BIO GREENWAYS FRAMEWORK, A SYSTEM WE LIKE TO CALL REGIONAL CONNECTORS.
SOME OF THOSE WOULD BE WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENT CORRIDORS.
WE TRY TO FIND PROTECTED CORRIDORS.
THAT'S OUR PREFERENCE. BUT WHEN WE NEED TO MAKE A CONNECTION ON THE STREETS, WE DO WORK HAND IN HAND WITH MUNICIPALITIES, SERVICES, MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS WHEN WE HAVE TO INCLUDE A PROTECTED BIKE LANE IN ORDER TO MAKE THE CONNECTION.
BUT YOU'RE RIGHT, AS FAR AS HOW YOU LOOK AT THE BIOS RUNNING LARGELY EAST AND WEST, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE SOME NORTH-SOUTH CONNECTIONS SO THAT PEOPLE CAN GO FROM BIO TO BIO.
YEAH, BUT WHAT IS WORTH IT? PRECINCT ONE. IN ADDITION TO THE 7 MILLION WE GAVE YOU, WE'VE ALREADY CONNECTED BRAYS AND BUFFALO ALONG AUSTIN STREET.
IF WE WORK IT OUT WITH THE CITY, WE'RE PUTTING UP THE FUNDING TO GO DOWN.
MARTIN LUTHER KING TO CONNECT BRAYS AND.
SAM'S AS ANOTHER ON THE WEST SIDE WHERE WE TRY TO CONNECT GRAY'S AND SAM'S.
BUT IT WOULD HELP IF WE DO THIS.
MY POINT IS, IT WOULD BE FUNDING TO CONNECT SOME OF THESE BAYOUS IN IN OUR LIFETIME.
I THINK THE POTENTIAL IS THERE.
CERTAINLY THE EXPERTISE IS THERE.
WE'VE CREATED A TYPOLOGY, IF YOU WILL, FOR BIO GREENWAYS.
AND WE THINK IT'S IT'S IT'S AN APPROACH THAT WORKS.
IT'S A MULTI-USE BENEFIT OF USING OUR BIO GREEN BAYOUS, WHICH OBVIOUSLY ARE NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND USED FOR FLOOD MITIGATION.
BUT WE THINK THE MORE THAT WE WORK IN THESE RIPARIAN CORRIDORS, THAT ALSO BECOMES A GREAT LAND CONSERVATION STRATEGY, WHICH HELPS WITH FLOOD MITIGATION AND OUR BEYOND THE BIOS PLAN.
WE ALSO POINT OUT FLOOD MITIGATION AS ONE OF THE KEY OPPORTUNITIES FOR FUTURE PARK CREATIONS, AND THE COUNTY HAS DONE REALLY AMAZING WORK IN THIS REGARD WITH OUR STORY PARK WITH KEITH.
KEITH WEISS PART OF THE WORK WE'RE DOING IN PARTNERSHIPS AT INWOOD WITH THE WORK GOING ON AT WILLOW WATERHOLE, THERE'S JUST SO MUCH OPPORTUNITY TO CREATE A SYSTEM THAT IS RESILIENT AND WILL MAKE HARRIS COUNTY STRONGER AND MORE RESILIENT.
[02:25:07]
WELL, BETH MCQUAID, I HOPE THAT YOUR YOUR BOARD AND YOUR MEMBERS, IF THIS GOES ON THE BALLOT, WILL HELP 64%.I REMEMBER GOING IN WITH SOME OF THE ADVOCATES TO MEET WITH MAYOR PARKER, AND THE CONCERN WAS TO BUY YOU GREENWAYS WOULD BE A DRAG ON THE BOND PACKAGE.
AND IF MY MEMORY SERVES ME CORRECT AT 64%, THIS ITEM PASSED BY A LARGER MARGIN THAN ANY OF THOSE ITEMS. AM I CORRECT? AM MY. NOTICE.
GO AHEAD. WELL, PARTICULARLY ALL OF THIS IS A DIVIDED VOTE.
I DON'T REMEMBER WHAT THE VOTE WAS AT CITY HALL.
WHEN MAYOR PARKER PUT IT ON THAT.
BUT IT WAS CERTAINLY VISIONARY ON HER PART.
TO TAKE THE CHANCE ON $100 MILLION.
MUCH AS I APPRECIATE THE COUNTY DONATING THE LAND, I WAS NOT WITH THE CITY OR THE COUNTY.
IT WAS LAND THAT THE COUNTY DOES NOT USE.
AND HEY, WHO MOWS THAT GRASS, BY THE WAY, AND KEEPS UP THOSE TRAILS? YOU ALL DO IT OR WE DO IT ON THAT COUNTY LAND AS THE AGREEMENT.
PART OF THE AGREEMENT THAT WE HAVE WITH THE CITY OF HOUSTON IS THAT WE ARE ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSERVATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE ENTIRE BIO GREENWAY SYSTEM. THAT WAS PART OF THE PROJECT MANAGER ROLE THAT WE NEGOTIATED WITH THE CITY.
SO DOES THAT MEAN THE CITY IS PAYING TO MAINTAIN THAT SOMEHOW THEY GET YOU THE MONEY ON COUNTY LAND? THEY MAINTAINING THE IT'S NOT US PAYING FOR IT.
I REMEMBER CALLING YOU ONE OUT, KEEGAN'S OR WHEREVER I WAS, AND THAT WAS A COUNTY BOARD.
AND YOU WENT OUT AND MOWED THAT GRASS.
ONCE I GOT ONCE I MOVED TO THE COUNTY.
YOU REMEMBER THAT I CALLED YOU.
IT'S PRETTY EMBARRASSING FOR YOU.
YEAH. AND COMMISSIONER GARCIA, THAT WAS AN EQUITY ISSUE.
SO YOU ALL CAME UP TO MONEY AND I THINK YOU OUT THAT MORNING.
I MAY HAVE CALLED YOU ON A FRIDAY AND THEY WALKED THAT MOWING ON SATURDAY.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
JUDGE, I JUST REMEMBERED SOMETHING.
YOU KNOW, WHEN I WAS ON COUNCIL, I HELPED TO BRING TO LIFE THE VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK THAT A GROUP OF HISPANIC VIETNAM WAR VETERANS HAD ADVOCATED FOR.
AND MY MY PREDECESSOR ON COUNCIL WAS ABLE TO GET THE LAND OVER OFF OF HARDY AND TIDWELL.
AND THEN I WORKED TO GET IT JUMPSTARTED.
AND I REMEMBER GOING TO BOB PERRY AND BOB PERRY GAVE ME WAS ABOUT 150,000 TO DO THE FIRST MURAL OR NOT MURAL, MOSAIC MURAL.
AND SO FAST FORWARD, I HAPPENED TO BE RIDING THROUGH IT AND THOUGHT I'D STOP BY AND NOT A WHOLE LOT HAD BEEN DONE TO THE PARK SINCE I LEFT COUNCIL.
YOU KNOW, THEY VETERANS ADVOCATED FOR THIS.
IT WASN'T LIKE WE SAID, HEY, LET'S TAKE OUR VETERANS AND HERE'S A PIECE OF LAND.
AND SO JUST IT JUST REMINDS ME THAT IN YOUR CONVERSATION WITH BETH THAT THERE'S A WHOLE LOT THAT THIS PARK CAN DO AND THE QUALITY OF LIFE THAT IT CAN BRING TO SO MANY PEOPLE WHO DESERVE THAT KIND OF MEMORIAL AND RESPECT.
YOU KNOW, DURING THIS PANDEMIC, THERE'S NOTHING ELSE TO DO.
SO I'VE EXPLORED A LOT OF TRAILS OUT OF MY PRECINCT, BY THE WAY.
NOT TELLING THEM WHO I WAS IN SOME NEIGHBORHOODS, BY THE WAY.
BUT IT'S INTERESTING WHEN YOU SEE PEOPLE ON THESE TRAILS WHO ARE NOT ON BIKES LIKE THE ONES WE ARE.
AND WHO DON'T HAVE A CAR WITH NO HELMET? YEAH, I MEAN, THEY GOT EMPTY BIKES, RIGHT? BUT IT REALLY IS EXCITING TO SEE ABOUT THAT.
YOUR NOSTRILS. THANK YOU, MS. WHITE. THANK YOU.
JUDGE. THE INTERPRETER IS HAVING SOME TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES.
SO WHILE WE WAIT TO GET HER BACK, WE'RE GOING TO TAKE THE SPEAKERS WHO DON'T NEED AN INTERPRETER.
[02:30:02]
SO NEXT IS NUMBER 25, IRMA PINEDA OF THE TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT, SPEAKING ON ITEM 140 UNDER COMMUNITY SERVICES.AND THIS ONE AS THE SPEAKERS COME UP.
AND LOOK, THE BUYOUTS ARE NECESSARY FOR A REGION THAT IS AS FLOOD VULNERABLE AS OURS IS.
AND THERE'S ALWAYS GOING TO BE CHALLENGES.
THIS ITEM, AS I UNDERSTAND IT, AND THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CC'D, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, IT'S AN ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION, SOMETHING LIKE A TYPO FOR SOMETHING THAT WAS ALREADY APPROVED.
SO IF WE VOTE NO ON THIS ITEM, IT ALREADY HAPPENED, WHATEVER IT IS.
AND SO FOR THAT REASON, I'M FINE LETTING IT MOVE FORWARD TODAY.
THAT SAID, I CANNOT CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THIS BUYOUT PROJECT UNLESS AND UNTIL I AND THIS IS FOR ME PERSONALLY, I SEE DRASTIC IMPROVEMENTS AND FUNDAMENTAL CHANGES IN THE WAY THIS PROGRAM IS BEING RUN AND IN THE WAY THESE CONSTITUENTS ARE BEING ENGAGED.
AND WHAT I HEAR NOW MANY MONTHS LATER IS THE EXACT PROBLEMS ARE THE SAME OR WORSE.
AND SO I WOULD LIKE FOR MR. BERRY, I THINK THIS IS SOMETHING YOU PERSONALLY NEED TO DIG INTO.
I THINK CLEARLY DIRECTOR HOLLOWAY IS NOT IS NOT ADDRESSING IT.
AND YOU NEED TO FIGURE OUT PERSONALLY WHAT IS GOING ON HERE.
AND, YOU KNOW, AT THE END, NOT EVERYONE'S GOING TO BE HAPPY.
BUT THERE ARE VERY CLEAR PROBLEMS GOING ON HERE AND THEY'VE BEEN GOING ON FOR TOO LONG.
SO I JUST WANT TO I JUST WANT TO SHARE THAT WITH YOU.
YES. AND THANK YOU, JUDGE, FOR THAT, BECAUSE I'VE BEEN HERE FOR ABOUT FOUR YEARS.
I'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THE BUYOUT PROGRAM.
FOCUSED ON WITH ALL THE ALL OF THE BOND MONEY THAT WE HAVE SPENT, HOW WE CAN CONTINUE TO HAVE AREAS THAT REQUIRE THE BUYOUT AND WHY THE COUNTY DID NOT THINK ABOUT ELEVATION MONEY.
I'VE BEEN DIGGING INTO THAT AND SPOKE TO DIRECTOR DR.
ALL THAT TO SAY IS THAT WE WE.
LIKE IF I'M NOT IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, I THINK I HEARD AT THE MEETING THAT I ATTENDED THAT MOST OF THE HOMES THAT FLOODED AND FLOODING IS FLOODING NO MATTER HOW LITTLE OR HOW MUCH.
BUT ON AVERAGE, THE HOMES ARE FLOODED.
FLOODED, I THINK LIKE AN AVERAGE OF INCHES TO MAYBE A FOOT.
NOBODY FLOODED OR THREE FEET OR FOUR FEET OR ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE.
I WAS TOLD BY THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT THAT ELLENDALE IS SEVEN FEET INTO THE FLOOD FLOODWAY.
AND SO SO THE FACT THAT WE COULD HAVE DONE SOME ELEVATION WAS A POTENTIAL IT'S NOT THE RECOMMENDED THING TO DO, BUT IT SURE IS BEING DONE IN MARLIN.
BUT THE LEADERSHIP AT THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ISN'T WHAT IT IS TODAY.
SO WE'RE TRYING TO THINK THROUGH HOW WE HOW WE RESOLVE THAT.
BUT BUT YOU'RE YOU'RE RIGHT, JUDGE THAT.
TO ME, SERVICES, I THINK COULD DO A BETTER JOB.
AND I THINK A LOT OF THOSE ISSUES, A LOT OF THOSE CLIENTS WERE WERE DEALT WITH AND RESOLVED.
[02:35:02]
THAT IS UNREASONABLE.AND FOR THE TYPE OF ISSUES THAT I HEARD AT THE MEETING, THAT'S THAT'S UNCALLED FOR.
AND SO I ABSOLUTELY THINK WE CAN DO BETTER.
I THINK CUSTOMER SERVICE IS SOMETHING THAT WE CAN BENEFIT FROM IN A LOT OF DEPARTMENTS AND PARTICULARLY COMMUNITY SERVICES, BUT. TRUE AND CONSISTENCY IS TANTAMOUNT TO CONFIDENCE ON THE COMMUNITY'S PART.
AND SO, SO, SO NUMBER ONE, I'M READY TO HEAR HEAR YOU AGAIN.
BUT JUST TO LET YOU KNOW THAT THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF WORK AND RESEARCH BEING DONE TO UNDERSTAND WHY THE MARLIN AREA GOT ELEVATION AND WE DIDN'T. AND THERE'S AN APPLICATION PROCESS THAT HAS TO GO THROUGH IT.
THERE'S AN INVESTMENT THAT THE COUNTY COULD HAVE MADE BUT DIDN'T.
SO SO I REGRET THAT YOU GUYS ARE HERE, BUT ALSO TO THIS TO THIS BOND ELECTION, THE INVESTMENT THAT THE HOLDING AREA COULD HAVE GOTTEN FOR DECADES BEFORE ANY ANY OF US GOT HERE JUST DIDN'T HAPPEN, PRIMARILY BECAUSE YOUR HOMES AREN'T AS VALUABLE AS THEY ARE IN OTHER PARTS OF THE COUNTY.
THAT'S UNFORTUNATE THAT IT'S THAT THAT'S THE PRINCIPAL WAY THAT PROJECTS WERE DECIDED.
AND AS A RESULT, YOU KEPT BEING PUT IN HARM'S WAY WHEN MORE STORMS CAME.
AND SO AS WE AS YOU HEAR US TALK ABOUT EQUITY, THIS IS WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO STRIVE FOR, THAT YOUR COMMUNITY SHOULD GET THE SAME TYPE OF INVESTMENT AND CONSIDERATION AND PRIORITY THAT OTHER PARTS OF THE COUNTY GET.
BECAUSE YOUR HOME IS YOUR HOME, IT'S YOUR CASTLE.
I'M NOT GOING TO JUDGE WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE.
IT'S YOUR HOME. IT'S WHAT YOU CALL HOMES WHERE YOU RAISE YOUR FAMILIES.
I APPRECIATE YOUR YOUR YOUR SUPPORT.
COMMISSIONER ELLIS, COMMISSIONER GARCIA, I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP.
AND I'M WELL AWARE THAT YOU REPRESENT THIS AREA.
AND AS YOU KNOW, I REPRESENTED IT SHORTLY BEFORE YOU DID.
I THOUGHT I STILL REPRESENTED YOUR STAFF AND JUDGE, THANK YOU FOR BRINGING IT.
IN PART, THE CITY IS WILLING TO PAY FOR IT.
YOU HAVE MORE PEOPLE IN UNINCORPORATED HARRIS COUNTY THAN YOU HAVE IN THE CITY OF HOUSTON.
GET THAT BUDGET. BUT IT WAS BIGGER THAN I WAS.
I WAS TALKING TO A COMMISSIONER FROM MIAMI-DADE THIS MORNING.
I KNOW THE FIGURE MUST BE WRONG.
MR. RAMOS, I HOPE YOU WOULD CHECK WITH A COMMISSIONER OVER THERE.
WE WILL LISTEN IN DENVER TOBIN TO THE MWB ISSUE.
I SAID, ARE YOU JOKING? YOU MUST THINK YOU'RE IN LA COUNTY.
YOU KNOW, YOU HAD MIAMI-DADE, 3 MILLION PEOPLE, I THINK, IN THAT COUNTY.
BUT, YOU KNOW, THERE WERE NO EQUITY GUIDELINES IN THE PAST IN ANY OF THESE BOND ISSUES.
AND EVEN WITH THE LANGUAGE I PUT THERE, IT WAS JUST A BROAD TERM, NOT DEFINED.
THAT MEANT PEOPLE ALREADY HAD A 50 YARD ADVANTAGE, ONE TO GO DIVIDED EQUALLY SO THEY COULD KEEP IT.
I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT I LAY THAT OUT LEAVING THIS DISCUSSION JUST COMING UP LATER.
I DO FOLLOW THEM BECAUSE YOU GOT OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS, BY THE WAY, YOU KNOW, WHEN DECISION WAS MADE, WHO WERE BOUGHT OUT, AND WE GOT TO BUT NOW THAT WE HAVE THE FLOODING MONEY, THAT WILL BE OTHER BUYOUTS THAT WE HAVE TO DO.
AND WE WANT TO CHANGE THE RULES.
I'M FOR IT. BUT I'M ONE WHO BELIEVES EQUITY IS MORE JUST A SIX LETTER WORD.
YOU GOT ME, AND I'LL CERTAINLY DO THAT.
THANK YOU. WHEN I TIP OUT, I'M NOT BEING RUDE.
I NEED TO DO AN INTERVIEW, BUT I'LL COME RIGHT BACK.
IT'S GOOD TO SAY YOUR NAME AND AFFILIATION FOR THE RECORD.
YES, THANK YOU. HI, THIS IS I AM RAPPING AND I AM COMING IN BEHALF OF THE HARRIS BUYOUT PROGRAM.
AND BASICALLY, YOU YOU SAID EVERYTHING I WAS COMING IN TO SAY.
I MEAN, IT'S BEEN MISHANDLED VERY BADLY.
AND I ALSO. YOU SAID THE CUSTOMER SERVICE.
AND THEY'RE ACTING AS IF WE ARE ASKING THEM FOR A FAVOR.
[02:40:01]
I DON'T FEEL LIKE THEY ARE TAKING US SERIOUSLY.THEY HAVE LIKE ZERO EMPATHY SHOW NO COMPASSION TOWARDS PEOPLE.
THEY DON'T EVEN TAKE THE MINUTE TO LISTEN TO US OR OUR NEEDS.
SOME OF US HAVE JUST GONE OUR WAY, TRY TO GET RID OF IT BECAUSE IT WAS CAUSING TOO MUCH STRESS.
BECAUSE THAT'S. THEY'RE HOME, THEY'RE GETTING RID OF EVERYTHING THAT IT'S THEIRS AND THE WORST.
IT'S IT'S THE WAY THEY THEY COME ABOUT THE SITUATION.
AND I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW IF SOMEBODY IS ALLOWING THIS TYPE OF BEHAVIOR, BECAUSE I KNOW THAT SOMETIMES IN ORDER FOR THE PEOPLE AT THE BOTTOM HAVE THIS RUDE BEHAVIOR IS BECAUSE SOMEBODY ABOVE THEM IS ALLOWING IT.
THAT'S WHY WE ARE SEEKING OTHERS TO HELP US AND FIND OUT WHAT'S THE ISSUE.
THANK YOU. THAT'S THE ONLY REASON WE KEEP COMING.
WE JUST WANT SOMEBODY ELSE TO TAKE A LITTLE STEP IN, YOU KNOW? OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. LISTENING.
INTERPRETER. CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES, I CAN HEAR YOU.
THIS IS STEPHANIE. I'M INTERPRETING.
THANK YOU. MINUTES, DNA, THOSE MINUTOS, POR FAVOR, AS I WOULD SAY, THE SPANISH INTERPRETER IS.
WHEN I STARTED THIS COMMISSION AND THE OTHER WOMEN WERE PART OF OUR MASS IN PROGRAM ABOUT THE STUDIES THAT ROLANDO SAID.
AND GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS.
I'D LIKE TO MAKE A REQUEST BECAUSE OF THE BECAUSE OF PEOPLE BEING EVICTED.
THERE'S A LOT OF INSECURITY IN THE HOUSING AND OUR HOUSING.
IT STUDIES ON THE PROCESS OF MENTAL STRESS.
I ASK ALESSANDRA WHY IT IS DONE IN LONDON IS THE LAST PERSON.
PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ROBBED OF EVERYTHING.
EVEN THE FEW PEOPLE THAT ARE STILL HERE.
REMAINING. WHEN I SEE THE GAME, I KNOW EVERYONE'S TRYING TO PAY ME.
YOU KNOW YOU'RE GOING IN THIS MARKET.
I KNOW AMERICANS TRYING TO PAY ME YELLOW SPAM AND ME THAT.
NO POLICE OFFICERS CAME WHEN I CALLED THE NON-EMERGENCY LINE AT 9 P.M..
THEY DIDN'T COME UNTIL MIDNIGHT.
CAT A.K.A. TANTO TEMPO PARA RESOLVER LOS CASOS DE ESTA SOLO.
THE AREA IS BY ITSELF AND WE DON'T WANT THEM TO TAKE AS LONG TO RESPOND.
I ALSO WANT TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND FOR YOUR COMMUNICATION.
GREG CHRISTY, SUZANNE CAVAZOS, NAOMI JOY MARTINEZ, YOUR REPRESENTANTES FOR YOUR ECONOMIC VECINOS.
NECESITAMOS TODOS LOS CASOS BETTER TRAVEL, BUT A LA CASA POR LA. WE NEED WE NEED SUPPORT.
AND WITHOUT THESE CASES TO BE WAITING FOR HOUSING BECAUSE I HAD TO RESUBMIT PAPERWORK.
YEAH. WHAT I SAW IN COURT IS THE PROCESS, AND I'M WAITING IN THE COURT TO PROCESS MORE PAPERWORK.
[02:45:01]
AND SO, YES, THANK THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE.IN MOTION TRATADOS DE LA SALLE PIRATES.
TOO MUCH ATTENTION AS TO SECTOR, BUT IT'S DONE WHEN YOU ARE NOT IN THE SAME THEATERS.
AND I'M GOING TO SPEAK TO OFFICIALS HERE SO WE PAY MORE ATTENTION TO YOUR SECTOR.
DEBI MAZAR DISCUSSING THIS IDEA THAT PROBLEMS CANNOT BE DONE FOR OTRAS PERSONAS IS SUFFICIENT ATTENTION, AND THAT'S A PROBLEM FOR THE REST OF THAT CON GRAVEST CONSEQUENCES.
AND I THINK NOT PAYING ATTENTION TO IT CAN CAUSE GRAVE, GRAVE CONSEQUENCES.
YOU HAVE 2 MINUTES, BUT THOSE MINUTES BY NECESSITY.
WHEN I STARTED THIS UNIVERSITY, THEY SAW POLIO POUR OBTENIR OUT OF THIN AIR.
IT'LL TAKE SENOR SERGIO BARRIGA.
I NEED SUPPORT TO GET THE CHECK THAT THEY GAVE TO SIT HERE.
THE NUMBERS. THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING FOR MY LAND BECAUSE IT WAS JUST A LOAN.
BUT THEY DON'T. THEY DIDN'T BELIEVE ME WHEN THEY SAID IT WAS MY LAND.
A DURING THE INTERVIEW CONTACT ABOGADOS DE LA LISTA RECURSOS DISPONIBLES.
PER THE LAWYERS ON THE LIST OF RESOURCES THAT YOU ALL GAVE ME SAID THEY COULDN'T HELP ME.
I MEAN, THIS IS WAY YOU SAY IT, BUT CAN YOU GIVE ME YOUR LOS POWERS? AND YOU KNOW.
IT'S I NEED TO GET THAT CHECKED BECAUSE IT'S NOT FAIR THAT AS I WAS PAYING FOR MY LAND.
IN SENORA OF THE WAS BENEFICIOS OR KIKYO IN THE COURT COULD BE MORE OR LESS THE LAS PERSONAS ATTENTION. THE MAN HAS RECEIVED THE BENEFITS.
I TOLD THE COURT THAT IT WAS MY LAND AND THE PEOPLE LEFT AND I HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANYTHING.
NONETHELESS, MANY HERE ARE YOUNG PEOPLE FROM KENYA, BUT THEY DON'T KNOW. I THEY ASKED ME IF I HAD LEGAL PAPERS SAYING THAT I WAS THE OWNER.
I TOLD THEM I HAD A LOT OF PAPERS AND EVEN THEN THEY DIDN'T PAY ANY ATTENTION TO ME.
BE DOING THE ECONOMY, GOING THROUGH THE APPRENTICE PEOPLE.
THEY MUST MEET THE CONTESTANT THAT.
I'VE ATTEMPTED TO COMMUNICATE WITH OTHER LAWYERS.
UNFORTUNATELY, THEY CAN'T HELP ME OR THEY DON'T RESPOND.
YES. PLEASE SEE MY CORDOVA AND BURKE COMMENTS.
THINK IN NOVEMBER THEY'LL KNOW BETTER.
IS THAT NORMALLY THE WINDOW BELOW? YOU KNOW, HE HAS A CAR FOR REQUISITOS.
JOEL, AS YOUR SPOUSE STARTS TODO CUANDO SAVE ME ANY PROGRAM BECAUSE YOU OWN YOUR OWN DOCUMENT.
YOU KNOW WHAT? I KNOW? HE LET ME GO AHEAD.
INTERPRETER IF YOU COULD PLEASE TRANSLATE WHAT'S BEEN SAID.
WELL, WE HAD A MEETING ABOUT THIS, AND YOU SAID IT WAS YOU.
[02:50:01]
IT WAS UNDER YOUR NAME.THE LAND IS NOT UNDER YOUR NAME.
BECAUSE AT THE TIME, I COULDN'T HAVE IT UNDER MY NAME BECAUSE IT WAS TOO MUCH PAPERWORK.
THEY WERE ASKING FOR TOO MANY PREREQUISITES.
AND BUT I HAVE ALL OF THE DOCUMENTS SHOWING THAT I PAID THE BILLS, THAT I PAID THE TAXES.
SEE, THIS IS THE CONTENT OF WHERE I GO.
WHAT IS APPROPRIATE? I DON'T THINK THAT YOU MEAN THOSE.
YOU START TO THINK, WELL, MAYBE I DON'T.
I MEAN, THEY ARE THE SAME THING.
TEXAS IS NOT GOING TO LET TEXAS GET DUMPED ON ME, BUT I CAN'T BE IN DENIAL.
GO AHEAD, INTERPRETER. THEY TOLD ME THAT.
WHO PAID FOR THE PROPERTY? I OWE THREE $31,250.
THAT'S HOW MUCH I PAID FOR THE PROPERTY.
AND THEY TOLD ME THAT THEY WERE GOING TO PAY TEXAS STUFF.
NOW TEXAS STUFF IS REACHING OUT TO ME AND ASKING ME TO PAY THE BILLS, TO PAY THE 8800 $950.
AND I DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO PAY THAT THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO ALREADY BE PAID.
THANK YOU. HAS THE MONEY GOT YOU.
AND MR. COUNTY ATTORNEY, I KNOW THAT AT THE LAST MEETING WHEN THESE FOLKS SPOKE LIVE, COMMISSIONER CAGLE ASKED YOUR OFFICE TO VISIT WITH THEM. BUT YOU'RE NOT.
ALLOWED TO REPRESENT HER CASE, RIGHT? I GUESS. I GUESS YOUR OFFICE WAS THE ONE THAT MADE THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE OF THE MAYBE THE LEGAL FOUNDATION OR THE RECOMMENDATION FOR THOSE ATTORNEY, THOSE LEGAL SERVICES.
IS THAT IS THAT ABOUT AS FAR AS YOU CAN GO WITH THIS? AND OUR GALLO DEL CONDADO WINE CELLAR WILL SELL YOUR BODY A VISITOR LOVE INCINERATORS CANNOT ST AND THEN THE ANC CANNOT REPRESENT THAT.
WHAT I SAID IS I SAID AND WON'T VIDEO LEGAL OR.
IS THE COUNTY ATTORNEY ON THE LINE.
OKAY. BUT ONCE I GOT OUT OF THE STORE, HE SAID I WAS IN COMMUNICATION.
OKAY. OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO GET A RESPONSE ABOUT THIS AND WE'LL BE IN TOUCH.
NEXT IS SPEAKER NUMBER 26, MAXIMO DIAZ OF TOP SPEAKING ON ITEM 140.
ALSO USING AN INTERPRETER, YOU HAVE 2 MINUTES BEST THAT ORLANDO MAXIMO IS IN QUARANTINE AND THEN NECESSARY TO INTERPRET THE MINUTES.
YOU KNOW, THIS IS THE PART OF THE PROGRAM THE.
I'M PART OF THE THE GROUP OF PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN IN THE PROGRAM FOR RELOCATION.
THERE'S GREAT LESSONS FOR POLIO, BUT PERSEVERANCE.
AND THEY LOVE THE BALLAD DE LA LA COUPE DE LA LA PROPIEDAD.
AND I'M ASKING FOR SUPPORT TO BE ABLE TO RECEIVE DIGNIFIED TREATMENT FOR THEM TO GIVE US A PRICE OF THE PROPERTY OF WHAT IT'S WORTH AND NOT AND NOT WHAT THEY WANT. NOT PREMATURE ON THE NOSE WHEN THE MATERIAL DANCES.
[02:55:01]
THE PLAZA FOR CASA YORTA YORTA MOTION.MY. WE WERE PROMISED HOUSE FOR HOUSE.
AND NOW THAT WE'RE IN THE PROCESS, THEY'RE TELLING US THEY WANT ME TO MOVE MY TRAILER.
AND THEY'RE OFFERING US A LOT.
I MEAN. NO, NO, THAT'S CRIMINAL.
PARASTATALS LIKE THE THE NOT NEVER COMATOSE BENEFICIARIES MUST PROVIDE THEIR.
IT WAS MUTUAL, BUT I HAD NO IDEA.
THANK YOU FOR ASKING. YES, YES.
I COULD I COULDN'T HEAR THAT QUESTION FROM COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT IF YOU WANT TO.
IF HE WANTS TO ASK ME THAT, I'M HAPPY TO.
AT THE LAST MEETING, I APOLOGIZE.
THE LADY THAT SPOKE JUST RIGHT BEFORE THIS GENTLEMAN AT THE LAST COMMISSIONERS COURT MEETING.
SHE MADE HER CONCERN ABOUT NOT BEING PAID FOR HER PROPERTY, THAT THE CHECK WENT TO SOMEONE ELSE.
THAT'S THE ONLY AUTHORITY THAT THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE HAS.
YOU CAN'T REPRESENT HER, CAN REPRESENT HER CLAIM YOU MADE.
Y'ALL GAVE. I'M ASSUMING SOMEONE IN YOUR OFFICE GAVE HER THE LIST OF.
YES. RESOURCES TO BE ABLE TO CALL THAT.
THAT WAS MY THAT WAS MY QUESTION.
YEAH, THAT'S CORRECT, COMMISSIONER.
GENERALLY, WE HAVE A SORT OF, GENERALLY SPEAKING, AN OMBUDSMAN ACTIVITY THAT WE DO FOR RESIDENTS AND FOLKS WHO HAVE ISSUES AND QUESTIONS, BUT WE CAN'T REPRESENT THEM IN ANY OFFICIAL CAPACITY.
BUT WE'RE HAPPY TO PROVIDE INFORMATION AND OBVIOUSLY WE'LL WORK WITH WITH CC'D ON ON ANY ANY WAYS TO TRY TO HELP RESOLVE SITUATIONS LIKE THAT.
SURE. AND NOW ULTIMATE PERSONAL CARE LAW IN ITS CAPITAL.
COMMISSIONER, HE IS SO SORRY I CANNOT RECEIVE YOU THE SUPER ELIGIBLE PERSON AS MOST PREGNANT.
SO THERE IS A REQUIREMENT IS THAT THERE IS NO PLAN C, IS THAT NO MORE REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY.
BUT THE ALSO SEE THAT YOU ARE BELOW THEM OR REPRESENT THEM ALSO, NOT LEAST THAT THE RECURSOS CUANDO CUANDO SE CONTACTO.
THANK YOU. NEXT IS SPEAKER NUMBER 27 ZOILA MORALES SPEAKING ON ITEM 140 VIRTUALLY.
YOU HAVE 2 MINUTES. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
AND MY JOB IS TO INTERPRET THOSE PHOTOS.
SEE, WHEN I STARTED NOTICING THE MORALITY COMING IN AT PROYECTO, THEY'RE REALLY PURSUING A OUT TO ASSIST RECIPE ON CADA THE KIDS ARE ENTERING TO PERSONALIZE YOUR ALCOHOL.
SENORA DONA LEMON POR CORREO ELECTRONICO TRATANDO THEY ARE PUTTING SOME OF THEIR MEAL IN LIMA.
ANY KIND OF WAY OF MAKING IT, WE INTERPRET IT WELL.
I MEAN, ZOILA MORALES I'M ALSO PART OF THE RELOCATION PROGRAM.
I RECEIVED A LETTER SAYING THAT I HAD 90 DAYS TO LEAVE THE PROPERTY.
I SPOKE TO DONALD AND SENT HIM A LETTER THROUGH EMAIL TRYING TO NEGOTIATE.
THEY'RE OFFERING ME ONLY $20,000 FOR MY PROPERTY.
[03:00:02]
CONTINUED TO SEE ALL THE ECONOMIC REASONS BUT I ME PERSONALLY AND IT TOOK ME, I, YOU KNOW, I, I BEGAN TO WORK BUT A TRAILER FOR YOUR VISIT BECAUSE I'M PERSONALLY HIT WITH NO DIFFICULT BUT THE THE MANTRA THAT THE RESPUESTA E TAMPOCO IS OF ANOTHER MONETARY AND YOU KNOW I TRIED TO I'VE TRIED REACHING OUT TO NEGOTIATE THEY HAVEN'T RESPONDED.I RECEIVED A 90 DAY EVICTION NOTICE AND I CAN'T FIND ANYTHING WITH THAT AMOUNT.
I NEED HELP TO MOVE MY TRAILER.
I DON'T QUALIFY FOR A HOUSE AND I HAVEN'T GOTTEN A RESPONSE.
AND IN 90 DAYS, THAT'S THAT'S NOT ENOUGH TIME.
I HAVEN'T SIGNED ANYTHING TO NEGOTIATE WITH THEM.
TO SEE AND TO SEE THE SOLUTION.
BUT IT ALSO GOES TO THOSE POOR GENERALS WHO DON'T KNOW WHEN THEIR PARENTS ARE GOING TO BE AMBUSHED BY AL PROYECTO.
I NEED A SOLUTION TO CONTINUE NEGOTIATING BECAUSE IT'S NOT FAIR.
THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY FOR NOW.
THANK YOU. NEXT IS SPEAKER NUMBER 28, NORMA ESCALANTE SPEAKING IN PERSON ON THE SAME ITEM.
SHE'LL BE USING THE INTERPRETER AS WELL.
AND THAT'S, AGAIN, THE PERSONA THAT IS NORMAL, SCANDALOUS.
YOU KNOW, THOSE PHOTOS CAN BE BANNED OUTSIDE THEN.
BUT THEN WHEN I STARTED THIS ME NOBODY NORMAL IT'S TURKEY SO NOBODY LESS FOR OUR SOFTWARE FOR THIS THE MARZO TO ELLA COURT IT'S TO THE AGUADO AND BENJAMIN THAT WE FILM DOCUMENTOS GET THE FILM.
DO YOU SEE MY BEING IN POWER FOR ME? POR LA CASA. WHEN? HI. MY NAME IS NORMA ESCAMILLA.
AND UP UNTIL THIS POINT, I HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANY PAYMENT FOR MY HOME.
I READ THAT NOSOTROS PERSONNEL YOUR MI FAMILIA, YOUR MOST APPROPRIATE PARA SOMOS MM THE LAMENT.
DID YOU NOTICE THE CONSTANT CONTROL OF GASTOS EVEN WHEN THOSE WHO STILL ACCESS THE REST OF THE PROGRAM.
MY FAMILY AND I PERSONALLY, WE FOUND A NEW PROPERTY, BUT IT'S RIGHT AT OUR LIMIT FINANCIALLY AND IT'S TAKING A LOT FOR US TO TRY TO GET AHEAD WITH ALL THESE EXPENSES. AND IT'S NOT FAIR FOR FOR US TO HAVE TO GO THROUGH THIS BECAUSE OF THE PROGRAM.
THEN YOU ARE IN FOR JUST ME SO MUCH AS WELL.
JUST CANCEL YOUR COURT BILL OR THROW IN THE AND SEE WHICH ONE TO RETURN.
[03:05:06]
AND UP UNTIL NOW, NOTHING.AT LEAST I CAN CHECK IN SACRAMENTO.
SO THE PROBLEM FOR YOU IS NOT THE AMOUNT, IT'S THAT YOU HAVEN'T RECEIVED THE CHECK, CORRECT? I HAVEN'T RECEIVED THE CHECK.
AND WE'RE AT OUR LIMITS, YOU KNOW, OF TRYING TO FIND HOUSING AND OF COVERING THESE EXPENSES.
NEXT IS SPEAKER 29 SYLVIA OLIVER SPEAKING ON THE SAME ITEM, VIRTUALLY USING THE INTERPRETER.
YOU HAVE 2 MINUTES. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
THE QUESTION IS TO THE END, OKAY, FOR YOU THEN FOR HIM AND YOUR PERSONAL TENGO MACHADO SUPPORTERS.
I JUST HACIENDO AND JOAN MIRO TO COME IN A MORE RAPIDO ME EASY ON THAT BECAUSE THEY ALL CAME OVER SOME PERSONAL HE SAID THOUGH I DO NOT PARROT HE LOOK YOU'RE UNDER NO NOISE LOOK YOU TANGO LOOK AT YOUR THINGS LOOK SEE LOOK NO TENEMOS BECAUSE INNOCENT ANIMALS.
AND MY NAME IS SYLVIA LIVES AND I'M ALSO PART OF THE RELOCATION PROGRAM.
AND WHAT I HAVE TO PAY IS, IS NOT WHAT I'M GOING TO BE RECEIVING.
INSTEAD OF FAMILIES, IT STANDS FOR FREE AND REPENTANT MACHISMO.
SO HE HAS A EUROPE FOR THE RAINBOW, AND HE CAN UNDERSTAND THAT NOT ONLY OUR FAMILY IS SUFFERING BECAUSE OF A SUDDEN RELOCATION, THE CHANGE IN SCHOOL, THE LAND WE NEED, THE SPACE AND IT'S NOT HAPPENING AS QUICKLY AS WE NEED IT TO.
RESPUESTA DEL TERRENO DE LA GRANDE CINEMAS, THOUGH WE NEED A RESPONSE.
WE WANT THE SAME SIZE FOR WHAT WE'RE SELLING, AND THAT'S NOT WHAT THEY'RE DOING.
THEY'RE NOT OFFERING US THE SAME OF WHAT WE HAVE BEEN OFFERED.
AND LOOK AT NOSOTROS TENEMOS MERCADO DIFERENTE DE LA STAMPA DANDO COMO AS TEMPORADA COMO EL MERCADO. WHEN THE REPETITIVE SUPPORT, FOR INSTANCE, BEGAN OR LOST LOST AN INVALUABLE IN EL MERCADO PESO AS THE MARCELLO ALTO THEY WERE PAYING BASED ON THEIR VALUATION, NOT ON THE MARKET RATE.
SO IT'S NOT IT'S NOT WORKING BECAUSE THE MARKET PRICES RIGHT NOW ARE TOO HIGH.
THEY'RE NOT AS POOR AS SAN ANTONIO YO LA TENGO AND 70/% I THINK ALMOST ANDANDO IS FOLLOWING CONTRA ON THE MAINLAND IS IS PRICE ABOUT 300,000 AND I'M GETTING 65,000.
IF YOU WANT TO LOOK AT TANGO IN A SCHEME SIMILAR TO WHAT I HAVE
[03:10:02]
AND IN THE CORNER LIKE THAT.THANK YOU, MA'AM. YOUR TIME IS UP, SENATOR.
OKAY. THAT WAS THE LAST SPEAKER REQUESTING AN INTERPRETER.
SO AN INTERPRETER. I WILL MUTE YOUR LINE NOW.
NEXT IS SPEAKER NUMBER 30 DAY.
MS.. GONZALES OF TOP SPEAKING ON ITEM 140.
THANK YOU. I'M HERE TODAY TO ASK YOU TO PLEASE.
I KNOW THAT YOU MENTIONED ABOUT THE PROJECT.
YOU MENTIONED ALL THE THINGS THAT ARE EXACTLY RIGHT.
