[00:00:06]
>> OKAY, WE'LL HOLD JUST A LITTLE WHILE LONGER UNTIL WE CAN FIGURE OUT. OKAY.
[3. Strategic Plan Discussion – Justice Management Institute ]
OKAY. SO, WE WILL GO AHEAD AND START WITH THE JMI PRESENTATION. WE HAVE ELAINE AND DR. JOHNSON AND GIVE ME A SECOND AND I'LL TRY TO MOVE FORWARD TO YOUR PRESENTATION. ELAINE CAN YOU TEST YOUR MIC?>> OKAY GREAT. >> KAREN DO YOU WANT ME TO SHARE
MY SCREEN? >> I THINK WE MAY BE QUEUED UP.
CAN YOU SEE IT NOW? >> I CANNOT.
>> OKAY, GIVE ME ONE SECOND. >> ELAINE, GO AHEAD AND SHARE
HOPEFULLY THIS WILL WORK. GIVE ME ONE MINUTE.
OKAY. CAN EVERYBODY SEE THAT NOW?
WE'VE PROBABLY SEEN ME AT ONE OF OUR MEETINGS AROUND STRATEGIC PLANNING SO AURILIA AND I HAVE TAKEN THE FEEDBACK WE'VE GOTTEN OVER THE PRIORITY MATE TRICKSES AND WALK THROUGH OUR FINAL LOOK AT THE STRATEGIC PLAN BEFORE WE SUBMIT THE FULL PLAN FOR THE CJCC APPROVAL. SO.
JUST A COUPLE OF ITEMS OF NOTE. WE DID GET ONLY SIX PRIORITY MATRIXES. THE RESULTS I'M PRESENTING TODAY ARE BASED ON THOSE. IF INDIVIDUALS WANT TO COMMENT OR SHARE THEIR THOUGHTS ABOUT PRIORITY AND BROKEN DOWN BASED ON THESE SIX YOU CAN DO THAT IN CHAT OR RAILS YOUR HAND.
I KNOW PEOPLE ARE HAVING AUDIO DLUKTS SO CHAT WILL WORK BECAUSE AND WE GOT A RESPONSE FROM A CJCC MEMBER NOTING THERE WHAT A LACK OF SAFETY COMPONENT. LOOKING AT HOW THE GOALS FELL OUT BAILED ON PRIORITY, REDUCTION OF PUBLIC HARM INFORMATION SHARING WERE VERY CLOSE AT ONE AND TWO SEPARATED BY A COUPLE 10THS OF A POINT ON AVERAGE AND COLLABORATION RENT IS THE LOWEST PRIORITY AND IN FACT HAD THE GREATEST PROPORTION OF STRATEGY I THINK 7 OUT OF 10 THAT WERE RANKED BY AT LEAST ONE PERSON AS NOT A PRIORITY AT ALL. SO, I WANTED TO START THERE BECAUSE I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO GO BACK TO A SLIDE THAT WE SHOWED. ACTUALLY I DON'T REMEMBER WHEN.
MAYBE WAIT THE LAST PRESENTATION ABOUT THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF AN EFFECTIVE PLAN AND CJCC SO CAN YOU SEE HERE THE COLLABORATION REALLY DOES SERVE AS THE FOUNDATION FOR EFFECTIVE CJCC.
IT ALLOWS FOR EFFECTIVE INFORMATION SHARING WHICH THEN ALLOWS THE CJCC TO SUCCESSFULLY ENGAGE IN THE OTHER PRIORITY
[00:05:07]
AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED WHICH FOR HARRIS COUNTY ARE EQUITY AND PUBLIC HARM REDUCTION SO WHILE SIX PEOPLE MAY NOT BE RIVETS CONCERNING THAT COLLABORATION RANKED SO LOW.BUT YOU KNOW IT COULD BE INDICATIVE OF ONE OF TWO THINGS, MAYBE MEMBERS FEEL THAT COLLABORATION WITH CJCC IS GOOD.