WHAT I'VE SEEN IN THE PAST THREE MONTHS THAT I'VE BEEN ORGANIZING IN THIS COMMUNITY, IT'S THE LACK OF COMMUNICATION, A LOT OF CONFUSION BECAUSE A LOT OF STAFF HAVE LEFT THE PROJECT AND COMES NEW CASEWORKERS THAT ARE GIVING PEOPLE THE WRONG INFORMATION.
THOSE PROMISES ARE NOT COMING THROUGH.
THEY'RE NOT ONLY LEAVING VALUE BEHIND, BUT THEY'RE LIVING A WHOLE ENTIRE LIFE.
AND. NEXT, THE SPEAKER 31 JAMAL KEN WASHINGTON SPEAKING ON ITEM 161 UNDER GRANT.
SO YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONERS, AS CAN WASHINGTON FROM WATERS THERE ALONG WEST LAKE HOUSTON.
I'VE BEEN ABLE TO SPEAK PREVIOUSLY.
FORGIVE ME. I'M OFF OF THE COMMISSIONERS COURT IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY.
I WANT TO SPEAK ABOUT THE MONEY.
I BELIEVE THE MONEY IS ROUGHLY $800,000 THAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR TO BE APPROVED BY THE COMMISSIONERS.
MY CONCERN COMES IN IS THAT THERE'S ALREADY BEEN MONEY THAT IS POSSIBLY COULD BE USED FROM THE PURCHASE OF LAND FROM UNREALIZED ON THAT 90 ACRE TRACT LAND I'VE SPOKEN ABOUT BEFORE TO THE HARRIS COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, WHICH THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION WAS AT OUT AND SPOKE TO BEFORE ABOUT.
SO MY CONCERN IS THAT WHAT'S HAPPENED WITH THE MONEY PREVIOUSLY THAT THEY RECEIVED? IS THERE ANY OVERSIGHT AND IS THERE AN AUDIT NEEDED TO TRY TO FIGURE OUT EXACTLY WHERE THOSE MONIES ARE BEING SPENT AND HOW THEY'RE BEING SPENT IN THE COUNTY THAT'S ALREADY BEEN ALLOCATED? BUT CAN YOU CONTINUE YOUR REMARKS? YES, SIR. SO, YOU KNOW, I SPOKE WITH SOME OF OTHER RESIDENTS OUT IN THE COMMUNITY WHO WE'VE CONTINUED TO WATCH HOW THESE HARVEY FUNDS ARE BEING SPENT, HOW THEY'RE BEEN ALLOCATED AND BROKEN DOWN BETWEEN DIFFERENT PROJECTS.
AND CONSIDERING THAT THEY ARE ALSO BEING USED IN REGARDS TO DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS LIKE THE LAKE VIEW AT LAKE HOUSTON PROJECT, WHEN IT MAKES SENSE TO SELL THAT PROPERTY THAT UNWISELY IS NOT MADE JUST ONE, NOT TWO, NOT THREE, BUT FOUR OFFERS.
AND I THINK BETWEEN 8 TO 12 MILLION, DON'T QUOTE ME ON THAT.
SO WE'RE SEEING A WATCH THIS AND I JUST THINK THAT POSSIBLY AT THIS TIME THAT SHOULDN'T BE APPROVED WHILE WE CONTINUE TO RESEARCH AND LOOK AT HOW PREVIOUS MONIES HAS BEEN ALLOCATED. THANK YOU, KAREN.
HAS THE OUTREACH BEEN FROM COMMUNITY SERVICES ON THE PROJECTS YOU'RE REFERRING TO? I HAVE NOT HEARD BACK FROM THEM.
I KNOW THAT THE RESIDENTS, I'VE SPOKEN TO THEM AS THEY CONTINUE TO EMAIL AND TEXT ME, THEY CONTINUE TO REACH OUT TO THEM TO KEEP AN UPDATE ON WHAT'S GOING ON AND WHAT'S GOING ON. WHAT FUNDS? I'VE NOT HEARD BACK FROM THEM.
I KNOW THAT THERE'S A COUPLE OTHER RESIDENTS WHO CAME UP WITH ME TODAY THAT ARE TRYING TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSIONERS, AND THEY'RE ALSO REACHING OUT NOT ONLY TO HOUSE AUTHORITY, BUT THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, SIR.
HOLLOWAY. I WAS WONDERING IF I CAN MAKE SOME REMARKS.
THANK YOU. I'LL JUST START WITH THE BUYOUT PROGRAM.
AND FIRST, I WANT TO JUST ACKNOWLEDGE HOW CHALLENGING THIS PROGRAM IS, NOT ONLY FROM AN ADMINISTRATION PERSPECTIVE, BUT FROM A PARTICIPANT'S PERSPECTIVE AND UNDERSTANDING THAT WHAT WE ARE ASKING RESIDENTS TO DO IS A HARD, HARD REALITY FOR THEM TO BASICALLY MOVE FROM SOMETHING THAT'S BEEN COMFORTABLE TO
[03:15:04]
THEM FOR YEARS TO A PLACE THAT WILL BE NEW TO THEM IN SO MANY DIFFERENT RESPECTS.AND THAT REQUIRES THE BUILDING OF NEW RELATIONSHIPS AND SOCIAL NETWORKS AND CONTACTS.
AND WE'RE LOOKING AT THIS FROM THAT LENS AS WELL.
BUT THERE ISN'T A ROAD MAP OR PRECEDENTS FOR THIS.
WE'RE ACTUALLY TWO PROGRAMS ARE OPERATING BUYOUT IN THIS FASHION IN THE COUNTRY AT THIS TIME.
SO WE WE ARE DEVELOPING THIS PROGRAM AS NEW NEW BOOK, NEW TO THIS PROCESS.
BUT THERE IS SOME IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE'VE MADE WHEN I CAME IN, AND THAT WAS MAKING SURE THAT WE WERE TRYING TO GET THE WORD OUT IN MANY, MANY DIFFERENT WAYS AND IN IN AN ACCESSIBLE FASHION AS WELL.
SO DOCUMENTS THAT ARE PRODUCED OR PRODUCED BOTH IN ENGLISH AND SPANISH, WE DEVELOPED AN ADVISORY BOARD OF WHICH MEMBERS THAT SPOKE ON COURT ARE ACTUALLY PART OF THAT. AND THE INTEREST THERE WAS TO GET FIRSTHAND WHAT PEOPLE WERE HEARING FROM THEIR TRUSTED NEIGHBORS TO ENSURE THAT WE WERE INCORPORATING THAT, INCORPORATING THAT INTO OUR OUTREACH.
SO WE CANVASED THE NEIGHBORHOODS.
WE WE'VE ACTUALLY THIS YEAR ALONE FOR SIX MONTHS, WE DID 15 DIFFERENT OUTREACH CAMPAIGNS, BOTH CANVASING NEWSLETTERS, IN-PERSON EVENTS SIMILAR TO THE ONE THAT COMMISSIONER GARCIA HAD SPOKEN ABOUT IN HARVEY AT HARDY STREET PARTY CENTER, WHERE WE'RE BRINGING RESIDENTS INTO THE SAME SPACE AS ELIGIBILITY SPECIALIST AND BULLY CASE, MANAGING THEIR EFFORTS.
THAT CAUSES LESS INCONVENIENCE FOR THEM.
BUT IT IS A TOUGH PROGRAM AND IT'S VERY MUCH INDIVIDUALIZED.
AND THIS PROGRAM IN AND OF ITSELF BRINGS IN DIFFERENT REGULATIONS THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO BE CONSIDERATE OF IN OUR OTHER PROGRAMS, LARGELY URA AND THE BUYOUT PIECES.
IT'S COMPLEX AND WHAT I WOULD SHARE IS NOT EVERYONE'S SITUATION IS THE SAME AND OFTENTIMES WHAT ONE PERSON MAY RECEIVE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM ANOTHER. IT COULD BE THE AMOUNT THAT'S OFFERED FOR THEIR HOME, BUT THEIR RELOCATION IS DESIGNED TO GET THEM INTO A COMPARABLE HOME SO THEIR APPRAISED VALUE FOR THEIR HOME MIGHT BE 60,000.
IF IT COST 245,000 TO GET THEM INTO A HOME, THEN WE COME IN WITH A GRANT TO PROVIDE THAT BALANCE.
BUT THAT MIGHT BE DIFFERENT FROM ONE PERSON TO A NEXT.
SO WE WILL BE WE'RE COMMITTED TO CONTINUING TO PROVIDE THE CLARITY AND WORKING WITH TOP SO THAT WE HAVE MORE INFORMATION THAT'S BEING SHARED BY TRUSTED STAKEHOLDERS TO THE RESIDENTS AS THEY'RE GOING THROUGH THIS PROCESS.
WE'RE CONNECTING THEM TO REALTORS.
BUT WE ARE COMMITTED TO MAKING SURE THAT INFORMATION CONTINUOUSLY IS SHARED WITH RESIDENTS AS THEY'RE GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS AND TRYING TO MAKE IT AS DIGESTIBLE AND UNDERSTANDABLE AS POSSIBLE, CONSIDERING HOW COMPLEX AND DIFFICULT THIS PROCESS IS.
SO I JUST WANTED TO SHARE THAT WITH YOU.
WE ALSO ARE WANTING TO PROVIDE A BRIEFING TO THE STAFF ON THE PROGRAM ITSELF TO MAKE SURE THAT ANY PERSONS WHO ARE INTERFACING WITH CLIENTS THAT ARE CALLING YOUR OFFICES ARE A BIT MORE FAMILIAR WITH HOW THIS PROGRAM IS RUNNING.
SO WE'RE GOING TO SHARE AN EMAIL WITH THAT INFORMATION ON AND HOPEFULLY WE CAN HAVE SOME PARTICIPATION ON THAT AND WE'LL RECORD IT SO THAT OTHERS CAN PARTICIPATE AS WELL. AND THEN, OF COURSE, WE'LL BE ABLE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH ADDITIONAL DATA TO.
AND IF I CAN SPEAK TO THAT TO THE LAST.
REMARKS AS WELL REGARDING THE LAKE HOUSTON PROJECT.
IT IS A HOUSING AUTHORITY PROJECT.
WE HAVE EXPRESSED TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY THAT DUE TO TIMING OF THE PROJECT AND NOT NECESSARILY RECEIVING THE GO AHEAD BETWEEN THE HOUSING AUTHORITY AND STAKEHOLDERS THAT THE DRT FUNDS CANNOT BE INVESTED IN LAKE HOUSTON.
WE HAD TO MAKE SURE WE COMMUNICATED THAT TO THE GLO SO THAT THEY WERE AWARE OF THE CHANGE IN OUR INVESTMENT DECISION AND RECEIVED THE PERMISSION FROM THEM TO MOVE FORWARD AND BEING VESSELS AND SINGLE FAMILY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.
WE HAVE RECEIVED THAT THE HOUSING AUTHORITY IS AWARE OF THAT.
SO WE ARE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO PURSUE THE LAKE HOUSTON PROJECT WITH D.R.
FUNDS OR ANY COMMUNITY SERVICE OR HARRIS COUNTY FUNDS OUTSIDE OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY.
IT IS THE HOUSING AUTHORITY, PROPERTY AND PROJECT.
[03:20:02]
THEY WILL BE THE ONES TO DETERMINE WHAT THE PATH FORWARD WILL BE FOR THAT PARTICULAR PARCEL.BUT THERE AREN'T GOING TO BE ANY CDBG FUNDS INVESTED IN LAKE HOUSTON FOR THE LAKE HOUSTON PROJECT.
SO I JUST WANTED TO PROVIDE SOME CLARITY THERE, BUT WE HAD TO GET THROUGH THE GLO PROCESS FIRST.
THANK YOU, DIRECTOR HOLLOWAY, FOR THE UPDATE.
THANK YOU. NEXT IS SPEAKER NUMBER 32, REGINA DEWEY OF THE HARRIS COUNTY NWC, NUMBER 36, SPEAKING ON ITEM TWO 2600 PURCHASING.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD.
GOOD AFTERNOON. THIS IS REGINA DUNCAN, ACTUALLY IN THE GENERAL MANAGER FOR HARRIS COUNTY, WC 36.
WE SERVICE THE RELIEF AREA AND THIS IS ADDRESSING COMMISSIONER ADRIAN GARCIA.
AND THIS WOULD HELP THE RELIEF COMMUNITY AS FUNDING COULD BE ALLOCATED.
THANK YOU. THIS IS COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
AND WE ARE ABSOLUTELY COMMITTED TO TAKING CARE OF CLOVERLEAF.
BUT WE'VE GOT A LOT OF WE'VE GOT A LOT OF PROJECTS THERE.
FLOOD CONTROL IS DOING A LOT OF WORK IN THE AREA, BUT WE WANT TO DO MORE AND LOOKING FORWARD TO ENSURE YOU GUYS AREN'T AREN'T LEFT OUT ANY LONGER. THANK YOU.
AND WE ARE ALWAYS HERE AS A RESOURCE TO HELP SEND OUT COMMUNICATIONS, WHATEVER WAY WE CAN TO THE RELIEF RESIDENTS, TO HELP EDUCATE THEM ON WHATEVER IS NEEDED TO GET THOSE FUNDING PASSED FOR THEM.
YOU GOT IT. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH.
BYE BYE. NEXT, THE SPEAKER NUMBER 33, AUSTIN RUIZ OF THE HOUSTON LGBTQ+ POLITICAL CAUCUS, SPEAKING ON ITEM 245 UNDER COUNTY JUDGE.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK THERE.
THEY EXCLUDE MANY AT RISK INDIVIDUALS.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.
AND WE'LL TOUCH ON THIS LATER.
AND OBVIOUSLY, THE MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN POPULATION MUCH LARGER THAN THAT.
SO THE CONCERN WE HAVE IS, OF COURSE, WE KNOW THAT IDEALLY IN ORDER TO TO CHART A DIFFERENT PATH WITH THIS THAN WE DID WITH, SAY, COVID, WE HAVE TO BE PROACTIVE AND WE HAVE TO VACCINATE MUCH LARGER POPULATIONS THAN THOSE THAT ARE NARROWLY DEFINED AS ELIGIBLE RIGHT NOW. BUT IT DOESN'T DO US ANY GOOD TO SCHEDULE THESE FOLKS FOR APPOINTMENTS AND NOT HAVE VACCINES TO GIVE THEM.
SO WHAT WE REALLY NEED TO DO RIGHT NOW IS GET MORE VACCINES TO OUR AREA.
17,000 HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED IN EACH, EACH VERSUS TWO VACCINES.
SO THAT REALLY ONLY GIVES US HALF OF THAT.
BUT THOSE HAVEN'T EVEN ARRIVED.
ABSOLUTELY. I ABSOLUTELY HEAR IT.
AND THAT'S THAT'S THE THE BALANCE THAT PUBLIC HEALTH IS HAVING TO STRIKE.
[03:25:06]
NEXT SPEAKER NUMBER 34, NEIL RATCLIFFE SPEAKING IN PERSON ON ITEM 288 UNDER SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM.YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. SHE? GOOD AFTERNOON. MEMBERS OF COMMISSIONERS COURT.
IT'S A PLEASURE TO BE WITH YOU HERE.
I'M AN ATTORNEY REPRESENTING THE NHP FOUNDATION, WHICH HAS THE ITEM 288 ON THE AGENDA.
COMMISSIONER ELLIS ASKED ME TO COME AND ADDRESS SOME QUESTIONS THAT HE HAS, SO I DON'T KNOW IF HE WILL LIKE TO DO THAT WHEN WE REACH THAT ITEM OR IF YOU WANT ME TO ADDRESS THOSE THINGS NOW.
I CAN SAY JUST VERY GENERALLY, I'VE WORKED WITH MY CLIENT AND HP.
THEY ARE A NONPROFIT WITH A 32 YEAR HISTORY OF PROVIDING GOOD, QUALITY, AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
AND THEY'RE WORKING TO PROVIDE A PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FACILITY THAT WILL HELP 149 CHRONICALLY HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS HAVE QUALITY HOUSING, AND WE'RE WORKING TO DO ALL WE CAN TO PULL THAT TOGETHER.
MR.. I'M TEMPTED TO SAY LET'S LET'S WAIT FOR COMMISSIONER GARCIA TO RETURN.
I HEARD YOU MOVE OVER THERE AND LET'S MOVE FOR COMMISSIONER ELLIS TO RETURN.
AND THEN WHEN WE TAKE UP THE ITEM.
OH, HERE'S COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
SO, COMMISSIONER ELLIS, THIS IS THE SPEAKER FOR ITEM 288, AND IT'S GOOD TO SEE YOU.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IT'S GOOD TO BE HERE.
SURE. I JUST COMMENTED BRIEFLY ON THE FACT THAT WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO MOVING FORWARD ON 3300 CAROLINE AND HELPING 149 CHRONICALLY HOMELESS PEOPLE BE IN A MUCH BETTER SITUATION THAN THEY'RE IN TODAY, CERTAINLY.
YOU ASKED ME TO COME DOWN, SO I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU, NEAL. IT'S A IT'S A GOOD PROJECT.
HOLLOWAY, ARE YOU THERE? DR. HOLLOWAY. SO WE CAN BRING THEM UP NOW.
CAN YOU JUST WALK US BACK THROUGH WHAT THE PROJECT DOES? DR. HOLLOWAY, I THINK IT'S ABOUT 100 CHRONICALLY HOMELESS PEOPLE WHO'LL BE PLACED THERE UNDER 49 MINUTES, SAY PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PROJECT, AND IT'S PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIONAL NHP AND NHP AND MAGNIFICENT.
IT'S PART OF OUR CDBG, OUR INVESTMENT IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING RENTAL.
SO IT'S ONE OF THE LAST PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE ON BOARD TO BREAK GROUND.
THE BALANCE OF THEM ARE ACTUALLY IN CONSTRUCTION, AND THIS WOULD REALLY BRING SOME VERY NEEDED HOUSING UNITS TO THE POPULATION THAT WE'VE BEEN TRYING TO SERVE THROUGH THE SUPPORT OF HOUSING THROUGH OUR CHIP 1.0 AND CHIP 2.0 INITIATIVES.
AND WHAT ARE THE NUMBERS? 9 MILLION WE'RE PUTTING IN TO CITIES.
PUTTING IN HOW MUCH? 5 MILLION.
I THINK WE PUT IT 909 I'M SORRY.
AND THE CITY IS PUTTING IN 1515 I'M THINKING ABOUT TEN OR 15 MILLION.
YEAH. I THINK IT'S 18 MILLION CITIES PUTTING IN.
AND I, I CALLED YOU AND ASKED YOU TO HOLD IT BECAUSE I SAW A PRESS ACCOUNT WHERE NHP WAS ONE OF THE PARTICIPANTS IN CLEMMY MANOR, THE CLEMMY MANOR PROJECT.
AND YOU WERE KIND ENOUGH TO HOLD IT.
AND YOU ALL HAVE WORKED UP SOME TENANT.
AGREEMENTS JUST KIND OF ROUGHLY WALK US THROUGH WHAT'S IN THEM.
SURE. THE REASON WE WERE BRINGING THIS TO COURT AND THEN HELD THE ITEM WAS WHAT WE'RE EXPERIENCING WITH ALL OUR OTHER AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS IS JUST INCREASING COST OF CONSTRUCTION.
SO WE WERE REQUESTING TO ADD ADDITIONAL FUNDS TO THE BUDGET.
SO THAT'S WHY THERE ARE TWO COMPONENTS TO THE ACTION BEING PRESENTED TO TODAY.
AND THE OTHER WAS A REQUEST THAT YOU MADE, COMMISSIONER, TO INCLUDE TENANT PROTECTIONS IN OUR AGREEMENT TO ENSURE THAT WE WOULD NOT HAVE AN EXPERIENCE SIMILAR TO THE RESIDENTS OF CLEMMIE MANOR, MOST RECENTLY IN THE HOUSING THAT IS OWNED BY NHP.
[03:30:01]
AROUND TEN PROTECTIONS.THERE IS EVICTION PROTECTIONS, THERE'S REPAIR AND NOTIFICATION.
AND I THINK THAT'S BECAUSE THEY'VE BEEN DOING THIS WORK ACROSS THE NATION FOR QUITE SOME TIME.
SO THE LIST OF TENANT AGREEMENTS THAT WE'VE PLAYED WITH, A LITTLE MASSAGING OF THAT INCLUDES OUR EVEN OUR PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW OF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANIES THAT WOULD BE OR AT LEAST A VOTE IN THEIR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANIES THAT WOULD BE HIRED.
SO IT INCREASES INSPECTIONS OF THE UNIT AND PARTNERSHIP WITH THE OTHER INVESTORS TO ENSURE THAT OUR HOUSING QUALITY STANDARDS INSPECTIONS IS OCCURRING AT A DIFFERENT TIME AS A LOAN CAP, HOUSING TAX CREDIT INSPECTIONS, AND AT A DIFFERENT TIME AS THE HOUSING AUTHORITIES, SECTION EIGHT OR VOUCHER INSPECTIONS, SO THAT WE HAVE MORE EYES ON THE PROPERTY AND WERE VERY AMENABLE TO THE CHANGES THAT WE'VE MADE.
SO WE USE THOSE AS MODELS TO PRESENT OUR TENANT PROTECTIONS IN THIS AGREEMENT.
OKAY. LOOK, I'M JUST GOING TO RUN THROUGH QUICK CATEGORIES.
SO YOU HAD SIX, ABOUT 20 ITEMS. SO ON THE TENANT SCREENING UNIT, PROPERTY INSPECTIONS, REPAIRS AND TIMELINES, EVICTIONS, TERMINATIONS OF LEASE AND RELOCATION PROTECTIONS AGAINST RETALIATION TENANTS, ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND RIGHT TO ORGANIZE.
HOLLOWAY AND NHP AND OF COURSE, MY STAFF WHO HAD BEEN WORKING ON THIS FOR SOME TIME, THIS WILL ONLY APPLY TO THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT.
BUT YOU'RE LOOKING AT THIS AND HOPEFULLY SOME OTHERS.
I KNOW WE LOOKED AROUND TEXAS, BUT I DO KNOW THAT NATIONALLY NEW YORK, LA COUNTY AND PHILADELPHIA MIGHT HAVE EVEN STRONGER PROTECTIONS.
AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE GO AS FAR AS THE LAW WILL ALLOW.
I APPRECIATE NHP, YOU KNOW, WHEN EVEN AS RECENTLY AS AN HOUR AGO WITH THE COUNTY ATTORNEY ON THE LINE, BECAUSE SEPARATE AND APART FROM THIS PROJECT, WHICH I'M VERY MUCH SUPPORTIVE OF, IT WAS ANOTHER PROJECT MANOR WHERE THERE HAVE BEEN SOME PROBLEMS AND I HAVE BEEN THIS IS HOW I REALLY LOST MY HAIR.
I'VE BEEN PULLING MY HAIR OUT, TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO ADD LANGUAGE ALONG THESE LINES THAT'S RELEVANT TO THE PROTECTIONS THAT ARE RELEVANT TO THE CLIMATE AGREEMENT, WHICH IS WHICH THE COUNTY PUT NO MONEY IN.
IT WAS SOME TIME AGO AND I WAS EXPLAINING TO MY BRILLIANT STAFF, THEY DO SUCH A GOOD JOB BECAUSE THEY I KNOW I'VE DRIVEN THEM CRAZY THAT THE ONLY REASON I WAS HOLDING THIS ONE UP WAS BECAUSE OF CLEMMIE MANOR, BECAUSE I HAPPENED TO SEE THE ARTICLE IN THE PAPER AND I SAW NHP VIDEO AND IT JUST STUCK IN MY HEAD BECAUSE I'VE LOOKED AT THE AGENDA AND I SAW NHP WAS PART OF THIS ONE.
AND THE AGREEMENT WE'VE COME TO, I THINK, IS YOU ALL WILL AGREE IF YOU CALLED YOUR CEO.
SEPARATE TMU MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SO THAT I WON'T TRY TO ADD IT TO THIS FOR FEAR THAT IT WOULD BLOW THIS UP BECAUSE YOU HAVE OTHER PARTNERS.
AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE IF I'M DEAD OUT OF OFFICE, WE'RE GONE.
YOU'RE GONE, THAT THESE ISSUES DON'T COME UP AGAIN.
SURE. AND YOU ALL WROTE A GREAT LETTER, WHICH I WON'T READ INTO THE RECORD, BUT YOU WROTE A GREAT COMPANY THAT YOU PROBABLY WROTE IT AND THEY SIGNED IT SAYING YOU WOULD AGREE TO ALL OF THESE THINGS TO GET ME TO BACK OFF.
BUT I WAS STILL EARLY THIS MORNING.
WE WERE HAVING PRAYER EARLY THIS MORNING.
YOU'RE QUITE EARLY TO WALK ME OFF THIS CLIFF.
SO LET'S EXPLAIN. WHY IS IT I CAN'T ADD IT TO THIS AGREEMENT?
[03:35:03]
SURE. AND LET ME JUST SAY TO THANK YOU FOR LEADING THE CHARGE ON PROVIDING REALLY WONDERFUL ENHANCED TENANT PROTECTIONS, BECAUSE I KNOW THAT FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND, CSG WILL USE THESE SAME PROVISIONS IN PROJECTS MOVING FORWARD TO MAKE SURE THAT MORE PEOPLE IN HARRIS COUNTY HAVE THAT ENHANCED PROTECTION.AND AND I FELT A LITTLE BIT, AS YOU AND I HAVE DISCUSSED IN TALKING WITH YOU AND TALKING WITH HP, LIKE I'M DEALING WITH TWO PARTIES WHO WERE JUST IN VIOLENT AGREEMENT THAT THEY WANT TO DO THE RIGHT THING.
RIGHT. SO AS RESPECTING THE TECHNICAL ASPECT OF BEING ABLE TO SAY ADD TENANT PROTECTION LANGUAGE ON THE COLUMBIA MANOR PROJECT INTO 3300 CAROLINE HP THE WAY THAT TAX CREDIT DEVELOPMENTS WORK, THEY HAVE A COMPLEX OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE.
AND SO NHP CAN I IS THE GENERAL PARTNER OF A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.
THERE IS A PRIVATE LENDER THAT HAS LOAN AGREEMENTS AND PROMISSORY NOTES AND DEEDS OF TRUST INVOLVED.
THERE'S THE CITY THERE ARE THERE A COMPLEX INTERLINKING OF PARTIES THAT FORM THAT PARTNERSHIP.
SO NGCP CANNOT UNILATERALLY IMPOSE ON ALL OF THOSE PARTNERS AND A PROJECT THAT CLOSED IN 2014.
SO SO AND YOU ALSO IT'S IT'S CRITICALLY IMPORTANT FOR THE INVESTORS AND THE LENDERS ON THESE PROJECTS THAT EACH OF THOSE PROJECTS BE ISOLATED SO THAT IF THERE'S A FINANCIAL PROBLEM WITH ONE PROJECT, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT IT DOESN'T LEAK INTO OR CAUSE A CASCADING FAILURE OR PROBLEM WITH A WHOLE PORTFOLIO OF PROPERTIES.
SO, SO EACH OF THESE PROPERTIES HAS TO BE SELF CONTAINED LEGALLY.
AND, AND THAT'S THAT'S THE WAY THE STRUCTURE WORKS.
AND HP DOESN'T HAVE THE ABILITY TO CHANGE THAT IF THEY WANTED TO.
BUT WHAT THEY HAVE DONE HERE AT YOUR URGING AND THEY'VE BEEN VERY HAPPY TO DO IT, THEY'VE ALREADY OFFERED TO VOLUNTARILY TO IMPLEMENT THE SAME CHANGES AT COLUMBIA THAT ARE BEING IMPLEMENTED IN 3300.
CAROLINE THEY PUT THAT IN WRITING AND THEY ARE HAPPY TO DO, IN MY VIEW, TO DO WHATEVER THEY CAN DO TO GIVE YOU AS MUCH COMFORT AS POSSIBLE THAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO THE RIGHT THING.
NOW, MAY I ADD ONE OTHER THING? THE REASON I GOT TO KNOW NHP, I USED TO BE THE HOUSING DIRECTOR FOR THE CITY OF HOUSTON, AND BACK IN 2014, WHEN THIS PROJECT WAS DONE, WE WERE LOOKING AT WAYS TO HELP THE FIFTH WARD AND CLEMMIE MANOR WITH THE EPICENTER OF CRIME AND BLIGHT IN THE FIFTH WARD AND NHP STEPPED UP TO THE TABLE AND PUT MONEY DOWN AND RENOVATED THE PROPERTY AND ACTUALLY DID INITIATED A DRAMATIC TURNAROUND IN TERMS OF DRAMATICALLY REDUCING CRIME AND IMPROVING THE LIVES OF THE FAMILIES THERE.
AND I THINK I'VE TOLD YOU THIS BEFORE, TOO.
I DIDN'T JUST TAKE THEIR WORD FOR IT.
I TALKED TO MOTHERS OF CHILDREN ON THAT PROPERTY BEFORE THAT DEAL WAS CONSUMMATED AT CITY COUNCIL, AND I SAID, WHAT IS IT LIKE? AND THEY SAID, WE'RE AFRAID TO LET OUR CHILDREN GO OUT AND PLAY BECAUSE THE CRIME IS SO BAD.
A FEW MONTHS AFTER THEY TOOK OVER THE PROPERTY AND THEY INITIATED THESE VERY SWEEPING CHANGES, I WENT BACK TO THE SAME MOTHERS AND SAID, HOW IS IT NOW? AND THEY SAID, IT'S NIGHT AND DAY.
THEY HAD DID HAVE SOME CHALLENGES RECENTLY.
THEY'VE TERMINATED THE MANAGEMENT COMPANY THAT THEY HAD AND THEY'RE MOVING FORWARD.
SO. SO NOW. A COUPLE OF POINTS IS I FELT YOU.
IN NO WAY AM I CRITICAL OF NHP.
IF THIS ISSUE HADN'T GOTTEN IN THE PRESS, WE WOULDN'T BE WHERE WE ARE.
AND IF I COULD SLEEP AT NIGHT LIKE NORMAL PEOPLE INSTEAD OF WAKE UP, TURN ON THE PHONE AND SEE YOUR ARTICLE ON MY PHONE AND SAW THE NHP AND THEN REMEMBERED DR.
HOLLOWAY HAD TALKED TO ME ABOUT CAROLINE.
STUCK IN MY HEAD. WE WOULDN'T BE HERE.
I KNOW YOU'RE YOUR CLIENT, AND YOUR COMPANY IS A NOT FOR PROFIT.
I GET THAT. I ALSO KNOW SOME OF THE WEALTHIEST PEOPLE IN THE COUNTRY.
IN THE LOW INCOME HOUSE IN BUSINESS.
I'D SAY THAT ABOUT YOUR COMPANY, BUT THIS HAPPENS TO BE A GREAT COMPANY.
[03:40:03]
IT'S A NOT FOR PROFIT FOUNDATION.SO IT'S NOT ENOUGH FOR ME FOR SOMEBODY TO SAY, WE'RE GIVING YOU.
$10 MILLION. $10 MILLION FOR THIS EXTRA PROJECT TO JUST HELP THE POOR PEOPLE.
YOU GOT IT. I'M THE ONE THAT FIGHTS AT THIS TABLE, SO ALL OF THEM DON'T GO IN ONE PRECINCT.
YOU KNOW, BUT THE REASON WE'RE HERE, JUDGE, IS I WAS TELLING HIM.
YOU WENT TO THE KENNEDY SCHOOL? I WENT TO THE LBJ SCHOOL.
WHEN YOU HAVE POWER, YOU USE IT.
SO WHEN I HAD THE ABILITY TO HOLD UP THIS 9 MILLION AND MAYBE KILL IT.
EVEN IF IT WOULD HURT SOME OF THESE 140 949 PEOPLE WHO ARE CHRONICALLY HOMELESS.
NOPE. NOT RIGHT NOW. I GOT YOU. I'M HELPING YOU.
TRUST ME, THOUGH, WITH 300 PEOPLE.
FOR WHAT? THREE PEOPLE PER UNIT.
SOME OF THIS STUFF IN THERE WHEN THEY AWARDED THAT MONEY AND THE COUNTY SHOULD HAVE HAD IT.
DOCTOR, HOW LONG BEFORE YOU CAME? AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON IT NOW GOING FORWARD.
WE ARE GOING TO HAVE IT IN JUDGE.
I ALSO HOPE IN THIS BOND PACKAGE, IN SOMEWHERE, WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING FOR THESE NEIGHBORHOODS WHO TAKE PEOPLE WHO ARE CHRONICALLY HOMELESS AND PEOPLE WHO COULD BECOME HOMELESS, AS OPPOSED TO SOME AREAS THAT GET INTO THE NIMBY ROUTINE AND FIGHT EVERYTHING BUT HAVE THEIR HANDS OUT TO GRAB THE FLOODING DOLLARS, GRAB THE DOLLARS FOR CRIME AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT'S NOT EQUITABLE. AND I WANT TO USE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO SAY THAT.
BUT, HEY, I APPRECIATE YOU ALL WORKING WITH US, AND IT'S GOOD WORK.
I THINK THEY'RE LUCKY TO HAVE YOU.
I DIDN'T KNOW THE COMPANY FROM ADAM.
JUST BECAUSE YOU REPRESENT THEM, I WOULDN'T KNOW NHP FROM BP.
YOU HAVE ME, BUT YOU REPRESENT THEM.
BUT I'M HOPING AND THERE ARE OTHER PROJECTS OUT THERE THAT HAVE PROBLEMS TO NOW GET IT.
WE DEAL WITH A POPULATION THAT HAS A HOST OF ISSUES, SOME OF IT GOVERNMENT CREATED.
COMMISSIONER RAMSEY. HEY, ALL GOOD TO SEE YOU.
SURE. THERE'S $1,282,132 SET ASIDE FOR SIDE IMPROVEMENTS.
WHAT IS THAT FOR? THAT'S KIND OF IMPRESSIVE IN TERMS OF GOING TO DO SOMETHING ON THE SIDE TO MAKE THINGS BETTER.
CAROLINE THAT'S A NEW CONSTRUCTION, RIGHT? SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE SPECIFIC SITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE, BUT ROGER MAY, IF HE MAY, I'M JUST CURIOUS WHAT WAS BEING DONE FOR THAT. I THINK THAT'S PART OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WE'RE PUTTING INTO THE PROJECT BECAUSE THERE'S A TOTAL OF I DON'T REMEMBER THE NUMBER OFFHAND WITH LIKE 14 MILLION CONSTRUCTION WILL BE DONE AND IT'S A NEW PROJECT, 149 UNITS THAT WE PUT IN THAT AREA.
AND THE SITE IMPROVEMENT IS JUST THE I THINK IT'S THE DEMOING OF THE HOUSE THAT'S THERE AND IMPROVING THE THE SEWER, WATER LINES, PHONE LINES, ETC..
THANK YOU, HEARTS FOUNDATION, ETC..
SO WE'RE ON TIME FOR A QUICK BREAK.
SO LET'S SEE. JUST A REALLY QUICK ONE.
WE'LL FINISH THE SPEAKERS, DO THE CONCERT, THEN WE'LL TAKE LUNCH.
LET'S WE CAN NOT ON THIS, BUT THERE'S STILL ABOUT 20 SPEAKERS LEFT.
AND I KNOW FOLKS NEED A BREAK NOW.
THANK YOU. SO LET'S BREAK UNTIL 230.
DO WE NEED TO CALL ANOTHER SPEAKER? TIFFANY. OKAY.
NEXT WOULD BE SPEAKER NUMBER 37.
TOM ZAKES SPEAKING IN PERSON ON ITEM 307 UNDER SUPPLEMENTAL ITEMS. YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE.
GOOD AFTERNOON. I'M TOM DAVIS.
I'VE BEEN A REPUBLICAN PRECINCT CHAIR LONGER THAN ANY OF YOU HAVE BEEN ON COMMISSIONERS COURT.
I'VE BEEN A DELEGATE TO EVERY STATE REPUBLICAN CONVENTION IN THE LAST 25 YEARS.
BUT ON ELECTION DAY, I HANG OUT MY REPUBLICAN HAT AND AROUND THE ELECTION IN A NONPARTISAN MANNER.
[03:45:04]
I TAKE MY OATH AS AN ELECTION OFFICER SERIOUSLY.I INSIST THAT THE PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR ME DO THE SAME THING.
I FIRST WORKED AS AN ELECTION WORK IN 1988 WHEN ANITA, RHODA, HEBER WAS THE COUNTY CLERK.
I QUICKLY LEARNED THAT THE JOB SHE DID WAS CONSIDERED THE GOLD STANDARD IN THE STATE OF TEXAS.
I ALSO VOLUNTEERED THAT YEAR IN SECRETARY OF STATE JACK RYAN'S OFFICE TO BE AN ELECTION INSPECTOR, DROVE TO EAST TEXAS AND LOOKED AT THINGS IN SHELBY COUNTY.
I'VE ALSO WORKED POLL WATCHER IN MULTIPLE ELECTIONS.
THERE'S A SIMPLE BOTTOM LINE ABOUT AUDITS.
THANK YOU, SIR. YOUR TIME IS UP.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
NEXT IS SPEAKER NUMBER 38, BARBARA DICKSON SPEAKING ON ITEM 308 UNDER SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM.
SO YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
BUT AM I PART BLACK? AM I A HISPANIC, GREEK, ITALIAN, MIDDLE EASTERN? I'VE BEEN TOLD I LOOK ALL OF THE ABOVE.
HOW DOES IT MAKE SENSE THAT MY ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION DETERMINES HOW MUCH MONEY I'M PAID? THERE ARE A LOT OF PEOPLE IN HOUSTON THAT ARE LIKE ME IN THAT REGARD.
I HAVE A FRIEND WITH KIDS THAT SAID TO HER MOM, I HATE WHEN THEY ASK THAT I'M NOT ANY ONE THING.
WHY DO WE EVEN ASK IT ANYMORE? LET'S MAKE HARRIS COUNTY THE FIRST PLACE IN THE COUNTRY THAT STOPS ASKING THE QUESTION.
IT'S RACIST TO PAY PEOPLE BASED ON THEIR ETHNICITY.
NEXT IS NON AGENDA RELATED SPEAKER NUMBER ONE, ROBERT HORTON.
THEY'RE ALL BEEN ON ME MONEY FOR QUITE SOME TIME.
AND ALL THE AGENDA I'M TALKING ABOUT IS MONEY TO CALL ON THEM.
BOOMS AND STUFF LIKE THAT GOT OLD ME MONEY AND Y'ALL HAVE NOT SET A WAY TO PAY ME.
AND I VIOLATED MY HUMAN RIGHTS AND I HAVE STOPPED CERTAIN THINGS FOR YOU ALL TO DO.
AND Y'ALL NEED TO COME TO ME THE CORRECT WAY.
I'M LOOKING FOR ABOUT A COUPLE OF COOL $200,000.
AND SOME SOME SOME CLOSE TO ME COME TO ME AND I'M OVER.
HARDEN AND THOMPSON, YOUR FIRMS, THESE LAW FIRMS ARE ALL LAW FIRMS PLAYING GAMES WITH ME. WELL, I HAPPEN TO BE THE JUDGE AND I HAPPENED TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF OVER THE ALL PRESIDENTS OF OUR GLOBAL PRESIDENTS.
AND WHO WAS THE SPEAKER? I THINK WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THEY STATE THEIR NAME AND AFFILIATION.
IT WAS SPEAKER NUMBER ONE UNDER KNOWN AGENDA.
NEXT IS SPEAKER NUMBER FIVE ON AGENDA.
DARLENE KING, YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE.
TOO HEAVY TO DIE TO NOW HIM GIVING ALL PRAISE AND HONOR.
I LOVE MY FAMILY MORE THAN ANYTHING.
PUBLIC'S INTERESTS IN THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC.
THANK YOU. NEXT IS SPEAKER NUMBER SIX ON AGENDA, TRAVIS SMITH. YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE.
GO AHEAD, PLEASE. HI, THIS IS TRAVIS SMITH.
I'M CALLING ON JUDGE LINA HIDALGO AND THE COMMISSIONERS OF THIS COURT TO DECLARE A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY IN RESPONSE TO THE SUPREME COURT OVERTURNING ROE V WADE AND STRIPPING AWAY THE RIGHT TO A SAFE, LEGAL ABORTION FOR MILLIONS OF HARRIS COUNTY RESIDENTS.
IT IS VITAL THAT YOU WORK TO ENSURE THE PEOPLE OF HARRIS COUNTY HAVE ACCESS TO ABORTION.