MEMBERS ARE COMFORTABLE AT THE CURRENT LEVEL OF COLLABORATION OR THAT MEMBERS DON'T FEEL COLLABORATION IN HARRIS COUNTY IS IMPORTANT AS THE OTHER GOALS THAT HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED OR COULD MEAN THOSE SIX PEOPLE DIDN'T THINK COLLABORATION WAS IMPORTANT SO JUST SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT AS WE GO THROUGH THE PRIORITY AREAS. ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE I MOVE NO? OKAY. LOOKING AT THE STRATEGIES UNDER THE EQUITY GOAL I'VE ORGANIZED THEM BY LEVEL OF EFFORTS IN TERMS OF HOW PEOPLE RANK THEM BASED ON HOW MUCH TIME AND EFFORT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT THESE AS WELL AS THEM BY PRIORITY AREA. SO, THE HIGHEST PRIORITY THAT IT WAS THE EASIEST TO IMPLEMENT WAS THE ASSESSMENT OF THE CAPACITY AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE HEART PROGRAM.
FOR THOSE FOR THE CITE AND RELEASE FINDINGS WE WILL TALK ABOUT BUT THE REEVALUATION OF THE CURRENT RELEASE EFFORTS AND POLICIES SHOWED UP AS MEDIUM PRIORITY AND THE PEOPLE THAT FILLED OUT THE MATRIXES . . . I'M GOING TO SKIP OVER THE MEDIUM LEVEL AND GO TO THE HIGH LEVEL OF EFFORT BECAUSE THE NOT A PRIORITY CAST GRIST WITH ALSO RELATED TO CITE AND RELEASE SO IT'S INTERESTING PEOPLE THOUGHT IT WAS PRETTY EASY AND MEDIUM PRIORITY TO REEVALUATE CURRENT CITE AND RELEASE PRIORITIES BUT THIS WERE SEVERAL INDIVIDUALS THAT SAID ASSESSING THE REASONS FOR LACK OF FULL IMPLEMENTATION AND REVISING THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES WERE NOT A PRIORITY SO THAT IS SOMETHING THAT'S PROBABLY MORE ARTIFACT OF THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT FILLED OUT THE MATRIXES BUT I WANT TO POINT THAT OUT BECAUSE THERE'S BEEN DISCUSSION AT OUR MEETINGS THERE WERE INDIVIDUALS WHO SAID I DON'T SEE THAT HAVING IMPACT AT ALL.
REVISING PRETRIAL AND CONDITIONS WHILE HARD WAS RATED AS A HIGH PRIORITY FOR THE CJCC. SO THE MEDIUM LEVEL OF EFFORT WHICH INCIDENTALLY MOST OF THE STRATEGIES REGARDLESS OF OBJECT IFTS WERE OF MEDIUM LEVEL OF EFFORT AND MEDIUM PRIORITY.
SO YOU'LL SEE THE BIGGEST CATEGORY HERE.
HIGH PRIORITY AREAS WHICH COLLABORATE AROUND DATA NEEDS AND DEFINING THOSE, IDENTIFYING NEW OPPORTUNITIES AND EXPANDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR DEFLECTION AND DIVERSION, IDENTIFYING RELEASE CONDITIONS DEFINING EARLY OPPORTUNITIES FOR PRETRIAL INTERVENTION ASSESSING CAPACITY FOR EXPANDED DEFENSE CAPACITY.
THAT'S USING CAPACITY TWICE. SORRY ABOUT THAT.
PROVIDING FUNNELING FOR HEART EXPANSION AND DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING A PLAN FOR STRENGTHEN THINK INB INDEPENDENT GENTLEMAN DEFENSE. MEDIUM PRIORITY SO THE THINGS THAT WOULD COME NEXT FOR THE CJCC WERE FOCUSED ON DEFINEING THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PRETRIAL INTERVENTIONS TO INCREASE RELEASES ASSESSING THE FEASIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTING A LEAD PROGRAM IN HARRIS COUNTY DEVELOPING AND FUNDING STRATEGIES THAT WOULD INCREASE PRETRIAL RELEASE CONDUCT REGULAR SOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICES THAT COULD BE PROVIDED TO CLIENTS ON PRETRIAL RELEASE AND PREPARING A REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTING LEAD.
SO ANY THOUGHTS ABOUT HOW THESE BROKE OUT? DO FOLKS AGREE WITH THE CATEGORIES THEREIN? ARE THERE THINGS THAT SHOULD BE MOVED? AND YOU CAN EITHER CHAT OR RAILS YOUR HAND ALTHOUGH I DON'T KNOW
IF I'LL SEE THE HAND RAISE. >> WE HAVE A HAND GRACIE.