BY DECLARING A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY, THIS COURT CAN ACCESS FUNDS THAT CAN BE USED TO ENSURE ACCESS TO ABORTION BY PROVIDING TRANSPORTATION FOR PATIENTS TO ABORTION PROVIDERS AND OTHER STATES, EDUCATING RESIDENTS ABOUT THEIR RIGHTS REGARDING ABORTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE AND MORE.
[03:50:02]
NEXT IS NOT AGENDA. SPEAKER NUMBER SEVEN, MICHAEL STEINBERG SPEAKING IN PERSON.I'M MICHAEL FROM JERSEY VILLAGE.
E 100 00005 WAS GOING ALONG AND EVERYTHING IN PROCEEDING, AND THEN THEY DISAPPEARED.
AND ON 682 22, THE FLOOD DISTRICT GAVE AN UPDATE THAT THE CONTRACTOR HAD LEFT.
OR WE RELEASED RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PROJECT.
I DON'T KNOW. I HEARD MAYBE THEY WENT BANKRUPT.
I DON'T KNOW. I KNOW THAT'S NOT THE COUNTY'S FAULT.
IT'S NOT ANYTHING ANYBODY DID, ANY OF YOU ALL.
BUT SO WE'RE WE'RE CONCERNED BECAUSE NOW THE PROJECT HAS SLOWED DOWN.
YEAH. I'LL FOLLOW UP WITH YOU ON THAT PROJECT.
YES, SIR. YES. LET ME CHECK IN TO THAT PARTICULAR ONE THAT WAS AT THE POINT HERE, THE WHITE OAK PROJECT BEING THE TRADITIONAL, NOT THE TUNNEL, THE WIDENING. YES, YES.
LET ME HAVE THAT AND I'LL FOLLOW BACK THAT WAY.
YES, COMMISSIONER, THANK YOU FOR COMING IN.
NEXT IS NOT AGENDA. SPEAKER NUMBER EIGHT, GLADYS HOUSE EL, YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE.
GO AHEAD, PLEASE. OUR PIECE, COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
THE GRASSROOTS ORGANIZATIONS IN HERITAGE STREET SOUTH ARE REQUESTING YOU MEET THEM LATER THIS MONTH IN FREEDMAN'S TOWN AND DISCUSS URGENT CONCERNS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION FROM YOUR CHIEF OF STAFF DOWN TO PATRICK GRANT.
THE LACK OF RESPONSIVENESS HAS BEEN INAPPROPRIATE.
I RECEIVED THE FIRST CALL IN TWO MONTHS FROM MR. GRANT YESTERDAY AFTER HE REALIZED I WAS ON THE SPEAKER'S LIST TODAY.
HIS DEFENSE WAS HE HAD ANOTHER COVID ATTACK AND THAT HE ALSO TOOK VACATION.
PREVIOUS CHALLENGES PASSED AROUND AMONG YOUR STAFF, BUT NO TANGIBLE PROGRESSIVE RESULTS.
WE AWAIT YOUR READING, YOUR MEETING LATER THIS MONTH AND FREEDMAN'S TOWN, BECAUSE TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE AND WE JUST WANT TO SEE SOME SOME ACTION UNDER YOUR ADMINISTRATION.
NEXT IS NOT AGENDA. SPEAKER NUMBER NINE, ARTHUR SMITH SPEAKING IN PERSON.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE. IF I WANT TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS COMMISSIONERS COURT THAT IN A IN $1,000,000 LAWSUIT THAT MY WIFE AND I WERE THE PLAINTIFFS IN, JUDGE LATASHA LEWIS PAYNE RECEIVED $1,000 FROM ATTORNEY BENJAMIN BEING HALL.
AND, YOU KNOW, RIGHT BEFORE OUR CASE WAS DUE TO GO TO TRIAL, YOU KNOW, IT JUST LOOKS VERY SUSPICIOUS AND IT'S VERY UNETHICAL FOR A JUDGE TO RECEIVE MONEY FROM THE DEFENDANT'S ATTORNEY.
NOW, WE HAVE A PRESS CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR THURSDAY AT 10 A.M.
AND WE ASKING THAT THIS JUDGE BE INVESTIGATED BECAUSE THIS IS VERY UNETHICAL AND IT'S VERY UNACCEPTABLE FOR HER TO RECEIVE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE DEFENDANT'S ATTORNEY.
THANK YOU. NEXT IS NOT AGENDA.
SPEAKER NUMBER TEN, KOFI EL BEY.
YOU HAVE ONE MINUTE SPEAKING IN PERSON.
HELLO. I WAS REQUESTING A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION DONE ON ALL.
JUDGE LATASHA LUIS PAYNE IN REFERENCE TO WHAT MY HUSBAND JUST SPOKE ABOUT BEING HOW CONTRIBUTED $1,000 TO HER WHILE THE CASE WAS ACTIVE IN HER COURT. AND THAT'S JUST ALL, YOU KNOW, JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT BEING BIASED OR UNETHICAL.
YOU KNOW, AND MY HUSBAND GOT TASED IN REFERENCE, YOU KNOW, BY THIS CHURCH CAREER CHURCH AT LAMAR PATTERSON SECURITY BY BEHIND THEM BLOCKING OUR VOTE AND LIB.
WOW. THE MIRROR THAT PROMOTES VOTING AND GETTING REGISTERED TO VOTE.
SO HE GOT TASED FOR NOTHING ON CITY SIDEWALK.
[03:55:04]
DURING A PEACEFUL PROTEST, THE SECURITY GUARD CAME OUT OF THEIR CHURCH AND TASED HIM.I WAS STANDING THERE. I VIDEOED IT.
THEY REALLY RAN A STORY ON IT.
AND HE PAID THAT JUDGE FOR WHAT? HE PAID THE JUDGE FOR COURT PAPERS.
THIS IS AN AGENDA, SO WE CAN'T COMMENT ON IT, BUT THE RELEVANT DEPARTMENTS CAN CIRCLE BACK.
THANK YOU. GO AHEAD. MARISSA HANSEN SPEAKING IN PERSON.
HI. MY NAME IS MARISSA HANSON.
I'M SPEAKING ON THE BEHALF OF INAPPROPRIATE CAMPAIGN DONATIONS.
JUDGE HIDALGO, HAVE YOU HEARD OF THE LAW FIRM SUSMAN GODFREY? YOU ACCEPTED OVER SIX FIGURES OF CAMPAIGN DONATIONS FROM SUSMAN GODFREY, WHO IS REPRESENTING LIVE NATION AND THE ASTROWORLD FEST LAWSUIT. AND WITHIN THAT THREE WEEK PERIOD THAT YOU GOT DONATIONS FROM OUT-OF-STATE DONORS, YOU CALLED FOR AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO ASTROWORLD BEST.
WERE YOU STEERING AN INVESTIGATION OVER A LITTLE CHILD THAT WAS TRAMPLED TO DEATH? REMEMBER, EZRA. IT SEEMS LEGAL, DOESN'T IT? SEEMS LIKE YOU'RE STARING AN INVESTIGATION.
IT'S OVER $100,000 THAT YOU ACCEPTED FROM THIS LAW FIRM.
SPEAKER NUMBER 14, MELINDA MORRIS SPEAKING IN PERSON.
GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONERS.
I'M MELINDA MORRIS AND I'M A RESIDENT OF HOUSTON.
I'M HERE AS A CONCERNED CITIZEN.
THE OPTION OF ADDING $1,000,000,000 BOND ISSUE TO THE BALLOT.
THIS IS NOT THE APPROPRIATE TIME FOR THAT.
WE'RE DEALING WITH HUGE INFLATION ISSUES, PROPERTY TAX ISSUES, RISING GAS ISSUES.
THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT NOW IS TALKING ABOUT INCREASING INCOME TAX.
I DO RECOMMEND THAT I FEEL LIKE A FORENSIC AUDIT NEEDS TO BE DONE ON THE MONEYS THAT HAVE BEEN SPENT BY THIS COMMISSIONERS COURT FOR 2021 AND UP TO 2022. LOOKING FOR WASTEFUL SPENDING AND FRAUDULENT SPENDING.
THANK YOU. NEXT IS NOT ON AGENDA.
SPEAKER 15 I READ DENVER OF MEDICARE FOR ALL ABOUT US.
I'M THANK YOU FOR HEARING THAT ONCE MORE.
THIS IS ABOUT HAVING COMMISSIONERS, COURTS ADOPT THE RESOLUTION, NOT SPENDING ANY MONEY OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, JUST ADOPTING A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, ENACTING MEDICARE FOR ALL, SINGLE PAYER UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE, WHICH WOULD BE OF TREMENDOUS BENEFIT TO HARRIS COUNTY, ACCORDING TO, EXCUSE ME, THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE, RIGHT INTO HARRIS COUNTY.
IT WOULD ENHANCE OUR COUNTY'S ECONOMY BY OVER $9 BILLION A YEAR.
I HOPE THAT THAT WOULD GET YOUR ATTENTION.
AND THANK YOU FOR FOR HEARING ME OUT.
AND LET'S GET THAT RESOLUTION PASSED.
THOSE ARE ALL THE SPEAKERS WE WERE ABLE TO REACH.
I WANTED TO GO OVER THE DISCUSSION ITEMS, BUT WE'RE MISSING COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
SO, JUDGE, YOU WANT TO GO OVER THE CORRECTION? YEAH, I'LL DO THE THE CORRECTIONS AND THE NO ACTION, AND THEN WE'LL DO THE RESOLUTION FOR THE COAST GUARD, AND THEN WE'LL TAKE A BREAK.
I UNDERSTAND THEY HAVE A CAKE, SO IT'S GOOD TIMING.
[Departments (Part 2 of 5)]
WE'LL START WITH THE CORRECTIONS.I THINK I MENTIONED EARLIER, NO ACTION.
[04:00:03]
223 NO ACTION.WE NEED TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT FROM 19 MILLION TO 4.5 MILLION.
SO IT SHOULD READ. REQUEST THAT THE COUNTY JUDGE EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO A SOLE SOURCE EXEMPTION AGREEMENT WITH ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION CONSULTANTS LLC IN THE ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF 4,500,000, ETC..
AND THAT'S IT. IT LOOKS LIKE IT WAS JUST A NO ACTION AND NO CORRECTIONS.
WE DO HAVE THE DISCUSSION ITEMS LISTED.
I'M LOATH TO GO OVER THOSE WITHOUT COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
SO LET'S GO OVER THE COAST GUARD ITEM.
AND THAT IS ITEM FOUR ON PAGE TWO UNDER RESOLUTIONS IS TIFFANY.
DO WE HAVE I KNOW WE WERE WAITING FOR CAPTAIN SMITH.
NO, MA'AM, HE'S NOT AVAILABLE YET.
FOR WHOM? SO THEY'RE CHECKING WHETHER HE'S AVAILABLE AFTER WE TAKE A LUNCH BREAK BECAUSE HE MAY BE AVAILABLE NOW. YEAH.
SEE IF WE CAN GET COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
THAT'D BE GREAT, TOO. SO LET ME CHECK AND SEE IF THERE'S ANY DISCUSSION ITEMS THAT THE MEMBERS WHO ARE PRESENT FLAGGED. SO MAYBE WE CAN BEGIN THE DISCUSSION ON SOME OF THEM.
COMMISSIONER GARCIA'S ON HIS WAY.
OKAY. SO LET'S START GOING DOWN THE LIST OF EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS. DO FOLKS NEED TO DISCUSS EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEM 244.
COME, SUGAR. WE JUST BEGAN GOING DOWN THE ITEMS TO 44 FOUR.
EXECUTIVE SESSION. EXECUTIVE SESSION.
ITEM 280. THAT'S AN APPOINTMENT.
OKAY. ITEM 281 EXECUTIVE SESSION.
THE REGIONAL FLOOD PLANNING COMMITTEE.
THOSE ARE GOING TO BE A MOTION FOR THOSE FOR TO 18 TO 81 MOTION FOR TO 88.
YES. YEAH, I DO. THAT IS SIMPLY TO APPOINT TO APPOINT THOSE INDIVIDUALS.
YES, SIR. SO YOU ARE GOING TO APPROVE IT? YES. PRESENTED AS PRESENTED.
SO WE'RE MOVING TO 80 AND TO 81 TO THE CONSENT AGENDA TO 82.
TO ALSO FILM CONSENT AGENDA TO 83.
THREE TO GO TO EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEM ON 283 KINGSLAND PARK.
LAND ACQUISITION THAT SEEMS LIKE.
THREE. WE ALREADY FLOWED FOR NO ACTION TO 92.
WE ALREADY. WE DON'T HAVE TO GO.
OKAY, SO. SO NOW HE HAS A MOTION.
OKAY. WAS I FELT HE WAS WORKING UP SOMETHING.
THAT WAS THE ONE WITH COMMISSIONERS WHO VOTED FOR IT.
DO WE NEED TO GO TO EXECUTIVE SESSION ON 309? NO, ACTUALLY, LET ME TELL YOU, THAT'S ONE WAY I HAVE A MOTION ON IT.
OKAY. WELL, ACTUALLY, THAT'S WHAT IT WAS.
YES, I WANTED TO SEE IF WE CAN INCLUDE.
IT'S I'M NOT SURE HOW TO EXACTLY PHRASE IT, BUT THE STOPPING OF THE RAIL CARS, COMMISSIONER.
[04:05:05]
SORRY. WE'LL FIGURE IT OUT.YEAH, I'LL LEAVE IT ON THE DISCUSSION AGENDA THEN.
OKAY, GREAT. SO WE'VE GOT 244 AND IN 309 FOR DISCUSSION UNDER THE EXECUTIVE SESSION AGENDA.
THE REGULAR AGENDA? YEAH. I'M SORRY, JUDGE. I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY.
309 DOES NOT NEED TO BE AN EXECUTIVE SESSION.
WELL, NEITHER DOES THE OTHER ONE.
RIGHT. I'M JUST GOING OVER WHAT'S ON THE AGENDA, JAY.
BUT YOU GUYS WILL TELL US BECAUSE PARTS OF IT, I UNDERSTAND, DO NEED TO GO TO EXECUTIVE SESSION.
YES. YES. POTENTIALLY GOING TO LET US KNOW ABOUT THAT.
OKAY. ITEM SIX IS THE TWO FOLKS TO DISCUSS ITEM SIX, THREE AND FOUR FLAGGED.
SO MOVE THE MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA ON ITEM SIX.
THAT'S AN ANALYSIS OF THE GULF COAST CHILDCARE SUBSIDY PROGRAM.
AND YOU OPPOSED. NO, THIS IS PFM AND THE ANSWER IS NO.
I'M IN FAVOR OF MOTION CARRIES 3 TO 2.
ITEM 19 I'VE GOT EXCUSE ME, 18.
I HAVE A VERY BRIEF UPDATE ON COVERED ITEM 20.
WE DO NEED TO DISCUSS THAT THE POTENTIAL BOND.
I KNOW THEY NEED US TO DISCUSS IT ALONG WITH THEIR OTHER COMPENSATION STUDY ITEMS. ITEM 103, PRECINCT ONE FLAGGED.
IT'S AN AGREEMENT WITH BURNS AND MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY.
OKAY, SO WE'LL LEAVE IT FOR DISCUSSION.
125. COMMISSIONER CAGLE FLAGGED ITEM 125 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE PORT OF HOUSTON.
OKAY. WE ALREADY HAVE 129 AS NO ACTION.
I. YEAH. I HAVE A LIST OF THE NEW ACTIONS ALREADY ALREADY LISTED.
130. I'M ONLY READING THE ONES THAT HAD BEEN FLAGGED FOR DISCUSSION.
SO 140 GOES ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.
192 COMMISSIONER RAMSEY FLAGGED.
192 TO 24 COMMISSIONER CAHILL FLAGGED.
A PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF THE JAIL.
241. LET HOLT COMMISSIONER CAGLE FLAG THAT ONE.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
ALL IN FAVOR. AND YOU OPPOSE? NO, NO, I'M IN FAVOR.
ITEM 242 COMMISSIONERS CAGLE AND RAMSEY FLAGGED.
ITEM 242 IS RELATED TO THE O'DONNELL CONSENT DECREE MOVE IN SAGA MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
ITEM 244 WE ALREADY HAVE THE POSSIBLE EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEM.
IT'S ALSO ON THE REGULAR AGENDA WHICH I NEED THE VOTE 244 TO MOVE.
SECOND MOTION BY COMMISSIONER US, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
ALL IN FAVOR I STRONGLY OPPOSE.
MOTION CARRIES 3 TO 2 ON ITEM 244.
COMMISSIONER RAMSEY FLAGGED ITEM 248 IT'S THE TOWING SERVICE OF 264.
ALSO, COMMISSIONER RAMSEY ON ATTRITION.
COMMISSIONER RAMSEY, IT'S A TRANSMITTAL OF THE 2022 CERTIFIED ESTIMATE.
[04:10:01]
YES. 284 COMMISSIONER GARCIA, THE SHERIFF'S VIOLENT CRIME REDUCTION INITIATIVE TO 85.WE DO BUDGET DIRECTOR RAMOS HAS REQUESTED THAT WE DO DISCUSS THAT.
HE'S GOT A PRESENTATION FOR US RELATED TO THE TAX RATES.
SO I'LL LEAVE THAT ON TO 88 COMMISSIONER LIST.
WE JUST HAD THE DISCUSSION PUT IT ON THE CONSENT OC 308 IS FOR DISCUSSION ALONG THE OTHER COMPENSATION STUDY ITEMS 310 COMMISSIONERS ELLIS AND CAHILL.
THE INFLATION REDUCTION ACT OF 2022.
WE'LL LEAVE IT FOR DISCUSSION.
WANT YOU TO VOTE. YOU WANT TO VOTE? NO. YOU WANT TO DISCUSS IT? DID YOU WANT TO? THE QUESTION IS, WHAT'S THE POSSIBLE ACTION THAT WE SUPPORTED WITH OUR LEGISLATIVE AGENDA IN SUPPORT OF IT? LET'S JUST VOTE. OKAY, I'LL MOVE IT.
COMMISSIONER, WOULD YOU MIND READING THE MOTION FOR THE RECORD THAT CAN ONLY GO ON RECORD IN SUPPORT OF THAT FEDERAL LEGISLATION? MOTIONED BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
COMMISSIONER ELLIS? DID YOU GET THE ITEM MYSELF? ITEM 310 310 THAT THE COUNTY GO ON RECORD IN SUPPORT OF THAT FEDERAL LEGISLATION MOTION AND SUPPORT.
COMMISSIONER ELLIS MADE THE MOTION.
IS THERE A SECOND? SO COMMISSIONER GARCIA HAS A SECOND.
ALL IN FAVOR AND YOU OPPOSE? NO, NO, I'M IN FAVOR.
THE SPECIAL COUNSEL ACTION ON MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES.
COMMISSIONER RAMSEY DOSSENA LABORATORY TESTING.
YES AND 314 COMMISSIONER CAHILL.
WITH THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.
I THINK WE'VE GOT ENOUGH CONSULTING SERVICES FOR A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
SO HERE ARE THE DISCUSSION ITEMS I HAVE.
ITEM 309, WHICH CAN ALSO BE DISCUSSED IN OPEN COURT.
SO IT'S ITEM 418 2026 103 125 192 248 264 TWO 7284 280 53083 12 313.
DID I MISS ANYTHING? COLLEAGUES. THERE ARE 2 TO 24 WE MAY NEED TO DISCUSS.
LET ME BRING I'M BRINGING BACK TO 24.
33. 283 DEALS WITH THE LAND TRUST.
I'M IN FAVOR OF THE PROJECT, BUT NOT IT BEING DONE IN A LAND TRUST FORMAT.
COMMISSIONER. SO LET ME LET ME READ THE LIST AGAIN.
WE HAVE ITEMS. EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEM 309 AND REGULAR REGULAR COURT ITEMS FOR 18 2026 103 125 192 224.
248 TO 60 4 TO 72 83 TO 80 4 TO 85.
313. JUDGE, ARE YOU COVERING THE 245? THAT'S THE MONKEYPOX.
YOU'RE COVERING THAT UNDER ANOTHER.
I DON'T KNOW. THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN LISTED.
THANK YOU. THAT'S WE DEFINITELY NEED TO DISCUSS THAT.
LOOK, WE'RE ADDING TO 45, WHICH IS THE MONKEYPOX ITEM.
ANYTHING ELSE THAT I MISSED? NO. ALL RIGHT. NO PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THIS AGENDA.
[04:15:03]
NO ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATIONS.MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
I'M IN FAVOR OF MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
SO LET'S START WITH THE COAST GUARD AND THEN.
I HEAR THE HR CONSULTANT THAT'S PRESENTING THE COMPENSATION STUDY.
THEY HAVE A HARD STOP AT 4 P.M.
IF THAT WORKS, THE WORST OF IT.
ALL RIGHT. SO FOR A POSITIVE ITEM, WE'RE CELEBRATING THE COAST GUARD'S BIRTHDAY.
AND WE HAVE SOME SOME WONDERFUL GUESTS HERE.
SO LET ME JUST READ THIS RESOLUTION.
I THINK I SAW CAPTAIN SMITH MAKE HIS WAY.
WELCOME. IT'S ALWAYS GOOD TO SEE YOU.
ALL RIGHT. HERE'S THE THE RESOLUTION.
WHEREAS SINCE AUGUST 4TH, 1790, THE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD HAS SAFEGUARDED THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND PROMOTED NATIONAL SECURITY, BORDER SECURITY AND ECONOMIC PROSPERITY IN A COMPLEX AND EVOLVING MARITIME ENVIRONMENT.
THE COAST GUARD IS THE PRINCIPAL FEDERAL AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR MARITIME SAFETY, SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP IN US PORTS AND INLAND WATERWAYS ALONG MORE THAN 95,000 MILES OF U.S.
COASTLINE. THE COAST GUARD SECTOR HOUSTON.
GALVESTON SUPPORTS A WIDE RANGE OF COAST GUARD OPERATIONS, INCLUDING MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, AIDS TO NAVIGATION PORTS, WATERWAYS, LAW ENFORCEMENT AND SEARCH AND RESCUE IN AN AREA THAT ENCOMPASSES FIVE OF THE 20TH BUSIEST PORTS TO INCLUDE THE PORTS OF HOUSTON, BEAUMONT, LAKE CHARLES, TEXAS CITY, PORT ARTHUR, FREEPORT AND GALVESTON, AS WELL AS 247 MILES OF GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAYS, COLLECTIVELY ACCOUNTING FOR 25% OF THE TOTAL US TONNAGE BY SHIPS AND CONTRIBUTING OVER $1,000,000,000,000 TO THE NATION'S ECONOMY.
A SECTOR COMMANDER, CAPTAIN SMITH SERVES AS THE CAPTAIN OF THE PORT.
OFFICER IN CHARGE OF MARINE INSPECTION.
FEDERAL MARITIME SECURITY COORDINATOR AND FEDERAL ON SCENE COORDINATOR AND COORDINATES.
SEARCH AND RESCUE. WATERWAYS MANAGEMENT AND CONTINGENCY PLANNING OPERATIONS.
WHEREAS AUGUST 4TH IS CELEBRATED NATIONALLY AS COAST GUARD DAY TO HONOR THE ESTABLISHMENT ON THAT DAY IN 1790 OF THE REVENUE CUTTER SERVICE FOREBEAR OF TODAY'S COAST GUARD BY THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT, WHICH AUTHORIZED THE BUILDING OF A FLEET OF TEN CUTTERS WHOSE RESPONSIBILITY WOULD BE ENFORCEMENT OF THE FIRST TARIFF LAWS ENACTED BY CONGRESS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION NOW THEREFORE BE A RESULT, THE HARRIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT PROCLAIMED SATURDAY, AUGUST 4TH, AS COAST GUARD DAY IN HARRIS COUNTY.
AND WE WERE JUST VISITING WITH CHIEF ROYAL TODAY, WHO WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN THE RESPONSE TO ITS FIRE.
SO AS THE COAST GUARD, SO MANY OTHER ISSUES, YOU GUYS ARE THERE AND AND YOU'RE SUCH AN IMPORTANT PART OF MAKING SURE THAT THAT WE CONTINUE TO BE SUCH A GREAT PORT AND SUCH A GREAT ECONOMIC ENGINE AND A SAFE ONE.
I APPLAUD CAPTAIN SMITH AND HIS COLLEAGUES.
AND AND TO HONOR YOUR SERVICE AND TO HONOR OUR COAST GUARD.
WE'RE SO VERY PROUD TO CELEBRATE THIS BIRTHDAY.
YES, COMMISSIONER. JUDGE, THANK YOU.
THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THIS RESOLUTION FORWARD.
AND AND THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU DO TO TO PROTECT OUR WATERWAYS.
BUT ANOTHER GUY WHO REPRESENTS YOU WELL IS THE PRIEST AT MY CHURCH.
FATHER TOM WAS WAS A GUARDIAN AT ONE POINT.
AND SO WE'RE YOU KNOW, HE KEEPS US STRAIGHT IN CHURCH.
YOU KNOW, HE KNOWS HOW TO RUN MASS.
BUT LISTEN, WE'RE JUST SO PROUD OF YOU AND GRATEFUL FOR ALL YOU DO.
[04:20:07]
BACK IN MY EARLIER YEARS, WE'RE WORKING CLOSELY WITH DEA.THERE'S SOME OPERATIONS WE WOULD DO CONCURRENTLY.
THANK YOU FOR ALL YOU'VE DONE.
THANK YOU FOR ALL YOU'VE ALL YOU REPRESENT.
AND AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS.
AND SO WE'RE GRATEFUL FOR YOU.
COMMISSIONER ELLISON AND COMMISSIONER RAMSEY, I JUST WANTED TO ADD MY THANK YOU WELL, SO APPRECIATIVE FOR THE WORK THAT YOU DO AND I TRY TO GET IN THE WHITE HOUSE, BUT THEY LEFT ME OUT.
I JUST GOT BACK IN THE COUNTRY.
THEY SAID, YOU CAN'T BE AROUND THE VICE PRESIDENT.
BUT I HEARD COMMISSIONER GARCIA WAS SINGING YOUR PRAISES.
BUT THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING THAT YOU DO, COMMISSIONER.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR LOCAL PARTNERSHIPS.
WITHOUT Y'ALL, OUR PORT WOULD NOT FUNCTION AS WELL AS IT DOES.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY A FEW WORDS, CAPTAIN SMITH? JUDGE, I JUST WANT TO AMEND WHAT WAS SAID BY THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COURT.
THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER CAHILL.
[Appearances before court (Part 3 of 3)]
JUDGE, THANK YOU FOR THIS TIME AND THANK YOU FOR THE RECOGNITION.I WANTED TO BRING SOME OF MY MY COLLEAGUES, THE WOMEN AND MEN OF THE COAST GUARD.
EACH OF THEM IN A DIFFERENT UNIFORM, REPRESENTING THE MANY MISSIONS THAT WE SERVE.
YES. 232 YEARS AGO, THE COAST GUARD WAS FORMED.
AND SINCE THAT TIME, THE COAST GUARD HAS CHANGED, CHANGED ALL FOR THE BETTER.
BUT PROBABLY THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IS WE RECOGNIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF PARTNERSHIPS.
SO DEFINITELY COULDN'T DO WHAT WE DO.
ALL THOSE STATISTICS YOU MENTIONED ARE NOT POSSIBLE WITHOUT THE SUPPORT OF HARRIS COUNTY.
SO DEFINITELY APPRECIATE, JUDGE, YOUR PERSONAL INVOLVEMENT WITH THE COAST GUARD RIGHT FROM THE START DURING THE FIRES YOU MENTIONED THROUGHOUT EVERY HURRICANE SEASON IN ANY INCIDENT THAT HAPPENS ON THE WATER.
SO ON BEHALF OF ALL OF US THAT ARE HERE TODAY AND EVEN THOSE THAT ARE NOT OVER 1700 THAT SERVE IN THIS AREA, WE WANT TO PRESENT YOU WITH A BALL CAP AND MAKE YOU AN HONORARY COAST GUARD MEMBER.
ALL RIGHT. SHE'S DONE A TRIATHLON SO SHE CAN SWIM, TOO.
OKAY. WELL, THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH.
I HEAR THERE'S A SHEET CAKE TO CELEBRATE 232 YEARS.
AND WE'LL GET A PICTURE WITH YOU ALL IN A MOMENT.
NOW. ANY ANY CHALLENGE COINS? JUST. JUST ASKING.
DO YOU GUYS KNOW WHAT THE DEAL IS? THEY CAN SPEAK TO A CERTAIN PORTION OF THE ITEM DIVA.
WHO CAN WHO CAN EXPLAIN THIS? THAT'S CORRECT. SO THEY HAVE A THEY HAVE A BRIEF PRESENTATION PREPARED ON THEIR STUDY, WHICH I THINK WOULD BE AN APPROPRIATE LEAD IN TO THE DISCUSSION ON POSITIONS AND POTENTIALLY ANALYSIS AS WELL.
THE PRESENTATION, I DON'T THINK SHOULD TAKE MORE THAN 10 MINUTES.
OKAY. SO WE'LL TAKE THE PICTURE, DO THE PRESENTATION, THEN GO GO FOR A BREAK AND HAVE THE CAKE.
SO LET'S JUST CONTINUE VERY BRIEFLY WITH WITH THE HR PRESENTATION BEFORE THEY HAVE TO LEAVE.
[Departments (Part 3 of 5)]
THEY WANT TO DO THAT PRESENTATION.YEAH. JUST FOR, LIKE, PERPETUITY.
OKAY, JUDGE, ARE YOU GOING TO VOTE ON ITEM? I'M SORRY. ON ITEM FOUR AT THE END.
I'M SORRY. ARE YOU GOING TO MAKE A MOTION FOR NUMBER FOUR AT THE END? YES, WHEN HE RETURNS.
OKAY. SO WE CAN TAKE THE AIR PRESENTATION BECAUSE THESE FOLKS ARE ABOUT TO LEAVE.
SO DAVE, IS THIS YOU OR SHANE THAT CAN TIE US UP HERE?
[04:25:01]
SHANE CAN TEE IT UP. AND THEN THE CONSULTANT FROM CBS IS ON TO GIVE A SHORT PRESENTATION.YEAH. JUDGE, WE PERFORMED A OR HAD A CONSULTANT PERFORM A COMPENSATION STUDY.
SO HE'S GOING TO GIVE LET HIM HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO GIVE A HIGH LEVEL PRESENTATION ON THE STUDY.
SO. I WOULD TYPICALLY PULL UP THE PRESENTATION.
AND JOE REISS IS FROM CBS CONSULTING.
SHE'D REMIND US WHICH ITEM THIS IS, NUMBER 2 TO 3.
OKAY. AND IS IT 308 AS WELL? YES, SIR. THAT'S YOUR ITEM, COMMISSIONER.
AND IT'S RELATED TO THIS STUDY.
YES. ALL RIGHT. SO WE'RE AN ITEM TO 56.
AND WHAT? LISTENING TO A PRESENTATION ABOUT THE COMPENSATION STUDY.
GO AHEAD. CAN EVERYONE HEAR ME OKAY? YES, WE CAN HEAR YOU.
CAN YOU PLEASE ADVANCE TO THE NEXT SLIDE? SO QUICKLY.
HELLO, I'M JOE RICE WITH CBS COMPENSATION CONSULTING.
THE EXCITEMENT. SO WITH THAT, I'LL BRIEFLY DESCRIBE SOME OF THE KEY PROJECT STEPS.
SO WE DO THAT BY FIRST REVIEWING THE CURRENT JOB DOCUMENTATION.
SO WE'RE LOOKING AT JOB DESCRIPTIONS AND WE'RE TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THINGS LIKE WHAT ARE THE MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS FOR JOBS, WHAT ARE THE ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES SO THAT WE'RE USING THAT CONTENT AND NOT JUST JOB TITLE FOR PURPOSES OF MATCHING TO THE MARKET? NEXT SLIDE. AS WE START THE PROCESS, WE ALSO NEED TO CONSIDER HOW YOU WANT TO COMPETE IN THE MARKET, AND THERE'S VARIOUS APPROACHES THAT YOU CAN TAKE.
SO THAT'S PAYING IN THE MIDDLE OF ALL LABOR MARKETS THAT HAVE SIMILAR POSITIONS.
SO THAT POINT WHERE HALF PAY MORE, HALF PAY LESS.
I WON'T GET INTO SOME OF THE OTHER METHODS, BUT THERE ARE ORGANIZATIONS THAT MIGHT CHOOSE TO LEAD THE MARKET BY SETTING THEIR PAY HIGHER THROUGH THAT MARKET RANGE OF PAY FOR VARIOUS REASONS, OR INTENTIONALLY SETTING THAT LOWER FOR VARIOUS REASONS AS WELL.
NEXT SLIDE. OUR NEXT STEP THEN IS TO EVALUATE MARKET DATA.
SO ONCE WE HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE JOBS, WE WANT TO LOOK AT PUBLISHED SURVEY DATA AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK THAT CAN BE PURCHASED SURVEY DATA THROUGH PAY FACTORS OR PAY SCALE. THERE ARE TWO COMPETITORS THAT MERGE DURING THE PROJECT, BUT THEY HAVE MARKET DATA AND WITHIN THEIR TOOL, PART OF WHAT WE'RE DOING IS IS HELPING TO IMPLEMENT THAT FOR THE COUNTY.
SO WE'RE DOING BENCHMARKING WITHIN THE SYSTEM.
WITHIN THAT WE CAN SET SPECIFIC LABOR MARKET PARAMETERS.
SO THE DIFFERENT THINGS THAT WE TYPICALLY LOOK AT ARE INDUSTRY, GEOGRAPHY AND SIZE.
AND SO FROM A GEOGRAPHIC STANDPOINT, WE SET THE MARKET TO HOUSTON.
SO THAT'S BASED ON YOUR EMPLOYEE HEADCOUNT OF 17,000.
FROM THAT, WE CAN ESTABLISH A COMPETITIVE RANGE.
SO THOSE WERE THE PARAMETERS THAT WERE SET UP WITHIN PAY FACTORS.
AND AGAIN, WE'RE USING THAT MARKET 50TH THEN TO BUILD THE PAY STRUCTURE.
SO LET ME SET UP THIS CHART A LITTLE BIT.
[04:30:05]
SO ALONG THE HORIZONTAL AXIS, WE HAVE PAY WITHIN THE MARKET, ON THE VERTICAL AXIS, WE HAVE PAY WITHIN THE COUNTY.AND IF YOU PICK ONE OF THOSE GREEN DOTS, THAT REPRESENTS ONE JOB.
AND SO IF YOU PICK A DOT AND YOU DRAW A LINE DOWN, THAT'S WHAT WE DOCUMENT AS THE MARKET.
AND THAT'S WHAT WE'LL SHOW AS THE AVERAGE INTERNAL COMPENSATION.
SO FOR SOME OF THESE JOBS, IT'S A MULTI INCUMBENT POSITION.
SO THAT DOT REPRESENTS THE AVERAGE SALARY DATA FOR ALL JOB HOLDERS.
AND THEN THE GOLD DATA AND TREND LINE REPRESENTS THE MARKET DATA WHICH WE PLOT AGAINST ITSELF.
SO IT ESTABLISHES A NICE BENCHMARK FOR COMPARISON.
SO BROADLY, WHAT YOU SEE IS THAT THERE ARE SOME DOTS ABOVE THAT LINE AND BELOW THAT LINE.
SO WE HAD SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS AROUND SOME OF THAT.
BUT AS A BROAD VIEW, THAT'S THE OVERALL COMPARISON OF HOW CURRENT PAY COMPARES TO THE MARKET.
MY SON. SO WE THEN TURNED OUR ATTENTION TO APPROPRIATE SALARY STRUCTURES.
SO YOUR SALARY STRUCTURE IS GOING TO SERVE A FEW PURPOSES.
SO FIRST OF ALL, IT'S GOING TO HELP BALANCE ALL OF THE MARKET DATA THAT'S OUT THERE, RIGHT? IT'S GOING TO SIMPLIFY COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION, BUT IT'S ALSO GOING TO ALLOW YOU THE FLEXIBILITY TO LOOK AT MARKET DATA AND THEN BALANCE THAT WITH INTERNAL EQUITY.
BROADLY, WE WANT RANGE MINIMUMS TO REPRESENT ATTRACTIVE ENTRY LEVEL PAY.
THE MIDPOINT THEN APPROXIMATES THAT MARKET BENCHMARK, WHICH HERE IS THE MARKET 50TH PERCENTILE.
BY CREATING THAT TOP UP PAY, IT'S GOING TO ENCOURAGE EMPLOYERS AS THEY APPROACH THE RANGE MAXIMUM TO SEEK NEW JOBS, NEW RESPONSIBILITIES DEVELOP THEIR SKILLS TO GROW THROUGH DIFFERENT POSITIONS AS COMPARED TO UNLIMITED COMPENSATION UPSIDE IN THEIR CURRENT ROLE.
NEXT LINE. WE ALSO EVALUATED BENEFITS AND THEN MORE BROADLY, TOTAL COMPENSATION.
SO OUR APPROACH IS WHAT WE CALL AN ENHANCED FRINGE FORMULA WHERE WE CAN LOOK AT FIXED COST ELEMENTS LIKE MEDICAL AND MEDICAL RELATED AS AN AVERAGE COST PER EMPLOYEE, AND THEN LOOK AT VARIABLE COST ELEMENTS.
SO IF WE'RE LOOKING AT THE RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS, WE'RE PUTTING A VALUE TO A DAY NOT WORKED.
THOSE ARE BENEFITS THAT ARE DIRECTLY TIED TO EMPLOYEE SALARIES.
SO WE LOOK AT THOSE AS A PERCENTAGE OF PAY.
AND SO WE CAN COMPARE BENEFITS.
NEXT SLIDE. SO WE HAVE A CHART JUST HIGHLIGHTING THAT OVERALL TREND THAT WE SAW THAT FROM A BASE PAY STANDPOINT, ON AVERAGE, PAY WAS A LITTLE MORE THAN 4% BELOW MARKET.
TOTAL CASH COMPENSATION IS THAT GREEN BAR.
SO WITH THAT, WE'RE GOING TO INCLUDE ANY SHORT TERM VARIABLE PAY THAT WE SEE IN THE MARKET.
SO THAT'S GOING TO BE ANY BONUSES OR INCENTIVES THAT WOULD BE PAID WITHIN A YEAR.
AND H.R. THOSE MIGHT HAVE SOME INCENTIVE COMPENSATION IN THE BROADER LABOR MARKET.
AS WE EVALUATE BENEFITS, WE DO SHOW THAT THE BENEFITS PACKAGE DOES HELP.
IT IS ABOVE MARKET BY ABOUT 10%, BUT IT'S A SMALLER PIECE OF THE TOTAL COMPENSATION PIE.
RIGHT. SO THE QUESTION IS, WHEN YOU PUT THAT ALL TOGETHER, WHERE DO YOU NET OUT? AND SO OVERALL, IT'S VERY CLOSE TO COMPETITIVE, YOU KNOW, ABOUT A PERCENT BELOW MARKET WHEN YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THAT FULL PICTURE.
NOW, OUR GOAL, THOUGH, IS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE BASE SALARY DATA GETS COMPETITIVE.
RIGHT. SO WE'D LIKE TO SEE THAT BASE NUMBER MEET MARKET EXPECTATIONS.
NEXT SLIDE. SO WITH THAT, I'LL COVER SOME FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
[04:35:04]
SO JUST ASSESSING THE CURRENT PLAN OVERALL, OUR VIEW WAS THAT THE SALARY STRUCTURES THAT YOU HAVE IN PLACE CAN BE SIMPLIFIED AND IMPROVED.SO IN SOME CASES, THERE'S MULTIPLE SALARY STRUCTURES.
SO TYPICALLY WHEN IT COMES TO THINGS LIKE THAT, WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW WIDE A PAY RANGE MIGHT BE AND WE'RE LOOKING AT THINGS LIKE HOW MUCH ONE MIDPOINT OF A PAY GRADE INCREASES OVER THE PREVIOUS.
THE CURRENT JOB DOCUMENTATION DOES MAKE RELIABLE MARKET BENCHMARKING DIFFICULT.
AND SO THAT'S A PRODUCT THAT OVER TIME, WITH SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION CHANGING AND HOW JOBS ARE CLASSIFIED IN THE CURRENT SYSTEM, THERE NEEDS TO BE A BETTER CONNECTION BETWEEN THE JOB DOCUMENTATION AND ROLES.
IN BROAD TRENDS, WE DO SEE THAT BASE PAY IS GENERALLY BELOW MARKET LEVELS.
SO WE SAW THAT A LITTLE BIT EARLIER IN THE CHART.
BUT BUT MORE OFTEN THAN NOT, PAY IS GENERALLY BELOW MARKET LEVELS.
THE BENEFITS ARE GENERALLY ABOVE MARKET LEVELS.