THANK YOU FOR PUTTING THIS TOGETHER.
YOU KNOW WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE HAVING YOU JUST EXPLAINED AND I DO BELIEVE THAT THE ONE OF OUR PRIORITIES IS US WORKING TOGETHER, RIGHT? I DON'T THINK WE CAN MOVE
[00:10:04]
FORWARD WITHOUT COLLABORATING SO, I DO THINK THAT MAYBE THAT SHOULD BE PUT ON AS A HIGH PRIORITY SO I ALSO THINK WHEN THINKING ABOUT THE JAIL POPULATION, I THINK THAT THECITE AND RELEASE HAS [INAUDIBLE] >> GRACEY I THINK YOU'RE MUTED
YES, SO I THINK THAT WE NEED TO REEVALUATE THE CITE AND RELEASE AS WELL AS TO WHERE THAT GOES, BECAUSE I TRULY BELIEVE THAT THAT COULD BE PART OF THE REDUCING THE JAIL POPULATION AS
AND NICKY, I SEE YOUR CHAT. THANK YOU THAT YOU AGREE WITH GRACIE. CERTAINLY IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS WHERE IT'S DONE WELL IT HAD IMPACT ON THE JAIL POPULATION BUT I DO THINK FOR HARRIS COUNTY BECAUSE IT'S BEEN TRIED AND NOT HAD IMPACT IT'S GOING TO BE A HARD THING TO GET DONE BECAUSE YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO CONVINCE A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT EVEN THOUGH IT DIDN'T WORK THE FIRST TIME, IF DONE RIGHT, IT COULD WORK.
SO I'M NOT SAYING IT SHOULDN'T BE ON THERE.
I'M JUST SAYING IT IS GOING TO BE A HARD PRIORITY.
>> [INAUDIBLE] >> ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS? >> COMMISSIONER GARCIA CAN I OFF
MUTE? >> DID YOU HAVE A COMMENT
COMMISSIONER GARCIA. >> NO, MA'AM.
SO, IF YOU DO HAVE THOUGHTS, THE DECK HAS BEEN SHARED WITH YOU.
THE PRIORITY MATRIXES WERE SENT OUT TO EVERYBODY SO IF YOU WANT TO FILL THOSE OUT OR GIVE COMMENTS ON THE DECK WE SENT OUT PLEASE FEEL FREE TO DO THAT WE ARE SCHEDULED TO DELIVER A FINAL BY THE END OF THIS MONTH SO IF YOU'RE GOING TO PROVIDE COMMENT PLEASE DO THAT SOONER RATHER THAN LATER.
ALL RIGHT. SO LET'S GO OVER THE INFORMATION STRATEGIES. INFORMATION SHARING STRATEGIES.
SORRY. INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH VERY FEW OF THE INFORMATION SHARING STRATEGIES WERE THOUGHT TO NOT REQUIRE A LOT OF EFFORT. THE ONLY ONE THAT DID AND IT WAS RATED AS A HIGH PRIORITY WAS PROVIDING TRAINING ON DATA REQUESTS AND INTERPRETATION TO CJCC MEMBERS STAFF AND THE COMMUNITIES IN OTHER WORDS WHAT DATA ARE BEING REQUESTED HOW IS IT BEING USED AND INTERPRETED AND FOR WHAT PURPOSE.
FOR THE MEDIUM LEVEL OF EFFORT, AGAIN ALL THESE WERE DEFINED AS HIGH PRIORITY BUT REQUIRING MORE WORK THAN PROVIDING THE TRAINING ON DATA REQUESTS. MODERNIZING ARCHAIC DATA COLLECTION STORAGE AND REPORTING PRACTICES AND THESE ARE IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER SO ONE WASN'T RANKED HIGHER THAN THE OTHER, CONDUCTING A DATA VALIDATION STUD TOY ASSESS ACCURACY RELIABILITY VIRGINIA LID BUILT OF THE DATA, DEVELOPING A INTER GUIDE THAT OUTLINES PURPOSE QUESTIONS AND INTERPRETATION OF THE DATA. PREPARING A DATA ANALYSIS PLAN TO HELP DEFINE WHAT KIND OF STATISTICS ARE GOING TO BE RUN.
AND HOW THE DATA ARE GOING TO BE DESCRIBED.
SO THAT EVERYBODY IS CLEAR ON DATA THAT'S PROVIDED IS BEING USED AND INTERPRETED, ASSESSING CAPACITY FOR DATA ANALYSIS WITHIN MEMBER AGENCIES FOR THE CJCC AS WELL AS PROVIDING RESOURCES TO INCREASE CAPACITY WHERE LACKING AND CREATING PUBLIC INTERNAL AND CJCC DASH BOARDS WAS RATED EVERYBODY RATED AS MEDIUM LEVEL AND HIGH PRIORITY SO THIS WAS THE ONLY ONE STOOD OUT IN THE MATRIXES WE GOT BACKING AMONG THOSE THINGS THAT ARE HARD TO DO THE HIGHEST PRIORITY IS RESTRUCTURAL J WEB TO HELP DATA AVAILABILITY AS A LONG-TERM STRATEGY.
I'VE BEEN AROUND HARD B HARRIS COUNTY TO KNOW ANY CHANGES TO JWEB OR INFORMATION SYSTEMS TAKE QUITE A LONG TIME.
REFRESHING HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE ACROSS THE SYSTEM TO ENHANCE DATA CAPACITY SEEN AS HIGH PRIORITY BUT AS LONG-TERM STRATEGY, DEVELOPING IMPLEMENTING DATA SHARING AND USE AGREEMENT SORT OF IN LINE WITH THAT HOW ARE DATA GOING TO BE COLLECTED WHAT TYPE OF DATA HOW ARE WE GOING TO BE USING THAT. AND THEN MEDIUM PRIOR LESS IMPORTANT BUT STILL MORE IMPORTANT THAN SOME OF THE THINGS THAT ARE NOT PRIORITIES IS ESTABLISHING A DATA SUBCOMMITTEE IN THE CJCC AROUND DATA AND INTEGRATING THAT WITH
[00:15:03]
THE ILTC AND I APOLOGIZE I REMEMBER WHAT THAT STANDS FOR SO I JUST USE THE ACRONYM BUT I BELIEVE IT'S ANOTHER SUBCOMMITTEE THAT'S WORKING ON TECHNOLOGY OR DATA ISSUES.SO, THAT'S OR COMMENTS HERE. I JTC.
THAT'S PROBABLY WHY I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT STANDS FOR.
THANK YOU. >> WE HAVE TO READ ACTUALLY THE COMMENT BECAUSE THE PUBLIC CANNOT SEE THE CHAT.
SO, THAT WAS A COMMENT THAT IJTC STANDS FOR INTEGRATE JUSTICE
TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE. >> PERFECT.
THANK YOU. >> ANY THOUGHTS BEFORE WE MOVE ON? NO? OKAY. MOVING RIGHT ALONG THEN.
THE PUBLIC HARM REDUCTION STRATEGIES.
AGAIN, MOST OF THESE WERE MEDIUM LEVEL EFFORT.
SEVERAL HAVE HIGH PRIORITY BUT AMONG THOSE THAT WERE SEEN AS REQUIRING THE LEAST AMOUNT OF EFFORT THAT WAS RATED AS A HIGH PRIORITY WAS ASSESSING THE CAPACITY AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE HEART PROGRAM FOR THE PURPOSES OF EXPANDING IT. WHEN WE GET INTO THE MEDIUM LEVEL OF EFFORT HIGH PRIORITY FOCUSED A LOT ON PRETRIAL AND DIVERSION SO INCREASING THE USE OF LEGAL AND EVIDENCE BASED PRETRIAL PRACTICES INCREASING CAPACITY AND ELIGIBILITY CRY A FOR DIVERSION THROUGH HEART AND OTHER COMMUNITY BASED SERVICE PRESENT ZUG PROCEED CUE TORAL DIVERSION ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA DELLING EXPANDED LIST OF ELIGIBLE OFFENSES SEEN AS A LONG-TERM STRATEGY BUT HIGH PRIORITY IMPLEMENTING CASE SCHEDULING ORDERS AND CASE MANAGEMENT PLANS TO REDUCE CASE PROCESSING TIMES, ALSO SEEN AS A LONG-TERM STRATEGY BUT HIGH PRIORITY. IDENTIFYING AND IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO REDUCE EVIDENCE PROCESSING TIMES AND RELATED TO THAT WAS THE ASSESSMENT OF CRIME LAB OPERATIONS AND CAPACITY.