SO THOSE DO HELP AND THEN PAY.
AS YOU LOOK AT A SPECIFIC JOB, YOU CAN SEE THAT PAY CAN VARY PRETTY WIDELY ACROSS THE COUNTY.
WE HAVE AN EXAMPLE OF THAT ON THE NEXT SLIDE.
SO ON THIS CHART IT'S ANOTHER BUSY CHART.
I'LL TAKE A MOMENT TO SET IT UP, BUT WE'RE TAKING WORK TO.
SO IT IS A JOB THAT EXISTS IN MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS ACROSS THE COUNTY.
AND SO WHAT WE'VE LINED UP HERE ALONG THE VERTICAL AXIS, WE'RE LOOKING AT SERVICE YEARS.
SO THIS IS TOTAL TENURE AND THEN WE'RE PLOTTING THAT WITH ANNUALIZED PAY.
SO THE GOLD BOXES HERE REPRESENT OUR PROPOSED PAY RANGE.
THE BOTTOM OF THE BOX IS THE RANGE MINIMUM.
THE GRAY LINE THROUGH THE CENTER IS THE MIDPOINT, THE TOP IS THE RANGE MAXIMUM.
AND SO WE'RE PLOTTING EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION BASED ON TENURE.
BUT THERE IS A LOT OF VARIABILITY.
SO WE HAVE SOME EMPLOYERS THAT ARE BELOW OUR PROPOSED RANGE MINIMUM, MANY EMPLOYEES ABOVE OUR RANGE MAXIMUM, BUT NOT THE CORRELATION IN PAY YOU WOULD EXPECT TO SEE BASED ON SOMETHING LIKE TIME AND JOB.
THIS IS ALSO A JOB THAT EXISTS IN THE SERIES, RIGHT? SO AS A CLERK, TOO, YOU MIGHT INFER THAT THERE IS A CLERK, ONE AS WELL.
SO THIS IS A JOB THAT EXISTS IN A HIERARCHY WHERE THERE'S OPPORTUNITY FOR ADVANCEMENT.
SO IF YOU LOOK AT THE SPREAD OF CURRENT INCUMBENT PAY, WHICH CAN VARY QUITE, QUITE A BIT FROM BELOW 30,000 TO NEARLY 55,000, THAT'S A BIG VARIABILITY IN PAY FOR SOMETHING THAT EXISTS IN A HIERARCHY LIKE THAT.
YOU WOULD EXPECT THOSE RANGES TO BE A LITTLE TIGHTER.
SO WE LOOKED AT A SEGMENT OF THE JOBS WE DID NOT LOOK AT ALL.
SO THAT BENCHMARKING NEEDS TO CONTINUE.
WE RECOMMEND IMPLEMENTING THOSE MARKET BASED PAY STRUCTURES.
SO THAT'S REALLY LOOKING AT THE ALIGNMENT OF THE MARKET DATA COMPARED TO THE PROPOSED PAY RANGE USING THAT MARKET BASED FIRST APPROACH, BUT THEN MAKING ADJUSTMENTS WHERE NEEDED FOR INTERNAL EQUITY.
GOING FORWARD, THEN INCREASE PAY FOR EMPLOYEES WHO ARE BELOW THOSE PROPOSED RANGE MINIMUMS. WE THINK THOSE ARE EMPLOYEES THAT YOU'RE AT RISK OF LOSING DUE TO PAY, BUT ALSO FREEZE PAY FOR EMPLOYEES WHO ARE ABOVE THEIR RANGE MAXIMUM.
OVER TIME, WE EXPECT THE STRUCTURE TO INCREASE THAT.
IN THE FUTURE, THE EMPLOYEE MIGHT BE ELIGIBLE FOR ANOTHER INCREASE AT SOME POINT.
SO THIS IS A BIG RECOMMENDATION.
JUDGE, MAY I INTERJECT WITH A QUICK QUESTION? YES, GO AHEAD. COMMISSIONER CABLE, YOU JUST TOUCHED THE POINT THAT HAS SOME CONCERN IN IN OUR LOOKING AT THIS.
WHEN YOU SAY FREEZE AND WE'LL USE THE EXAMPLE OF THE CLERK TO POSITION WHAT YOU'RE ENCOURAGING US TO DO IS TO IF SOMEONE, INSTEAD OF INCREASING THEIR PAY ABOVE CLERK TO, WE TURN THEM INTO A CLERK ONE OR THREE, WHATEVER THE NEXT STEP UP IN THE SYSTEM WOULD BE.
[04:40:02]
YOU'RE NOT ADVOCATING THAT WE CUT PEOPLE'S PAY, BUT THAT WE REDEFINE THE RANGES VERY SIMILAR TO THE STATE WHICH THEY HAVE THEIR SE ONE THROUGH 19.RIGHT. OR THE FEDS THAT HAVE THEIR G ONE THROUGH WHATEVER THEIR HIGHER NUMBER 23 IS THAT WE CLOSER DEFINE OURSELF WITH THOSE RANGES AND THAT WE MOVE OUR EMPLOYEES FROM AG7 TO AG8 WHEN IT'S TIME FOR THEM TO GET THAT INCREMENTAL INCREASE. WE'RE NOT ADVOCATING THAT WE FREEZE THE EMPLOYEE'S PAY, BUT THAT WE CREATE MORE OPPORTUNITIES FOR MORE RANKINGS.
IF I'M UNDERSTANDING WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, IT COULD BE ONE OR THE OTHER.
SO IN SOME CASES WE MIGHT WE MIGHT REALLY RECOMMEND THAT YOU FREEZE PAY.
THREE WE WOULDN'T RECOMMEND THAT YOU JUST ADVANCE AN EMPLOYEE BECAUSE OF TIME IN THE JOB, RIGHT? WE WOULD HOPE THAT THERE'S SOME UNDERLYING JOB CHARACTERISTICS THAT THEY WOULD NEED TO BE ABLE TO MOVE THAT.
SO I THINK A LOT OF THOSE COULD BE CLEANED UP.
BUT IN SOME CASES, IF THAT CLERK TOO IS NOT READY TO MOVE INTO A CLERK THREE, THEN WE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THEY BE WHAT WE CALL RED CIRCLE, RIGHT? SO THEY WOULD BE THEY WOULD NOT RECEIVE A SALARY INCREASE UNTIL THAT POINT WHERE THE RANGE MIGHT CATCH UP IN THE FUTURE AND THEY COULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR AN INCREASE.
DOES THAT HELP CLARIFY? YES. SORT OF.
SO I SO IF I MIGHT JUST WANT YOU ON THAT PAGE, ON THE CLERK POSITION, IT LOOKS LIKE THERE ARE MASSIVE DISPARITIES IN PAY FOR PEOPLE WITH SIMILAR EXPERIENCE IN THE SAME POSITION. CORRECT.
SO ONE OF THERE IS NOT THE LEVEL OF DETAIL WE WOULD LIKE ON THAT.
SO IT WOULD BE GREAT IF WE HAD TIME AND JOB, RIGHT? SO WE DON'T KNOW.
ALL WE KNOW IS IS IS TOTAL TEN YEAR, RIGHT.
SO WE ARE BRINGING FORWARD POTENTIALLY OTHER EXPERIENCE WITHIN THE COUNTY INTO THAT.
BUT BY AND LARGE, I THINK IT'S STILL ILLUSTRATIVE OF THE PROBLEM.
SO BUT BUT AND IT WOULD INDICATE THAT THERE ARE SOME DISPARITIES.
MAYBE NOT AS STRONG, THOUGH, AS WE MIGHT THINK BASED ON THE DATA WE HAVE.
IS IT NORMAL TO SEE THAT KIND OF INEQUITY IN PAY IN OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES? IT'S SOMEWHAT RARE TO SEE THAT LEVEL OF DISPARITY, ESPECIALLY IF YOU JUST HAD CLARK RIGHT.
SO, I MEAN, I KNOW WE'RE ON OUR TIME SCHEDULE.
I JUST WANT TO SAY I PERSONALLY THINK PAY EQUITY IS IS IMPORTANT.
AND BECAUSE LABOR IS OUR LARGEST COUNTY EXPENSE, ANYTHING THAT WE CAN DO TO BE STRATEGIC AND COMPETITIVE AND EQUITABLE, I THINK IS WORTH INVESTING IN.
BUT I'LL LET YOU FINISH YOUR PRESENTATION.
YEAH, I THINK THE POINT OF THE JOB ARCHITECTURE IS CAN HELP A LOT TO THOSE ENDS.
RIGHT. SO I MENTIONED CURRENTLY.
JOB DOCUMENTATION HAS GOTTEN AWAY FROM SYSTEM TITLES.
AND SO I THINK THIS JOB ARCHITECTURE PROCESS, WHICH WOULD BE MORE INTERNAL EQUITY FOCUSED TO SAY THERE'S CERTAIN TYPES OF WORK, RIGHT? SO MANAGERIAL VERSUS PROFESSIONAL OR BUSINESS SUPPORT AS A BROAD CATEGORY AND THEN WITHIN THAT TO DEFINE SOME SPECIFIC JOB LEVELS.
SO AS AN ENTRY LEVEL PROFESSIONAL VERSUS INTERMEDIATE OR SENIOR, WHAT ARE SOME OF THOSE REQUIRED MINIMUMS? WHAT HOW DO YOU SCOPE OUT THE JOB BASED ON FACTORS LIKE THE ROLE SPAN OF CONTROL AUTHORITY TO ACT, DIFFERENT FACTORS LIKE THAT TO CREATE SOME STANDARDS, WHICH I THINK THEN YOU'LL HAVE TO GO THROUGH A PROCESS TO PLACE EMPLOYEES IN THAT JOB ARCHITECTURE.
SO. WAS THERE A QUESTION? YEAH, A QUICK QUESTION.
SO YOU'RE TRYING TO STANDARDIZE POSITIONS IN 30 PLUS DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS IN THE COUNTY.
I MEAN, THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE JOBS ARE NOT AS SIMPLE AS YOU MAY OUTLINE.
[04:45:04]
AND WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO IF YOU IF YOU LOOK WITHIN DISCIPLINE INSIDE THIS IS WHAT TYPICALLY HEALTH CARE WORKERS PAY AND THIS IS WHAT A CLERK IN THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY MAKES.THIS IS WHAT A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER PAYS WHEN HE'S MANAGING.
WE'VE GOT 17,000 OF PROBABLY THE MOST DIVERSE DISCIPLINES YOU COULD FIND ANYWHERE.
SO I'M CLEARLY NOT UNDERSTANDING WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO HERE.
SO IT IS NOT AN EXPECTATION THROUGH THIS JOB ARCHITECTURE PROCESS THAT THE INDIVIDUAL BULLETS OF WHAT A JOB IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WOULD ALIGN ACROSS ALL DEPARTMENTS.
THERE'S STILL VARIABILITY THAT YOU CAN BUILD IN FOR THAT, BUT IF IN ONE.
SO IF YOU THINK ABOUT A POSITION AS A CLERK, THAT'S TYPICALLY A BUSINESS SUPPORT CLERICAL TYPE POSITION, THAT IF IN ONE DEPARTMENT THE REQUIRED QUALIFICATIONS OR ZERO YEARS OF EXPERIENCE AND ANOTHER IT'S TEN, BUT THEY SHARE THE SAME JOB TITLE AND PAY RANGE.
THOSE ARE THE THINGS THAT WE'RE TRYING TO ALIGN.
JUST A COUPLE OF QUICK POINTS.
I DON'T WANT YOU HERE, BUT I WANT TO DO OTHER JURISDICTIONS HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE PAY SCALE? I'M SORRY, WHAT WAS THE QUESTION? DO OTHER JURISDICTIONS HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE PAY SCALE? YEAH. I MEAN, YOU HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE PAY SCALE NOW.
SO SO THEY EXIST. THEY EXIST IN MOST ORGANIZATIONS.
HOW MUCH MORE DO YOU HAVE? I KNOW WE WERE ABOUT 10 TO 13.
I THINK THIS MAY BE THE LAST SLIDE.
I HAD SOME MORE TIME IF THERE ARE OTHER QUESTIONS.
SO EITHER FOR YOU OR FOR THE COUNTY MANAGER OF THE BUDGET OFFICE.
I REMEMBER YOUR FIRST SLIDE REALLY STRUCK ME.
YOU SAID STRUCTURES CAN BE SIMPLIFIED AND IMPROVED.
CURRENT DOCUMENTATION MAKES RELIABLE, BENCHMARK AND DIFFICULT BASE PAY GENERALLY BELOW MARKET BENEFITS IN THIS COUNTY, GENERALLY ABOVE MARKET PAY CAN VARY SIGNIFICANTLY FOR SIMILAR JOBS.
SO WHAT I WANT TO ASK YOU TO YOU ARE COUNTY MANAGER.
WHAT WOULD YOU NEED TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THIS STUDY? YOU TAKE THAT ONE? GO FOR IT. YEAH.
THIS PROCESS STARTED BY LOOKING AT A SEGMENT OF THE WORKFORCE.
AND SO I THINK MORE WORK NEEDS TO BE DONE TO EVALUATE OTHER JOBS AND THEN.
SO I THINK SOME OF THE ACTIONS HAVE BEEN PUT IN MOTION TO BETTER DEFINE WHAT JOBS DO TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE DOING THAT ACCURATE ASSESSMENT FROM FROM THERE.
I'LL HAVE TO HAND IT OVER TO OTHERS TO FINISH.
I WOULD SAY, COMMISSIONER, THERE IS A PEOPLE ISSUE.
IT'S NOT A HUGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE, BUT WE HAVEN'T HAD PEOPLE AT THE COUNTY WHOSE RESPONSIBILITY IS TO REALLY MAINTAIN AND UPDATE THE SALARY STRUCTURE AND THE COMMISSIONERS. RAMSEY POINT YOU DON'T WANT TO HAVE.
YOU WANT TO HAVE THE RIGHT LEVEL OF GRANULARITY, RIGHT? BECAUSE SOMEONE ANSWERING THE PHONE AND SCHEDULING MEETINGS MAY BE THE SAME JOB ACROSS DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS, BUT SOMEONE PROCESSING, YOU KNOW, HEALTH CARE PAPERWORK MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM SOMEONE PROCESSING A DIFFERENT KIND OF PAPERWORK.
AND IF THAT'S THE DIRECTION I KNOW SHANE AND CHIQUITA AND I'M READY TO GO MAKE IT HAPPEN.
SO HOW MANY PEOPLE WHAT DO YOU THINK YOU'D NEED? HOW MANY POSITIONS TO 3 TO 100.
WHAT? FIVE, NINE? SIX. WELL, WE'RE STARTING WITH NINE.
[04:50:04]
LOOK, I THINK IT'S THOUGHTFUL.IT'S A WORK IN PROCESS, OBVIOUSLY.
I'LL READ IT IN CASE SOMEBODY HAS A PROBLEM WITH IT.
THREE A ROAD MAP FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVIDING SUFFICIENT TIME TO DEPARTMENTS FOR FLEXIBILITY FOR HIGH PERFORMERS AND EMPLOYEES WITH EXTRA DUTIES.
AND THIS COULD BE PART OF A SEPARATE ONE.
CAN I CAN I ASK A QUESTION, A QUESTION OF THE MR. RICE AND MR. KURZWEIL? YOU KNOW, THE ANALYSIS BRINGS UP SOMETHING THAT I THINK WE WERE KIND OF THEORETICALLY AWARE OF, AND IT'S THAT THE BENEFITS ARE SORT OF ABOVE AVERAGE, WHEREAS THE ACTUAL COMPENSATION IS BELOW AVERAGE.
DO YOU HAVE ANY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HOW TO RECRUIT, GIVEN THAT FACT? AND YOU KNOW, LIKE, I GUESS, WHAT'S THE BEST PRACTICES FOR HOW TO MANAGE THAT? THAT'S ONE. THE SECOND QUESTION IS, YOU KNOW, YES, WE ARE AIMING FOR THE THE KIND OF AVERAGE OF THESE POSITIONS IN IN THE IN THE GENERAL GOVERNMENT SECTOR.
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE AREAS WHERE WE DO COMPETE WITH THE PRIVATE SECTOR? WE'VE TALKED ABOUT REALLY TALENTED ENGINEERS OR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS.
WE'RE TRYING TO PUT THE FORENSIC SCIENCES OR THAT KIND OF THING.
IS THERE LIKE A SEPARATE CATEGORY FOR THAT? YEAH. SO SO ON THE FIRST THING, HOW TO RECRUIT.
SO TRANSLATING THAT MESSAGE ALSO TO JOB CANDIDATES CAN BE REALLY IMPACTFUL, RIGHT? SO TO BRING THAT SAME TYPE OF MENTALITY.
BUT WHEN YOU'RE COMMUNICATING WITH CANDIDATES TO CLEARLY LAY OUT IN A JOB OFFER THOSE BENEFIT ITEMS. SO TRADITIONALLY YOU MIGHT GIVE A LETTER THAT OUTLINES THE BASE RATE OF PAY AND THEN YOU MIGHT PROVIDE THEM A BENEFITS PACKET, BUT YOU CAN INCORPORATE SOME OF THAT SAME TOTAL REWARDS MENTALITY INTO YOUR JOB OFFERS.
SO THAT WOULD BE A BEST PRACTICE TO HIGHLIGHT.
SO THAT'S THAT'S SOMETHING THAT, THAT YOU CAN DO, THAT YOU CAN, AS YOU DO THE MARKET COMPARISONS WITHIN CERTAIN JOBS FOR CERTAIN JOB FAMILIES TO BE MORE OPEN WITH THAT COMPARISON.
I MEAN, I THINK OBVIOUSLY THE PRESENTATION IS A SUMMARY.
IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO GET IN THE WEEDS OF ALL OF THIS, BUT IT DOES SEEM, AT LEAST FROM WHAT WE'VE SEEN COME TO US, LACK OF CONSISTENCY WHEN IT COMES TO TO CERTAIN SALARIES.
AND THEN IN PARTICULAR, THE ISSUE OF COMPETITIVENESS.
WE ONLY HEAR ABOUT ONES THAT ARE NOT COMPETITIVE ENOUGH.
SO I KNOW SOME WERE MORE COMPETITIVE.
THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR.
MR.. HE HAD TO LEAVE IN ABOUT 5 MINUTES.
BEFORE I SENT MY MOTION AROUND OUR THEATERS.
ALL WHICH YOU. WE HAVE THE MOTION TABLE.
DO YOU GUYS HAVE IT, MARICELA? YES, I DID RECEIVE THE EMAIL.
LOOK, I WANT TO SAY IT'S A WORK IN PROGRESS.
SO I THINK IT'S AN ATTEMPT AND WE'LL SEE WHAT YOU COME BACK WITH.
[04:55:02]
COMMISSIONER, I THINK THIS IS WELL-INTENDED.I THINK THE STUDY WAS WELL INTENDED, BUT I HAVEN'T SEEN THE STUDY THAT HADN'T BEEN APPROVED.
I MEAN, I SEE A POWERPOINT AND I REALLY DON'T LIKE POWERPOINTS, BUT THAT'S A PERSONAL THING.
AND AND WHEN I LOOK AT THIS AND THE MOTION SAYS WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A PLAN IS GOING TO BE MORE STANDARDIZED DESCRIPTION, SIMPLER THERAPY, ROADMAP TO IMPLEMENTATION AND FLEXIBILITY FOR HIGH PERFORMERS.
AND WE'RE GOING TO MOVE TO THE AND DIRECT THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET TO INCLUDE THE PROPOSED BUDGET GOING FORWARD, ADEQUATE RESOURCES TO ADDRESS THE PAY DISPARITIES ON A STUDY WE'VE NOT EVEN READ.
I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW WE CAN DO ANYTHING AT THIS POINT.
THERE OUGHT TO BE SOMETHING MORE, I'LL SAY IT INTRODUCTORY.
YOU KNOW, THERE MIGHT BE A FIRST STEP.
BUT I'LL BE GLAD TO GET WITH YOU.
YOU START, YOU GET A CHANCE TO RAISE THOSE CONCERNS.
BUT SO I MADE A MOTION AS THE SECOND COMMISSIONER REAL QUICK, IS THERE GOING TO BE TWO SEPARATE MOTIONS OR IS THIS STILL CONSIDERED IN ONE? PUT IN ONE. JUST MAKE IT ONE VOTE.
TAKE OUT THE AMMO TOO AND DIRECT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET TO INCLUDE AND PROPOSED BUDGET TO TO INCLUDE A PROPOSED BUDGET GOING FORWARD TO ADEQUATELY ADDRESS RESOURCES.
EXPERIENCE. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK IF, IF MR. KURZWEIL CAN UPDATE US I MEAN, I CAN UNDERSTAND WHERE THIS IS NOT IT'S NOT SIMPLE PROCESS, YOU KNOW, AND AS I SAID, WE DON'T WE HAVEN'T ADDED UP THE THE THE DIFFERENTIALS IN WHETHER WE HAVE, YOU KNOW, THE LONGEVITY OF THE EMPLOYEE.
RIGHT. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT IS JUST GOING TO HAVE TO DIG INTO.
SO, MR. CARROLL, PERHAPS YOU CAN YOU CAN UPDATE US WHAT'S WHAT'S A REASONABLE PERIOD AT WHICH YOU COULD COME BACK MAYBE THREE OR FOUR MONTHS OR SOMETHING. YEAH, I THINK SO.
OR IT CAN EVEN BE PIECEMEAL AS LONG AS WE'RE COMING THROUGH WITH RECOMMENDATIONS.
BUT TO RAMSEY'S POINT, WE HAVE A LOT OF DETAIL OF THE STUDY AND ALL THE POSITIONS AND WHICH ONES THEY BENCHMARK, WHICH ONES THEY SLOTTED.
AND THIS WAS JUST A KIND OF A SUMMARY OF THAT.
YOU KNOW, I MEAN, I THINK OBVIOUSLY ANY WHOLESALE CHANGE WILL HAVE TO COME THROUGH COURT.
THEY DON'T JUST GET TO GO DO IT.
AND I KNOW THAT COMMISSIONER ELLIS JUST WANTED TO INCLUDE THEM TOGETHER, BUT I THINK THAT IT COULD BE MADE TO WHERE WE DIRECT THE OFFICE OF BUDGET MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET TO INVESTIGATE POTENTIAL PAY DISPARITIES AND INCLUDE AND PROPOSED BUDGET GOING FORWARD ADEQUATE RESOURCES TO PAY THE DISCOVERED DISPARITIES.
AND I COULD SUPPORT THAT SECOND MOTION IF WE HAD THE CATEGORY YOU WANT TO VOTE ON SEPARATE.
SO THE MOTION WOULD BE THIS IS THIS WILL BE THE MOTION.
I MOVE TO DIRECT THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET TO INVESTIGATE POTENTIAL PAY DISPARITIES AND INCLUDE IN THE PROPOSED BUDGET GOING FORWARD ADEQUATE RESOURCES TO ADDRESS ANY IDENTIFIED PAY DISPARITIES.
WOULD YOU MAKE THAT MOTION? COMMISSIONER CAHILL I WOULD, AND THAT'S WHY THE SECOND ONE, RIGHT? THAT'S FOR THE SECOND. I'LL SECOND.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS, ALL THE SEPARATELY JUDGE.
YES, LET'S VOTE ON THAT ONE RIGHT NOW.
YEAH THIS IS ON ITEM 308 FOR THE MOTION.
YOU JUST FINISHED READING AT THE MOMENT.
YES, FOR THE MOTION I JUST READ NOW WE'RE GOING TO MAKE ANOTHER MOTION.
[05:00:01]
AND THE COMMISSIONER. YES.WOULD YOU LIKE TO READ MOTION? WHAT YOU HAVE IS I MOVED TO DIRECT HUMAN RESOURCES AND RISK MANAGEMENT TO PREPARE A PLAN TO IMPLEMENT TO PREPARE A PLAN TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMPENSATION STUDY.
THIS PLAN SHOULD INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO ONE MORE STANDARDIZED JOB DESCRIPTIONS TO A SIMPLER, FAIRER PAY STRUCTURE. THREE A ROADMAP FOR IMPLEMENTATION PROVIDING SUFFICIENT TIME TO DEPARTMENTS FOR FLEXIBILITY FOR HIGH PERFORMERS AND EMPLOYERS WITH EXTRA DUTIES.
I MAKE THAT MOTION AND THE NOT THE LAST SENTENCE? NO. IS THERE A DATE ON THAT PLAN? NO. SO WHEN THEY'LL, THEY'LL BRIEF US, THEY'LL COME BACK WHEN THEY THINK, YEAH I MEAN I WOULD JUST ANY PROPOSALS SHOULD COME BACK TO COMMISSIONERS COURT FOR IT'LL COME BACK.
SO THAT'S WHY IT DID SAY I'VE MOVED DIRECT TO PREPARE A PLAN TO IMPLEMENT.
THAT WAS HIS THAT WAS A SEPARATE WEBSITE.
YEAH. BUT JUST TO CLARIFY AND DIRECTOR ALMOST CAN CHIME IN, I THINK WE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSING INCLUDING SOME AMOUNT IN THE PROPOSED BUDGET FOR IDENTIFIED DISPARITIES, BUT I THINK THE FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF A NEW SALARY STRUCTURE WOULD WOULD TAKE LONGER THAN THAT AND THE PLAN WOULD COME BACK TO COURT FOR OUR REVIEW.
IF THERE'S A NEW JOB ARCHITECTURE, YES, COURT WOULD HAVE TO APPROVE IT.
WELL, YOU ARE RIGHT. THE WOMAN AT THAT SENTENCE.
THAT'S WHAT COMES BACK. IT'S YOU WANT TO ADD IT OR AND THAT WOULD COME BACK TO COURT.
OKAY, I'LL ANSWER THIS MOTION.
THIS PLAN WILL COME BACK TO COMMISSIONERS COURT.
MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY ON THAT LATTER MOTION.
NOW WE ALSO DO HAVE TO VOTE ON ITEM 26.
THAT'S THE PROPOSAL OF NINE POSITIONS.
AND THANK YOU, MR. RICE. THAT'S A PROPOSAL OF NINE REQUESTS FOR NINE POSITIONS FOR H.R.
IN ORDER TO BEGIN ALL OF THIS WORK.
I'LL MOVE IT. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
THOSE ARE THE EXTRA POSITIONS.
YES. SO THEY WERE GOING TO WORK ON.
WELL, DO YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT WHAT IT IS AGAIN? WAIT ONE MOMENT, PLEASE.
YEAH. SHE HAS NINE POSITIONS FOR HUMAN RESOURCES.
OKAY. SO MOTION CARRIES 4 TO 1.
I WILL ADD THE. I WILL ADD THE COMMENT.
I'D RATHER PAY OUR HR DEPARTMENT THAN PAY OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS.
AND THEN THE LAST ONE WAS ITEM 256, WHICH IS A TRANSMITTAL OF THE PRESENTATION THAT MR. RICE JUST SHARED WITH US.
SO. UM, I DON'T KNOW IF THE COAST GUARD FOLKS ARE STILL THERE, BUT I PROPOSE WE GO CHECK AND WE COULD TAKE 30 MINUTES FOR A LATE LUNCH OR SOMETHING.
YEAH, I KNOW NEITHER TIME BECAUSE THAT FOG IS COMING BACK.
GET OUT OF HERE. THAT FOG IS COMING BACK FOR PEOPLE THAT ARE OVER THE AGE OF 55.
AT 4:00 IS WHEN WYATT'S CAFETERIA, PICCADILLY CAFETERIA AND LUBY'S HAS THE SENIOR DINNER SPECIAL.
THOSE OF US STILL ALIVE TAKE A NAP AND THEN COME BACK IN A BETTER MOOD.
WE'RE BREAKING TILL QUARTER TILL FIVE.
OKAY. WE'RE BACK FROM DINNER, NUMBER ONE.
[Emergency/Supplemental COVID-19 items]
IT'S 448 AND COMMISSIONERS COURT IS BACK IN SESSION.AND SO NOW WE'RE MOVING TO ITEM 18.
WHICH IS THE BRIEF COVID UPDATE.
AND. WERE YOU GOING TO BE MAKING A MOTION NOW, JUDGE? NO. WAIT FOR THE COAST GUARD.
YEAH. NO, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO BRING IT BACK WHEN COMMISSIONER GARCIA IS IS PRESENT.
SO LAST TIME WE SPOKE, THE WASTEWATER LEVELS WERE GROWING WITH NO SIGN OF STOPPING.
[05:05:03]
BUT NOW THOSE WASTEWATER COVID LEVELS HAVE ACTUALLY GONE DOWN TO 725%.WHAT IT WAS WHEN THE MEASUREMENTS STARTED TO BE TAKEN FROM 927% AT THE LAST COURT, WE SHOULD EXPECT TO SEE HOSPITAL USAGE DECREASING SOON SINCE THAT FOLLOWS THE CASE LEVELS.
OBVIOUSLY, THE GOVERNOR EXTENDED HIS DISASTER DECLARATION.
BUT FOR NOW, IT SEEMS THAT THIS WAVE WAS ABLE TO SPARE OUR HOSPITALS AND JUST CREATE INCONVENIENCES FOR PEOPLE AND WHICH IS WHICH IS WHERE WE WANT TO BE. SO, YOU KNOW, SCHOOL STARTS REALLY SOON.
WE REALLY WANT TO ENCOURAGE PARENTS TO GET THEIR KIDS VACCINATED.
AND I KNOW THAT THE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS WORKING TO FINALIZE AND DISTRIBUTE NEW BOOSTER SHOTS THAT ARE GOING TO TARGET THE OMICRON STRAINS AND THE LATEST BY SUB VARIANTS. SO THAT'S WHAT I HAVE.
DIRECTOR ROBINSON SHOULD ALSO BE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
THEN WE DON'T HAVE ANY MOTIONS TODAY FOR REQUESTS.
NO ONE, UNLESS MY COLLEAGUES HAVE ANY MOTIONS.
THERE WILL BE NO NO ACTION ON ITEM 18.
NEXT, THIS ITEM 20, THAT'S THE ONE ON THE BOND INITIATIVES.
I IMAGINE COMMISSIONER GARCIA WANTS TO BE PRESENT FOR THAT ONE, SO WE'LL SKIP IT FOR NOW.
ITEM 26, WE ALREADY DISCUSSED THAT WAS THE COMPENSATION STUDY ITEM.
COMMISSIONER ELLIS, YOU HAD FLAGGED ITEM 103.
WHAT WAS. AND ONE INTERVIEW I WANT YOU TO HEAR A LITTLE BIT MORE CONTROL TO WALK US THROUGH THAT ITEM.
PEARSON, YOU SEEM TO BE ON MUTE.
WELL, GOOD AFTERNOON, JUDGE AND COMMISSIONERS.
MY NAME IS TINA PETERSON, AND I WILL BE HAPPY TO WALK YOU THROUGH THIS ITEM, COMMISSIONER ALICE.
IN SHORT, THIS IS AN ITEM TO PROVIDE AN COMPREHENSIVE AND STANDARDIZED APPROACH TO THE COST ESTIMATING PROCEDURES OF THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT.
AND REALLY WHAT IS DRIVING THIS IS THE FACT, AS YOU MENTIONED EARLIER, COMMISSIONER GARCIA, WE HAVE SOME MARKET VOLATILITY AND UNCERTAINTY THAT WE'RE DEALING WITH.
AND SO THIS EFFORT IS IS AN ATTEMPT TO GET SOME CLARITY ABOUT OUR PROCEDURES, PUT IN A STANDARDIZED PROCESS THAT WILL BE COMPREHENSIVE IN NATURE.
I'M OKAY WITH IT. WE NEED A MOTION ON.
SALUTE. SECOND ITEM 103 MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER IS ALL IN FAVOR.
ALL RIGHT. I SUPPOSE I'M IN FAVOR OF MOTION.
CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU, DR.
I'M GLAD YOU DID THAT. 25% GOLD ON IT.
I WAS VERY IMPRESSED WITH THAT, MWB.
COMMISSIONER CAHILL FLAGGED THAT ITEM.
SO WE CAN MOVE SOME FURTHER MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
COMMISSIONER RAMSEY FLAGGED THAT ITEM.
YOU KNOW, THIS IS A CONTINUATION OF A DISCUSSION WE HAD IN THE RENEWAL OPTION.
WHICH CENTENNIAL OFFENDER? THAT'S THAT MONITORING SYSTEM WE PUT ON FOLKS THAT ARE ON PROBATION.
AND I THINK THE QUESTIONS THAT CAME UP BEFORE IS, DO WE HAVE ENOUGH PEOPLE MONITORING THE PEOPLE THAT ARE OUT WITH THESE MONITORS ON WE'RE RENEWING A CONTRACT SO WE CAN HAVE THE MONITORING ANKLE BRACELETS.
[05:10:06]
BUT DO WE HAVE ENOUGH STAFF TO MONITOR THOSE? BUT I WAS JUST CURIOUS WHETHER OR NOT WE HAD RESOLVED THAT.I KNOW WE DISCUSSED IT AT LENGTH BEFORE WAS PULLED AND WAS BROUGHT BY COMMISSIONER RAMSEY.
IF I IF I MAY, THANK YOU FOR SPEAKING UP ON THIS.
I THINK THIS MICHAELIDES WILL TELL US THAT.
THERE IS STILL A PLACE, A BETTER PLACE THAT WE NEED TO GET TO BECAUSE WE HAVE TOO MANY OF THESE MONITORS OUT FOR PEOPLE THAT ARE NOT LIKELY THE BEST CANDIDATES FOR IT.
BUT WHERE WE DO NEED MONITORING AND MORE PEOPLE IS ON THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE HIGH RISK FACTORS TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF THAT BRACELET.
AND SO THIS IS THIS IS STILL AN AREA THAT NEEDS A LOT OF ATTENTION.
AND I THINK WE NEED TO WE'RE STILL WORKING.
WE'RE GETTING TO A BETTER PLACE.
THE NUMBER OF BRACELETS HAS REDUCED MONITORS.
BUT BUT IT'S A GOOD CATCH ON YOUR PART.
WELL, I THINK THAT'S A THAT'S A GOOD FIRST PLACE TO START.
IF WE COULD JUST MONITOR THE HIGHEST RISK.
SECONDLY, THE OC COMMISSIONER RAMSEY HAS THE MOTION.
SECOND, BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
ALL IN FAVOR. ALL RIGHT, THEN.
YOU OPPOSE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
YES. THIS IS ANOTHER OUT-OF-TOWN CONSULTANT THAT WE'RE HIRING.
WE'VE WE'VE GOT CHIEF HERR KLOTZ, WHO IS THE EXPERT IN THIS REGION.
I THINK THAT WE'VE GOT OUR OWN EXPERTISE AND HOUSE.
I DON'T THINK THAT WE NEED TO BE HIRING ANOTHER OUT-OF-TOWN CONSULTANT.
AND SO WITHOUT MUCH FURTHER ADO ON THIS, I'M I'M JUST THIS IS A SMALL FIRM THAT'S OUT THERE.
WE HAD IN OUR RESEARCH, THERE SEEM TO BE SOME ISSUES AND SOME OTHER LOCATIONS.
AND I JUST WOULD LIKE FOR US TO VOTE ON IT.
AND I'M GOING TO VOTE NO. SECOND MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
AND YOU OPPOSE? NO, I'M IN FAVOR OF MOTION.
ITEM 245 IS THE MONKEYPOX DISCUSSION.
AND LET ME JUST SAY VERY BRIEFLY AND I'LL HAND IT OVER TO BARBIE.
AS YOU GUYS HEARD THE THE SPEAKER EARLIER TODAY SAYING, YOU KNOW, WHY CAN'T WE PUT THE HIV POSITIVE COMMUNITY ON THE ON THE ON THE CRITERIA, ETC.? YOU KNOW, I'M TRYING AND I'D APPRECIATE SUPPORT FROM EVERYONE TO ADVOCATE FOR MORE VACCINES.
THAT'S REALLY WHERE THINGS ARE.
CERTAINLY THE CASES ARE GROWING EXTREMELY FAST IN OTHER LOCATIONS PRETTY FAST, AND OURS HAS BEEN ABOUT 300%, 600% INCREASE IN THE PAST THREE WEEKS, 120% INCREASE IN THE PAST WEEK.
BUT REALLY, IT'S IT'S ABOUT THE VACCINES RIGHT NOW.
SO THAT'LL BE MY MY ONLY COMMENT.
JENNIFER KIGER, OUR DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF COVID RESPONSE, AS WELL AS OUR INTERIM DIRECTOR OF OUR DIVISION OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, SURVEILLANCE AND EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, AS WELL AS ALLISON REESE, OUR ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF OUR COVID DIVISION.
TODAY, WE WANTED TO PROVIDE AN UPDATE TO YOUR COURT ON THE STATUS OF MONKEYPOX IN OUR COMMUNITY IN HARRIS COUNTY, AND THE EFFORTS THAT ARE UNDERWAY TO ADDRESS AND MITIGATE MONKEYPOX, AS WELL AS TO REQUEST RESOURCES TO SUPPORT OUR ONGOING EFFORTS AS WE BELIEVE WE WILL BE RESPONDING TO MONKEYPOX FOR SOME TIME.
AND TODAY, CAN YOU GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE? SO JUST IN TERMS OF AN OVERVIEW OF MONKEYPOX, HISTORICALLY, IT'S PRIMARILY OCCURRED IN AFRICA, OFTEN IN PROXIMITY TO TROPICAL RAINFOREST.
[05:15:09]
BUT RECENTLY IT HAS STARTED TO APPEAR INCREASINGLY IN URBAN AREAS.HARRIS COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH, IN COORDINATION WITH THE HOUSTON HEALTH DEPARTMENT, ARE WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPLICATE IMPLEMENT OUR MITIGATION OPERATIONS TO ADDRESS THIS NEW PUBLIC HEALTH THREAT.
AND ON BEHALF OF THE LEADERSHIP TEAM HERE IN HARRIS COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH, I JUST WANT TO COMMEND ALL OF THE HARD WORK THAT PUBLIC HEALTH STAFF HAS DONE TO STAND UP YET A NEW OPERATIONS TO RESPOND TO A NEW EMERGING THREAT TO OUR COMMUNITIES, ALONG WITH OUR CONTINUING COVID EFFORT AND OUR OTHER ESSENTIAL WORK DUTIES TO PROTECT THE HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF RESIDENTS IN HARRIS COUNTY.
WITH THAT, I WILL TURN IT OVER TO DR.
ERICA BROWN, WHO'S GOING TO PROVIDE A CLINICAL OVERVIEW.
ERIC BROWN. LOCAL HEALTH AUTHORITY.
SOME OF THIS. THE SYMPTOMS OF MONKEYPOX.
SORRY. SO THE SYMPTOMS OF MONKEYPOX START WITH A PRODROMAL, WHICH SOME PEOPLE MAY MISS, BUT THE SYMPTOMS CAN BE FEVER, HEADACHE, MUSCLE ACHES, SWOLLEN LYMPH NODES, CHILLS, RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS, THINGS THAT ARE VERY SIMILAR TO COLD OR FLU LIKE SYMPTOMS. THIS PROGRAM TYPICALLY LASTS ANYWHERE BETWEEN 7 TO 14 DAYS.
AND AGAIN, SOME PEOPLE CAN MISS THE PRODROMAL AND AND NOT NOTICE THAT THEY HAVE MONKEYPOX UNTIL THEY SEE THE CHARACTERISTIC RASH, WHICH CAN PRESENT ALONG A CONTINUUM OF MANY DIFFERENT THINGS. IT CAN BE PUSTULES LOOKING LIKE PIMPLES, IT CAN BE VESICLES LOOKING LIKE BLISTERS, AND IT CAN BE CRUSTED OR SCABBED OVER LESIONS AS WELL. THE MODE OF TRANSMISSION IS DIRECT CONTACT WITH INFECTIOUS RASH SCABS OR BODY FLUIDS.
RESPIRATORY SECRETIONS CAN TRANSMIT MONKEYPOX WITH PROLONGED FACE TO FACE CONTACT OR DURING INTIMATE PHYSICAL CONTACT, PROLONGED KISSING, CUDDLING OR SEX. IT CAN ALSO BE TRANSMITTED THROUGH TOUCHING FABRICS OR OBJECTS THAT WERE USED BY A PERSON WITH MONKEYPOX THAT HAVE NOT BEEN DISINFECTED.
IT IS NOT EASILY TRANSMITTED ON SURFACES.
THERE NEEDS TO BE SOME SECRETIONS LEFT BEHIND ON THE SURFACE.
CURRENTLY TREATMENT IS AN ANTIVIRAL WHICH WHICH ASSIST WITH THE SEVERITY OF ILLNESS.
BUT JUST LIKE MANY VIRUSES, IT DOES NOT CURE THE ILLNESS.