TEST STRATEGIES THAT WERE SEEN AS SLIGHT HI LOWER PRIORITY WERE DEVELOPING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TO SUPPORT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LEAD AND OTHER PREARREST DIVERSION PROGRAMS CONDUCTING IMPACT ASSESSMENT THAT ENGAGES VICTIMS AND COMMUNITY IDENTIFICATION OF VIOLENCE PREVENTION STRATEGIES, INTERESTINGLY THIS WAS SEEN AS A LONG-TERM STRATEGY.
AND THEN REVIEWING AND INTERVIEWING THE SEQUENTIAL INTERCEPT MAPPING DONE IN HARRIS COUNTY TO MAKE SURE THOSE FININGS GET TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT AND PUT INTO PRACTICE.
FOR THOSE STRATEGIES THAT REQUIRED A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF EFFORT, NONE WERE RATED AS A HIGH BREYERTY.
THEY WERE ALL RATED AS MEDIUM PRIORITY.
THAT WAS IMPLEMENTING A MULTI-SOURCE, MULTI-RESOURCE COLOCATED SERVICE CENTER SUCH AS A FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER OR RESEARCH HUB SEEN AS A LONG-TERM STRATEGY WHICH MAKES A LOST SENSE IMPLEMENTING A CASE REVIEW TEAM TO PRIORITIES THE RESOLUTION OF CASES FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE IN CUSTODY AND THEN CONDUCTING A RESOURCE ASSESSMENT OF AVAILABLE COMMUNITY BASED RESOURCES FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION. ANY THOUGHTS THERE? YOU CAN EITHER RAISE YOUR HAND OR CHAT.
ALL RIGHT. MOVING ON TO OUR LAST SLIDE, WHICH IS MISSING THE WORD COLLABORATION IN THE TITLE.
MY APOLOGIES. SO, THE COLLABORATION EVEN THOUGH I SAID IT RANKED THE LOWEST AMONG ALL THE GOALS, THERE WERE STILL SEVERAL AREAS THAT WERE OF MEDIUM AND HIGH PRIORITY AND SO IN TERMS OF THE EASIEST THINGS THAT FOLKS THOUGHT COULD BE DONE AROUND COLLABORATION, IT WAS IDENTIFYING THE POWER DYNAMICS WITHIN THE CJCC.
FOR THE MEDIUM LEVEL OF EFFORT, HIGHEST PRIORITY WERE CREATING GROUND RULES AN DATA. LIKE I SAID WITH INFORMATION SHARING THERE WERE A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO REALLY PRIORITIZED HOW DATA ARE USED AND SHARED AND INTERPRETED SO THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT, ENGAGING IN GOALS THAT ALIGN WITH EQUITY AS WELL. SLIGHTLY LESS PRIORITY INCLUDED IDENTIFYING THE KEY ISSUES THAT REQUIRE INTERAGENCY
[00:20:02]
COLLABORATION I WOULD ARGUE ALL THE STRATEGIES YOU'VE IDENTIFIED SO FAR REQUIRE SOME LEVEL OF INTERAGENCY COLLABORATION.EVALUATEING THE CURRENT STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURE OF THE CJCC, DO YOU HAVE THE RIGHT PEOPLE, DO YOU HAVE THE RIGHT SUBCOMMITTEES IS THERE A DIFFERENT WAY TO ORGANIZE SO PEOPLE FEEL GAINLDZ AND VALUED, CREATING A MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS SO THAT PEOPLE UNDERSTAND WHAT THE COMMITMENTS ARE AND THE EXPECTATIONS OF THEIR FELLOW MEMBERS FOR PARTICIPATION. THIS WAS SEEN AS A LONG-TERM STRATEGY. AND IMPLEMENTING METAL DA OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF POLICIES PRACTICES AND STRATEGIES ALSO SEEN AS A LONG-TERM STRATEGY BUT REALLY FOCUSED ON ACCOUNTABILITY IF THE CJCC IS GOING TO DO THAT AND INDIVIDUAL MEMBER AGENCIES HAVE VECTORS PORTIONS OR ALL OF THE TASKS HOW DO WE MAKE SURE IT GETS DONE.