THE TREATMENT IS CALLED TT POX AND AGAIN IS AN ANTIVIRAL.
TWO PILLS USED TO TREAT ADULTS AND THERE IS SIMILAR TREATMENT AS LOWER DOSE FOR CHILDREN.
THE VACCINE THAT WE ARE USING IS CALLED GENIUS.
IT IS ONLY RECOMMENDED FOR THOSE WHO ARE 18 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER, AND IT IS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR ANYONE WHO IS INFECTED WITH MONKEYPOX CURRENTLY OR HAS BEEN INFECTED IN THE PAST.
AND WITH THAT, I WILL TURN IT OVER TO JENNIFER KIGER.
GOOD AFTERNOON. SO I WANT TO GIVE YOU A QUICK OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT SITUATION OF MONKEYPOX IN COMPARISON TO SOME OTHER CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES THAT HAVE HIGHER RATES OF MONKEYPOX.
AND THE RATE IS REALLY THE NUMBER OF CASES OVER THEIR POPULATION.
SO THEIR CASE RATE IS HIGHER AND THE HIGHEST THAT WE HAVE IN THE UNITED STATES.
AND IN COMPARISON TO NEW YORK CITY AND SAN FRANCISCO, THE CITY OF HOUSTON AND HARRIS COUNTY ARE DO HAVE A LESS HAVE LESS CASES AND A LOWER RATE OF MONKEYPOX CURRENTLY. NEXT SLIDE.
NEXT SLIDE. OUR OUTREACH AND EDUCATION GROUP HERE AT HARRIS COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH HAS BEEN VERY BUSY CONDUCTING TOWNHALLS WITH HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS AND HIGH RISK COMMUNITIES SUCH AS THE LGTBQ COMMUNITIES.
WE ARE DOING THOSE WEEKLY ON THURSDAYS AND FRIDAYS.
[05:20:01]
WE ALSO HAVE SEVERAL PRESS RELEASES, MEDIA INTERVIEWS AND SOCIAL MEDIA ENGAGEMENT, INCLUDING OVER 58 POSTS ON FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM AND TWITTER.AND WE HAVE THAT HOTLINE AVAILABLE FOR THE PUBLIC PROVIDERS AND PATIENTS SEVEN DAYS A WEEK.
NEXT SLIDE. AS FAR AS TESTING PATIENTS CAN GET TESTED BY THEIR PROVIDERS DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE HAVE A LAB CAPACITY HERE IN HOUSTON, HARRIS COUNTY, WHICH IS DIFFERENT FROM COVID 19 PROVIDERS, CAN COLLECT THE SPECIMENS FROM THEIR PATIENTS AND THEN USE THEIR COMMERCIAL LABS TO PROVIDE THE SAMPLE TO GET RUN THROUGH THE TEST.
ADDITIONALLY, US, ALONG WITH HOUSTON HEALTH DEPARTMENT, IS PROVIDING GUIDANCE TO THE PROVIDERS SO THAT THEY KNOW HOW TO CORRECTLY CONDUCT THE SPECIMEN COLLECTION AND THEY KNOW WHO TO PROVIDE THAT SPECIMEN TO TO GET THAT LAB SAMPLE RUN.
OUR HOUSTON HEALTH DEPARTMENT PARTNERS HAVE THE LABORATORY RESPONSE NETWORK, AND THEY ALSO HAVE LIMITED ABILITY TO RUN TEST, ESPECIALLY FROM OUR EPIDEMIOLOGY GROUPS FOR THOSE EXPOSED. WE WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW THAT THE LOCAL LABS RIGHT NOW THAT CAN PROVIDE THE TESTING IS LABCORP OR QUEST AND THEN THE HOUSTON LAB.
AS FAR AS CASE INVESTIGATIONS AND CONTACT TRACING ARE, CASE INVESTIGATORS ARE BUSY INVESTIGATING ALL CASES EITHER THAT WE DETERMINE THROUGH PROVIDERS OR THROUGH OUR LAB RESULTS THAT WE GET FROM THE STATE.
THOSE ARE SPECIFICALLY DONE FOR THE CASES THAT HAVE THE CASES OF MONKEYPOX.
IN ADDITION, WE PERFORM CONTACT TRACING FOR THOSE CASES SO THAT WE CAN DETERMINE IF THEY MEET THE ELIGIBILITY TO GET VACCINATED AND HOPEFULLY PREVENT GETTING INFECTED WITH MONKEYPOX.
WE ALSO MONITOR THE THOSE CLOSE CONTACTS FOR SYMPTOM DEVELOPMENTS IN CASE THEY DO TURN INTO A CASE.
WE ARE ALSO WORKING WITH PROVIDERS AND PARTNERS TO PROVIDE VACCINE FOR THOSE PATIENTS.
WE HAVE RECEIVED, IN COMBINATION WITH HOUSTON HEALTH DEPARTMENT, 5324 DOSES OF VACCINE AS OF 722, AND WE EXPECT AN ADDITIONAL 6740 EITHER TODAY OR TOMORROW IS THE LATEST THAT WE'VE HEARD.
I WANT TO BE CLEAR THAT WE KEEP GETTING DIFFERENT DATES ON WHEN THIS WILL ARRIVE.
WE ARE SPLITTING THAT 7030 WITH HOUSTON HEALTH DEPARTMENT.
SO THE ALLOCATION THAT COMES OUR WAY IS A SPLIT.
SO WE'RE WORKING WITH WE'VE WORKED VERY CLOSELY WITH YOU ON THE COMMISSIONERS COURT AND OUR COUNTY JUDGE, AND WE'RE VERY GRACIOUS FOR THE EFFORTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE TO ASK FOR MORE VACCINE. NEXT SLIDE.
AS FAR AS VACCINE ELIGIBILITY.
SO ON YOUR SCREEN, YOU SEE TWO GROUPS.
GROUP A AND GROUP B, AGAIN, THESE GROUPS WERE DETERMINED TO BE TO IDENTIFY THOSE WHO ARE HIGH RISK, HIGHEST RISK FOR INFECTION GIVEN THE LIMITED SUPPLY OF VACCINE THAT WE HAVE.
SO GROUP A IS PEOPLE WHO'VE BEEN CONFIRMED WITH HIGH OR INTERMEDIATE RISK CONTACT WITH SOMEONE WITH KNOWN MONKEYPOX INFECTION, AND THEN THOSE WHO HAVE ATTENDED AN EVENT OR A VENUE WHERE THERE WAS HIGH RISK OF EXPOSURE TO SOMEONE WITH CONFIRMED MONKEYPOX.
RUBY IS PART OF OUR CONTACT TRACING AGAIN, WHERE WE'VE IDENTIFIED SOMEONE WITH KNOWN MONKEYPOX AND DONE A SURVEY OF THE GROUP OF PEOPLE THAT THEY HAVE BEEN EXPOSED TO.
GROUP B IS THOSE WHO'VE ATTENDED OR WORKED AT A COMMERCIAL SEX VENUE OR OTHER VENUES WHERE THEY HAD ANONYMOUS SEX OR SEX WITH MULTIPLE PARTNERS WITHIN THE PAST 21 DAYS. JUST TO CLARIFY, 21 DAYS IS THE TYPICAL LENGTH OF TIME FOR A MONKEYPOX INFECTION.
[05:25:02]
ANYONE WHO IS ON HIV PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS.THESE ARE INDIVIDUALS WHO DO NOT HAVE HIV BUT POTENTIALLY ENGAGE IN HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR.
SO HOW DOES A RESIDENT WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY GET VACCINATED? THE EASIEST WAY FOR THEM TO GET VACCINATED IS TO CALL OUR HOT CENTER OR OUR HOTLINE OR THE CITY OF HOUSTON HEALTH DEPARTMENT'S HOTLINE, AND THEN WE WILL DETERMINE THEIR VACCINE ELIGIBILITY AND THEN GET THEM SCHEDULED TO BE VACCINATED IN ONE OF OUR CLINICS.
ADDITIONALLY, THEY CAN GO TO THEIR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER AND WE CAN WORK WITH THEM THAT WAY.
THE PATIENT IS THEN SCHEDULED AND THEN WE AT THE TIME OF THEM RECEIVING THEIR FIRST DOSE, WE GO AHEAD AND SCHEDULE THEIR SECOND DOSE, WHICH IS FOUR WEEKS OR 28 DAYS, ROUGHLY AFTER THAT FIRST DOSE.
SO THE CURRENT SITUATION, THESE ARE NUMBERS AS OF YESTERDAY.
THAT'S ALL THE CITIES OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF HOUSTON, INCLUDING THE UNINCORPORATED AREA.
SINCE THEN, THE TEAM HAS ACTUALLY HAD A LOT MORE PEOPLE SCHEDULED FOR VACCINATIONS, AND WE HAVE OVER 530 SCHEDULED FOR A VACCINE UNTIL THE END OF SATURDAY. RIGHT NOW OR AT THE END OF YESTERDAY, WE HAD 175 REMAINING DOSES.
AND THOSE DOSES ARE IS A TWO COURSE REGIMEN.
AS OF SINCE JULY 20TH, WE'VE HAD OVER 4200 HOTLINE CALLS.
SO GOING INTO OUR VACCINE STRATEGY, IF AND WHEN WE RECEIVE MORE VACCINE AND WE'RE ABLE TO KNOW THAT WE'RE GOING TO GET VACCINE AT MORE OF A STEADY STATE, WE DO HAVE PLANS TO OPEN ELIGIBILITY TO MORE INDIVIDUALS AND MORE POPULATIONS THAT ARE VULNERABLE TO MONKEYPOX.
WE ARE ABLE TO DO MOBILE VACCINATION UNITS LIKE WE DO FOR NORMAL VACCINES, AND WE DID IN COVID 19.
AND THEN IF NEEDED, WE'RE ALSO ABLE TO DO MASS VACCINATION CLINICS.
AND ON THE RIGHT, WE HAVE POTENTIAL EXPANDED ELIGIBILITY.
SO WE WOULD ALSO INCLUDE, AS WE HAVE MORE VACCINE, HIV PATIENTS, THOSE THAT SELF REPORT MULTIPLE OR ANONYMOUS SEX PARTNERS IN THE LAST 14 DAYS, HEALTH CARE WORKERS WHO ARE AT A HIGH RISK OF EXPOSURE AS A PREVENTION.
SO RIGHT NOW, IF HEALTH CARE WORKERS ARE EXPOSED, THEY ALREADY ARE ELIGIBLE FOR THE VACCINE.
NEXT SLIDE. SO WITH THAT, WE IN ADDITION TO PROVIDING THAT UPDATE, WE ALSO ARE REQUESTING ADDITIONAL RESOURCES TO SUPPORT OUR ONGOING RESPONSE.
AND THE REQUEST IS FOR APPROXIMATELY $1.7 MILLION FOR THREE MONTH PERIOD OF OPERATIONS.
AND IT WILL ALLOW US TO EXPAND OUR MONKEYPOX OPERATIONS, TO ADD ADDITIONAL STAFF FOR OUR HOTLINE, STAFF FOR VACCINATIONS, EPIDEMIOLOGY STAFF WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOING THAT, CONTACT TRACING AND OTHER SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES, SUPPORT STAFF AND AGAIN, SUPPLIES AND SERVICES, PPE, FIELD EQUIPMENT AND I.T., ETC..
THE ADDITION OF THE ABOVE STAFF WILL ALLOW US TO SCALE UP OUR OPERATIONS TO A CAPACITY OF ABOUT 1600 VACCINES PER WEEK, AND WE ARE JUDICIOUS IN OUR EFFORTS AND MONITORING THE NEED.
WE WOULDN'T SCALE ALL OF THAT UP ALL AT ONCE.
IT'S ALLOWING US TO BE STRATEGIC AND THOUGHTFUL IN WHAT WE MAY NEED GOING FORWARD.
SO WITH THAT, I WILL CONCLUDE OUR PRESENTATION AND WE ARE ALL HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE COMMISSIONER ELLISON AND COMMISSIONER GARCIA JUDGE THE APPROPRIATE TIME. I'D LIKE THE MOTION TO MAKE A MOTION.
[05:30:01]
THANK YOU. DO YOU KNOW BY PRECINCT WHERE MOST OF THE INCIDENTS OF PEOPLE WHO ARE POSITIVE ARE.YOU MUTE IT. CAN YOU? CAN YOU. ARE YOU ABLE TO TRACK BY PRECINCT? YES. YES.
BUT WE DO HAVE THE MAJORITY OF CASES INSIDE THE CITY OF HOUSTON, COMMISSIONER.
AND SO THAT WOULD MEAN THAT MAJORITY OF THEM ARE IN YOUR PRECINCT.
RIGHT. AND HOW WILL WE COMPARE TO I KNOW I'VE CHATTED WITH DIRECTOR ROBINSON ABOUT THIS, BUT I KNOW WHEN I THINK NEW YORK AND SAN FRANCISCO NOW THEY HAVE DECLARED IT A EMERGENCY.
IT WAS YESTERDAY, A DAY BEFORE.
OVER THE WEEKEND. DEREK ROBINSON, SAN FRANCISCO, NEW YORK.
WHAT HAVE THEY DONE? AND A WIN IN LINE WITH WHATEVER THEY'RE DOING.
OUR NUMBERS ARE NOT QUITE WHERE THEY ARE, BUT JUST GIVE US SOME REACTION.
YOU WERE GOING TO CHECK WITH YOUR COLLEAGUES.
YES. SO SAN FRANCISCO, I'VE SPOKEN WITH MY COLLEAGUES IN SAN FRANCISCO AND HAVE YET TO HAVE COMMUNICATION WITH MY COUNTERPARTS AND IN THE COOK COUNTY AREA OF CHICAGO.
WE HAVE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETINGS, BUT AS YOU CAN IMAGINE, THEY'VE BEEN BUSY.
SAN FRANCISCO INFORMED ME THAT THEY DECLARED AN EMERGENCY FOR THREE PRIMARY FACTORS.
ONE WAS TO ALLOW FOR THEM TO STAND UP THEIR OPERATIONS QUICKLY.
UNDER AN EMERGENCY DECLARATION, THEY'RE ABLE TO UTILIZE PROCUREMENT RULES, FOR EXAMPLE, TO STAND UP CLINICS AND GET CONTRACTS IN PLACE IN ORDER TO RESPOND, AS WELL AS TO RAISE AWARENESS OF THE URGENCY OF THIS ISSUE WITHIN THE SAN FRANCISCO AREA, GIVEN THE LARGE LGBTQA+ POPULATION, AS WELL AS TO SHED LIGHT ON THE LACK OF A FORMAL, STRONG FEDERAL STRATEGY AT THIS JUNCTURE.
AND SO THOSE WERE THE PRIMARY REASONS WHY THEY IMPLEMENTED A A EMERGENCY DECLARATION.
AND IN ADDITION TO RAISING THE AWARENESS OF SOUNDING THE ALARM WHEN IT'S DECLARED A PUBLIC EMERGENCY, WHAT DOES THAT TRIGGER AND AND WHAT DOES NOT DECLARED ONE DO, PARTICULARLY AS IT RELATES TO FEDERAL REIMBURSEMENTS? SO AS IT RELATES TO FEDERAL REIMBURSEMENT, WHAT I'VE BEEN INFORMED IS THAT THEY ARE UTILIZING THEIR OWN DOLLARS BECAUSE THERE HASN'T BEEN A STATE DECLARATION WHICH WOULD ALLOW THEM TO DRAW DOWN STATE DOLLARS OR A FEDERAL DECLARATION WHICH WOULD ALLOW FOR FEDERAL REIMBURSEMENT.
HOWEVER, THEY'RE UTILIZING THEIR OWN GENERAL FUND RESOURCES TO LEAD THEIR OPERATIONS AND RESPONSE.
SO WE DON'T MEET AGAIN FOR A COUPLE OF WEEKS.
FOR YOU DIRECT ROBINSON OR THE JUDGE CAN THE JUDGE DO IT UNILATERALLY OR IS THERE SOMETHING WE OUGHT TO DO? WELL, IF THERE WAS A NEED TO DECLARE IT A PUBLIC EMERGENCY, HOW WOULD THAT WORK? SO NORMALLY, COMMISSIONER, IT'S IT IS A DECLARATION THAT I SIGNED AND IT'S IT EXISTS FOR A WEEK.
AND IT IS A CONVERSATION WE'RE HAVING.
OBVIOUSLY, WE'VE HAD IT WITH MARK SLOAN AS WELL.
IT'S IT'S HARD TO TELL, RIGHT? YOU DON'T WANT TO YOU DON'T WANT TO PANIC PEOPLE.
BUT AT THE SAME TIME, IT IS SOMETHING THAT IS GROWING AND THAT WE NEED TO TAKE SERIOUSLY.
SO MY ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN LET'S REALLY PUT THE PRESSURE ON THE VACCINES.
IT'S ALREADY YOU KNOW, IT'S ALREADY BEEN ALMOST A WEEK.
AND WE STILL DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHEN THEY'RE GOING TO ARRIVE.
I JUST DON'T KNOW. THREE WEEK BREAK IS A THREE WEEK BREAK, BUT AS OF RIGHT NOW, I'M COMFORTABLE WITH WHERE WE ARE AND WITH AND WITH ALL OF US UNITING TO SAY, HEY, WE UNDERSTAND SAN FRANCISCO MAY HAVE MORE PER CAPITA CASES, BUT IF WE DON'T GET THE VACCINES NOW, ALL YOU'RE DOING IS PUTTING US ON THE SAME TRAIN TO GET TO WHERE THEY ARE.
[05:35:02]
AND IT'S LIKE WE CAN SEE THE FUTURE, YOU KNOW, AND WE NEED TO CHART A DIFFERENT PATH.AND THE WAY WE DO THAT IS BY VACCINATING THE AT RISK POPULATION WHO WANTS TO BE VACCINATED.
THEY WANT THEY WANT TO RECEIVE THE VACCINE.
WE JUST DON'T HAVE IT. AND I KNOW YOU AND THE MAYOR ARE IN CLOSE CONTACT.
SO IS HE COMFORTABLE AS WELL OR IS THAT SOMETHING YOU WOULD LIKE? YOU COULD ALWAYS CALL US BACK.
BUT SO YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE YOU DON'T NEED ANYMORE? I WOULD I WOULD ADVOCATE FOR SUPPORT FOR THIS THIS FUNDING THAT PUBLIC HEALTH IS REQUESTING SO THEY CAN BEGIN WORKING ON THIS RAMP UP.
AND SO I THINK THAT IF THEY RECEIVE THEIR THIS SUPPORT, THEY CAN BEGIN BUILDING WHAT I'VE TOLD THEM AND CONVEYED ALSO TO THE COMMUNITY AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS OUR BOTTLENECK, IS NOT OPERATIONAL.
OUR BOTTLENECK IS ONE OF VACCINE SUPPLY.
I WILL CHECK AGAIN, COMMISSIONER, AND TALK TO MR. SLOAN THE TIME BEFORE COURT ADJOURNS TO SEE IF THERE'S ANYTHING ELSE.
BUT I THINK FOR NOW, LET'S ADVOCATE FOR VACCINES.
LET'S SUPPORT THEIR REQUEST FOR FOR OPERATIONAL FUNDING.
AND THEN AND THEN IF IT COMES TO PASS, THAT WE NEED TO HAVE AN EMERGENCY DECLARATION.
I WILL ABSOLUTELY GIVE YOU GUYS A HEADS UP, BUT LET'S HOPE WE DON'T GET THERE.
SO MY STAFF I KNOW YOU ALL HAVE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH MY TEAM, BUT WE DO HAVE STRONG TIES IN THROUGHOUT THE AREAS THAT I'VE REPRESENTED FOR THREE DECADES. SO PROBABLY TAM, I'LL MAKE A MOTION.
SO JUDGE DEREK ROBINSON, THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION.
I MADE IT CLEAR YESTERDAY THAT I THINK WE'RE BEING SHORT SIGHTED.
AND THAT WE'RE NOT IN LINE WITH NEW YORK, WHERE NEW YORK HAS BEEN MUCH MORE LIBERAL WITH THEIR AVAILABLE VACCINES AND THEIR DISTRIBUTION PROCESS. I AM ADVOCATING THAT WE DON'T HOLD A SECOND VACCINE JUST BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE THE THIRD ONE.
I THINK THAT WE ARE GOING TO GET THE VACCINES.
I JUST WORRY THAT WE'RE GOING TO PUT PEOPLE IN HARM'S WAY.
WE'RE GOING TO. NOT MAKE THE PROCESS.
WE'RE WE'RE REVISITING THE EARLY STAGES OF COVID 19, AND WE SHOULD BE LEARNING FROM THOSE MISTAKES.
SO I JUST WANT TO BE REAL CLEAR.
I'LL SUPPORT THIS MOTION IN SPITE OF BUT I JUST DON'T THINK WE'RE BEING AS AGGRESSIVE AS WE SHOULD BE AND AS WE CAN BE GIVEN THE RESOURCES THAT WE HAVE.
TO ME, IT JUST JUST LIKE A JUDGE.
TO ME, IT JUST SEEMS THAT WE'RE REVISITING THE SAME DAMN MISTAKES WE MADE EARLY IN COVID 19.
AND I JUST WANT TO BE REAL CLEAR THAT I THINK WE CAN BE MUCH MORE AGGRESSIVE WITH WHAT WE GOT AND GO OUT TO THE HHS AND ADVOCATE FOR MORE.
BUT WE NEED TO GET THOSE VACCINES OUT.
BUT, YOU KNOW, THEY'VE MADE A STRONG CASE, AND I THINK IT IS A DISCUSSION WORTH HAVING AT THE TABLE.
AND I WANTED TO BRING IT UP HERE.
BUT MY INSTINCT IS WITH YOU, COMMISSIONER.
AND THEN THAT'S THAT'S THE MOTION I WOULD MAKE.
SO IF I'M COMMISSIONER GARCIA, WE HAVE GRAPPLED WITH THIS VERY ISSUE AND CONCUR.
IT'S THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE SAME COIN.
PART OF WHAT WE WERE TRYING TO MITIGATE AGAINST IS HAVING A SITUATION WHERE A SHIPMENT CAME IN AND FROM THAT SHIPMENT IT WOULD JUST BE SECOND DOSES FOR PEOPLE AND THE INABILITY TO VACCINATE FOLKS.
[05:40:09]
AVAILABLE. WE WERE JUST TRYING TO PREVENT OURSELVES FROM BEING IN A POSITION WHERE WE'VE GIVEN SOMEONE, GIVEN FOLKS A FIRST DOSE AND WE DON'T HAVE THE SECOND DOSE AVAILABLE TO THEM AT SOME POINT IN THIS IN THE CYCLE OF CATCHING UP.TODAY. AND YOU CAN RAMP START RAMPING UP TODAY.
IF YOU IF YOU WERE TO GIVE OUT ALL THOSE VACCINES TODAY, THEN IN THEORY, YOU'D HAVE 27 DAYS TO GET THAT SECOND VACCINE IN PEOPLE'S ARMS. IF I'M GOING TO IF I'M GOING TO RAMP YOU UP, I WANT YOU TO BE READY FOR DAY 27.
THIS I REALLY THINK THAT WE'RE NOT PAYING ATTENTION TO THE MISTAKES MADE EARLY IN COVID 19.
AND I'M ADVOCATING FOR AGGRESSIVENESS ON YOUR DEPARTMENT'S PART SO THAT WE DO NOT HAVE PEOPLE WAITING WHILE WE HAVE VACCINES. THAT'S THAT'S MY FRUSTRATION WHILE WE HAVE VACCINES.
AND WE CAN COLLECTIVELY USE OUR VOICE TO GO OUT AND GET THE SUPPLIES THAT WE NEED.
YOU TOLD ME YESTERDAY THAT THERE'S ONLY ONE PLACE IN DENMARK CURRENTLY PRODUCING THE VACCINE.
I ASSUME THAT THE ADMINISTRATION IS WATCHING THIS.
THE NATIONAL NEWS THIS MORNING SHOWED ONLY TWO STATES THAT HAVE NOT IDENTIFIED ANY POSITIVE MONKEYPOX INFECTIONS. SO THIS IS NOW IN 48 STATES AND THE ADMINISTRATION IS PAY ATTENTION TO IT, THE RAMPING UP.
SO I DON'T HAVE THE SAME CONCERN THAT I HAD EARLY IN IN THE COVID EXPERIENCE.
AND COMMISSIONER, JUST ON THAT POINT, I MEAN, THE THING THAT I ALSO DON'T WANT TO MISLEAD ANYBODY IS EVEN IF YOU AND I WANT TO HAVE THIS QUESTION OF WHAT DO WE DO WITH THE SECOND DOSES? WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HUNDREDS, RIGHT? WE'RE NOT TALKING THOUSANDS RIGHT NOW.
SO IT'S NOT LIKE I AGREE WITH YOU THAT MY INSTINCT IS TO USE THEM BECAUSE EVERY PERSON THAT GETS VACCINATED IS ANOTHER PERSON THAT DOESN'T HAVE ALL THOSE THAT DOESN'T GET MONKEYPOX, THAT DOESN'T GET OTHER FOLKS MONKEYPOX.
BUT WE'RE STILL WHAT WE HAVE ON HAND IS STILL VERY SMALL NUMBERS AND WHAT'S COMING, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE A SHIPMENT OF 17,000 COMING FOR THE FOR THAT IS HALF OF THAT RATE OF PEOPLE IS GOING TO NEED TO COURSES OR EVEN IF YOU HAVE THE FULL 17,000 THERE'S 30,000 PEOPLE IN HARRIS COUNTY LIVING WITH HIV.
THAT'S NOT EVEN GOING TO THE POPULATION OF MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN.
THAT'S NOT EVEN GOING TO THE POPULATION THAT'S ON PREP.
THAT'S NOT EVEN ON THE POPULATION.
THE OTHER POPULATIONS THAT ARE AT RISK, HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR.
SO THE GONORRHEA RECENTLY DIAGNOSED.
WE NEED TO DO THE MOST THAT WE CAN WITH WHAT WE HAVE.
THE DIFFERENCE FROM COVID IS WE DO HAVE TESTING NOW.
THE BEGINNING OF OF COVID, WE DIDN'T HAVE TESTING.
THE TURNAROUND WAS LIKE A WEEK.
NOW THE TURNAROUND IS A FEW DAYS.
THEY ARE THEY ARE RAMPING UP, THEY'RE VACCINATING, THEY'RE DOING THE TOWN HALLS, ETC..
SO IF I MAY JUDGE JUST TWO OTHER POINTS I WANTED TO MAKE.
THE CDC IS ADAMANT AND DOES NOT RECOMMEND GIVING AWAY THAT SECOND DOSE.
AND PART OF THE CHALLENGE IS IF WE USE, AS YOU'VE MENTIONED, WE HAVE A LIMITED SUPPLY, RIGHT? 1500. BUT IF YOU THINK ABOUT THAT, IS IT 1500 TO 1500? AND IF WE GIVE ALL OF THOSE OUT, IF AN INTERVENING FACTOR, RIGHT, SOMEONE COMES IN THAT IS NOW VERY HIGH RISK.
WE'VE GIVEN OUT ALL OF THAT, ALL OF THE DOSES BEFORE WE'VE HAD A CHANCE TO, YOU KNOW, MEET THE NEEDS OF INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE HIGH RISK THAT MAY POP UP IN THE PROCESS OF WAITING FOR NEW VACCINE.
[05:45:03]
AND AGAIN, IN GOOD CONSCIENCE, WE'RE GOING TO BE HOLDING ON TO A VACCINE AS A MATTER OF SCHEDULE.AND PEOPLE WILL BE CALLING US.
THEY'RE GOING TO BE CALLING YOU AFTER YOU GO THROUGH THE AVAILABLE DOSES THAT YOU'RE HOLDING ON TO.
AND SO I JUST THINK THAT THE MORE THAT WE CAN VACCINATE, EVEN WITH ONE DOSE.
IT HELPS US PREVENT FURTHER, FASTER SPREAD.
AS I SAID, WE'VE BEEN WE'VE BEEN GRAPPLING WITH THIS VERY ISSUE.
YOU ALL ARE THE POLICYMAKING BODY, AND WE ADMINISTER YOUR POLICY.
AND SO WE'RE OPEN TO HAVING THAT ONGOING DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION FROM YOU ALL.
COMMISSIONER ELLISON THEN. COMMISSIONER RAMSEY WELL, I WOULD SUGGEST AT LEAST.
ME TOO. IF WE WERE GOING TO MAKE A DECISION, IF I WAS GOING TO VOTE ON A POLICY MATTER.
COUPLE OF QUESTIONS I WOULD ASK WOULD BE, FIRST OF ALL, WHAT DOES THE CDC SAY? NOT THAT THAT'S THE GOSPEL, BUT I'D ASK AND THEN I WOULD ASK WHAT OTHER JURISDICTIONS ARE DOING, BECAUSE SOMETIMES A JURISDICTION MAY NOT FOLLOW THE CDC RECOMMENDATIONS.
BUT I WANT SOMETHING TO GAUGE.
I JUST WOULDN'T WANT. NEW YORK IS NOT.
YEAH. SO IS THAT IS THAT TRUE? IS NEW YORK NOT FOLLOWING THE CDC RECOMMENDATION ON ARE WE FOLLOWING IT FIRST DIRECTOR.
THEY'RE GIVING IT AWAY. THEY'RE ALL GIVING.
SORRY ABOUT THAT. WHAT'S THE DISTINCTION ON THEM VERSUS US? IF THEY HAVE MORE OF THE AT RISK POPULATION.
WELL, THEN YOU SEE THE CHART COMMISSIONER OF THE PER CAPITA.
BUT THE SENSE IS WE'RE GETTING THERE ANYWAY.
I DON'T I DON'T WANT TO MINCE WORDS WITH PER CAPITA.
I MEAN, WE HAVE A HIGH RISK POPULATION AND WE HAVE DOSES.
AND SO, AGAIN, I THINK THAT WE ARE THE ALL THE OTHER BIG JURISDICTIONS ARE DOING EXACTLY WHAT I'M ADVOCATING.
AND SO TO ME, IT'S JUST PAINFUL TO TO THINK THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO GIVE OUT THE AVAILABLE DOSES THAT WE HAVE. JUST BECAUSE WE'RE WE WANT TO WAIT TILL WE GET ANOTHER BATCH IN.
IT HELPS TO MITIGATE THE SPREAD.
WHY WOULD WE NOT GIVE OUT EVERY AVAILABLE VACCINE? SO I THINK IT WOULD BE A LITTLE DIFFERENT IF IF WE SAID WE'VE GIVEN OUT 1,001ST DOSES AND WE DON'T KNOW WHO OR IF WE'RE GOING TO GET ANOTHER SHIPMENT, BUT WE'VE ALREADY BEEN ASSURED A 17,000 VACCINE SHIP.
ON JULY 22ND, WE HAD THREE CASES, RIGHT? HOUSTON HAD 18.
NOW WE'RE AT HOW MANY CASES AS OF TODAY? HOW MANY? WE HAVE 125 IN HARRIS COUNTY, INCLUDING THE CITY OF HOUSTON.
SO DON'T TELL ME THERE'S NOT A SPREAD.
SO THIS THING IS MOVING RAPIDLY.
AND WE HAVE VACCINES AVAILABLE.
SO. THIS THING IS MOVING QUICKLY AND WE HAVE TO MOVE.
WHAT'S OUR PROCESS AND HOW DO WE SELECT WHO TO GIVE THE VACCINE TO? NOW. FIRST COME, FIRST SERVE.
YOU'RE DRAWING A NAME OUT OF THAT, BUT HOW DO YOU DECIDE WHO GETS IT TODAY? BECAUSE WE HAVE LIMITED NUMBER OF VACCINES.
[05:50:05]
COME ON. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONER.BUT I'M CURIOUS SO NARROW THAT IT HASN'T BECOME A MAD RUSH OF PEOPLE.
AND THAT'S WHY REALLY WE JUST NEED A WHOLE LOT MORE VACCINES.
IF YOU'RE AT RISK, YOU HAVE HIGHER YOU GET MORE ENTRIES INTO A RANDOMIZED SYSTEM.
BUT BUT ANYWAY, WHAT DID WE DO TO LOBBY TO GET MORE AND QUICKER? IS IT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT? IS IT? YEAH.
SO? SO BEFORE I FORGET, YOU JUST REMIND ME OF SOMETHING.
JUDGE. WE CREATED A VERY STRANGE PROCESS TO GET TO GIVE OUT THE COVID VACCINE.
I DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO BE THE SAME THING WITH MONKEYPOX, BUT.
WHY HOLD ON TO AVAILABLE VACCINES IF THIS THING IS MOVING AS QUICKLY AS IT IS? SO COULD WE SAY DR.
BROWN AND DIRECTOR ROBINSON? I MEAN, I THINK IF WE WERE SITTING HERE AND WE DIDN'T KNOW THAT ANOTHER SHIPMENT WERE COMING, THEN OKAY.
BUT CAN WE SAY FOR THIS CASE TO MAKE A MOTION, TO GIVE THE TO GIVE THE ONE THE SECOND DOSE AWAY? ONLY BECAUSE IN THIS SPECIFIC INSTANCE, OKAY, NOT SETTING A POLICY FOR YOU GUYS FOR THE LENGTH OF MONKEYPOX, BUT SITTING HERE TODAY, BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT THERE'S A 17,000 VACCINE, 2000 FOR US, OR 3,001ST SHIPMENT THAT IS COMING.
AND THEN I THINK WE SHOULD HAVE A THE MOTION TO SUPPORT YOUR GUYS'S FUNDING REQUEST.
AND I THINK WE SHOULD HAVE A DISCUSSION AND MAYBE THINK THIS WAY AS A CONCESSION.
I DON'T KNOW ABOUT HOW TO GET THESE MORE DOSES.
I WOULD IN ADDITION TO THOSE MOTIONS, SOMEBODY WILL GET A COPY.
I MEAN, NOW'S THE TIME TO RECORD ROBINSON FOR SAN FRANCISCO, NEW YORK, COOK COUNTY.
LOOK, I EVEN KNOW ONE ONE PERSON IN CONGRESS HAD TAKEN CARE HEALTH ISSUES, HADN'T BEEN UP TO VOTE IN A WHILE, AND THEY ALL PLANNED ON GOING BACK BECAUSE THERE'LL BE SOME CLOSE VOTES NEXT WEEK.
THERE'LL BE A LOT OF ACTIVITY GOING ON.
I DON'T KNOW ABOUT LATER THIS WEEK, BUT NEXT WEEK IT'S GOING TO BE PRETTY BUSY.
SO I'D SUGGEST THAT YOU JUST OVER IN THE WHITE HOUSE, I CAN GET IN, YOU KNOW, THE TIME.
SO I AGAIN, MY MY POSITION IS WE NEED TO MAKE USE OF WHAT WE HAVE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE.
I HAVE GREATER CONFIDENCE IN THIS ADMINISTRATION THAN PREVIOUSLY THAT THE DOSES THAT THE ADMINISTRATION HAS PAID ATTENTION TO GETTING THESE DOSES PRODUCED, GET THEM TO OUT OUT TO THE JURISDICTIONS WITH THE GREATEST NUMBER OF OF AT RISK POPULATION. AND I AND I, AGAIN, I JUST IN GOOD CONSCIENCE CAN NOT FEEL COMFORTABLE THAT WE'RE HOLDING ON TO A SECOND VACCINE WHEN WE CAN PUT THAT IN ARMS. I'M ASSUMING. DIRECTOR ROBINSON, YOU COULD REVERSE THAT POLICY IF YOU HAD A CLEARER SENSE THAT THOSE OTHER VACCINES ARE GOING TO GET IT QUICKER.
THAT'S YOUR RELUCTANCE? YEAH, I AS I SAID, WE'VE GRAPPLED WITH THIS.
AND THIS IS ONE WHERE IT'S YOU KNOW, WE COULD WE COULD GO EITHER WAY.
WE SEE COMPELLING ARGUMENTS FOR BOTH SIDES.
I BELIEVE THAT WE CAN WE COULD GIVE OUT THAT SECOND DOSE AND AND TAP INTO THE UPCOMING SUPPLY WHEN IT BECOMES AVAILABLE.
SO COULD THE MOTION BE SOMETHING LIKE THAT? OVER THE NEXT WEEK, HARRIS COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRIBUTE THE DOSES CURRENTLY EARMARKED A SECOND DOSE IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ARRIVAL OF THE CURRENT SHIPMENT OF MONKEYPOX VACCINE.
[05:55:02]
WE'RE IN AGREEMENT. OKAY.COMMISSIONER, WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE THE MOTION? I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION SECOND.
OH, GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER CAGLE.
I THINK THAT WE ARE WERE POSSIBLY HEARING TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.
ONE THING THAT I HEAR IS THAT WE'VE GOT A CURRENT SUPPLY ON HAND.
AND THAT WE HAVE A SUPPLY THAT'S COMING THAT SHOULD BE HERE IN A MATTER OF WEEKS.
AND SO THE FIRST DISCUSSION IS, SINCE WE HAVE A SUPPLY THAT'S COMING THAT WE ARE AWARE OF, THEN WE COULD GO AHEAD AND RELEASE ALL THAT WE HAVE BECAUSE WE HAVE A SUPPLY CHAIN IN PLACE.
THAT'S THE FIRST QUESTION THAT I HAVE IS, IF THAT'S CORRECT, THEN THAT'S FINE.
THEN THE NEXT QUESTION IS, IS WITH WHAT WE GET OUT OF WHAT'S COMING IN AFTER IT BECOMES THE SECOND DOSE FOR EVERYTHING THAT WE RELEASE NOW, HOW MUCH WILL WE HAVE LEFT OVER AND HOW MUCH OF THAT FOR FIRST DOSES SHOULD WE HOLD? SO WE'RE GOING TO THAT'S TO TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS.
QUESTIONS. YOU KNOW, THE FIRST QUESTION IS WE'LL HAVE ENOUGH.
IF WE RELEASE EVERYTHING NOW TO BE COVERED BY WHAT WE KNOW IS COMING, THEN HOW MUCH THAT WE HAVE LEFT OVER AS THE SECOND DOSES, DO WE HOLD ANY OF THAT BACK FOR A SECOND DOSE BECAUSE WE DO NOT KNOW WHAT'S COMING AFTER THAT? AT THIS POINT. WE KNOW THERE ARE THREE WAVES OF DOSES, BUT WE DON'T KNOW THE TIMING OF THOSE OF OF WHEN THEY WILL ARRIVE.
SO BECAUSE WE ONLY KNOW THREE, RIGHT.
WE'D HAVE TO PREDICT OR GET OUR CRYSTAL BALL OUT AND SAY, WHAT DO WE ANTICIPATE THE FOURTH DOSE TO BE? BECAUSE AT SOME POINT, RIGHT, IF WE KNOW CONCRETELY THERE'S ONLY THREE DOSES, WE'D HAVE TO TRY TO PLAN FOR SECOND DOSES FOR GROUPS OF PEOPLE THAT RECEIVED VACCINES.
AND THEY'RE COMING UP ON THEIR FOUR WEEK PERIOD, THEIR MONTH PERIOD TO GET THEIR SECOND DOSE.
SO AT SOME POINT, BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW THE SUPPLIES AND CONSISTENT AND IT'S NOT CERTAIN HOW MUCH WE WILL GET AT SOME POINT, WE MAY HAVE TO CONTINUE TO MONITOR AND MANAGE THE DOSES AND HOLD SOME BACK FROM FIRST FROM FIRST DOSES IN ORDER TO GIVE PEOPLE THEIR SECOND DOSE.
BECAUSE THAT'S NOT WHAT I'M HEARING.
WHAT I'M HEARING IS, IS THAT THE SECOND ROUND OR THE SECOND SUPPLY WOULD ADEQUATELY COVER ALL OF THE DOSES WE CURRENTLY HAVE. SO IF WE PUT ALL OF THE CURRENT DOSES IN ARMS. YEAH, NO. IS THE SECOND SUPPLY THAT'S GOING TO COME IN IN TIME, THAT COULD COVER THE SECOND DOSE WHEN IT COMES.
OKAY. SO TO THAT EXTENT, THEN, I THINK I AGREE WITH WHAT COMMISSIONER GARCIA IS SAYING.
THERE'S NO NEED TO HOLD BACK OUT OF DOSE ONE BECAUSE WE HAVE A SUPPLY CHAIN IN PLACE FOR DOSE TWO.
THEN THE QUESTION BECOMES, THOUGH, OUT OF WHAT IS LEFT OVER OF SUPPLY, TO HOW MANY DO WE HAVE ON HAND NOW? HOW MANY DO WE CURRENTLY HAVE? 1500. AND WE'LL HAVE ABOUT 500 LEFT AT THE END OF THE WEEK.
AT THE END OF THE SESSION, AT THE END OF THE SECOND, THERE'LL BE 1500.
THAT WE CAN PUT AN ARMS NOW AND THEN.
HOW MANY WILL BE COMING ON WAVE TO.
2000. SO THERE'LL BE 500 LEFT OVER.
SO THE QUESTION THEN IS OF THAT 500, DO WE ISSUE 250 OR DO WE ISSUE 500 ON ROUND TWO? BRAEDEN I THINK WHAT I'M SAYING IS LET'S LET THEM FIGURE THAT OUT, BECAUSE THEY MIGHT KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT THE FALLING SHIPMENT, BUT SO THAT'S WHY I'M LIKE, THAT'S WHY THE MOTION IS ABOUT THIS SHIPMENT AND THIS ROUND OF SECOND DOSES BECAUSE, I MEAN, ULTIMATELY, THEY'RE THEY'RE THEY'RE IN THE ON THE FRONT LINES.
SO WHAT I'M HEARING IS THAT WE'RE COVERED FROM WAVE TWO.
AND BECAUSE AT ANY TIME I NOTICE COULD BE PRESENTED AND WITHIN THREE DAYS WE COULD COME IN.
IF THERE'S AN ISSUE, THEN I THINK THAT I SUPPORT GOING AHEAD AND PUTTING EVERYTHING WE GOT CURRENTLY IN THE ARMS BECAUSE WE KNOW WAVE TWO SHOULD BE HERE IN TIME TO COVER THE SECOND DOSE. FAIR.
NOW MY ACCURATE OR INACCURATE? DR. BROWN IS NODDING HER HEAD.
YES. AND THAT DOESN'T VIOLATE EITHER CDC OR ANYBODY ELSE.
WE'VE GOT A SUPPLY CHAIN IN PLACE.
WE'RE JUST TALKING ABOUT IT, ACTUALLY.
BUT THE CDC GUY I WANT TO BE CLEAR, THE CDC GUIDANCE IS TO HOLD BACK THAT SECOND DOSE.
[06:00:04]
WELL, IF IT'S A DECISION BETWEEN THAT AND THE OTHER, I WOULD I WOULD LEAN TO WHAT, COMMISSIONER ELLIS, WHERE MOST OF THE INDIVIDUALS ARE, AS YOU HAVE DESCRIBED, AS TO WHETHER HE WANTS TO FOLLOW CDC OR IF HE WANTS TO FOLLOW THE OTHER PRACTICES, RELYING ON WHAT HE KNOWS TO BE OR WHAT WE ANTICIPATE TO BE, THE SECOND WAVE OF DOSES THAT SHOULD BE COMING WHEN WHEN ARE THEY ANTICIPATED TO ARRIVE? WELL, I WOULD SUGGEST IF WE DO IT, WHETHER IT'S REMOTELY OR IN PERSON, WE WOULD DO OUR PART TO PUSH IN ANY WAY WE CAN TO GET THAT OTHER SUPPLY.OR WE WILL HAVE MADE A YOU KNOW, LIKE THEY SAID, YOU COULD GO EITHER WAY.
BUT WE ARE MAKING A POLICY CHANGE, WHICH IS COUNTER TO WHAT THEY SUGGEST AND WHAT THE CDC SUGGESTS.
I CAN GO WITH THE WAY. I HONESTLY DON'T KNOW.
BUT IF THE SENTIMENT IS TO DO IT, GO AHEAD AND DO IT WELL.
BUT I, FOR ONE, WOULD MAKE SURE THAT WE TRY TO GET TO WASHINGTON, DO WHATEVER WE CAN TO MAKE SURE, THOUGH I CAN'T STRESS ENOUGH, EVEN THIS ADDITIONAL 15, THIS ADDITIONAL 500, BASICALLY ALL WE'RE RELEASING IS ABOUT 500 MORE VACCINES.
SO, ANYWAY, I'M MAKING A MOTION.
SO COMMISSIONER GARCIA MAKES THE MOTION.
COMMISSIONER ELLIS HAS A SECOND.
JUDGE, CAN YOU PLEASE REPEAT THE MOTION FOR CLARITY? OVER THE NEXT WEEK, HARRIS COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRIBUTE THE DOSES CURRENTLY EARMARKED A SECOND DOSE IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ARRIVAL OF THE CURRENT SHIPMENT OF MONKEYPOX VACCINE.
MR. GARCIA SECOND BECOMES JEALOUS.
IT WAS AN I I'M IN FAVOR OF MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO DIRECT THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET TO WORK WITH HARRIS COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH TO IDENTIFY A FUNDING SOURCE FOR THE LABOR AND SUPPLIES NEEDED TO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES TO COMBAT THE SPREAD OF THE MONKEYPOX FIRES, INCLUDING THE ADMINISTRATION OF VACCINES, AND TO BRING BACK FOR APPROVAL AT THE NEXT COURT MEETING AN ALLOCATION OF APPROXIMATELY $1.74 MILLION.
SO ONE SECOND, BUT I GOT A QUESTION.
IS ARPA ELIGIBLE FOR THIS? WE DON'T BELIEVE SO.
AND IF IF THERE IS A FEDERAL EMERGENCY DECLARED, WOULD BE ABLE TO GET REIMBURSED.
DEPENDING ON THE RULES. BUT YES, BUT THAT'S WHAT WE'RE GOING TO BE HOPING THAT WAY AS WELL.
BUT IT WILL BE BROUGHT BACK ONCE WE DETERMINE WHAT THE FUNDING SOURCE IS.
AND IS THAT IS THAT APPROPRIATE? DIRECTOR ROBINSON, CAN YOU GUYS WAIT THREE WEEKS TO GET THAT 1.7 MILLION? NO. WE CAN WAIT THREE WEEKS.
YOU SURE? I DON'T WANT TO WAIT AND RAMP UP.
THERE'S NO WAY WE CAN. YOU CAN APPROPRIATE 1.7 MILLION TODAY.
IT HAS TO WAIT. SO WE HAVE TO DO IT IN THE NEXT BIT.
TO BE CLEAR, WE'RE WORKING WITH PUBLIC HEALTH ON ISSUING THE POLLS, GETTING FOLKS ON BOARD IN.
WE MAY NEED TO COME BACK FOR A TRANSFER, BUT THEY HAVE EXISTING APPROPRIATIONS SURPLUS THAT THEY CAN USE TO EXECUTE THE POS AND AN ON BOARD STAFF AND THEN YOU BASICALLY REIMBURSE THEM FOR WHAT THEY USE.
YEAH. SO JUST TO BE VERY CLEAR, I MEAN, I THINK THE POSITION IS WE'RE EXPECTING YOU GUYS GET OUT THE DOOR AND BEGIN AND BEGIN RAMPING UP FOR ALL OF THE THE PROJECTS, THE PROPOSALS YOU SUBMITTED.
ANYWAY, I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE NOT DOING ANYTHING SLIP DOWN.
WE ARE NOT DOING ANYTHING TO SLOW THEM DOWN.
SO, OKAY, THERE'S A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
THEN YOU OPPOSE. MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
AND THIS IS THE SECOND MOTION FOR 245.
CORRECT. THAT'S THE ONE I JUST READ.
SO, YOU KNOW, IS THERE ANY ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION WE NEED TO HAVE ON THE ADVOCACY FRONT? FOLKS ARE. WELL, ACTUALLY, I DID HAVE A QUESTION ON THE ADVOCACY ON THE ADVOCACY FRONT.
AND I WOULD ENCOURAGE COMMISSIONERS RAMSEY AND CAGLE, THIS IS A BIPARTISAN ISSUE, AND WE'D LOVE TO HAVE YOU GUYS ACTIVE WITH IT. AND I THINK IT'LL MAKE A POWERFUL STATEMENT AND FURTHER ENSURE THAT WE DO GET OUR ALLOCATIONS.
[06:05:05]
I'D LIKE TO ENCOURAGE THAT.WE ALL WORK TOGETHER IN THAT REGARD.
WHO MAKE THOSE DECISIONS IN WASHINGTON.
THEY'LL BE THERE. AND AND BUT I DO WANT TO BACK UP REAL QUICKLY TO THE TOWN HALL MEETINGS.
DIRECTOR ROBINSON, THESE ARE NOT WHO'S WHO WHO'S BEING INVITED, BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND THAT THE TOWN HALL MEETINGS ARE NOT REACHING A BROAD AUDIENCE.
THEY THEY ARE WE'VE SOLICITED AND THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT ONES.
ONE IS WITH THE LGBTQ STAKEHOLDER COMMUNITY AND THE OTHER IS WITH THE PROVIDER COMMUNITY.
AND THAT'S BROADLY DISSEMINATED TO THE SAME FOLKS THAT SHOWED UP FOR OUR WEEKLY COVID.
ON THE PROVIDER SIDE, OUR WEEKLY COVID MEETINGS.
AND THAT WAS, YOU KNOW, EVERY EVERY MAJOR PROVIDER AND STAKEHOLDER IN OUR COUNTY.
AND THEN ON THE LGBTQ, IF THERE ARE SOME FOLKS THAT YOU THAT HAVE REACHED OUT TO YOU AND SAID THAT THEIR ORGANIZATION OR THEY WEREN'T INVITED, PLEASE LET US KNOW, BECAUSE WE'VE WE'VE WORKED REALLY HARD TO DO OUTREACH TO THE BROADER LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND ENGAGE THEM AND SHARE INFORMATION.
ARE YOU WORKING WITH THE SPANISH SPEAKING TRANS COMMUNITY? YES, WE ARE.
YES, WE ARE. ARE YOU WORKING WITH THE CITY? YOU UNDERSTAND? WE MEET.
WE MEET WITH THE CITY ON A WEEKLY BASIS EVERY FRIDAY.
AND WE ARE COORDINATING OUR EFFORTS.
WE'RE SHARING OUR DATA, WE'RE SHARING OUR STRATEGY.
AND WE'RE MOVING IN LOCKSTEP AS WE MOVE FORWARD.
WE WE ARE ALSO HAVING JOINT TOWN HALLS.
YEAH, I JUST FOUND OUT THERE'S AN EVENT I DID WITH THE CITY OVER THE WEEKEND.
FAR MORE THAN PEOPLE SHOWED UP THAN WE ANTICIPATED AND STAYED ALL DAY FOR THAT EVENT.
YEAH AND THEY POINT THAT'S BEING MADE IN DIRECT ROBINSON IS THAT THE, THE LGBTQ TOWNHALLS ARE BASICALLY JUST BEING DONE THROUGH THE RYAN WHITE AGENCIES.
IT'S WE'VE EXPANDED IT'S BROAD.
YES, WE'VE WE'VE REACHED OUT FAR AND WIDE.
OKAY. YOU GIVE SAYING, GIVE ME A LIST TO MY OFFICE ON WHO YOU'RE WORKING WITH.
WE'LL SEND THAT OVER RIGHT NOW.
THANK YOU, DIRECTOR, AND TO YOUR TEAM.
THANK YOU FOR LEADING US ON THIS.
COMMISSIONER RAMSEY, YOU HAD A QUESTION ON ITEM 248.
I'M NOT GOING TO I'M NOT GOING TO GO INTO GREAT DETAIL HERE.
FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO THANK THE SHERIFF.
WE'RE PUTTING THE BETA TEST OF AUTO RETURN.
THEY PUT THAT ON PAUSE AND THERE'S JUST A LOT OF QUESTIONS THAT WE NEED ANSWERED.
AND I KNOW I'LL BE WORKING WITH THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE TO GET QUESTIONS RELATED TO ALL THE RETURN RELATED TO WHY THE LOW BIDDER WAS NOT SELECTED, CONTINUED ISSUES OR THE ISSUES THAT WERE IDENTIFIED DURING THE BETA TEST.
BE SURE WE GET ALL THOSE SORTED THROUGH THAT WILL BE COMING BACK AT SOME POINT TO TO COURT.
THIS WAS JUST FIRST OF ALL, THANK THE SHERIFF FOR PUTTING IT ON PAUSE.
THAT PROBABLY SAVED A LOT OF BUSINESSES.
AND SECOND IS, THIS IS COMING BACK MAYBE WITH A MORE DETAILED OVERVIEW OF IT.
THAT'S THAT'S GREAT THAT THINGS ARE MOVING ON.
SO NO ACTION, COMMISSIONER? NO. NOW ON TO 48 TO 64, COMMISSIONER RAMSEY.
YEAH. THIS WAS IN I APPRECIATE THE ANALYST OFFICE.
FOR MORE REASONS AND COMPENSATION.
FOR EXAMPLE, IN 2014, WE HAD 79 PEOPLE LEAVE WITH TEN PLUS YEARS EXPERIENCE.
WE NEED TO CONTINUE TO MONITOR THAT PART OF IT.
MAKE SURE WE DO EXIT INTERVIEWS WITH PEOPLE THAT ARE LEAVING.
[06:10:04]
NO KNOW WHY THEY'RE LEAVING BECAUSE THE THE AMOUNT OF THE ANECDOTAL AMOUNT OF INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE WE'VE LOST IN RECENT YEARS IS SIGNIFICANT.AND WE OUGHT TO BE SURE WE'RE PAYING ATTENTION TO PAY ATTENTION TO COMPENSATION.
THEY PAY ATTENTION WHY PEOPLE ARE COMING AND WHAT PEOPLE ARE GOING.
THERE'S NO ACTION OTHER THAN JUST A COMMENT ON THE JOB THAT KATIE DID.
THANK YOU. KNOW, IT WAS HELPFUL TO SEE THESE NUMBERS.
ITEM 270, COMMISSIONER RAMSEY.
I KNOW THE CONVERSATIONS I'VE HAD WITH FOLKS ON THIS ESTIMATE OF TAXABLE VALUE, AND I KNOW THAT I HAD USES A FORMULA WHERE THEY THEY DO NOT FULLY RECOGNIZE THE PROPERTY THAT'S IN SOME KIND OF LITIGATION.
AND SO IT'S A VERY COMPLICATED FORMULA, BUT IT HAS SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THAT TAXABLE VALUE NUMBER TO THE TUNE OF $45 MILLION IS THAT 4747.
SO THAT'S A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.
I KNOW THAT SOME COUNTIES ARE USING A ROLLING FIVE YEAR AVERAGE ON THAT VALUE.
THE TAX ASSESSOR COULD USE THAT RATHER THAN WHAT THEY HAD USED, RIGHT? CORRECT. AND WE'RE WORKING WITH THEM ACTIVELY ON THAT, IS MY QUESTION.
TO BE SURE WE'RE ENGAGED, WE NEED TO USE A ROLLING FIVE YEAR AVERAGE, WHICH TO ANYBODY THAT WOULD SIT THERE AND THINK OF IT, IT MAKES A LOT MORE SENSE THAN SOME MADE UP FORMULA THAT ARBITRARILY LOWERS THE VALUE WHEN IT REALLY IS NOT THERE.
GOOD. YOU'RE ON IT. THANK YOU.
SO WE'LL ACCEPT THE TRANSMITTAL ON ITEM TWO, 72, 83.
I THINK COMMISSIONER CAGLE FLAGGED THAT ONE.
YES. I'VE SUPPORT THE PROJECT.
WHAT 283 IS, IS THAT IT IS THE MOVING OF THIS PROJECT INTO THE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST, WHERE THE COUNTY WILL BUY THE REAL ESTATE TO THE BENEFIT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER, TO WHERE WE, IN ESSENCE BECOME A LONG TERM LANDHOLDER.
I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S A GREAT DEBATE THAT SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES LIKE THIS LAND TRUST APPROACH TO WHERE WE ARE THE LANDOWNER IN SOME OF THESE PROJECTS.
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THAT APPROACH.
I THINK THAT WE DO NOT NEED TO BE ENGAGED IN THAT BUSINESS.
THIS ISN'T PRECINCT FOUR AND I WOULD NOT SUPPORT THE LAND TRUST IN PRECINCT FOUR.
I DID SUPPORT THE PROJECT IN PRECINCT FOUR.
OR YOU CAN VOTE TO PUT IT IN PRECINCT FOUR IN THE LAND TRUST.
IS IT A PROBLEM TO HOLD IT? JUDGE, THIS IS DR.
HOLLOWAY. SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
THIS IS ONE OF OUR ITEMS. AND WE CAN HOLD IT AND HAVE A CONFERENCE WITH COMMISSIONER CAGLE AND ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THIS PROJECT AND HOW IT'S BEING PLACED OR BEING REQUESTED TO BE PLACED IN LAND TRUST AND HOW THE LAND TRUST WORKS.
THIS IS A PROJECT THAT WAS FUNDED.
THE IMPROVEMENTS WERE FUNDED THROUGH CDBG.
THANK YOU. OKAY, SO NO ACTION ON ITEM 283.
YOUR JUDGE. YES, JUDGE, I JUST WANTED TO VERY QUICKLY TOUT THE SUCCESS OF THIS INITIATIVE, AND I'M EXCITED ABOUT THE FINAL TRANCHE COMING OVER TO THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND JUST WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THIS
[06:15:01]
INITIATIVE THAT WAS THE PROOF OF CONCEPT FOR VIPER HAS PROVEN IMMENSELY SUCCESSFUL.THE BRIEFING I GOT DIDN'T INCLUDE THE BREAKDOWN OF THE FELONY ARREST, BUT LET'S JUST SAY THAT THE ARRESTS ARE IN THE HUNDREDS OF FELONY WARRANTS CLEARED OF FELONY ARRESTS MADE.
SO THIS IS THIS HAS BEEN VERY SUCCESSFUL.
AND I WANT TO THANK SHERIFF GONZALEZ AND HIS TEAM FOR THEIR INCREDIBLE WORK.
BUT THE CURRENT RATE OF VIOLENT CRIME IS THAT IS BEEN REPORTED BY THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, INDICATES THAT THE RATES ARE PLATEAUING, TRENDING DOWN COMPARED TO LAST YEAR AT A -7%.
CASE BACKLOGS HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY 39%.
SO I JUST COMMEND THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE FOR THEIR PHENOMENAL WORK ON THIS INITIATIVE AND JUST WANT TO COMMEND THEM FOR JUST CONTINUE TO WORK HARD AND SO VERY PROUD OF THEM.
BUT THIS IS THIS IS JUST A GOOD ITEM TO JUST HIGHLIGHT AND AGAIN, APPLAUD THEIR WORK IS.
JOSH, I ACTUALLY WANT TO APPLAUD.
I THINK THIS IS IF I'M CORRECT, THIS IS AN EDITION OF 575,000 AND THE VIOLENT CRIME REDUCTION INITIATIVE OVER IN THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE. I THINK IT COMES ON TOP OF THE OTHER EFFORT TO REDUCE GUN VIOLENCE BY SOLVING MURDERS OF ABOUT 3 MILLION, 3 MILLION ALLOCATION, BRINGING THE TOTAL TO ABOUT THREE POINT ALMOST $3.6 MILLION.
AND I THINK ALL OF US REALIZE THAT KEEPING PEOPLE SAFE IS A NUMBER ONE PRIORITY.
THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE IS VERY SERIOUS ABOUT DOING IT.
AND IT COMES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A HOST OF OTHER THINGS, THAT VIOLENCE INTERRUPTION PROGRAM.
THE ALTERNATIVE RESPOND TO PROGRAM.
MAYOR TURNER AND I HAD A SUCCESSFUL GUN BUYBACK PROGRAM THIS PAST WEEKEND.
I KNOW GOING THROUGH THE ARPA PROCESS, WE ARE TRYING TO GET THE COUNTY TO AT LEAST MATCH THE MILLION DOLLARS THAT THE CITY HAS PUT UP OR PRECEDE ONE PUT UP.
I APPRECIATE THE PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR THE ONES WHO DIDN'T.
WE PUT ABOUT $100,000 TO DO IT, BUT IT'S PART OF THAT EFFORT TO REDUCE GUN VIOLENCE AND GOING AFTER IT IN EVERY WAY HE CAN. EVERY WAY WE CAN.
I THINK THE LAST PEOPLE IN THAT LINE SAID THAT THEY HAD BEEN THERE SINCE EIGHT IN THE MORNING.
IT STARTED AT EIGHT AND WAS SUPPOSED TO END AT NOON.
IT WENT UNTIL 5:00 AND WE LEARNED SOME LESSONS FROM THIS BUYBACK WOULD DO OF US.
BUT I HOPE THAT WE GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS.
WE PARTNERED WITH PUBLIC HEALTH OVER AT THE CITY AND THE MAYOR'S OFFICE, THE COUNTY FOLKS.
I THOUGHT WE'D BE A LITTLE EMBARRASSED BECAUSE YOU, GARCIA.
SO THERE WAS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR I MOVE MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
YOU POST. MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY TO 85.
I KNOW THE DIRECTOR ALMOST HAS A PRESENTATION.
THANK YOU, JUDGE. THANK YOU. FOR SURE.
THERE'S NO PRESENTATION AT THIS POINT.
BUT THAT WOULD. THIS IS THE POINT WHERE WE WOULD BE MAKING THAT MOTION.
SO THIS IS JUST REAFFIRMING THAT.
SO I GUESS THIS IS A GOOD TIME TO TALK ABOUT THE BOND.
I'D LIKE TO BRING THAT ITEM UP.
SO IF YOU'D LIKE TO JUST GO OVER TWO QUICK THINGS, SINCE WE AS COMMISSIONER RAMSEY BROUGHT UP, WE DID GET THE PRELIMINARY NUMBERS AND WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH EACH AND WHAT WE CONSIDER TO BE THE APPROPRIATE INTERPRETATION OF SB TWO.
[06:20:06]
WITH THAT BEING SAID, IF WE IF WE USE THAT FIVE YEAR ROLLING AVERAGE, IT'S ABOUT A $47 MILLION INCREASE.SO OVERALL REVENUES WOULD GO FROM GO TO 2.217 BILLION.
THAT WOULD LEAVE US WITH A $47 MILLION DEFICIT ON THE OFFICER OPPOSITE END.
IF WE DO THAT ON A NO NEW REVENUE RATE, USING THAT FIVE YEAR CALCULATION, THE REVENUE WOULD BE 2.157 BILLION AND THAT WOULD LEAVE US WITH $107 MILLION DEFICIT IN THE OPERATING BUDGET.
SO I WANT TO JUST PUT THAT OUT THERE.
MY OFFICE IS CURRENTLY WORKING ON THE ON THE PROPOSED BUDGET.
OUR GOAL IS TO GIVE THAT TO THE COMMISSIONERS OFFICES THE WEEK OF AUGUST 15 TO DO THE FORMAL PRESENTATION AUGUST 23RD AND FOUR, FOR US TO VOTE ON THE TAX RATE AS WELL AS THE BUDGET SEPTEMBER 13TH.
JUST YOU GUYS ARE TOLD THE FIVE YEAR AVERAGES.
CAN YOU CAN YOU THE ROLLING AVERAGE? CAN YOU JUST EXPAND ON THAT? BECAUSE I'M AFRAID I MIGHT BE MISSING SOMETHING.
SO THE DIFFERENCE IS ONE INTERPRETATION OF S.B.
TWO WOULD BE TO TAKE THE FULL VALUE OF WHAT'S IN THE DISPUTE.
SO IF EACH CAT SAYS THE PROPERTY IS WORTH $1,000,000, I HIRE AN ATTORNEY.
THE ATTORNEY SAYS IT'S WORTH $0.
TECHNICALLY, THAT WHOLE MILLION DOLLARS IS UNDER DISPUTE.
WE MET WITH THE OTHER BIG COUNTY'S BUDGET DIRECTORS AND WERE ABLE TO SEE WHAT THEY WERE DOING.
AND WHAT MANY OF THEM ARE DOING IS A IS A ROLLING AVERAGE WHERE FROM CANTOR'S ORIGINAL APPRAISAL OR MAYBE NOT EACH CAT, BUT WHATEVER COUNTY IS ORIGINAL APPRAISAL, THEY TYPICALLY LOSE BETWEEN TEN AND 12% AS OPPOSED TO HAVING THAT FULL MILLION DOLLARS.
SO BASICALLY IT WOULD BE FOR THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE WHERE THE APPRAISAL IS UNDER DISPUTE.
CORRECT? THEY GET THAT RIGHT, GENTLEMEN.
YES. AND THEN I'M HAPPY TO PROVIDE THE NUMBERS.
SO THERE'S NO WAY WE DON'T HAVE A DEFICIT, BASICALLY.
I MEAN, UNLESS WE UNLESS WE GO ANYWHERE BEYOND NO NEW REVENUE.
CORRECT. WITH THE REVENUE CAP, WE YOU KNOW, THERE'S A REVENUE CAP.
ALSO, KEEP IN MIND, WE HAVE MINIMAL SPENDING ON PUBLIC SAFETY.
SO WITH WITH THOSE TWO THINGS, WE ARE FACING A SMALL DEFICIT.
IT'S SMALL IN THE CONTEXT OF HARRIS COUNTY'S OVERALL BUDGET.
WE'RE GOING TO BE RECOMMENDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CUTS.
BUT AGAIN, MY CONCERN ISN'T NECESSARILY NEXT YEAR.
OKAY. YES. COMMISSIONER ELLIS, IF I MAY JUST REMIND US AGAIN HOW MUCH MONEY WE HAVE.
CUT FROM HOW MUCH MONEY WE HAVE CUT? HOW MUCH HAVE WE REDUCED THE REVENUE WE WOULD HAVE IF THIS COURT DID WHAT THE COURT DID THE PREVIOUS 30 YEARS? IS THAT NUMBER 600,000,050? WHAT WAS IT? I THINK IT'S SOMEWHERE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF 600 MILLION.
I BELIEVE IT'S SOMEWHERE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF 200 MILLION A YEAR ACROSS ALL THE TAXING ENTITIES.
SO THAT'S ABOUT $600 MILLION A YEAR SINCE JUDGES ARE.
200 MILLION A YEAR TOTALING 600 MILLION.
SORRY. IN TOTAL OVER THESE FOUR YEARS.
WE WILL END UP CUTTING 100 AND.
TO GO TO THE NO NEW REVENUE RATE.
IT'S ABOUT $107 MILLION DEFICIT.
OKAY. I THOUGHT I THOUGHT I HIT ONE 7107 MILLION OFF THE BUDGET WE ADOPTED IN MARCH.
THIS IS ON THE CURRENT LEVEL OF SERVICE FORECAST.
SO IF YOU REMEMBER AT THE END OF JUNE, I WORKED WITH COUNTY DEPARTMENTS TO FIGURE OUT THINGS LIKE UNFUNDED MANDATES, LEGISLATIVE CHANGES, GRANTS GOING AWAY, INFLATION IN THEIR CONTRACTS TO PROJECT OUT HOW MUCH COSTS WERE GOING TO GO OUT.
WELL, JUST GIVE US SOME IDEAS.
I HAVE MY IDEAS ON WHAT $107 MILLION COME FROM.
[06:25:01]
WHERE WOULD IT COME FROM? THERE'S GOING TO BE A LOT OF VERY UNPOPULAR ITEMS THAT ARE GOING TO HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED.WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO LOOK AT OUR BENEFIT PACKAGES.
WE'D BE LOOKING AT ANY OF THE BENEFIT PACKAGE BECAUSE MOST OF WHAT WE DO IS EMPLOYEES, CORRECT.
SO AND WE DO ASSUME A COLA IN THAT BASELINE NUMBER.
SO THAT WOULD LIKELY BE ONE OF THE FIRST THINGS THAT WE WOULD GET THE BENEFITS WHICH I HEARD EARLIER FROM THAT EARLY PRESENTATION, WE IN MANY IN THE CATEGORIES WE WERE TALKING ABOUT, I GUESS THAT THEY SURVEYED THIS IS A LIMITED SURVEY.
I KNOW WE PAY LESS, BUT BENEFITS ARE BETTER.
SO NOW WE'LL PAY LESS THAN OTHERS, BUT YOU'LL HAVE TO COME IN.
PART OF THE SUGGESTION WOULD PROBABLY BE CUT BENEFITS.
IF WE DO FACE OUR THAT, WHAT ELSE? WHAT ELSE WILL WE BE LOOKING AT? VACANT POSITIONS, ANY NEW PROGRAMING, ANYTHING THAT WAS BUILT IN.
WHEN YOU PASS THE SHORT FISCAL YEAR 22 BUDGET AND THE BULK OF ASK WHAT PERCENTAGE OF OUR SPENDING GOES IN, THE, SHALL WE SAY, PUBLIC SAFETY? IS THAT 60%? I KNOW IT'S OVER 56.2 BILLION.
IT'S 1.2 BILLION OUT OF A LITTLE OVER 2 BILLION.
60 60% OF THE BUDGET GOES INTO PUBLIC SAFETY.
SO OBVIOUSLY, SOME OF THAT CUT, THAT 107 MILLION WOULD IMPACT.
EVEN IF IT'S BENEFITS, IT'S GOING TO DISPROPORTIONATELY IMPACT PEOPLE WHO ARE IN PUBLIC SAFETY.
I'D HAVE TO LOOK AT NEW PROGRAMING ACROSS ALL DEPARTMENTS.
I THINK A LOT OF THINGS ARE GOING TO HAVE TO BE ON THE ON THE TABLE.
I KNOW IT'S LATE IN THE DAY, BUT I'D LIKE TO BRING IT UP.
SO WE WALK THROUGH IT TO PUT A FACE ON IT BECAUSE OFTENTIMES PEOPLE HAVE COME HERE AND MAKE SUGGESTIONS ON THINGS THEY WOULD LIKE AS THOUGH THEY WERE AT HBI ONCE.
BUT OBVIOUSLY YOU HAVE TO THAT'S LEADERSHIP TO MAKE TOUGH DECISIONS.
IT'S NOT THIS IS NOT A GROCERY STORE.
WE DON'T PRINT IT, SO WE SHOULD GO SEE IT.
YEAH. MR. RAMOS, SO THIS IS A FORECAST YOU'RE GIVING US, CORRECT.
IT'S ALWAYS BETTER TO BE PREPARED THAN HAVE TO SORT OF THE CONVERSATION ABOUT MONKEYPOX.
ANY RECOMMENDATIONS TO DATE? I MEAN, SHOULD WE BE DOING A HIRING FREEZE TODAY? I'M NOT RECOMMENDING THAT AT THIS POINT.
AND IN RELATION TO MONKEYPOX, IN RELATION TO THE PANDEMIC.
IF THE VOTE WERE TO BE WALKED AS IT DID ONE YEAR, WHAT WOULD BE THE WHAT WOULD BE THE IMPACT? THAT'S THAT 107.
I MEAN, SO PUBLIC SAFETY IS MAYBE ABOUT 60% OF THE OF THE OF OUR SPENDING.
I DID A FOLLOW UP ON THAT ONE.
SO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT COMES OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND.
SO THEY WOULD THEY WOULD BE HIT BY THAT.
I THINK IT WOULD BE FAIR TO SAY THAT ALL DEPARTMENTS WOULD HAVE SOME LEVEL OF CUT, WHETHER IT BE THE BENEFITS TO TO PLAN SALARY INCREASES TO VACANT POSITIONS. I DON'T THINK THAT THERE WOULD BE A DEPARTMENT THAT WOULD BE SPARED.
THE QUESTION. IF THE IF WE INTERPRETED THE LAW OPPOSITE FROM THE WAY THAT OTHER COUNTIES ARE INTERPRETING IT.
HOW MUCH WOULD THIS DEFICIT BE? ID BE AT THE VA 94 MILLION AND AT THE END 155 MILLION WHEN IT INVENTED.
SO THAT DIFFERENCE IN INTERPRETATION TAKES US FROM 101 55 TO 107.
I MENTION THAT BECAUSE WE TEND TO HAVE MORE OF A TARGET ON US.
AND SO IT COULD VERY WELL END UP BEING THAT 155 WE DON'T KNOW.
CONSISTENT WITH OUR PEERS. YEAH.
[06:30:07]
THE TAX RATE NO MATTER WHAT.WELL, I ALWAYS GO INTO I JUST LIKE WALKING THROUGH WHAT THE COURT DID.
I SAY THE PREVIOUS 30 YEARS IS AT LEAST 20 YEARS.
I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S 30, BUT PREVIOUSLY THIS COURT ALL AS FAR BACK AS I CAN REMEMBER.
SINCE I'VE BEEN AROUND POLITICS, THEY WOULD ADOPT THE EXISTING TAX RATE.
AND OF COURSE, THE LAW STATE LAW HAS CHANGED IN THE LEADERSHIP HERE CHANGED.
AND THEN IT WENT TO THE NO NEW REVENUE RATE.
BUT SORT OF PREVIOUS AT LEAST 20 TO 30 YEARS, MAYBE THE 38 THAT I'VE BEEN AROUND IN THIS BUSINESS.
OKAY. SO THAT IS ON ITEM 20? NOPE. THAT WAS FIVE.
OKAY. SO THERE'S NO ACTION ON THAT ONE.
AND THANK YOU FOR THE UPDATE, COMMISSIONERS.
ITEM 308, WE ALREADY DISCUSSED THAT WAS PART OF THE COMPENSATION STUDY.
COMMISSIONER RAMSEY, ITEM 312.
YEAH, THIS IS A JUST A BIT OF AN UPDATE AND A THOUGHT THAT THAT CAME.
IF YOU LOOK AT AT ARPA FUNDS THAT MAY BE USED FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND LISTENING TO AT LEAST TALKING TO OUR SAFE SCHOOL COMMISSION. AND BY THE WAY, LET ME JUST CONGRATULATE THE COURT ON THE FOLKS THAT WERE NOMINATED, THAT SAFE SCHOOL COMMISSION.
EVERYONE ON THAT COMMISSION IS A CREDIBLE.
AS INSIGHT ONCE A STUDENT JUDGE, ONE'S A TEACHER, ONE'S A MOM, ONE'S A SUPERINTENDENT.
THEY'RE JUST THEY'RE REALLY TO COMPLEMENT EACH OTHER.
AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THEY'VE IDENTIFIED IS THE MENTAL HEALTH ELEMENT.
AND IN SCHOOLS AND THIS AGENDA ITEM.
AND I'LL SIMPLY READ MY MOTION REQUEST, THE HARRIS COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH WORK WITH THE HARRIS COUNTY RESOURCES FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS DIVISION TO CREATE A PLAN, INCLUDING GUIDANCE FROM THE HARRIS COUNTY SAFE SCHOOLS COMMISSION FOR ARPA FUNDED MENTAL HEALTH RESOURCES WITHIN SCHOOLS.
THIS ONE, I WANT TO KIND OF GET A JUMP ON IN TERMS OF IT AT LEAST INVESTIGATE WHETHER ARPA FUNDING COULD BE PURSUED TO SUPPORT SOME OF THESE RECOMMENDATIONS ON MENTAL HEALTH IN SCHOOLS, CERTAINLY AS WE GO INTO THE NEW SCHOOL YEAR.
COMMISSIONER, I WOULD SUPPORT IT, BUT I'D WANT TO PROPOSE THAT WE THAT WE FOLLOW THE PROCESS AND SO SAY THAT THEY CREATE AND SUBMIT A PROPOSAL TO GO THROUGH ARPA AS OPPOSED TO COMMITTING THAT WE'RE GOING TO PUT ARPA ON SOMETHING THAT WE HAVEN'T YET SEEN.
SO THE THE NEXT STEP YOU WOULD YOU WOULD SAY WOULD BE TO GO THROUGH THE ARPA, RIGHT? FOR THEM TO PUT A PROPOSAL, GO THROUGH ARPA AND THEN WHATEVER COMES OUT OF ARPA, IT'LL COME BACK TO US.
JUDGE ONE POINT OF CLARIFICATION.
SO I THINK THAT WOULD ALSO BE A GOOD TIME TO LOOK AT WHAT WHAT MIGHT BE MISSING.
SO THE POINT IS GET OUR APPLICATION IN.
THEY COULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THESE THESE FIRES AS WELL.
THOSE HAVE ACTUALLY BEEN THROUGH THE BID PROCESS AND ARE SET TO BE AWARDED.
AND I WOULD ALSO MENTION THAT HARRIS CENTER CURRENTLY WORKS WITH 40 SCHOOLS CURRENTLY.
[06:35:10]
MAY EXPRESS A NEED.SO I THINK THERE'S SOME OPPORTUNITY THERE AS WELL.
I MIGHT GET A MOTION MOTION BY COMMISSIONER RAMSEY.
IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
ALL IN FAVOR, RIGHT? ANY OPPOSE.
COMMISSIONER KILGORE, YOU? I WAS AN I A KNIGHT.
COMMISSIONER, WE'VE THREE MORE ITEMS TO GET TO THE BOTTOM, AND WE'LL GO BACK TO THE CHOCOLATE.
COMMISSIONER RAMSEY, YOUR ITEM ON THE LABS.
JUDGE, JUST. I'M SORRY TO INTERRUPT, BUT I THINK WE SKIP 309.
IT'S NOT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEM.
AND I THINK IT WAS I DON'T THINK WE LISTED IT FOR DISCUSSION.
JUDGE, REALLY? YES. LET ME SEE.
OH, I HAVE IT LISTED UNDER EXECUTIVE SESSION.
THAT'S GOING TO GO BACK TO THE COUNCIL.
THANK YOU. SO YOU WANT TO DISCUSS IT NOW? YEAH. THIS IS COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
OKAY. I WANT TO FIRST TAKE A MOMENT TO THANK AND CONGRATULATE THE COUNTY ATTORNEY AND HIS TEAM FOR THEIR LEADERSHIP ON THIS ISSUE AND FOR TEAMING UP WITH THE CITY.
I THINK IT FEELS A POWERFUL STATEMENT TO TRY AND GET SOME JUSTICE FOR PEOPLE IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD WHO SUFFERED FOR SO LONG, KASHMERE GARDENS AND FIFTH WARD. Y'ALL DID A GREAT JOB ON IT.
AND UNION PACIFIC HAS COLLECTED RECORD PROFITS, EARNING $6.5 BILLION IN 2021, BUT THEY FAILED TO MEANINGFULLY ADDRESS RESIDENTS DEMAND FOR ROBUST CLEAN UP.
THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE HAD THE ABILITY TO LEAD ON THIS ISSUE BECAUSE OF A PREVIOUS MOTION THAT THE COURT PASSED.
BUT I WANT TO MAKE SURE IT IS CLEAR SO I HAVE A MOTION TO REAFFIRM THE COUNTY'S SUPPORT OF ANY INVESTIGATION OF CONTAMINATION AND KASHMERE GARDENS AND THE FIFTH WARD RELATED TO UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD FACILITY AT 4910 LIBERTY ROAD AND ANY RELATED LEGAL ACTION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE CURRENT CHALLENGE TO UNION PACIFIC PROPOSED CLEAN UP PLAN AND THE FORTHCOMING LAWSUIT AGAINST UNION PACIFIC UNDER THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT.
THE EXECUTIVE COMMISSIONER I'M I'M GOING TO SECOND THAT, BUT I'VE GOT SOME REMARKS ON COMMISSIONER.
WE GET TO DO THIS BECAUSE CITIZENS STOOD UP FOR THEMSELVES.
SOME OF THEM APPEARED TO ME TO BE THE SAME CITIZENS WHO FILED THE COMPLAINT THAT HELPED US BACK THE YELLOW UP A BIT.
IT'S FEDERAL LAW, AND IT'S UNIQUE IN THAT IT ALLOWS FOR CITIZENS SUITS AND WHICH MEANS ANYONE, YOU OR I OR EVEN POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS LIKE THE COUNTY CAN BRING SUITS WHEN THERE ARE ISSUES RELATED TO THE DISPOSAL, FOR EXAMPLE, OF HAZARD OR HAZARDOUS WASTE, AS WE'VE SEEN AT THE UNION PACIFIC SIDE.
AND MR. BLACKBURN AND HIS CLASS AT RICE ACTUALLY PUT TOGETHER AN INITIAL COMPLAINT ON BEHALF OF THE LOCAL RESIDENTS, PRESENTED IT TO THE COMMUNITY AND THEN WORKED WITH US TO HELP THE CITY AND THE COUNTY PUT TOGETHER THEIR COMPLAINTS.
AND SO THAT FLEXIBILITY IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT WHEN YOU'RE DEALING WITH SOMETHING AS COMPLICATED AS WHAT WE'RE SEEING IN KASHMIRI GARDENS AND FIFTH WARD AND WHERE WE KNOW, UNFORTUNATELY, THE STATE YOU KNOW, THE STATE LAW DOESN'T REALLY ALLOW THE STATE REGULATORS TO DO AS MUCH AS THEY REALLY SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO IN THIS CASE.