AND THE LAST ONE UNDER THE MEDIUM PRIORITY WAS ADOPTING GROUNDS RULES FOR THE RESPECT I HAVE CJCC DECISIONS HOW DO YOU AS A CLACKIVE BODY AGREE TO STAND BEHIND THE DECISIONS THE CJCC IS MAKING. THEN THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF EFFORT AND HIGHEST PRIORITY WERE DEVELOPING A COLLABORATION PLAN, MANY OF THE COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED ON THE MEDIUM LEVEL OF EFFORT WOULD FALL UNDER THAT CATEGORY AND CREATING MEASURES OF ACCOUNTABILITY FOR STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION AND CJCC PARTICIPATION. SO.
>> THE CHAT ON BEHALF OF COMMISSIONER ELLIS JUST REITERATING THAT VIOLENCE PREVENTION THROUGH MULTIPLE STRATEGIES SHOULD BE HIGH PRIORITY.
>> IF ANYONE ELSE CANNOT UNMUTE THEMSELVES OR CANNOT GET ON IF YOU TYPE IN THE CHAT WE WILL MAKE SURE THAT YOUR COMMENT IS
SHARED WITH THE GROUP. >> I DON'T SEE ANY OTHER HANDS.
SO, LIKE INSAID, WE ARE SCHEDULED TO DELIVER A FINAL PLAN BY TEND OF THIS MONTH. YOU GOT IN YOUR PACKETS THAT KAREN SENT OUT TODAY A DRAFT NARRATIVE OF THE PLAN AN IMPLEMENTATION AT A GLANCE SO KIND OF SUMMARY DOCUMENT AND AS WELL THE PRIORITY MATRIX DOCUMENT THAT WAS SENT OUT A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK OR COMMENTS EITHER ON THE WRITTEN NARRATIVE ON THE PRIORITIES, ON THE POWER POINT SLIDES WE PUT TOGETHER I WOULD ASK YOU DO SO BEFORE NEXT FRIDAY, THIS IS THE, I'M GOING TO STOP SHARING SO I CAN SEE MY CALENDAR.
NO. I HAVE TO FIND MY CALENDAR.
BEAR WITH ME. WHICH WOULD BE THE 22ND.
THAT WILL GIVE US TIME TO INCORPORATE THAT INFORMATION PUT TOGETHER THE FINAL DOCUMENT THAT WE WILL DELIVER AND THEN IT HAD BEEN UP TO THE CJCC TO ACCEPT, ADOPT, AND IMPLEMENT THE PLAN.
SO, HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PROCESS, ABOUT THE PLAN ITSELF, ABOUT THE NEXT STEPS IF ANYONE HAS ANY.
IF NOT, I JUST WANT TO THANK EVERYBODY FOR REALLY ENGAGING AROUND THIS TOPIC, PARTICIPATING IN THE STREENL I CAN PLANNING GIVING YOUR TIME AND YOUR THOUGHTS AND AND COMMITMENT TO THE CJCC AND IMPROVING JUSTICE IN HARRIS COUNTY AND THERE'S A COMMENT FROM COMMISSIONER ELLIS THANK YOU EVERYONE FOR THEIR
PARTICIPATION. >> WE APOLOGIZE FOR ANY DIFFICULTIES THAT ANY OF YOU HAVE INCURRED WHILE ATTENDING THIS MEETING. OF COURSE COMMISSIONER ELLIS IS STATING HE APOLOGIZES ABOUT THE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES AND WE WILL FIGURE IT OUT FOR THE NEXT MEETING WHICH IS IN FEBRUARY.
WE WILL MAKE SURE THAT THESE MINUTES ARE SHARED, ON THE CJCC WEB SITE AND ONCE WE CAN GET THEM TOGETHER FOR EVERYONE TO SEE. IN THE MEANTIME, EVERYONE HAVE A WONDERFUL HOLIDAY SEASON. BE SAFE.
>> T
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.