[06:40:02]
CAN YOU COMMENT ON, IF I MIGHT? CAN YOU COMMENT ON UNION PACIFIC, TAKING THE RESIDENTS TO COURT TO TRY TO TAKE AWAY THEIR ABILITY TO SUE IN THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT RULED AGAINST THEM.YEAH. SO SO THERE ARE A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT LAWSUITS THAT ARE THAT HAVE BEEN BROUGHT BY RESIDENTS.
AND SO FOR DIFFERENT REASONS, THESE LAWSUITS HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO PROCEED.
THESE WERE BROUGHT BY PLAINTIFFS LAWYERS ON BEHALF OF THE INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTS.
AND SO THAT WILL WORK IN PARALLEL TO THE COUNTY'S ACTIONS.
THOSE ARE REALLY TO RECOVER DAMAGES FOR THOSE RESIDENTS.
SO THOSE ARE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT LAWSUITS, TOO.
SO A LOT OF THESE FEDERAL LAWS REQUIRE THE ENTITIES THAT ARE BRINGING SUIT TO PROVIDE NOTICE TO THE ENTITY THEY'RE SUING AND TO PROVIDE NOTICE TO THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT THEY'RE GOING TO SUE.
SO WHAT WE DID LAST WEEK IS WE FILED THIS NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUE.
IT STARTS A 90 DAY CLOCK FOR UNTIL WE CAN ACTUALLY FOLLOW OUR LAWSUIT.
IDEALLY, WHAT WE'D HOPE IS THAT UNION PACIFIC WOULD COME TO THE TABLE AND WORK WITH US TO FORMULATE THE RELIEF THAT A COURT MIGHT COME UP WITH AFTER YEARS OF LITIGATION, BECAUSE THAT'S A MUCH MORE EFFICIENT RESOLUTION OF THINGS.
AND THAT'S KIND OF THE HOPE THAT YOU HAVE WITH THESE NOTICES.
AND WHAT WE WE ALSO HOPE IS THAT THE EPA HERE OR THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WILL GET INVOLVED AND MAYBE EITHER TAKE THE CASE OR WORK WITH US ON THE CASE AND PROVIDE THEIR IMMEASURABLE RESOURCES TO HELP US WITH THE CASE.
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE. THANK YOU.
AND THANK YOU, MR. COLEMAN, FOR YOUR WORK ON THIS IN THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE IN GENERAL.
AND SO I'D LIKE TO MAKE SURE THAT IF MY CONSTITUENTS MAY BENEFIT FROM THIS THIS ITEM, I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT PRECINCT TWO IS INCLUDED IN IT. BUT SECONDLY, I WANTED TO TRY TO AMEND THIS ITEM TO INCLUDE THE TRAIN STOPPAGE THAT OCCURS IN THE EAST END.
PRINCIPALLY, NO OTHER AREA, FOR THE MOST PART, SUFFERS WITH TRAIN STOPPING ON THE ROADWAY.
COUNCILMEMBER GALLEGOS HAS BEEN IMMENSELY VOCAL ABOUT THIS.
I WAS VOCAL ON IT WHEN I WAS A DISTRICT H.
COUNCILMEMBER. MAYOR WHITE INSTITUTED CAMERA SYSTEM TO DETECT THE STOPPAGE.
I THINK MAYOR TURNER HAS RESURRECTED THAT INITIATIVE, BUT IT CONTINUES TO BE A EAST IN ISSUE THAT ALMOST THE EAST END IS EXCLUSIVELY AFFECTED BY.
IS THIS ITEM NOT BROAD ENOUGH TO INCLUDE THAT THAT NUISANCE FOR EAST RESIDENTS.
SO I THINK, COMMISSIONER, UNFORTUNATELY, THE ITEM IS NOT BROAD ENOUGH.
VERY GOOD. THEN I'LL PUT AN ITEM ON THE AGENDA.
BUT THANK YOU FOR YOUR WORK ON THIS ITEM.
AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR YOUR WORK ON FOR YOUR CONSTITUENTS ON THIS COMMISSION.
BUT SOME OF THE SPEAKERS WERE TALKING ABOUT THE HISTORIC AFRICAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY IN CASHMERE GARDENS IN FIFTH WARD, WHERE THE STATS SHOW THAT NEIGHBORHOOD HAS CHANGED DRAMATICALLY OVER THE YEARS AND HAS A VERY LARGE HISPANIC POPULATION.
BUT, YOU KNOW, WHEN WHENEVER THE BABY AND MICKEY WERE WORKING TOGETHER, WHENEVER WE COULD HISTORICALLY, WHENEVER WE GO TO WASHINGTON, YOU KNOW, MAYBE A NOTE MR. MENEFEE AND I WERE TALKING ABOUT IN LATE SEPTEMBER.
I MIGHT TELL HER TO MOVE THAT UP, BUT TRYING TO PUSH EPA IN THE FEDERAL ENTITIES TO TAKE IT SERIOUSLY AND JUMP IN BECAUSE IT'S PRETTY POWERFUL FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY TO JOIN WITH BLACKBURN AND THOSE RESIDENTS.
DO YOU GUYS HAVE THE MOTION? I DO. I READ IT, YES.
IF YOU DON'T MIND READING THAT JUST FOR CLARITY.
[06:45:03]
PACIFIC RAILROAD'S FACILITY AT 4910 LIBERTY ROAD AND ANY RELATED LEGAL ACTION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE CURRENT CHALLENGE TO UNION PACIFIC'S PROPOSED CLEAN UP PLAN AND THE FORTHCOMING LAWSUIT AGAINST UNION PACIFIC UNDER THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT. DID I GIVE YOU A COPY? I THOUGHT WE SENT IT TO YOU. I'M SORRY.SO COMMISSIONER LEWIS MADE THE MOTION.
COMMISSIONER GARCIA MADE THE SECOND.
I'VE GOT MY QUESTIONS ANSWERED.
A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER RAMSEY OF 313.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA.
ALL IN FAVOR. I OPPOSE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
ONE MORE ITEM BEFORE WE GET TO THE BOND.
YEAH. I MEANT TO ASK, DID WE VOTE ON THAT LAND TRUST ITEM? STEP DOWN. WE HELD IT, BUT IT WILL COME BACK.
IN TWO WEEKS. A THREE WEEKS SERIES.
ITEM FOUR WAS THE THE RESOLUTION CELEBRATING THE COAST GUARD'S ANNIVERSARY.
WE STEPPED OUT BEFORE WE HAD A CHANCE TO VOTE ON IT.
SECOND MOVE, RATHER A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
THAT'S THE LAST ONE. THAT'S THE LAST.
[Departments (Part 4 of 5)]
IT'S 647. COMMISSIONERS COURT IS BACK IN SESSION AND WE'RE DISCUSSING ITEM 20.SO IS THERE ANYTHING? YES, GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER.
THANK YOU, JUDGE. I'D LIKE TO START THE DISCUSSION BY MAKING A MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF BUDGET MANAGEMENT, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, AND ALL RELEVANT DEPARTMENTS TO DEVELOP A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BOND PROPOSAL AND NECESSARY LEGAL DOCUMENTS FOR THE NOVEMBER EIGHT, 2022 ELECTION THAT INCLUDES UP TO $100 MILLION IN INVESTMENTS IN PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES AND TECHNOLOGY, UP TO $900 MILLION IN INVESTMENTS IN ROADS, DRAINAGE AND TRANSPORTATION RELATED PROGRAMS AND UP TO $200 MILLION IN INVESTMENTS IN PARKS.
AND YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A FEW.
NO, I JUST JUST WANT TO OPEN UP THE DISCUSSION.
I WOULD LIKE I KNOW WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THIS, YOU KNOW, QUITE A BIT.
I WANT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE, IF YOU DON'T MIND, JUST WALK THROUGH AGAIN.
GIVE US SOME SENSE OF THE GROWTH WE'VE HAD IN THE COUNTY.
I THINK PEOPLE ARE CLAMORING FOR MORE CAPITAL INVESTMENTS IN TERMS OF EACH OF THE AREAS LAID OUT PUBLIC SAFETY, TRANSPORTATION, DRAINAGE PARKS.
WELL, THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER ALICE, FOR THAT QUESTION.
AND IN MY MIND, I DON'T HAVE THE POPULATION GROWTH ON THE TOP OF MY HEAD.
AND YOU HEARD THIS MORNING FROM SOME OF THE FOLKS WORKING AT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE.
WE HAVE 6600 MILES OF ROADS TO TAKE CARE OF.
AND OF THOSE, NEARLY A 10TH OF THEM ARE IN SPORT, A FAILED CONDITION.
WE HAVE 260 MILES OF ROADS THAT HAVE AN E OR F LEVEL OF SERVICE WE HAVE THAT WE NEED MORE DRAINAGE INVESTMENT, I THINK IS OBVIOUS TO EVERYONE.
WE HAVE A NEED TO BRING OUR SIDEWALKS INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT.
ONLY ABOUT 40% OF OUR ROADS NOW HAVE HAVE A SIDEWALK.
[06:50:01]
AND I THINK ALL OF US KNOW SOMEONE WHO'S BEEN INJURED IN HARRIS COUNTY, WHETHER DRIVING, WALKING OR BIKING.I'M JUST GOING TO HAVE A FEW MORE AREAS I WANT TO GO INTO, IF YOU WOULD.
WOULD YOU ADDRESS SOME OF THE CONCERNS WE AS COMMISSIONERS HAVE HAVE RAISED ABOUT THE TIMING, A HOST OF ISSUES THAT YOU'VE HEARD US RAISING AT THE TABLE, IF YOU WOULD? CERTAINLY. STAFF DEVELOPED A COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PLAN THAT'S BEEN SHARED A COUPLE OF TIMES WITH COMMISSIONERS COURT OFFICES.
IT WOULD PROVIDE FOR OVER 20 COMMUNITY MEETINGS AS WELL AS NUMEROUS OTHER FORMS OF OUTREACH.
ANOTHER QUESTION WE'VE HAD A LOT OF IS HOW SPECIFIC DO WE NEED TO BE ON PROJECTS? AND IT'S AT LEAST OUR VIEW THAT BY HAVING SOME OF THESE SPECIFIC PROGRAMS I WENT THROUGH, WE CAN COMMUNICATE TO THE PUBLIC WHAT THE MONEY WILL BE INVESTED IN. THEY CAN HAVE A CLEAR SENSE AND SOME LEVEL OF TRANSPARENCY THAT THIS ROAD MONEY ISN'T, FOR EXAMPLE, JUST SUBSIDIZING NEW DEVELOPMENTS, IT'S ADDRESSING EXISTING NEEDS.
I THINK THERE ARE SOME OF US, MYSELF INCLUDED, WHO THINKS IT'S GOOD TO HAVE SOME FLEXIBILITY.
THERE ARE JURISDICTIONS THAT DO THAT.
SO I WOULD I'M PERSONALLY COMFORTABLE WITH NOT HAVING EVERY PROJECT SPELLED OUT.
I THINK IT'S NEVER SOMETHING WE'VE DONE IN THE PAST.
IT'S A POLICY CALL FOR THIS COURT.
BUT I KNOW I TRY TO PUT MYSELF IN THE SHOES OF A VOTER.
WOULD I UNDERSTAND WHAT I WAS VOTING ON, GIVEN WHAT WE'VE OUTLINED HERE? AND I THINK I WOULD.
I'M SURE THERE ARE MORE QUESTIONS THAT HAVE COME UP, BUT I HOPE I'VE HIT AT LEAST SOME OF THEM.
THE SUPPORT TO PASS THIS PROJECT COMPLETELY BIPARTISAN SUPPORT.
IF SOME COMMISSIONER WANTED TO REDUCE THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PIECE IN TERMS OF A CONSULTANT AND BRING MORE OF IT IN-HOUSE, I DON'T WANT TO REDUCE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT, BUT IT WOULD HELP GET BIPARTISAN SUPPORT.
I CERTAINLY MAKE MY STAFF AVAILABLE.
I SUGGEST WE TRY TO DO MORE OF IT IN-HOUSE IF WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE THAT ANYWAY.
YOU KNOW, I ALWAYS LAY MY CARDS ON THE TABLE.
I JUST WANT TO LAY THAT OUT AS PEOPLE THINK ABOUT IT.
I WANT YOU TO JUST BRIEFLY WALK THROUGH THE PROCESS.
AGAIN, WE WOULD GO THROUGH THIS.
YOU ALL WOULD COME BACK WITH SOME FINAL LANGUAGE FOR THE BALLOT IN.
THREE WEEKS, A MONTH OR WHATEVER.
JUST WALK US THROUGH IT. SO THE LAW ACTUALLY AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WILL CORRECT ME IF I GET THIS WRONG, BUT THERE'S A NARROW WINDOW TO ACTUALLY PUT SOMETHING ON THE BALLOT FOR NOVEMBER. SO WE WOULD NEED TO BECAUSE THERE'S NO REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF COMMISSIONERS COURT, WE WOULD NEED TO HAVE A SPECIAL MEETING BETWEEN THE 12TH AND THE 22ND. AND AT THAT POINT, A FORMAL ORDER WOULD BE ADOPTED BASED ON WHAT MR. GARCIA DESCRIBED, IT WOULD LIKELY BE ACTUALLY THREE SEPARATE BALLOT MEASURES ONE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY, ONE FOR ROADS, DRAINAGE AND TRANSPORTATION AND ONE FOR PARKS.
AND I MENTION THAT BECAUSE I JUST HAVE TWO MORE YEARS AFTER THIS.
I MENTION THAT BECAUSE IF WE WERE GOING TO GO TO WASHINGTON AND MAKE THE CASE FOR MONKEYPOX.
THE NEW FEDERAL LEGISLATION THAT I THINK IS MOVING THROUGH THE SENATE, THE MARRIAGE EQUALITY ACT.
ANYTHING ELSE, IF THIS PASSES, WANT TO GET SOME SENSE.
HOPEFULLY WE'LL DECIDE TODAY WHEN WHEN WE COME BACK FOR THAT MEETING, BECAUSE I THINK.
HOW MANY OF US HAVE TO BE HERE FOR THAT? THREE. THREE IS NOT A VIRTUAL MEETING, SO TWO MORE AREAS.
WOULD YOU WALK THROUGH A LITTLE BIT THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE TAX CONSEQUENCES? I THINK I UNDERSTAND SOME OF IT.
ARGUABLY, THERE WOULD BE NO TAX INCREASE BECAUSE WE WOULD WE WOULD WE WOULD WE WOULD IN SOME BONDS AND ISSUE WOULD WALK THROUGH THAT IF YOU WOULD.
MR. RAMOS. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE TO BLEND IT OUT IN TERMS PEOPLE CAN UNDERSTAND.
SURE. IF WE COULD PULL UP, THERE WAS A SLIDE ATTACHED TO THE COURT, BACKUP DOCUMENTS.
[06:55:02]
THIS MIGHT BE EASIER.THERE'S A CHART THAT COMES FROM MASTERSON PAGES THAT ON A SEPARATE.
MR. ELLIS, DID YOU HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION WE COULD TALK ABOUT? WELL, YEAH.
I WANT YOU TO WALK THROUGH THE HISTORY.
YOU CAN DO THAT AND COME BACK. YOU CAN MAKE THAT.
SO WHAT PAGE IS THAT? THESE ARE LIES. CAN'T SEE.
I'M NOT 100% SURE THAT'S ALL RIGHT.
LIKE I MENTIONED IN THE OTHER ITEM WE DISCUSSED TODAY, THIS TAX RATE WILL ACTUALLY OVERALL FOR HARRIS COUNTY WILL BE LOWER NEXT YEAR OR THIS COMING YEAR, FISCAL YEAR 23 THAN THEY WERE IN THE PRIOR YEAR.
AND THAT'S BECAUSE OUR ASSESSMENT IS GROWING.
WE'RE PAYING OFF DEBT AND THE OUR ASSESSMENTS ARE GROWING.
AND THERE ARE CAPS ON HOW MUCH REVENUE WE WE CAN GAIN FROM THE MAINTENANCE OF OPERATION RATE.
SO EVEN WHILE WE'RE ADDING DEBT TO OUR ROLLS, THE RATE WILL CONTINUE TO GO DOWN OVERALL.
RATE, WHICH IS SPECIFIC TO THE DEBT SERVICE BY 2028, BECAUSE WE'RE PAYING OFF SO MANY BONDS AND BECAUSE WE ARE OUR ASSESSMENTS CONTINUE TO GROW. FOLKS, IS INTEREST RATE OR DEBT SERVICE RATE WILL BE LOWER THAN IT IS TODAY.
AND THAT'S OVER THE LIFE OF THE BOND THAT THAT IS ANNUALLY PER YEAR FOR 25, 25 YEAR BONDS.
TYPICALLY, YES, FOR A YEAR, FOR 25 YEARS NOW, PEOPLE WILL GRASP.
BUT I JUST WANT TO TAKE A SHOT AGAIN AT RUNNING THROUGH THE LAST TIME THE CITY DID ONE.
THEY WERE IN THE SAME POSITION AND THEY CAMPAIGNED IT.
IT PASSED ON NO INCREASE IN TAXES, BUT THEY FOUND A WAY TO EXPLAIN WHAT YOU EXPLAINING IN A WAY THAT PEOPLE COULD UNDERSTAND IT.
GOT IT. AND SO IF YOU GO IF YOU LOOK AT THE CHART, SO FOR 22, OUR OVERALL TAX RATE IS 0.37693 WITH PART OF THE PORTION OF THAT ON ON DEBT SERVICE BEING 0.04193.
SO WHICH IS 8.42, EVEN WHEN YOU ADD WHEN YOU'RE ADDING IN THE DEBT SERVICE BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN PAYING OFF PRIOR YEAR BONDS, IF YOU LOOK AT 2028 FOLKS, IS TAX RATE FOR TRUST.
THE INTEREST WILL BE AT 0.04 TO.
SO AGAIN, THE LIBERTARIAN MINDS, THE RETIRING 25 YEAR BONDS.
CORRECT. AND SO WHEN WE ISSUED IT FOR THESE OVER THE NEXT 25 YEARS, THAT'S WHY.
AND I'M SURE THE FOLKS IN THE PRESS WILL GET IT.
CORRECT. AND I NOW KNOW THAT WE HAVE MR. RAMOS AND BOARD HAVE THE LUXURY OF NOT BEING IN EVERY DETAIL.
IF THERE IS ANY ADDED COST TO A PARTICULAR HOUSEHOLD, IT WILL BE BECAUSE THEIR APPRAISAL WENT UP.
AND WHAT'S CREATING ROOM IN THE EXISTING TAX RATE TO DO THIS IS WE'RE GOING TO BE FORCED TO CUT OUR TAX RATE AND WE'RE PAYING OFF OTHER BONDS, WHICH CREATES SOME ROOM IN THE DEBT SERVICE TAX RATE.
IF YOU DON'T DO IT NOW, WE'LL HAVE TIME.
BUT WHEN I SAY IT, PEOPLE DON'T BELIEVE IT.
AND THE CATEGORIES THAT COMMISSIONER GARCIA HAS LAID OUT, WHAT THIS COUNT HAS DONE IN THE PAST.
[07:00:01]
AND IF YOU DON'T KNOW NOW, IT'S OKAY.JUST HAVE IT BEFORE WE MAKE A FINAL DECISION.
AND THAT IS NOT WHAT HAS BEEN HAPPENING IN THIS COUNTY PERIOD.
YOU GOT ESPN, THE FOLKS MADE THE MOST NOISE, WERE THE MOST POLITICALLY ACTIVE.
IT HAS HAPPENED THROUGHOUT THE HISTORY OF THIS COUNTY.
AND HEY, HEY, AT THE END OF THE DAY, AS I'VE SAID MANY TIMES, I MAKE MY CASE.
I TRY NOT TO HOLD A GRUDGE EVEN IF I DON'T WIN KNOW GOVERNMENT.
BUT IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW THE FACTS.
THAT, BOY, WE CAN'T BE RIGHT ON.
BUT GOING BACK TO 2015, THE FORMULA FOR TRANSPORTATION DOLLARS FOR ROAD BONDS WAS BASED ON THREE THINGS THE POPULATION, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY EQUAL IN EACH PRECINCT, BUT NOT ALWAYS EXACTLY THE SAME NUMBER OF LANE MILES AND NUMBER OF THOROUGHFARE MILES OF LANE MILES.
MEANING SOMEBODY GAVE YOU A ROAD? YES. SO IN OTHER WORDS, IF YOU HAD AN INEQUITY.
AND YOU SAY LANE MILES, YOU REINFORCED IT AND THOROUGHFARE INEQUITY.
AND THAT LED TO A DISTRIBUTION OF AT THE TIME OF 18% TO PRECINCT ONE, 25% OF PRECINCT TO 27% TO PRECINCT THREE AND 30% TO PRECINCT FOUR.
SO ROUGHLY SPEAKING, JUST BASED BASED ON POPULATION.
AND SO OBVIOUSLY IT'S A POLICY DECISION OF WHETHER COURT WANTS TO CONTINUE TO DO THAT OR WHETHER WE WANT TO MOVE TOWARDS MORE OF A WORST FIRST FRAMEWORK OR WHETHER WE WANT TO DO A HYBRID OF THE TWO.
SO THAT'S THE TRANSPORTATION MONEY COMING FROM THE TOLL ROAD AND ROAD BONDS AND ROBOTS.
YES. SO THAT MEANT THAT ON ROAD BONDS FOR PRECINCT ONE, AS AN EXAMPLE, IF THERE WAS A BUILT IN INEQUITY, NOT JUST THE MONEY COMING OFF THE TOLL ROAD, WHICH IS A SMALL AMOUNT. SO I THINK I READ SOMETHING I WAS LOOKING AT THE OTHER NIGHT, MAYBE IT WAS THERE WAS A $700 MILLION ONE AT SOME POINT THAT OUR LAST OUR LAST ROAD BOND ISSUANCE APPROVAL WAS $700 MILLION BACK IN 2015.
THEY GAVE PRECINCT ONE 70%, 18% ORIGINALLY.
BUT AGAIN, COURT MODIFIED THAT FORMULA LATER SO THAT NOW IT WAS ALL LOANS.
BUT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH, THE MONEY. SO THAT MONEY WAS GONE.
AND WHAT ABOUT IN OTHER AREAS, PARKS? DO YOU KNOW? COULD YOU FIND ANYTHING? I KNOW THIS IS NOT A THAT WROTE DOWN.
I HAVE NOT FOUND ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE 25% SPLIT ON PARKS.
BUT MAYBE SOMEONE THAT'S BEEN HERE LONG.
I COULDN'T FIND IT. I'M CURIOUS HOW MY COLLEAGUES, PARTICULARLY COMMISSIONERS CAGLE AND RAMSEY, THINK THAT THE FUNDS SHOULD BE SPLIT FOR THIS IF WE WERE TO DO A BOND AND WHY? THE VIEWERS WOULD BE WILLING TO IF YOU HAVE AN OPINION ANYWAY.
I THINK A BOND ISSUED IN NOVEMBER OF 2023 MAKES SOME SENSE.
THAT GIVES US TIME TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE CONSTITUENTS.
THAT GIVES THE CONSTITUENTS TIME TO COMMUNICATE WITH US.
YOU KNOW, WHEN I WAS HERE TODAY AND LISTENING TO ALL THE INPUT, I COULD ONLY THINK OF MY THREE T'S THAT I'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT FOR SOME WEEKS NOW. TRUST.
YOU'VE GOT TO EARN THAT TRUST.
AND I THINK WHETHER THIS COURT WANTS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT OR NOT, WE'VE BEEN IMPACTED.
WHEN YOU LOOK AT HOW WE DID REDISTRICTING.
THAT WAS NOT A TRANSPARENT MANNER.
WHEN YOU LOOK AT HOW WE DID THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, THAT WAS NOT DONE IN A TRANSPARENT.
LET'S WORK THROUGH THE ISSUES.
SO AT LEAST THE PEOPLE I'M TALKING TO IN THE AREAS THAT I REPRESENT, THERE'S NOT A LOT OF TRUST THERE BECAUSE OF VERY SPECIFIC THINGS THAT HAVE OCCURRED IN THIS COURT.
AND WE'VE HAD A LOT OF WHAT AND WHERE'S CONVERSATION.
[07:05:03]
WE JUST HAD ONE HERE TODAY.WHEN YOU WHEN YOU SAY THINGS LIKE, WELL, WE KNOW THAT THAT THERE THERE IS AN OPINION THAT HOW MONIES WERE SPENT IN THE PAST WAS NOT DONE RIGHT.
SO YOU LEAD THE IMPRESSION THAT WITH THIS BOND ISSUE, THERE'S GOING TO BE A ATTEMPT TO MAKE UP FOR WHAT IS PERCEIVED TO BE PROBLEMS IN THE PAST.
SO THAT'S A THAT'S A STATEMENT.
THAT'S THAT'S MY CONSTITUENTS HEARD THAT.
THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT IT MEANS WHEN COMMISSIONER ELLIS TALKS ABOUT EQUITY.
THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT IT MEANS WHEN MR. GARCIA SAYS IF IT'S A32 VOTE, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE A 25% SPLIT.
AND THEN I FIND IT INTERESTING FROM A TRANSPARENCY STANDPOINT, THERE WERE A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT CAME TO COURT TODAY AND ARE TALKING ABOUT SPECIFIC PROJECTS. TRANSPARENCY HAS TO DO WITH TALKING ABOUT SPECIFICS.
AND WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, MR. BARRY, I DON'T I'M NOT SAYING YOU HAVE TO HAVE 99% SPECIFIC PROJECTS, BUT TO HAVE NO SPECIFIC PROJECTS TO SAY, LET ME HAVE A BLANK CHECK ON ROADS, LET ME HAVE A BLANK CHECK ON PARKS, LET ME HAVE A BLANK CHECK ON PUBLIC SAFETY.
AND AGAIN, IT'S BUILDING FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, THOSE, THOSE SORTS OF THINGS.
SO WHEN THERE'S THAT OUT THERE, THERE'S NOT THE SPECIFICS THAT YOU CAN COMMUNICATE WITH PEOPLE ON IN TERMS OF THIS IS WHAT IT'S ABOUT AND THIS IS WHAT IT'S NOT ABOUT.
AND THEN THERE'S THE TIMING OF IT.
AS I SAID WHEN I BEGAN, 20, 23, I THINK WOULD BE A BETTER TIME.
THAT GIVES US ALL TIME TO COMMUNICATE WITH OUR CONSTITUENTS ON WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO AND AND FULLY, CLEARLY COMMUNICATE. EVERYBODY HAS A NEED TO GET THE NEEDS PART.
BUT WHAT'S COMPLICATED IS WHICH OF THE NEEDS ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE CARE OF? BECAUSE I ASSURE YOU, 1.2 BILLION WON'T TAKE CARE OF ALL THE NEEDS THAT ARE IN THIS COMMUNITY.
SO YOU TALK ABOUT A GENERIC OUTREACH.
SO YOU'LL HAVE A 90 DAY MARKETING PLAN TO COMMUNICATE WHAT IT IS YOU'RE TRYING TO TRYING TO SELL.
THERE WON'T BE A LOT OF SPECIFICS THERE OTHER THAN CATEGORIES.
AND AND PEOPLE UNDERSTAND CATEGORIES.
BUT, YOU KNOW, IT'S IT TALKED ABOUT IT WAS ALSO MENTIONED TODAY ABOUT FEDERAL PARTNERING.
I ALSO REMEMBER THIS COURT TALKING ABOUT HOW FEDERAL PARTNERING WAS A BAD THING.
I'VE EVEN SAID SOMETIMES THE FEDERAL PARTNERING DRIVES, THE DRIVES, THE PRIORITIES, AND WE DON'T WANT WASHINGTON DRIVING OUR PRIORITIES. WE WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO FIGURE THAT OUT OURSELVES.
SO TRUST, TRANSPARENCY, TIMING, I THINK WE HAVEN'T CHECKED THOSE BOXES.
I'M READY TO HAVE THAT CONVERSATION.
I'M READY TO VOTE TODAY ON PURSUING THE DETAILS RELATED TO A 2023 BOND ISSUE.
YES. I'D LIKE TO ASK DANIEL, IF YOU WILL, ASSUMING THAT THIS BOND DOESN'T GET VOTED ON TODAY.
AND ASSUMING THAT IT WERE NOT TO PASS.
AND WITH WHAT YOU LAID OUT IN TERMS OF A POTENTIAL FORECAST, HOW WOULD WE FUND OUR SHERIFF'S OFFICE FACILITIES, OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT BUILDINGS? BECAUSE THE CONSTABLES ARE ASKING FOR IMPROVEMENTS AS WELL.
HOW WOULD HOW WOULD WE GO ABOUT FUNDING THAT? SO WE DO HAVE LIMITED AUTHORITY TO DO ON VOTING DEBT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY.
WHAT I WOULD SAY IS THAT THOSE PROJECTS, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE STILL VIABLE PROJECTS.
SO AT SOME POINT, YOU HAVE TO CUT SOMEWHERE AND COMPETE WITH THAT.
AND. THEY MAKE A STATEMENT HERE THAT.
[07:10:02]
FOR EVERY DOLLAR IN PUBLIC MONEY SPENT ON PARKS THAT IT CAN GENERATE BETWEEN 4 TO 12.DO YOU TEND TO AGREE WITH THAT? AND I WOULD DEFER TO THEIR EXPERTISE.
YEAH, I MEAN, I MEAN, IT'S IT ALSO GOES WITH WHY BIG DEVELOPMENT USUALLY LOOKS FOR BIG GREEN SPACE TO BE VERY ACCOMMODATING TO IT AS WELL.
NOW, IN TERMS OF THE THREE TS THAT COMMISSIONER RAMSEY LAID OUT.
I WANT TO SPEAK TO THE THREE TEAS THAT I KNOW OF.
AND THEY'RE THEY'RE THEY'RE EXACTLY THE SAME ONES.
ALSO DON'T HAVE A LOT OF TRUST IN HARRIS COUNTY BECAUSE OF THINGS THAT WERE DONE PRIOR TO 2019.
PRECINCTS HAS BEEN LARGELY UNDERFUNDED, UNDERSERVED, AND ROADS AND PARKS WERE NOT WELL FUNDED. SO WE'RE GAINING TRUST.
AT LEAST MY ADMINISTRATION HAS BEEN WORKING TO DEMONSTRATE WHAT STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS CAN DO TO A COMMUNITY AND DO TO IMPROVE THEIR QUALITY OF LIFE.
THIS IS WHERE REVIVED TO THRIVE IS IS REALLY THRIVING.
THE TRUST IS THERE TODAY TRANSPARENCY.
WE'RE HERE AT 712 AND COUNTING TONIGHT.
BUT NONETHELESS, PRIOR TO 2019.
I THINK THE LONGEST MEETING THAT WAS HELD WAS WHAT? WHERE DID WE FIND? WHAT RECORD DID WE FIND? AN HOUR AND A HALF AN HOUR AND A HALF.
YEAH, 30 MINUTES, 30 MINUTES, 30 MINUTES.
YEAH. SO, BOY, TALK ABOUT TRANSPARENCY.
YOUR PREDECESSOR. I WASN'T ON COURT TONIGHT.
THEY WERE TRYING TO GET ME TO BE QUIET LESS.
WHEN YOU WERE MAYOR, YOU MOVED AN ITEM TO BE ON THE BOND ELECTION.
I THINK IT WAS LESS TIME AND IT WAS LESS TIME BECAUSE TWO YEARS IT WAS THREE YEARS IT WAS.
SO YOU MOVED IT TO AUGUST, NOVEMBER AND HURT THAT THEIR BOND WAS SOUND WITH MUCH LESS TIME.
NOT TRUE. AND THIS ITEM YOU'RE MAKING, IT WAS PUT ON THE ON THE BOND WAS PUT ON THE TABLE BEGINNING IN JULY OF 2021 AND WITH ANOTHER ITEM ON DECEMBER OF 2021.
AND WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT IT AT LEAST A COUPLE OF TIMES IN BETWEEN THAT TIME HERE.
BUT I HAVE SPENT MY TIME TALKING TO MY CONSTITUENTS ABOUT THEIR INFRASTRUCTURE PRIORITIES.
WHERE FOLKS WANT TO SEE THEIR MONEY SPENT AND FOLKS WANT TO SEE THAT MONEY SPENT YESTERDAY.
SO YOU'RE RIGHT, THERE ARE THREE T'S AND THIS COUNTY, THIS THIS COMMISSIONERS COURT PRIOR TO 2019 HAS BEEN TERRIBLE AT THOSE THREE T'S.
AND SO AND THEN TOWARDS THE IDEA OF TODAY VERSUS 2023.
I BELIEVE THAT THERE IS A PROJECTION.
IS THAT ACCURATE? HAVE YOU HEARD THAT? I HAVEN'T SEEN THAT, BUT THAT WOULD NOT SURPRISE ME AT ALL.
SO IT WOULD BE FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE TO ACT ON THIS TODAY VERSUS TO WAIT, BECAUSE AS WE HEARD
[07:15:07]
MELVIN SPINKS TALKED ABOUT, THAT WE'LL ACTUALLY HAVE LESS MONEY TO DO THE WORK IF WE WAIT AND HAVE TO DEAL WITH THAT INFLATION.I CALL FOR A CALL FOR THE QUESTION.
LAST COURT SESSION, I RAISED FIVE QUESTIONS.
IS THIS THE TIME TO TAX THE PUBLIC? WHAT IS THE SPECIFICITY? ALEC IS ALLOCATION AND PRIORITIZATION THAT'S GOING TO BE USED WITH THE BOND.
THREE WHY ARE WE GOING TO SPEND $1,000,000 ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT WHEN FOR A BOND THAT WAS MORE THAN DOUBLE THIS AMOUNT? WE SPENT $250,000 ON THE FLOOD BOND.
NUMBER FOUR, WHY DID WE GO TO THE PUBLIC WHEN WE STILL HAVE FUNDS ON THE TABLE FROM THE 2015 BOND AND THE NUMBER FIVE? WHY SHOULD WE PUSH FOR THIS BOND NOW WHEN WE HAVE SOME BIG TICKET ITEMS THAT ARE GOING TO BE COMING DOWN IN THE FUTURE AND WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE PRESERVE OUR BONDING CAPACITY.
I WANT TO THANK DAVID BERRY FOR REACHING OUT TO ME TO DISCUSS A NUMBER OF THESE ISSUES.
I WANT TO THANK MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC FOR DISCUSSING THESE ISSUES WITH ME AND GOING FROM THE FIFTH TO THE FIRST. YOU KNOW, I UNDERSTAND THAT COMMISSIONER ELLIS THINKS THAT PERHAPS THE BIG ISSUES WILL NEVER GET PASSED IN THE COUNTY, AND THEREFORE WE SHOULD NOT CONSIDER THAT.
AND BECAUSE WE ISSUE THESE EVERY SEVEN YEARS, THAT THAT'S GOOD ENOUGH REASON FOR US TO GO FORWARD NOW BECAUSE OF HABIT, A ROUTINE, APPARENTLY A GOOD THING IN TIMES PAST, ALTHOUGH IT SEEMS LIKE I CONTINUALLY HEAR EVERYTHING BEFORE.
THE SEVEN YEAR ITCH, AS IT WERE.
NUMBER FOUR, HOW DO WE GO TO THE PUBLIC EYE? I'VE HAD MY TEAM ADD IT UP.
THERE'S $197,000,900, $900,000 REMAINING FROM THE 2015 BOND THAT HAS NOT BEEN ISSUED.
WE WE ASKED THE BUDGET OFFICE, COULD WE HAVE OUR 60 MILLION? AND THEY HAVE SAID THAT WE COULD HAVE 18 OF THE 60.
WHY THE MILLION DOLLARS BEING SPENT IN THIS ELECTION CYCLE IN NOVEMBER, WHEN WE HAD A FOURTH OF THAT AMOUNT FOR A BOND, THAT WAS TWICE THE AMOUNT.
IT JUST DOESN'T PASS THE SMELL TEST.
IT DOES NOT PASS THE SMELL TEST.
NUMBER TWO, WHERE IS IT GOING TO GO? I CAREFULLY LOOKED AT THE MOTION.
COMMISSIONER GARCIA, AND THIS DOES NOT TELL US HOW IT'S GOING TO BE ALLOCATED.
I'VE CAREFULLY LISTENED TO COMMISSIONER ELLIS, WHO HAS BASICALLY INDICATED THAT THE COMMISSIONERS WILL HAVE NO SAY OTHER THAN THE VOTE OF THE THREE TWO MAJORITY ON WHERE THESE FUNDS MAY OR MAY NOT BE SPENT.
I LISTENED TO THE TESTIMONY OF A NUMBER OF SHERIFF'S OFFICERS ON WHERE SOME OF THESE FUNDS MIGHT BE SPENT IN THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMPONENT.
AND I WAS INTRIGUED BY THAT BECAUSE WHEN YOU LOOK AT WHAT WAS PRESENTED BY THE BUDGET OFFICE ON PUBLIC SAFETY, THERE WERE TWO PAGES. ONE PAGE WAS THIS SUMMARY ON A POWERPOINT.
AND THEN THE OTHER PAGE HAD A LITTLE CHART THAT WAS ON IT.
SO WHERE DID THIS DISCUSSION? ABOUT THESE ITEMS THAT WERE BEING TESTIFIED TO BY THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE COME FROM? WELL, IF YOU GO TO THE TRANSMITTAL ITEM NUMBER 255, BURIED IN THE TRANSMITTAL, WHAT ARE THESE
[07:20:01]
PROPOSALS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY BOND? MANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY NOT HAVE KNOWN THAT THEY HAD TO GO TO A DIFFERENT PLACE IN THE AGENDA TO POTENTIALLY FIND THOSE.AND I LOOKED AT THESE ITEMS UNDER 255, AND THEY ARE NICE ITEMS. THERE'S FIVE OF THEM, BUT THERE WERE NO DOLLAR AMOUNTS ATTACHED TO ANY OF THE FIVE.
BUT THERE'S NO MENTION OF THE CONSTABLES OR THE CONSTABLES NEEDS.
SO APPARENTLY WE'RE ONLY GOING TO DO SOME PUBLIC SAFETY FOR ONE OFFICE, BUT NOT FOR THE OTHER CONSTABLES WHO HAVEN'T EVEN BEEN CONTACTED ABOUT WHAT THEIR NEEDS MAY BE AND THE PUBLIC SAFETY FORM.
AND WE HAVE NO DOLLAR AMOUNTS ATTACHED TO ANY OF THESE SPECIFIC ITEMS THAT WERE LISTED IN THE TRANSMITTAL ON TO 55 UNLINKED TO THIS BOND PROPOSAL ON AN ITEM NUMBER 20.
SO I DON'T THINK THAT WE HAVE A GOOD IDEA OF WHERE THE MONEY IS GOING TO GO OR HOW IT'S GOING TO BE SPENT EVEN IN THE CATEGORY OF THE SAFETY COMPONENT. AND THEN WE COME BACK TO ITEM NUMBER ONE.
IS THIS THE TIME TO TAX THE PUBLIC? AND FROM WHAT I HAVE HEARD, THE VERY ELOQUENT EXPLANATION OF MR. RAMOS ABOUT HOW THIS IS FREE MONEY AND WE COULD BORROW THIS MONEY AND IT'S NOT GOING TO COST THE PUBLIC ANYTHING.
I DON'T THINK THAT THE GENERAL PUBLIC YOU KNOW, I'M NOT THE BRIGHTEST GUY.
I WENT TO A SMALL SCHOOL OFF OF SOUTH MAIN.
THEY'VE HAD TO TIGHTEN THEIR BELT COMING OUT OF THE PANDEMIC.
THEY HAVE HAD TO TIGHTEN THEIR BELT COMING AFTER HARVEY.
AND I THINK THAT WE SHOULD DO THE SAME.
AND WE DON'T EVEN KNOW THE WHO'S HOWS AND WHYS AND THAT WE HAVE 197 $900,000 IN THE BANK LEFT OVER FROM THE 2015 BOND.
BUT JUDGE, DO YOU MIND IF I RESPOND TO THAT? SURE. SO JUST TO CLARIFY, COMMISSIONER, FOR ITEM 255, THAT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS WENT OUT TO ALL COUNTY DEPARTMENTS FOR NEW CIP PROJECTS.
THESE WERE NOT IT WAS NOT A REQUEST SPECIFIC TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY PORTION OF THE BOND.
WE THIS WOULD BE THE MOST LINEAR WAY OF FUNDING THAT PROJECT.
AND AGAIN, I AM SAYING THAT WE.
IT WON'T MATTER. AND ALSO JUST JUST TO CLARIFY, AS I'VE SAID, THE BOND IS GOING TO BE $32 FOR A HOUSEHOLD THAT FOR A HOUSE APPRAISED AT 300,000.
I CONTINUE TO CLARIFY ON THE TAX RATE.
WE MAY DIFFER ON IT, BUT AGAIN, I HAVE BEEN TRANSPARENT ABOUT THE COST.
SO. SO LISTENING TO ALL OF THIS, I SHARED THE CONCERN ABOUT THE TIMING.
AND I'M VERY MINDFUL OF PEOPLE DEALING WITH INFLATION RIGHT NOW.
WHAT I LEARNED IS THAT THE LEVY WON'T BE IMPOSED ON THE PUBLIC UNTIL LATE 2023.
AFTER THAT WE'VE INCURRED THE COST, WHICH EARLIEST WOULD BE AT THE END OF FISCAL YEAR 23, WHICH.
SO AT THE END OF FISCAL YEAR 23 IS THE EARLIEST.
THE FISCAL YEAR 23 TAX RATE WILL NOT INCLUDE THAT WILL NOT INCLUDE ANYTHING RELATED TO THIS BOND.
YES. CAN YOU GIVE ME A DATE? I SAID THE END OF YEAR, LIKE THE END OF YEAR, ACTUAL YEAR, 2023 OR LESS, THAT ANY COST WOULD GO TO THE LEVY WOULD BE IN FISCAL YEAR 24.
CORRECT. SO THAT WOULD MEAN THAT FOR.
YOU KNOW WE'RE LOOKING AT INFLATION NOW IT WOULDN'T THAT UP TO THAT BY THE TIME THE LEVY IS IMPOSED.
SO THAT WAS INTERESTING FOR ME TO TO REALIZE I'M NOT AS CONCERNED ABOUT THE TIMING FOR THAT REASON.
NOW, IF THE LEVY WERE GOING TO BE TOMORROW OR THIS YEAR, I WOULD BE.
AND THAT WAS KIND OF MY MY MY MAJOR CONCERN A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO IN TERMS OF THE.
[07:25:05]
A SORT OF LEFTOVER FUNDING QUESTION.I DON'T KNOW WHY CERTAIN PRECINCTS HAVE NOT FINISHED SPENDING THEIR.
THEY'RE FUNDING THOSE PROJECTS.
SO I DON'T REALLY I'M NOT I MEAN, I THINK THAT'S UP TO EACH EACH MEMBER.
YOU KNOW, THAT'S THAT'S UP TO THE COMMISSIONERS.
I JUST DON'T THINK IT APPLIES TO THIS CONVERSATION.
LOOK, I DO THINK THAT WE SHOULD HAVE A LIST BY THE TIME THE ITEM GOES TO THE VOTERS.
AND I, IN MY STAFF HAS HELPED EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT SORT OF IS DONE AROUND THE COUNTRY OF YOU DON'T WANT TO SHOW UP WITH A LIST OF PREDETERMINED PROJECTS TO A COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT MEETING, BECAUSE THEN YOU'RE GIVING PEOPLE THE ANSWER ALREADY WHEN REALLY YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BE THERE TO HEAR FROM THEM.
NOW YOU'VE GOT TO HAVE SOME GUIDING PARAMETERS, BUT I THINK BY THE TIME NOVEMBER ROLLS AROUND, THERE SHOULD BE MORE SPECIFICITY THAN THERE IS RIGHT NOW. SO I WOULD ASK FOR THAT, THAT BEING SAID.
WE DO KNOW THE BOND WOULD BUILD OR REPAIR ROUGHLY 300 MILES OF COUNTY ROADS, CREATE OR IMPROVE CLOSE TO 80 PARKS THAT REDUCE FLOODING POTENTIAL FOR ABOUT 13,000 RESIDENTS THROUGH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS THAT IMPROVE ROAD SAFETY FOR OVER 20 MILES OF HIGH INJURY INTERSECTIONS.
SO THAT'S JUST WHAT WE GOT FROM THE BUDGET OFFICE.
ANOTHER POINT ON THE TIMING IS TWO MORE POINTS ON THE TIMING.
WE HAVE WHAT MY UNDERSTANDING IS THERE ARE UNMET NEEDS THAT IF WE DON'T PASS THIS BOND, WE'RE GOING TO DROP BELOW A LEVEL OF SERVICE THAT THE COMMUNITY HAS COME TO EXPECT. AND THEN THE SECOND PIECE.
COMMISSIONER RAMSEY MAY HAVE ALLUDED TO THIS IS THE FEDERAL MONEY THAT'S COMING DOWN.
YOU KNOW, WE FOUND SOMETHING LIKE $50 MILLION TOWARD VISION ZERO IMPROVEMENTS COULD MATCH AS HIGH AS $250 MILLION IN FEDERAL ROAD SAFETY GRANT FUNDS. SO IF WE DON'T HAVE THIS MONEY AS THE FEDERAL INFRASTRUCTURE MONEY COMES DOWN, WE'RE GOING TO LEAVE MONEY ON THE TABLE.
SO THAT'S ANOTHER REASON FOR ME TO WANT TO DO IS THIS YEAR AS OPPOSED TO NEXT YEAR.
THE ONE HANGUP THAT I DO HAVE, I STILL HAVE A COMMISSIONER CAGLE BROUGHT THIS POINT LAST TIME AND THIS TIME IS THE SPECIFICITY AS TO THE SPLIT. AND THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING COMMISSIONERS CAGLE AND RAMSEY IF YOU GUYS HAVE A NEED FOR THE KINDS OF PROJECTS THAT WOULD BE PROPOSED IN THIS BOND BECAUSE. THAT THAT WOULD BE IN MY MIND WHAT I WOULD, YOU KNOW.
AND YOU CAN JUST, YOU KNOW, THE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND SIDEWALKS AND PARKS.
IF I UNDERSTAND YOUR QUESTION, IF WE WERE ISSUED THE FUNDING FROM THE 2015 BOND, THEN I THINK THAT WE WOULD BE GOOD FOR ANOTHER YEAR AND THEN WE CAN COME BACK AFTER A YEAR OF LOOKING AT IT, ASKING THE PUBLIC WHERE THE NEW PRECINCT FOR THE GIFT THAT KEEPS ON TAKING IS EXPLODING IN ITS GROWTH.
AND THERE ARE GREAT NEEDS IN THAT AREA THAT NEED TO BE ANALYZED AND LOOKED AT FOR THE FUTURE.
AND WHAT WE ARE DOING HERE IS YOU'RE ASKING ME FOR A MORE THAN A TRUST.
YOU DON'T KNOW WHETHER A SINGLE DIME WILL BE PUT IN THE PRECINCT FOR.
WE DON'T KNOW WHERE THESE FUNDS ARE GOING TO BE DONE.
I WOULD NORMALLY SAY THAT WHERE WE HAVE NO GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY TO TAKE CARE OF THE PUBLIC AND MORE THAN HALF OF OUR POPULATION NOW IS NOT IN THE CITY. WE'RE THE ONES SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THEM AND TO REALLOCATE SO THAT WE SPEND ALL OF OUR ROAD FUNDS, AS HAS BEEN SUGGESTED WITHIN THE CITIES THAT EXIST, WOULD NOT BE EQUITABLE BECAUSE THEN WE WOULD BE LEAVING SOME WITHOUT ANY REMEDY AT ALL, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT LOOKS AT THE OLD PRECINCT FOR WHERE COMMISSIONER RAMSEY NOW HAS MORE THAN HALF OF THE
[07:30:09]
RESPONSIBILITY TO TAKE CARE OF THE ROADS AND THE POPULATION THAT DON'T HAVE ANY CITY TO LOOK TO FOR PROTECTION.THE NEW PRECINCT FOUR IS ABOUT 5050.
I WOULD SAY LET'S USE WHAT WE'VE GOT.
LET'S SEE WHAT'S OCCURRING WITH INFLATION.
WE NEED TO LOOK AT IT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE TAXPAYER, NOT FROM THE TAX SPENDER.
COMMISSIONER RAMSEY AND I DID HAVE ANOTHER I WANTED TO FINISH WHAT I WAS SAYING HERE.
YOU HAD ASK A QUESTION AND LET ME RESPOND.
I THINK YOU'RE MAKING THE POINT THAT YOU TELL FOLKS WHAT YOU'RE CONSIDERING.
WE HAVE $360 MILLION WORTH OF PROJECTS THAT I KNOW OF IN MY PRECINCT.
SO YOU START HAVING CONVERSATIONS WITH PEOPLE.
AND THE BOND ISSUE THAT COMMISSIONER GARCIA KEEPS REFERRING TO THAT I LED WAS SUCCESSFUL WHEN IT WAS A TWO YEAR PROCESS FROM WHEN WE STARTED, WHEN WE HAD THE BOND ISSUE. I'M NOT EVEN SAYING TAKE TWO YEARS.
I'M SAYING TAKE A YEAR BECAUSE YOU'RE RIGHT.
YOU COMMUNICATE WITH THE VOTER WHAT YOU'RE THINKING ABOUT.
THEY TELL YOU, WELL, THIS IS GOOD AND THAT'S BAD.
AND THEN THEN YOU GET A REAL GOOD SENSE OF WHAT SHOULD BE ON THE BUDGET.
ABSOLUTELY. IN ORDER TO DO THE BOND ISSUE.
RIGHT, IN MY OPINION, YOU SHOULD DO IT IN NOVEMBER OF 2023.
THAT WAY, JUDGE, YOU CAN HAVE THAT GIVE AND TAKE THAT INHERENTLY, YOU KNOW, IS IS MAKE SENSE IN TERMS OF HAVING FOLKS TO COMMUNICATE WITH YOU AND YOU COMMUNICATE WITH THEM. AND OBVIOUSLY, SINCE MY NEW PRECINCT, I'VE HAD A FEW MONTHS NOW WE'RE GETTING TO KNOW EACH OTHER.
IT'S NOT LIKE WE'VE HAD SEVERAL YEARS TOGETHER.
SO THAT'S THAT WAS MY BASIS FOR THAT.
AND OBVIOUSLY THE FAIR DISTRIBUTION OF THE FUNDS BECAUSE THERE'S PEOPLE WHEN NEEDS IN ALL FOUR PRECINCTS, I THINK WE KNOW THAT WE NEED TO BE CLEAR ON HOW THAT'S GOING TO BE, HOW THAT'S GOING TO BE DIVVIED UP.
AND ONE THING I KNOW ABOUT THE VOTER IS WHEN THEY'RE CONFUSED, THEY'RE GOING TO VOTE AGAINST IT.
I SHOULD FINISH YOUR POINT FIVE.
I SPOKE EARLIER. I MEAN, I JUST, I, I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD WAIT TILL NEXT YEAR, BUT I ALSO DON'T THINK BECAUSE THE REASON I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD LEAVE THE MONEY ON THE TABLE BECAUSE IT'S WITH INFLATION AND EVERYTHING, NOW'S THE TIME TO DO IT.
AND I'M JUST MAYBE THE BUDGET OFFICER.
I MEAN, I'M I'M LOOKING AT THESE THESE VARIOUS CATEGORIES AND I WONDER I'M JUST SPITBALLING HERE, BUT TO YOUR POINT OF DON'T JUST LEAVE IT AT TRUST ME.
WE'RE NOT GOING TO MOVE THE JAIL.
SO THAT ONE IS JUST, YOU KNOW, THE DOWNTOWN COMPLEX.
IT'S HERE. SO SO THAT ONE CAN'T BE 25, 25, I THINK, NOR CAN IT BE, BECAUSE WE'VE ALREADY DONE THE ROAD STUDY ASSESSMENT.
AND AND SO THERE'S ALREADY DATA THERE.
I'VE NOT SEEN THAT ASSESSMENT.
SO, I MEAN, I THINK WE'RE DONE IN 2019.
BLUNT PRESENTED. IT SEEMS LIKE WE PAID A CONSULTANT TO GO INTO IT.
I THINK THEY DID SOME KIND OF MACHINE AND WENT OVER EVERY ROAD AND.
YEP, YEP. AND IF I SEE THIS IS I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW IF VISION ZERO, IF EVERY COUNT, IF EVERY PRECINCT HAS THESE EXTREMELY DANGEROUS INTERSECTIONS AND ROADS.
I DON'T KNOW. THAT'S YOU KNOW, I DON'T.
MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SAME THING AS A CONCENTRATED WHERE MULTIMODAL ALREADY EXISTS OR IS THAT DOES THAT EXIST? I GUESS MULTIMODAL INCLUDES TRAILS, RIGHT? IT'S NOT JUST TRANSIT.
SO THAT'S EVERY PRECINCT, ROAD REHABILITATIONS.
SO I'M ALMOST INCLINED TO SAY, YOU KNOW, AS WE IN THE END, THE MONEY SHOULD BE ALLOCATED WITHIN A
[07:35:08]
5% DIFFERENTIAL ACROSS THE PRECINCTS OR KNOW LIKE LET'S PICK SOMETHING SO WE DON'T HAVE ONE AT 30 AND ONE AT 15.I MEAN, I JUST BECAUSE LET'S SAY THAT COMMISSIONER GARCIA NEEDS MORE OF THE DRAINAGE MONEY BECAUSE HE YOU KNOW, THE WATER FLOWS THAT WAY. I'M MAKING THIS UP.
I GUESS IT'S THE OTHER WAY AROUND.
BUT OVERALL, IT EVEN IT EVENS OUT WHERE ROUGHLY OR WE'RE EVEN IN.
SO I MEAN, I'M JUST SPITBALLING HERE AND I WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR GUYS'S BUT BUT I WOULD ADD WE'RE ALSO WE COULD COME UP WITH I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THAT WE PUT ALL OF ALL OF THAT THROUGH A WORSE FIRST FRAMEWORK JUST BECAUSE AND THEY'LL, YOU KNOW, EVERYONE CAN DEVELOP IT BUT THERE IS THESE PROJECTS ARE MEANINGFUL.
THEY'RE NOT GOING TO MEET THE ENTIRE NEED.
SO HOW DO YOU DETERMINE, YOU KNOW, OC EACH PRECINCT HAVE ROUGHLY, ROUGHLY A QUARTER OF IT WITHIN THAT, LET'S MAKE SURE WE PUT IT IN THE AREAS THAT TRULY ACTUALLY NEED IT.
YEAH. OKAY. WELL, THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS.
I WANT TO MAKE A COUPLE OF POINTS.
ONE, PRECINCT ONE IS GOING TO SPEND EVERY DIME THAT WE HAVE A BOND MONEY.
WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF SPENDING.
IF YOU AND COMMISSIONER GARCIA HAD ONE, BY THE WAY, AND PUT IT IN OTHER PRECINCTS.
BUT, YOU KNOW, WE ARE DEVELOPING THE PARK ACROSS THE STREET, WHICH YOU ALL WILL PROBABLY BOOK AS MUCH AS I DO, BUT PRECINCT ONE WILL PAY FOR IT.
WE'RE GOING TO TWO MAJOR PARKS AND WE'RE UPGRADING ALL OF OUR PARKS.
BUT WHAT IS WORTH, I'M SPENDING MONEY IN THE CITY OF HOUSTON.
WE ALWAYS SPENT MONEY IN OTHER CITIES, BUT THE CITY OF HOUSTON WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THAT PROCESS UNTIL THE LEADERSHIP CHANGED HERE. BUT, YOU KNOW, LOOK, YOU TAKE THE LAST BOND PACKAGE ON FLOOD BONDS.
BY THE WAY, I REMEMBER ONE PROJECT IN PARTICULAR THAT CERTAINLY WAS NOT ON THE RADAR, DIDN'T COME UP IN A DISCUSSION, SPENT MONEY IN ONE PRECINCT, IN ANOTHER COUNTY.
I RAISED A LOT OF CANE ABOUT IT, BUT WENT AHEAD AND VOTED FOR IT.
IT WAS IN ANOTHER COUNTY, ALL VEGETATION PROJECTS.
THAT WAS ABOUT 15 MILLION FOR THAT ACQUIRED LAND IN ANOTHER COUNTY.
THAT CERTAINLY WAS NOT IN ANY DISCUSSION GROUPS OR VEGETATION PROJECT.
I DO THINK WE OUGHT TO DO WORSE FIRST.
THEY OUGHT TO BE SOME EQUITY INDEX IN.
EVEN IF 15 20% OF THE TRANSPORTATION MONEY WENT TO EACH PRECINCT, THERE OUGHT TO BE SOME MONEY SET ASIDE, IN MY JUDGMENT, FOR THOSE AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN HISTORICALLY NEGLECTED.
AND ONE WOULD HAVE TO BE WOULD JUST HAVE TO FEIGN A LACK OF INTELLIGENCE.
I JUST HAVE A TOTAL INABILITY TO SEE TO SAY THAT THIS COUNTY HAS BEEN EQUITABLE IN HOW IT HAS SPENT TRANSPORTATION MONEY OVER THE LAST 30 YEARS.
IT HAS NOT. AND WHEN THIS MADE A FORMULA ABOUT THE NUMBER OF ROADS.
I REMEMBER SHORTLY AFTER I WON, I WAS SHOCKED WHEN A GOOD FRIEND TOOK ME OUT TO LUNCH AND SHOWED ME A PIECE OF LAND AND WANTED TO KNOW IF I JUST RUN A ROAD THROUGH HIS LAND.
AND I WAS THINKING, IS THAT HOW THIS WORKS? BECAUSE HE WANTED TO DEVELOP ON IT.
BUT THAT'S HOW THIS HAS BEEN WORKING FOR DECADES.
WHAT DO WE DO IN THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS? LIKE THE ONES I REPRESENT AND I SHOULDN'T.
YEAH, ME TOO. YOU REPRESENT WHO TAKE AFFORDABLE MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING.
BECAUSE THEY ARE OUR PEOPLE TO.
ALL ABOUT ME. AND THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO LIVE AS WELL.
SO WHEN THEY HAVE MORE ISSUES AND THEN THEY PUT IT, EVEN IF THEY CAN'T AFFORD A CAR, WHO DOES MONEY? SO WHO PUTS IN THE MONEY SO THEY CAN HAVE OPTIONS, WHETHER IT'S A BIKE TRAIL, A WALKING TRAIL, A SCOOTER TRAIL OR MASS TRANSIT, IF IT'S NOT PAID FOR ANY OTHER WAY. SO I'M JUST SAYING, IF WE IF EQUITY IS MORE THAN A SIX LETTER WORD, YOU CAN'T GO IN AND REINFORCE.
[07:40:10]
IN EQUITIES THAT WILL PUT IN PLACE SYSTEMICALLY BY THE GOVERNMENT FOR YEARS.THAT'S WHAT HAS HAPPENED HERE.
COMMISSIONER, IF I MIGHT, I WANTED TO ASK JAY.
THAT? WELL, FIRST ONE POINT IS THAT WE HAVE FOUGHT HARD TO MAKE EQUITY NOT JUST A SIX LETTER WORD AND DEFINITELY MAKE IT MAKE SURE THAT IT'S NOT A FOUR LETTER WORD EITHER.
AND SO WHEN WE'VE GONE THROUGH A LOT TO MAKE SURE THAT EQUITY WAS IN THE FLOOD BOND PACKAGE THAT ORIGINALLY DID NOT HAVE.
AND SO I'D HATE TO SEE US REVERSE DIRECTION IN THAT REGARD.
IS IT RECOMMENDED? THAT WE PUT ANY KIND OF DISTRIBUTION LANGUAGE IN THIS IN THIS ITEM.
IN FACT, I WOULD STRONGLY RECOMMEND AGAINST LAYING OUT ANYTHING LIKE A FRAMEWORK WITHIN THAT.
THE BALLOT LANGUAGE ITSELF WOULD BE VERY PRESCRIPTIVE.
THEY'RE ESSENTIALLY A SET OF DOCUMENTS, SOMETHING CALLED THE VOTER INFORMATION DOCUMENT THAT IS ISSUED THAT WOULD BE POSTED ON OUR WEBSITE, THAT WOULD BE ALSO PLACED AT THE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, WHICH GOES INTO GREAT DETAIL ABOUT THE SORT OF THE FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS AROUND A BOND THE BALLOT LANGUAGE STATES, THE THE SPECIFIC AREA IN WHICH THE MONEY WOULD BE SPENT AND THAT SUFFICIENT PROCEEDS FROM TAXES WILL GO TO COVER THAT THE THE THE VOTER INFORMATION DOCUMENT AND THE BALLOT LANGUAGE ITSELF WILL NOT WOULD NOT CONTAIN IT.
AND FROM A STATUTORY PERSPECTIVE, WE WOULD NOT REALLY BE ALLOWED TO DO THAT IN THERE.
BUT THAT WOULD BE, AGAIN, OUTSIDE OF THIS PROCESS.
GOTCHA. THANK YOU. THAT'S YEAH.
ON THAT POINT. SO WHAT? TWO STEPS. FIRST OF ALL, WE HAD TO MAKE A DECISION.
ARE WE'RE GOING TO DO ANYTHING CORRECT, SIR? AND THEN WE COME BACK A COUPLE OF WEEKS, A WEEK OR SO, AND THEN WE DECIDE WHAT IT WILL BE.
CORRECT. AND WITHIN THAT WINDOW OF TIME, THE 90 DAYS, THE 15 DAY PERIOD THAT THAT THAT MR. BARRY HAD ALLUDED TO IS WHEN YOU CALL UP THE ELECTION AND IN THAT THERE WILL BE A FORMAL ORDER CALLING FOR THE ELECTION.
THERE WILL BE A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF WHAT THE BALLOT LANGUAGE WILL LOOK LIKE.
WHAT'S THE DATE FOR THAT FINAL LANGUAGE? SO THAT THAT WOULD BE 90 DAYS.
IT'S GOT TO BE WITHIN A WINDOW OF 90 DAYS.
SO THE NEXT NEED INPUT IS WHAT I'M SAYING.
I'M SORRY. WE SHOULD GET SOME WHILE WE'RE GETTING THE INPUT.
WE HAVE TIME TO MAKE THAT DECISION.
YES, YOU DO. YES. SO THAT'S WHY I WAS HEADED TO.
I ALSO WANT TO MAKE THIS POINT.
THE REASON I FOUGHT SO HARD, EVEN WHEN I WAS CLEARLY IN THE MINORITY BY MYSELF, BOTH PARTY AND JUST OH HANDSOME RODNEY AS WELL.
I WANTED GREENS AND HOLES DONE AND I THINK THE COURT GAVE ME.
THEY AGREED WE'D HAVE SOME EQUITY LANGUAGE.
MAYBE I DIDN'T CUT A GOOD ENOUGH DEAL.
IT WAS SIDE TO SIDE LANGUAGE, BUT IT WAS EQUITY.
WE DIDN'T TRY TO DEFINE IT THEN, BUT WE AGREED TO THAT.
AND THEN WHEN YOU TWO CAME ON BOARD, ALL OF A SUDDEN, EQUITY MEANT SPLIT IT FOUR WAYS.
WELL, AND THEN THINK ABOUT WHAT WE'VE DONE.
KNOWINGLY. UNKNOWINGLY, I THINK.
[07:45:03]
GOVERNMENT, THE GREENS IN HALLS.AND THEN WE HAVE TO COME BACK AND GO GET TRANSPORTATION MONEY TO MAKE UP FOR WHAT WE HAVEN'T DONE.
BUT OVER THE YEARS, THAT'S WHY THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS ALWAYS FLOODED.
AND WHEN SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES WOULD SAY, WHAT ABOUT SAM'S BAYOU? WHICH WAS THE WORSE WHEN IT WAS CHOCOLATE BY YOU? BY THE WAY, THAT'S BECAUSE IT WAS AN EARMARK.
IT WAS AS EMBARRASSING AS KATRINA.
BUT THAT'S WHY THESE HAVE NEVER DONE SO.
I'M JUST IF WE WANT TO FIGURE OUT HOW I'M SORRY IF THE PRECINCTS WHO ALWAYS HAD THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING. PEOPLE WHO VOTED TO GIVE THEM A PREFERENCE.
IT WAS NOT WORTH IT FOR US TO GIVE THEM A PREFERENCE.
WHEN THEY HEAR THE WORD EQUITY.
AIN'T NO WAY WHAT I GO AND SAY.
REGARDLESS OF HOW PEOPLE VOTE ON THIS, WE GO AND DENY THE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT ARE IMPACTED WORSE.
THOSE POOR NEIGHBORHOODS BEING YOUR PRECINCT COMMISSIONER RAMSEY OR COMMISSIONER CAHILL'S.
BUT I KNOW THOSE POOR NEIGHBORHOODS ARE THE ONES WHO HAVE GOTTEN THE SHORT END OF THE PROCESS.
I FIND IT INTERESTING, COMMISSIONER ELLIS, AND I'VE WONDERED THIS FOR 40 PLUS YEARS, HOW THE CITY OF HOUSTON, WHERE THERE'S A LOT OF INEQUITIES, THERE'S A LOT OF NEIGHBORHOODS YOU AND I COULD DRIVE TO NOT FAR FROM HERE AND WONDER, WHY WEREN'T THOSE ROADS TAKEN CARE OF? WELL, THEY WERE ALL IN THE CITY OF HOUSTON.
IT WASN'T IT WASN'T A COUNTY'S RESPONSE.
IT WAS ON THE CITY'S ROAD LOGS.
THEY WERE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY.
I CONTINUE TO WONDER WHY A CITY THAT SUPPOSEDLY GREATLY VALUED EQUITY AND YOU WENT TO SOME NEIGHBORHOODS, YOU AND I COULD WE JUST GO DOWN THE LIST AND SAY, WELL, WHY HAVEN'T THEY BEEN TAKEN CARE OF? BECAUSE IT'S IN THE CITY OF HOUSTON, WHERE FOR DECADES NOW EQUITY HAS BEEN VALUED IN THE CITY OF HOUSTON.
AND I AGREE WITH THAT, BECAUSE PART OF THE REASON NEIGHBORHOODS, FLOOD WATER CAN'T GET THERE.
THEY CAN'T GET TO THE BAYOUS, THE COUNTIES CLEARLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BAYOUS AND THE CREEK.
BUT THE CITY, IF THEY'RE RESPONSIBLE, IS TO GET THE WATER TO THERE.
AND I WONDER AND YOU PROBABLY WONDER IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA, WHY WEREN'T THEY AND HOW WHY WAS THAT BAD? BUT THERE IS A LOT OF INEQUITY GOING AROUND AND IT'S BEEN GOING AROUND A LONG TIME.
IT'S NOT JUST IN PRECINCTS THREE AND FOUR.
I THINK IT'S BECAUSE IF I MIGHT JUDGE, THERE'S BEEN A RELUCTANCE TO CONFRONT IT, BECAUSE USUALLY, SADLY, THOSE TEND TO BE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT DON'T VOTE, BY THE WAY.
AND BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THAT WAS AN ATTEMPT TO PUT ZONING IN HOUSTON.
WELL, VERY POSITIVE THING THIS COUNTY DID WAS COME UP WITH AN ATLAS 14 STANDARDS.
THAT'S WHY. WHAT'S YOUR GUESS? THE GOVERNMENT. AND BECAUSE WE DID ALL THIS SPRAWL, WE JUST KEPT EXPANDING OUT.
AND AT SOME POINT, IT CAUGHT US.
HOW DID SPRING VALLEY DEAL WITH THE UNDERSERVED AREAS? WELL, YOU KNOW, WE'RE A SMALL COMMUNITY.
IT'S SPRING BRANCH AND IT'S A I'D CALL IT SPRING SPRING VALLEY TRANSITIONED FROM BEING A MOSTLY HOMES OF 2000 SQUARE FOOT.
AND HOMES WERE TORN DOWN AND NEW HOUSES BUILT.
SO THAT'S KIND OF THE TRANSITION IN THE LAST 30 PLUS YEARS.
THERE'S 5500 LOTS IN SPRING VALLEY.
THERE'S 50 OF THEM CHANGE EVERY YEAR, OLD HOUSE TORN DOWN TO HOUSE BUILT.
SO THAT'S KIND OF WHAT'S HAPPENED THERE.
YOU DON'T HAVE. YEAH, BUT ALSO NOT JUST CLOSE ON THIS HISTORICALLY.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO DEAL WITH ISSUES IN THESE POOR AREAS.
[07:50:01]
COULD POLITICALLY GO AND MAKE THE CASE TO USE INFRASTRUCTURE MONEY TO DO THOSE DRAINAGE PROJECTS, LOCAL MONEY IN UNDERSERVED NEIGHBORHOODS.90% OF ALL THAT CITY, BIG MONEY THAT I REMEMBER BEING SPENT CITIES WERE SPENT ON SEWER.
YEAH. AND THAT STUFF, POLITICALLY, YOU OUGHT TO BE ABLE TO GET EXAMINE.
THERE'S A SECOND VOTE FOR THE QUESTION ONCE I A SECOND TO CALL FOR THE QUESTION.
AND I MEAN, MAYBE WE CAN LAND ON SOME AGREEMENT ON THIS OR LET ME JUST PRESENT THE ONE I PREFER IS THAT THAT ALL BUT THE PUBLIC SAFETY DOLLARS SHOULD BE ALLOCATED.
DO YOU TAKE A BREAK? I THINK IT MEANS HE HAS TO TAKE A BREAK.
ALL RIGHT. WE'LL TAKE A BREAK UNTIL EIGHT THEN.
YEAH, WELL, WE'LL GET OUT OF HERE SOON.
YEAH. SEE, Y'ALL TRY TO GO TO BALL GAME.
I NEED TO CALL MY. I NEED TO CALL MY SON.
ARE YOU GOING TO CALL BACK AND SAY 21 SQUARE IS BACK IN SESSION, SO TAKING BACK UP ON ITEM.
[Departments (Part 5 of 5)]
20. HERE'S WHAT I WOULD FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH.IS TO IS TO MOVE THE THE ITEM AS COMMISSIONER GARCIA READ IT FOR THE REASONS I ALREADY OUTLINED.
THEN TO ADD THE COMMISSIONERS COURT.
THE GUIDELINES SHOULD INCLUDE A WORSE FIRST APPROACH TO MATCH FUNDS TO THE GREATEST NEED, WITH AT LEAST $220 MILLION TO BE SPENT IN EACH PRECINCT AND $100 MILLION TO BE SET ASIDE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY.
SO WHAT THIS DOES IS THE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS WE TAKE OUT OF THE MIX AND IT GOES WHERE IT GOES.
EACH PRECINCT WILL HAVE A FLOOR.
EACH PRECINCT WILL RECEIVE AT LEAST 220 MILLION.
AND CERTAINLY ALL THE PRECINCTS WILL WILL GET SOMETHING OVER THAT.
SO AT MOST, THE DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN THE PRECINCTS, IT WOULD BE MAXIMUM, MAXIMUM.
IF I'M DOING THE MATH RIGHT, 10%.
LET US SEE. WHAT IF SOMEONE'S NOT SPENDING THEIR FUNDS, THEN THEY DON'T GET MUCH MORE THAN THE 2220.
IF THEY'RE SPENDING THEIR FUNDS AND THEY HAVE PROJECTS IN THE PIPELINE, THEY CAN GET MORE THAN 120.
AND I SEE FROM THE COUNTY ATTORNEY THAT HAS TO BE A SEPARATE MOTION.
SO. SO I WOULD MAKE THAT MOTION SEPARATELY.
SO WHAT'S THE PROCESS OF HOW WE WOULD VOTE ON THIS? SO I THINK WHAT THE JUDGE IS ASKING FOR IS TWO MOTIONS.
ONE, THE MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA THAT YOU SECONDED OR VICE VERSA, I'M NOT SURE.
AND THEN THE SECOND MOTION THAT, AS I UNDERSTAND THE JUDGE THAT THAT ASKS THAT THE COURT OR STATES THAT THE COURT WOULD DEVELOP A AN ALLOCATION SCHEDULE OR ALLOCATION CRITERION BEFORE THE NOVEMBER ELECTION.
SO THERE ARE TWO SEPARATE ITEMS, TWO SEPARATE MOTIONS OFF THE SAME ITEM.
AND I MEAN, I THINK IT'S PRETTY CLEAR WHAT I MENTIONED.
100 MILLION WOULD GO TO PUBLIC SAFETY.
AND WE KNOW THAT THOSE BUILDINGS ARE CONCENTRATED WHERE THEY'RE CONCENTRATED.
AND THEN THE REST, WE'RE GOING TO PUT 220 MILLION IN EACH PRECINCT.
SO EVERYBODY HAS A BASIC BASE LEVEL OF OF OF REVENUE FROM THIS BOND AND THEN THE REST WILL BE ALLOCATED BASED ON NEED AND THE WORST FIRST FRAMEWORK.
BUT MAKE SURE I GET THE MATH RIGHT TO 20 IS LEFT COMMISSION.
RIGHT. SO LET ME LET ME SAY I GET IT NOW.
[07:55:03]
I WAS LISTENING ATTENTIVELY, WHICH IS NOT ALWAYS THE CASE.AND I KNOW THAT I REPRESENT ONE OF THE TWO PRECINCTS THAT HISTORICALLY HAS BEEN NEGLECTED THE MOST.
I ALSO REALIZE $1.2 BILLION IS NOWHERE NEAR THE NEED THAT'S OUT THERE.
BUT AS IS THE CASE WITH MOST THINGS.
IT'S A BIG INCREMENTAL IS A BIG STEP, BUT IT'S AN INCREMENTAL STEP TOWARDS A PROBLEM.
I CAN LIVE WITH THAT IS NOT MY PREFERENCE.
BUT IF THAT'S WHAT IT TAKES TO MOVE THIS FORWARD, I'M A SECOND A MOTION.
I'LL MAKE THE MOTION WHICHEVER WAY YOU WANT IT TO GO.
YOU WANT THAT ITEM VOTED ON FIRST? YEAH. SO I'LL MAKE IT APPROPRIATE TO SAY TO ADOPT GUIDELINES.
MONK, AS I MENTIONED, I'LL GIVE MY TAKE ON IT.
THE ACTUAL BOND ORDER IS PRETTY MUCH PRESCRIPTIVE BY, BY LAW, BUT THE COMMISSIONERS COURT HAS IN THE PAST, AND I THINK IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO HAVE A SET OF GUIDELINES AND HOW FUNDS WOULD BE THAT WOULD NOT BE ON THE BALLOT.
AND WHAT I UNDERSTAND FROM THE JUDGE IS A GENERAL PRINCIPLE WOULD BE WORST FIRST, BUT THAT SHE'S PROPOSING THAT OF THE 1.1 BILLION NOT GOING TO PUBLIC SAFETY, THERE'D BE A FLOOR THAT AT LEAST 20% OF THOSE FUNDS BE SPENT IN EACH PRECINCT.
SO, JUDGE, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT THAT'S THE WAY I UNDERSTOOD WHY YOU.
YEAH, AND I GUESS THE QUESTION I'M ASKING YOU IS THAT TO ME SEEMS SPECIFIC ENOUGH THAT WE WERE GOING BACK AND FORTH WITH THE STUFF LIKE IS THAT I MEAN DOESN'T SAYING THAT ISN'T THAT ALREADY THE GUIDELINES LIKE I DON'T SEE WHY WE HAVE TO COME BACK WITH IT.
SO I JUST KIND OF SO CAN WE CAN WE JUST SAY THAT, THAT THAT THESE FUNDS BE DISTRIBUTED ACCORDING TO A TO WORST FIRST APPROACH TO MATCH FUNDS TO THE GREATEST NEED WITH AT LEAST $220 MILLION TO BE SPENT IN EACH PRECINCT AND $100 MILLION TO BE SET ASIDE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY.
OKAY. YOU WILL MAKE THAT MOTION.
YES, I WOULD MAKE THAT STATEMENT SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ELLIS.
AND THIS IS YOUR THIS IS GOING TO BE OUT OF ORDER.
AND THEN WE CAN TALK ABOUT THE FRAMEWORKS.
I THINK THAT'S WHAT IT'S WORTH I TO KEEP TO THE PIECE OF MY.
THAT'S FINE BECAUSE WE STILL HAVE TO COME BACK AND VOTE ON PUTTING IT ON THE BALLOT.
YEAH, I MEAN, I TALKED ABOUT IT LAST TIME.
IF YOU GUYS WANT MY SUPPORT TODAY, I'M NOT GOING TO DO IT WITHOUT KNOWING THE ALLOCATION.
WHY DON'T WE DO BOTH? I'M JUST TRYING TO.
WE VOTED TODAY. YEAH, THAT SEEMS TO BE SOME DEGREE OF DISTRUST.
AND BLESS YELLOW HEADED FOLK THINK I'M THE ONE WHO'S GOT AHEAD.
SO IT'S CLEAR I DON'T WANT TO BRING IT NEXT TO YOU.
I'M SAYING IF HE'S TRYING TO GET HIS VOTED ON FIRST, HE IS IN THE VOTE.
MAYBE IT WOULDN'T MATTER TO ME.
IS THAT WORK? IT'S CALLED ROBERT'S RULES, WHICH WE DON'T HAVE.
I THOUGHT YOU WERE SAYING. LET'S MOVE ON TO NEXT TIME.
I DON'T WANT TO VOTE ON IT BECAUSE HE MADE HIS MOTION EARLY.
HE'S NOT TRYING TO GET A VOTE ON HIS.
I'M NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY MIND.
PLUS, I KNOW YOU HAD THE OPTION OF NOT LETTING THIS GET ON THE BALLOT YET.
YOU GOT TO VOTE FOR IT TO GO ON THE BALLOT AGAIN.
WELL, I DO. A COMMISSIONER CAGLE THAT.
SO DO YOU GUYS NEED COMMISSIONER GARCIA TO READ HIS MOTION AGAIN? YES, PLEASE.
YOU HAD. THE MOVE TO AUTHORIZE THE OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATION OFFERS A BUDGET MANAGEMENT COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND ALL RELEVANT DEPARTMENTS TO DEVELOP A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BOND PROPOSAL AND NECESSARY LEGAL DOCUMENTS FOR THE NOVEMBER EIGHT, 2022 ELECTION.
THAT INCLUDES UP TO 100 MILLION IN INVESTMENTS IN PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES AND TECHNOLOGY, UP TO 100 $900 MILLION IN INVESTMENTS IN ROADS, DRAINAGE AND TRANSPORTATION RELATED PROGRAMS, AND UP TO 200 MILLION IN INVESTMENT IN PARKS.
SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GARCIA IN A SECOND.
ANY OPPOSE? NO, I'M IN FAVOR OF MOTION.
LET ME CLEAR UP MY A MOTION BECAUSE I KNOW I KIND OF REWROTE IT THAT THESE BOND FUNDS BE SPENT ACCORDING TO A WORSE FIRST APPROACH TO MATCH FUNDS TO THE GREATEST NEED WITH AT LEAST $220 MILLION TO BE SPENT IN EACH PRECINCT AND $100 MILLION TO BE SET ASIDE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY.
THAT WOULD BE MY MOTION SECOND.
I MADE THE MOTION COMMISSIONER.
I MADE THE SECOND VOTE IN FAVOR.
[08:00:02]
I THEN YOU OPPOSE.PLEASE VOTE FOR THIS. GET OUT OF HERE.
WOULD YOU BE AT THAT LINE? WRITE THIS STORY.
CAN I GO TO THE RESTROOM? I THINK THAT'S BEEN DONE BEFORE.
THANK YOU. SO THE MOTION CARRIES THROUGH TO TWO? YEAH. FOR MY BOOK. WELL, YES.
GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER. BEFORE WE LEAVE, I'D LIKE TO FIGURE OUT, IN CASE SOME OF US ARE CELEBRATING THE ANNIVERSARY OR WHATEVER, WHAT'S THE DATE? CAN WE DECIDE? AUGUST 12TH THROUGH 22ND IS THE RANGE OF DATES.
IS THIS LEGAL? CAN WE JUST PULL OUT OUR CALENDARS AND FIGURE THAT OUT? YES, WE CAN PULL OUT OUR COUNT.
CAN YOU VOTE FOR IT? WELL, NO, NO, NO.
WE KNOW THE JUDGE IN THE COURT WANT TO MOVE FORWARD ON THIS.
AND. THE 3 TO 1 AND PASS CORRECTLY OUGHT TO BE.
YES. THIS IS THE WHO COULD BE ABSENT.
SO WE WANT EVERYBODY HERE, JUDGE.
BUT TRY TO PICK A DAY THAT YOU'D NEVER BE COUNTING VOTES.
BUT YOU READ BETWEEN THE LINES.
ANY OTHER OUTSTANDING ITEMS FROM THE CLERK'S OFFICE? COUNTY JUDGE. COUNTY ADMINISTRATION.
MY COLLEAGUES. COMMISSIONER CAGLE WANTED.
DID YOU WANT TO HEAR SOME MORE OF MY ELOQUENCE TONIGHT? I'LL CALL YOU. HE'LL TURN HIS PHONE OFF NEXT WEEK.
FEEL BETTER, COMMISSIONER. ALL RIGHT.
COMMISSIONERS. COURT IS NOW ADJOURNED.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.